Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

If I ever want to increase replies on my AAR, to worry my opponent, all I have to do is post the wrong year.

Autocorrect also works.

:D :D :D :D :D
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17613
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Lowpe wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2023 12:36 am If I ever want to increase replies on my AAR, to worry my opponent, all I have to do is post the wrong year.

Autocorrect also works.

:D :D :D :D :D
I remember when someone posted a picture of a tree on his AAR and received 6 pages of posts, that was 30 (not the 20 now) posts per page. It did take awhile for his opponent to do a turn and he was thinking that there was some large attack being discussed.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

That was CR...kind of sad to think of the old days prior to migration and bans and now alternative forums.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17613
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Lowpe wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2023 12:43 pm That was CR...kind of sad to think of the old days prior to migration and bans and now alternative forums.
I agree.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Aug 31, 1943 (happy? ;) )

Just plugging forward. Ready to unleash some Corsairs, Jugs, Lightnings, and Hellcats on Saigon. Thinking about dropping more forces now at Quinhon. Just pushing forward, always forward.
a.jpg
a.jpg (562.93 KiB) Viewed 862 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Aug 1, 1943

Saigon...swept today...no Japanese fighter defenses.
a.jpg
a.jpg (655.44 KiB) Viewed 822 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan shock attacks at Chungking :o :


Ground combat at Chungking (76,45)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 99779 troops, 1360 guns, 2605 vehicles, Assault Value = 3526

Defending force 141728 troops, 19 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2575

Japanese adjusted assault: 1668

Allied adjusted defense: 2899

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), morale(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
8770 casualties reported
Squads: 115 destroyed, 640 disabled
Non Combat: 52 destroyed, 167 disabled
Engineers: 22 destroyed, 108 disabled
Guns lost 128 (11 destroyed, 117 disabled)
Vehicles lost 435 (135 destroyed, 300 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
4272 casualties reported
Squads: 216 destroyed, 351 disabled
Non Combat: 44 destroyed, 569 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20290
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

Do you have additional Allied A/T guns at Chungking or have the Chinese units gained that much in anti-armor?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 3:20 am Do you have additional Allied A/T guns at Chungking or have the Chinese units gained that much in anti-armor?
Nope...the best guns left are machine guns of which I think there are 19 left. :o

All the new spawning troops have 43 infantry though. ;)
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Up to 7 armor units in VIetnam now, I believe...will be using Pakse as a huge air transport base to get troops up to Vinh. In two days we will have three armored units racing up that way...

Looking at Vientiane as our next paradrop, once I get another para unit fully reorganized.

bombardment at Saigon:

Ground combat at Saigon (60,71)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 336 troops, 34 guns, 28 vehicles, Assault Value = 1119

Defending force 25748 troops, 169 guns, 146 vehicles, Assault Value = 510

Assaulting units:
4th Marine Division
766th Tank Battalion
27th Infantry Division
754th Tank Battalion
32nd Infantry Division
1st Australian Division
134th Field Artillery Battalion
145th Field Artillery Battalion

Defending units:
Cape St.Jaques Fortress
4th Division
1st Militia Regiment
Southern Army
11th Air Flotilla
25th Air Defense AA Regiment
12th Base Force
a.jpg
a.jpg (680.92 KiB) Viewed 749 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Impact of the Burma Road....also stopped flying supplies into Tsuyung...freeing up transports for other duties.

Kunming now has a DL of 9/10 so we will have to transfer our transports out of there. ;)
a.jpg
a.jpg (110.07 KiB) Viewed 741 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

When will the breakout occur?
a.jpg
a.jpg (367.02 KiB) Viewed 739 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20290
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

Interesting how your selected TF makes a curving path to Soc Trang. Looks like he has a wall of subs east of that path, trying to isolate Saigon from resupply/reinforcement.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:25 pm Interesting how your selected TF makes a curving path to Soc Trang. Looks like he has a wall of subs east of that path, trying to isolate Saigon from resupply/reinforcement.
Only a scant handful of subs operating outside of the South China Sea for Japan now. Don't tell anyone, but that concentration of force has really allowed the Allies to accelerate troop movement. :D
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Just two weeks ago (August 15th) and the Japanese position was a lot stronger...the Allies simply can move so fast. August 9th was when the Allies started taking Malaya bases....
a.jpg
a.jpg (559.7 KiB) Viewed 721 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20290
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

Lowpe wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:41 pm
BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:25 pm Interesting how your selected TF makes a curving path to Soc Trang. Looks like he has a wall of subs east of that path, trying to isolate Saigon from resupply/reinforcement.
Only a scant handful of subs operating outside of the South China Sea for Japan now. Don't tell anyone, but that concentration of force has really allowed the Allies to accelerate troop movement. :D
Allright! Bring in the Venturas and nail those subs!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:49 pm
Lowpe wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:41 pm
BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:25 pm Interesting how your selected TF makes a curving path to Soc Trang. Looks like he has a wall of subs east of that path, trying to isolate Saigon from resupply/reinforcement.
Only a scant handful of subs operating outside of the South China Sea for Japan now. Don't tell anyone, but that concentration of force has really allowed the Allies to accelerate troop movement. :D
Allright! Bring in the Venturas and nail those subs!
I got Zeppelins there! :D :D :D :D
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17613
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Lowpe wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 5:18 pm
BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:49 pm
Lowpe wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:41 pm

Only a scant handful of subs operating outside of the South China Sea for Japan now. Don't tell anyone, but that concentration of force has really allowed the Allies to accelerate troop movement. :D
Allright! Bring in the Venturas and nail those subs!
I got Zeppelins there! :D :D :D :D
Zepplins were rigid, they have a frame. The US Navy utilized nonrigid (limp) but sturdy bags in WWII for antisubmarine patrol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blimp
The three U.S. based Goodyear blimps hold over 200K cubic feet of helium. The total weight of the airship rings in at 12,840 lbs (5824 kg). However, when fully inflated with helium, the total apparent weight of the ship is typically regulated at just 100-200 pounds. If you want to look completely macho and you have connections with the higher ups at Goodyear, perhaps lying underneath one of the Goodyear blimps when inflated and bench pressing it might be in order.
:lol:

https://www.todayifoundout.com/index.ph ... ear-blimp/
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
krumenacker
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:57 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by krumenacker »

RangerJoe wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 5:26 pm
Lowpe wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 5:18 pm
BBfanboy wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2023 12:49 pm
Allright! Bring in the Venturas and nail those subs!
I got Zeppelins there! :D :D :D :D
Zepplins were rigid, they have a frame. The US Navy utilized nonrigid (limp) but sturdy bags in WWII for antisubmarine patrol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blimp
The three U.S. based Goodyear blimps hold over 200K cubic feet of helium. The total weight of the airship rings in at 12,840 lbs (5824 kg). However, when fully inflated with helium, the total apparent weight of the ship is typically regulated at just 100-200 pounds. If you want to look completely macho and you have connections with the higher ups at Goodyear, perhaps lying underneath one of the Goodyear blimps when inflated and bench pressing it might be in order.
:lol:

https://www.todayifoundout.com/index.ph ... ear-blimp/

Respectfully, I wouldn't want 6 ton of mass pinning me to the earth, or pulling me away from it after I benched it.

Otherwise, long time lurker finally caught up on this thread. Thank you, Lowpe, for the masterclass on spanking.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Sept 1, 1943


September already. My goodness, where did 1943 go?

We are using different tactics to degrade the Japanese ASW in the area around Singers.
a.jpg
a.jpg (616.24 KiB) Viewed 558 times
This area is flooded with Allied submarines....waiting for the IJN breakout...and you can see the effectiveness of IJN Air search and ASW operations...almost non existant. :)
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”