What i am doing wrong?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

Hi,
In my game against GH i atacking forest terrain in Russia,almost 600000 my troops against 150000 his.
I have all crack divisions of SAA here with morale 65-80 and experience above 90. Kwantung area army troops has higher morale but less experience. All troops are well supplied.
Results are terrible,only 0-1.
What i doing wrong?????

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 66,32

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 565215 troops, 5452 guns, 1202 vehicles

Defending force 145006 troops, 1793 guns, 311 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
20838 casualties reported
Guns lost 642
Vehicles lost 96

Allied ground losses:
1977 casualties reported
Guns lost 154
Vehicles lost 3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
Berkut
Posts: 757
Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 7:48 am

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Berkut »

Wow, 20,000 losses! That is an a s s kicking right there!

I have no idea what you are doing wrong. What is their fatigue and disruption?

The ground combat system in this game is a mystery.
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by treespider »

Are the japanese in forts?
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

Wow, 20,000 losses! That is an a s s kicking right there!

I have no idea what you are doing wrong. What is their fatigue and disruption?

The ground combat system in this game is a mystery.

Hi Berkut,
I dont like this kind of mistery.
In moment of attack fatigue is about 25-35,and disruption is less then 20 for all troops.
I have four HQ in hex to support attack.
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Nikademus »

Forest hex will give a defensive bonus, + if your troops have substantial fatigue and/or disruption, can result in a failed attack.

Allied units (in general) also tend to have heavier firepower than Japanese units so attacking a well positioned and supplied enemy can result in serious casuatlies.

Also, look at your leaders. Leaders can be very important for your rolls.
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

Question:
How is possible that 150000 green Russian stop 600000 elite forces with 0-1 odds???[:-]
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
User avatar
Fornadan
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:10 am

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Fornadan »

How long have the enemy been in that hex?
They'll start to dig in after some time iirc
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Feinder »

Fatigue and Disruption can be huge in WitP. From my limited testing, you get something similar to:

Assault Value x
(100 - Fatigue)% x
(100 - Disruption)%

So a unit with a 100 Assault value and

35 Fatigue (malaria effect) = 65 AV
35 Fatigue and 80 Disruption = 13 AV

It's not that simple of course. You're also modified for prep, leaders, terrain, HQs, and sh_t load of other stuff. But "ball park testing" indicates that Fatigue and Disruption will utterly ruin your day.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

Forest hex will give a defensive bonus, + if your troops have substantial fatigue and/or disruption, can result in a failed attack.

Look above in posts,my troops has no significant fatigue/disruption.
Also, look at your leaders. Leaders can be very important for your rolls.

Whole cream of Japanese comanders is here.
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Nikademus »

Easy, if the conditions are right. A 4-1 advantage in troop numbers does not automatically constitute a victory (1:1 or better) in this game, nor any other that i'm aware of.

Again, look at your forces condition before attacking, look at the terrain, the probable fort levels of the enemy, their current state (were they disrupted, were they bombarded or were they sitting there fresh and waiting for you?) Check your leaders....many LCU's start this game with leaders not optimal for their current position (example, i've found a few commanders who are best suited for "rear area HQ's" commanding frontline LCU's)

Keep in mind too your casualties are an abstraction. You didn't lose 20,000 men, you mainly lost alot of disabled men which range from badly wounded to shell shocked. Given time they do recover most of their strength. Keep grinding in a useless assault however, and you'll quickly have combat ineffective units.

User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Feinder »

In moment of attack fatigue is about 25-35,and disruption is less then 20 for all troops.
I have four HQ in hex to support attack.


Didn't notice that before.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

Fatigue and Disruption can be huge in WitP. From my limited testing, you get something similar to:

Assault Value x
(100 - Fatigue)% x
(100 - Disruption)%

So a unit with a 100 Assault value and

35 Fatigue (malaria effect) = 65 AV
35 Fatigue and 80 Disruption = 13 AV

It's not that simple of course. You're also modified for prep, leaders, terrain, HQs, and sh_t load of other stuff. But "ball park testing" indicates that Fatigue and Disruption will utterly ruin your day.

-F-

His unist also has disruption.
His units are GREEN with little experience.
I have whole SAA units here and Imerial guards has 98 exp.,others are also above 90.
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: hawker

Look above in posts,my troops has no significant fatigue/disruption.

How about your enemies?

Whole cream of Japanese comanders is here.

By that i take it you went through and swapped out leaders? Assuming you did....all fine and good. It will increase your chances of success but won't gurantee it. There is a large amount of variability built into the game....there is no "magic" formula. Did you bombard initially? air attacks? Or did you just frontally assault?
BLUESBOB
Posts: 219
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Fullerton, Ca.

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by BLUESBOB »

ORIGINAL: hawker

Question:
How is possible that 150000 green Russian stop 600000 elite forces with 0-1 odds???[:-]

MY OPINION : 150000 can't stop 600000. The big question is what year is it? Again, IMO, it's inherently built into the game that the Allies are crap in the beginning stages of the war, the Japanese in the latter. It's one of the biggest drawbacks of the game is that you REALLY CAN'T alter history. Battles may have different conclusions...but the game ultimately rushes toward the same ending as the real war.
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

By that i take it you went through and swapped out leaders? Assuming you did....all fine and good. It will increase your chances of success but won't gurantee it. There is a large amount of variability built into the game....there is no "magic" formula. Did you bombard initially? air attacks? Or did you just frontally assault?

I did a occasional air attacks(few).
I just cant believe that 600000 units against 150000 gain only 0-1.
And dont forget,this troops are elite.
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by hawker »

MY OPINION : 150000 can't stop 600000. The big question is what year is it? Again, IMO, it's inherently built into the game that the Allies are crap in the beginning stages of the war, the Japanese in the latter. It's one of the biggest drawbacks of the game is that you REALLY CAN'T alter history. Battles may have different conclusions...but the game ultimately rushes toward the same ending as the real war.

Its 07/42. So,early in war.
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
User avatar
Black Mamba 1942
Posts: 510
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:44 pm

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Black Mamba 1942 »

Units that defend in non-base hexes are invincible![;)]

If they were in a base, they would fold right up.[:D]
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by tsimmonds »

Those Sovs are probably forted up pretty good. Have they been in that hex awhile?
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: hawker

I did a occasional air attacks(few).
I just cant believe that 600000 units against 150000 gain only 0-1.
And dont forget,this troops are elite.

well again, you had a 4:1 edge in numbers...not decisive in my opinion. Common wisdom holds you need a minimum 3:1 edge for victory against an entrenched opponent, more recent reading has suggested 5:1 or better. Most of all you have to understand there is heavy abstraction going on here. This is not an tactical level game. You have two assault options.....deliberate attack (normal attack) and shock attack (Japanese = banzai! attack) There are no probing attacks, no flanking attacks, no enveloping attacks etc etc.....the figures go into a formula and static values (terrain/skill etc) are tied into variables that can alter the results. No gurantees. Not laughing at you but i always find posts like this funny, because most of the time people are complaining that the game is to fast, too easy to do this or that.

Not this time it seems. Assuming you did most everything right (which it appears you didnt' because there wasn't much in the way of prep by the sound of it) your attack can still draw bad rolls and fail. Chalk it up to an initial attack, a straight up frontal assault against a prepared position which stalled and took heavy losses in the ensuing counter bombardment. That happened alot in WWI. [;)]

Next attack might do better....maybe a leader roll will succeed and a more well thought out attack is abstractly played out. I'd let your troops rest first though.....with numbers that high your disruption is probably sky high.

Bring in some airpower.

Consider a hex-based flanking move?
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: What i am doing wrong?

Post by Nikademus »


Its 07/42. So,early in war.

I've seen LCU's in non base hexes build as high as 6 fort levels. Bad news for you if thats the case.

Do you have engineers?
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”