Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

anarchyintheuk wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 7:03 pm If he doesn't like your subs now, he'll really hate it when they start using the exploding kind of torpedoes.
Yeah, I thought of that. :lol: I did get the fleet carrier with weak torpedoes, but most of the others with British or Dutch boats.

Plus, for the most part all the subs have been doing picket work, supply work...now I am starting to put them forward on aggressive interdiction! You ain't seen anything yet///
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (276.77 KiB) Viewed 937 times
Hmm., decisions.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Got my first Corsair in the pools...US Marines...I think I get 240 of them over then next few months. Not CV capable...but a step up from P38s arguably.

Japan is up to A6M5cs...I think. Hasn't lost any yet, but I think they are in production. Franks probably in April.
a.jpg
a.jpg (76.3 KiB) Viewed 936 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Pretty much going to keep pushing forward here...just bypassing IJ concentrations at PM, Rabaul and Tulagi. Really, I think there is nothing stopping us getting up to Mindanao and even Luzon area. Yeah, we will have a narrow line of supply, but really who cares that much...interlocking bases, advantage or equality in navS, not risking a lot of important ships...I will take that matchup....while the hammer falls elsewhere...
admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (759.7 KiB) Viewed 932 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

So, the big question is taking China more important than a perimeter in the Pacific and Burma? How important is Lashio? I guess time frame is important...1942 maybe yes, 1943 JFB needs defenses, mid 1943...

So, if it is June of 43 and the Allies are in Luzon...or Marianas or Kuriles or all three even pushing across to Vinh? Sure, scenario 2 oil goodness...but putting the damper on oil flow from the SRA that early? Can I threaten Honshu early, prior to the AA upgrades and reinforcements? That is a snowball going downhill...

Only the KB can really stop me, I feel, and I am working hard to not engage it directly....rather looking for my subs and eventually my destroyers to do the hard fighting.

Often early, as a JFB wannabe, I wondered what allocating Tank Divisions to the Marianas would do for Japan...but in reality, the Allies would simply bypass them....isolate and remove them at your leisure. I came to the conclusion that the Tank Divisions need to fight in China first and Burma 2ndish and if you got there against the Soviets...I think I always took Mr Kane to heart and felt Magwe should produce into June of 43 and the SRA into June of 44. Or was that Spidery. Obvert? Somebody else? Not Olorin who was the master of the staged offense. Captain Cruft? -- nah, he was the 22 hex perimeter turtle. Koniu??? So many great approaches over the years. Certainly not Nemo. :D

The KB is potent, but only against certain islands like Marcus, Midway, Wake, Kusaie, Kuriles, Marianas, Palau...Jimas...otherwise just bounce form island to island, base to base, interlocking...and avoid that monster...and it is really only the initial invasion....once you get on the ground Japan has a such a problem.

Oh well, that is me rambling. Sorry for not mentioning all the great AFBs or any JFBs like John who is in another paradigm. ;)
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Encircled »

You are spot on about avoiding the KB

I'm very surprised though he hasn't got interlocking bases at the Rabaul line at least
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20288
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

Encircled wrote: Thu Jun 09, 2022 9:35 am You are spot on about avoiding the KB

I'm very surprised though he hasn't got interlocking bases at the Rabaul line at least
I put that down to pushing too far in the expansion - committing a lot to New Caledonia (Noumea et al) for example. Japan just doesn't have enough troops to fill all the holes quickly before the Allies start pushing back.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Plus all of Australia...still he has had a few months to establish something.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Jan 3, 1943

More off road movements by Japan. Getting dicey now...
a.jpg
a.jpg (629.64 KiB) Viewed 758 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Fourth IJA Division has nowhere to retreat to. Poor guys.
a.jpg
a.jpg (444.65 KiB) Viewed 754 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Jan 4th, 1943

Night Naval bombardment of Kusaie Island at 125,118

Japanese Ships
BB Yamato
BB Mutsu
DD Yomogi
DD Wakatake
DD Hokaze
DD Kikuzuki

Allied ground losses:
142 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled

Port hits 17
Port supply hits 3

admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (820.27 KiB) Viewed 693 times
Last edited by Lowpe on Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

1943 goodness. :D
a.jpg
a.jpg (261.6 KiB) Viewed 692 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

China and Burma
a.jpg
a.jpg (773.5 KiB) Viewed 691 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

P40K squadron sweeps effectively over Burma...
a.jpg
a.jpg (99.94 KiB) Viewed 689 times
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Capt. Harlock »

Lowpe wrote: Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:34 pm Jan 4th, 1943

Night Naval bombardment of Kusaie Island at 125,118

Japanese Ships
BB Yamato
BB Mutsu
DD Yomogi
DD Wakatake
DD Hokaze
DD Kikuzuki
He brought out the big stick! :cry:
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
GetAssista
Posts: 2834
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by GetAssista »

Those Jap tanks in China are on a lo-ong dirt road as their single supply line. This is one example of why I am a firm proponent of "cockroach Chinese" doctrine, parking and moving regiments from small divisions on a hard terrain near the roads. They become a supply line threat, and it is a hassle to clear them out
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Jan 5th, 1943

Bingo...
a.jpg
a.jpg (318.38 KiB) Viewed 575 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan lands more troops...I don't think they are combat ready. Japan has such a tough time landing troops and then with no prep, or minimal prep it is really tough.

Flying in about 25AV worth of troops per day...now have elements of the 32nd Division digging in along with more Marines. They are within range of my 4E beasts...
admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (211.75 KiB) Viewed 573 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Running out of P38Fs....this might be their last sweep. This squadron has racked up 143 confirmed kills. That is about a 3-1 ratio which is decent defense by Japan. For the day 19 losses for the Allies, 31 for Japan.

Morning Air attack on Shwebo , at 59,45

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 31 NM, estimated altitude 45,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 18
A6M5 Zero x 35
A6M5b Zero x 31
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 11
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 47
Ki-44-IIa Tojo x 13
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 24

Allied aircraft
P-38F Lightning x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M5b Zero: 2 destroyed
Ki-43-IIb Oscar: 2 destroyed
Ki-45 KAIa Nick: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38F Lightning: 3 destroyed
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Bombardments of Chungking:

Ground combat at Chungking (76,45)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 3333 troops, 228 guns, 165 vehicles, Assault Value = 1425

Defending force 121389 troops, 335 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2990

Japanese ground losses:
8 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
56 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
39th Division
15th Division
41st Division
13th/A Division
13th/B Division
13th/C Division
1st Mortar Battalion
12th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
6th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
4th Mortar Battalion
North China Area Army
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
52nd Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
1st Army
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
11th Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
73rd Chinese/B Corps
1st Chinese Cavalry Corps
73rd Chinese/A Corps
59th Chinese/B Corps
84th Chinese Corps
38th Chinese Corps
100th Chinese Corps
55th Chinese Corps
59th Chinese/C Corps
16th Chinese Corps
91st Chinese Corps
17th Chinese Corps
95th Chinese Corps
13th Chinese Corps
89th Chinese Corps
99th Chinese/B Corps
88th Chinese Corps
80th Chinese Corps
99th Chinese/C Corps
72nd Chinese Corps
22nd Chinese Corps
11th Chinese Corps
99th Chinese/A Corps
62nd Chinese Corps
59th Chinese/A Corps
73rd Chinese/C Corps
6th Chinese Base Force
20th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
China Command
56th AT Gun Regiment
1st Chinese Base Force
3rd Group Army
12th Chinese Base Force
14th Group Army
18th Artillery Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
CAF HQ
25th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
2nd Group Army
7th Artillery Regiment
29th Group Army
49th AA Regiment
14th Chinese Base Force
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”