Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

A squadron of heavy bombers are working over Manado's runways while we occasionally bombard it with a heavy cruiser force.

I guess a pincer move is coming here...or a little deception (or routed away from the subs) prior to rerouting to Balikpapan to rescue the troops there back to Singers for a fortress Singers gambit...which is what I think is likely. However the sub dropped mines at Manado could portend a breakout as the runway most likely is operational. The appearance of the KB would negate naval air attacks from Morotai and Talaud and Mindanao....

Will make plans accordingly, and rebase some strike aircraft.
a.jpg
a.jpg (584.51 KiB) Viewed 686 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Plane losses for the day.
a.jpg
a.jpg (104.01 KiB) Viewed 685 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

CaptBeefheart wrote: Mon Jun 26, 2023 2:40 am Looking good, as usual. Unless you are really short on supplies at the front, I'd convert a bunch more Liberties to xAPs. I'd also consider using some of your long-range flying boats to move HQs closer.

Click fatigue can be a problem. I try not to pay too much attention to air units--I don't care about airframe fatigue or pilot morale, and I don't shuffle pilots much at all. I figure I operate at about 95% efficiency with a quarter of the clicks required for 99% efficiency. You just have to figure out what clicks really add value to what you're doing. Heck, I remember an AAR where Canoerebel used to not even pay attention to pilot training--he'd just send raw pilots to his frontline units. He still did pretty well.

If they ever do a WIPT 2, there are a lot of things they could do to minimize clicks, such as standing orders for air units (rest if morale reaches 70%, graduate pilots to the pool when they've reached 50 EXP and 70 air skill, etc.). I'd keep the basic game intact while tackling a bunch of quality of life issues.

Cheers,
CB
Checking tracker I have converted 90 Liberty ships to troop transports and have 50 more to convert left, roughly.

Most of my Cats are ferrying troops forward...higher echelon command HQs are just lower on the priority list. But we are getting there.

I haven't really done too much with pilot training...USAAF is pretty good, USN is pretty poor, USMC good also. Also, I really neglected TOE upgrades and device upgrades, and ignore intelligence reports to save clicks.

I doubt we see a WITP 2...but maybe not. Might be an AI programed game in 10 years for example? ;) I would like to see a selection process for moving portions of a large lcu stack, perhaps a R&R mode for recovery and replenishment of units, morale or fatigue rating for ships especially subs.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Sept 9, 1943

Lots of nice juicy submarine wins this day....
a.jpg
a.jpg (594.85 KiB) Viewed 607 times
Small scale probing attack to see what kind of fighter presence Japan would move into Balikpapen....if the task forces decided to go there.

Morning Air attack on Balikpapan , at 64,97

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 7
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 1


Allied aircraft
B-24D1 Liberator x 3

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-24D1 Liberator: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
1 x B-24D1 Liberator bombing from 9000 feet
Airfield Attack: 10 x 500 lb GP Bomb
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan up to their usual in and around Singers:
a.jpg
a.jpg (587.48 KiB) Viewed 603 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17564
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

I wonder, if you had some attack bombers with a little firepower up front, could you send them in low without escorts and destroy both ships and enemy CAP?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

RangerJoe wrote: Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:43 pm I wonder, if you had some attack bombers with a little firepower up front, could you send them in low without escorts and destroy both ships and enemy CAP?
Those b25d1 are packed with nosecone 50 calibers...but are only twin engine. The Hellcats either came from the carriers...well, not sure where they came from to be honest so most likely they were at 15k or slim chance at 30k.

Setting a squadron of beasts to bomb from 30k works too, at stretching out the enemy LRCAP over ships. I used to call it a poor mans sweep....HB at 30k escorted by Jugs or Corsairs or something really good. Might be considered gamey over ships....but the technique works. Not gamey with torpedo bombers flying from max elevation with escorts.

Fly 100 Heavy bombers in formation at 30k over those ships...the enemy cap would get worn down pretty damn quickly. lols :D
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Messed up my move order into Moulmein....only one division and a regiment went in. Three more divisions tomorrow...I caught the mistake...but was hoping the IJA forces would vacate the base and let them go in. The regiment got shattered, the division barely touched.
a.jpg
a.jpg (728.98 KiB) Viewed 579 times
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2592
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by CaptBeefheart »

I'd be careful about raiding Singapore. I've had the IJN AI do a bombardment and they get shredded as they go through a channel with CDs (like Astoria or Bataan). Anyway, it's probably worth sending a couple of expendable DDs first and see what happens.

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Sept 10, 1943

Our DESRON makes contact just outside of Balikpapen. This is our 1-2 punch....with CV Benedict Arnold Group coming down the straights...but she might not be needed. AS a JFB I really like using those CS as Rufe low CAP with the KB....shockingly effective in that role. This is the 2nd CS the Allies have destroyed in this war. Not real sure what this task force was up to...it had no troops aboard.
a.jpg
a.jpg (400.73 KiB) Viewed 506 times
One Fletcher and a handful of Bristol class destroyers. ;)
Last edited by Lowpe on Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

I keep trying to attack Japan on a lot of Vectors to disperse here defense....float planes score. I will most likely pull the float planes out and back for some R&R.
admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (181.57 KiB) Viewed 505 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Working over Saigon and Cam Ranh Bay

b.jpg
b.jpg (191.45 KiB) Viewed 504 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan looks like they want to rescue that isolated IJA Regiment to the west.
b1.jpg
b1.jpg (408.24 KiB) Viewed 503 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

To make any potential breakout thru the Celebes Sea more difficult, we stepped up the suppression of Manado's runway. This will let our land based air be a bit more effective freeing up ships for other duties.

A pity our PT boats missed the enemy task force....but I can't complain about the results. ;)
a.jpg
a.jpg (359.2 KiB) Viewed 500 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan retreated their CAP trap ships back to Singers....

The British Navy...lots of Cruisers and a fair number of destroyers is at Georgetown now....I am thinking about a mad dash around Singers to be able to use them in the perimeter guard against a breakout from Singers. Perhaps that is too risky, and would leave Georgetown's port vulnerable....well, tbh, Georgetown is vulnerable to the Yamato.
a.jpg
a.jpg (236.59 KiB) Viewed 490 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

CaptBeefheart wrote: Tue Jun 27, 2023 3:05 am I'd be careful about raiding Singapore. I've had the IJN AI do a bombardment and they get shredded as they go through a channel with CDs (like Astoria or Bataan). Anyway, it's probably worth sending a couple of expendable DDs first and see what happens.

Cheers,
CB
Japan just doesn't have that many CD guns...and I spotted the Wake Gun unit at Rabaul. More worried about 1000 mines. :o
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Encircled »

The longer he waits, the worse it is going to be for him

I'm surprised that a player as good as your opponent appears to be hasn't grasped that
JanSako
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:06 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by JanSako »

Maybe he did.
Those ships are dead anyway, and if the transports have nothing to haul/he has plenty more in Japan, what is the point? This way there is a sort-of fleet-in-being that is keeping all those subs & DesRons & DS & whatnot on station in the South China sea instead of doing other mischief. At least as long as the supply in Singers holds.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

JanSako wrote: Tue Jun 27, 2023 6:21 pm Maybe he did.
Those ships are dead anyway, and if the transports have nothing to haul/he has plenty more in Japan, what is the point? This way there is a sort-of fleet-in-being that is keeping all those subs & DesRons & DS & whatnot on station in the South China sea instead of doing other mischief. At least as long as the supply in Singers holds.
+1, plus the fuel is basically free and plentiful. ;)
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Encircled »

Bit too historic for my liking that!

Heavy units stuck in the DEI while the Home Islands are vulnerable!
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”