Kursk

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Kursk

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Terminus




Any sort of shaped charge would negate the advantage the ADCAP gets by exploding under the keel of the target ship. The damage potential of the bubble formed by the detonation of the warhead in the water is far greater than the hole that would be punched in the side of the ship by a shaped charge.

An impact detonation makes a hole in the side, the detonation under the keel breaks the back of the ship. And I'm pretty sure that this fuse setting is standard for fleet ADCAP's.

Agreed, the most elegant way to make a big bubble underwater would be a spherical explosion.
Image
User avatar
mlees
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:14 am
Location: San Diego

RE: Kursk

Post by mlees »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Neilster

Have a look at page one of this thread to see that.

Cheers, Neilster

I think that is a contact fuse. Note the smoke and black debris coming out from inside the hull. You can also see the debris impacting the water behind the ship in the early frames.

No, I don't think so. Look at picture number 2... The explosion "plume" of water is coming up both side of the ship. That explosion is under the hull, not on one side of the ship.

The debris is from the stuff knocked loose by the shock of the explosion. I have seen training videos of the insides of such a hit, and all kinds of piping comes loose, and hull weld seams open up. It's just a pretty big bang, after all, and water makes a much better conductor of explosive shock than steel or air.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Kursk

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: mlees

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Neilster

Have a look at page one of this thread to see that.

Cheers, Neilster

I think that is a contact fuse. Note the smoke and black debris coming out from inside the hull. You can also see the debris impacting the water behind the ship in the early frames.

No, I don't think so. Look at picture number 2... The explosion "plume" of water is coming up both side of the ship. That explosion is under the hull, not on one side of the ship.

The debris is from the stuff knocked loose by the shock of the explosion. I have seen training videos of the insides of such a hit, and all kinds of piping comes loose, and hull weld seams open up. It's just a pretty big bang, after all, and water makes a much better conductor of explosive shock than steel or air.

You could be right. I thought that might be debris blown out the opposite side of the hull or a shock wave created ast the hull was displaced laterally? Also the smoke blowing out the stack seems to be very early in the process, but that could be from an external shockwave compressing some air-filled space with soot in it.
Image
User avatar
rhondabrwn
Posts: 2570
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:47 am
Location: Snowflake, Arizona

RE: Kursk

Post by rhondabrwn »

I continue to revisit this thread and have found it fascinating and educational.

I did find the following site dedicated to the Kursk. It is well done with a good collection of photos. My apologies if someone has already posted it.

Lost Liners - The Kursk
Love & Peace,

Far Dareis Mai

My old Piczo site seems to be gone, so no more Navajo Nation pics :(
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”