Do you guys believe it's too huge an advantage to the axis?

Moderator: MOD_GGWaW_2
ORIGINAL: Lucky1
Issue two: I am on the fence as to whether Schury's opener would constitute a major advantage (but it is interesting). Perhaps he can elaborate on what he thinks the benefits are. (I could simply be missing the implications) Are these in the context of his famed early German/Japanese attack on Russia?
ORIGINAL: Lucky1
In terms of specifics of the scenario, I am curious of how Rumania would subsequently enter the game.
ORIGINAL: Lucky1
If Italy joins, does S France unfreeze automatically?
ORIGINAL: Lucky1
I look forward to more comments, especially an explanation of how this specifically might constitute a 'super strategy' (although on that topic I am curious whether others have been successful in winning vs. an early German/Japan squeeze on Russia).
ORIGINAL: Forwarn45
On the other hand, I wonder if France should surrender at all if South France is taken. This would be an easy and realistic change - although it might also make it more tempting for the Allies to attack Italy.
ORIGINAL: schury
I don't trust a game starting with allies, that causes a big favor to the allies.
ORIGINAL: schury
forwarn plz don't emphasis on the drawbacks of this stretegy, because those drawbacks are nothing comparing to the gains I have . You are just avoid noticing them, IMHO.
ORIGINAL: Forwarn45
EDIT: It occurred to me after I posted, that the Rumania border war probably won't fire under these circumstances, which is another minus. I must be a little scatter-brained today (I just got back from the gym) - it looks like to me the fall of Rumania is a sure thing (and Bulgaria too if the WA want to push it). Am I wrong?