Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post here to meet players for PBEM games and generally engage in ribbing and banter about your prowess.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

Hi everyone,

Not sure if anyone remembers me, I used to hang out here some years ago ...

Anyway, I would like to play a slightly modified DaBabes Lite Scen 1 (as Japan) on the stock map with stacking limits and 3 day turns, and also very minimal house rules.

I would also be happy to look at any other GC scenario, as long as it has the Babes "combat fixes" (AA, ASW etc.)

Settings

Advanced Weather Effects = ON
Allied Damage Control = ON
Player Defined Upgrades = ON
Historical First Turn = ON
December 7th Surprise = ON
Reliable USN Torpedoes = OFF
Realistic R&D = ON
No Unit Withdrawals = ON
Reinforcements = Variable +/-15%

House Rules

1. No bombing from above 30,000ft (there may be an exploit).
2. Japan will not increase size of Air or Engine R&D factories.
3. Neither side will increase size or change purpose of Naval Shipyard, Merchant Shipyard or Repair Shipyard factories.

Otherwise NO RULES

Scenario Modifications

Refineries do not generate supply (this hinders Japan more than the Allies but I really dislike this feature).
Game duration is extended to 1,800 days (end date Nov 11 1946).

3 day turns????

Why 3 day turns? Well for one thing the game will be more likely to progress to the latter years (which is the period I find fascinating). For another I have been playing like this against the computer and much prefer the pace. There is also less scope for tactical optimisation, which IMO can be a bit of bug bear in PBEM.

I have version 1126b installed (can install other version if required), and can provide the stacking limits PWHEX files if necessary.

Thank you.
Last edited by Captain Cruft on Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (3 day turns)

Post by Lowpe »

Holy crap, just mentioned you in my AAR a few days ago. The strafing Oscar swarm! :D Good memories!
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

You did? Wow! :P

I will have to look up your AAR.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

I might be persuaded on 2 day turns.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (3 day turns)

Post by Lowpe »

There is a discord that is popular too...you might want to post there.

Here is basically what I said about you on June 15th:

Captain Cruft, an old time JFB, used a 2nd generation Oscar as a strafing platform....worked well until Allied AAA caught up.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

Yes I looked at the Discord. It seems pretty quiet as far as getting opponents goes.

The thing with the Oscars wasn't strafing it was about the ability to deliver a vast number of 250kg bombs into ships at low level (LowN training). It worked with stock but with the Babes AA changes the effect is vastly reduced (as IMO it should be).
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (3 day turns)

Post by Lowpe »

Captain Cruft wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:41 pm Yes I looked at the Discord. It seems pretty quiet as far as getting opponents goes.

The thing with the Oscars wasn't strafing it was about the ability to deliver a vast number of 250kg bombs into ships at low level (LowN training). It worked with stock but with the Babes AA changes the effect is vastly reduced (as IMO it should be).
I vaguely remember a 1000 plane swarm attack an Allied doomstack in China and forcing them to retreat early-mid war. :D
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

Still looking ...

I am open to more house rules if that's a problem.
szmike
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:21 am
Location: Poland

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by szmike »

I would give it a go if you're still looking.

I've never played 3day turns, but it should speed the game considerably. 26b with stacking limits is OK.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

Wow! Hello :-)

Are you OK with the lack of House Rules as suggested?
szmike
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:21 am
Location: Poland

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by szmike »

I see 3 HRs in opening post. I don't think we need them anyway.
No rules is fine with me. I never tried that, so it would be completely new waters.
No rules, 3 day turns.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

OK. PM sent ...
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Seeking Allied player for DaBabes based GC (2 or 3 day turns)

Post by Captain Cruft »

This is marvellous, I had really thought I wouldn't get a game like this.

If the game goes beyond May 1942 I will likely do an AAR. No Oscar Swarm this time though (probably) :-)
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents Wanted”