Utter BS

[Nomad]

ORIGINAL: Terminus

"Analize"? Does that involve some sort of probe?

Yes, please bend over. [X(][8|][:D]

[dtravel]

ORIGINAL: Nomad

ORIGINAL: Terminus

"Analize"? Does that involve some sort of probe?

Yes, please bend over. [X(][8|][:D]

Isn't that supposed to be Nik's line? He is the one onboard the UFO after all.

[Nomad]

Not if he criticises my spelling!

[Nikademus]

ORIGINAL: dtravel

Isn't that supposed to be Nik's line? He is the one onboard the UFO after all.

Come here....... <whiirrrrrrrrr>

tm.asp?m=831932&mpage=1&key=Tactical%2Cnuke

[Dino]

ORIGINAL: Feinder

Setting them up in this way will (hopfully) allow us to test the following:
1. Do fort levels have any reducing effect on bombardments? (I believe not, but that's for you to prove!).
2. Is there any bias for Japan or Allies in the bombardment routines? (Again, I believe nukes are -not- biased toward either side in execution).
3. Establish if available ops points (thru range) has any effect on the damage inflicted.
4. Attempt to establish a baseline thru repetition, and see if we can obvserve what triggers the massive "nuke" result. We can do this by...

I think you need to factor in the detection level of the base, but I'm not sure if this can be recreated in a test environment...

[Nikademus]

lol....did anyone chk the link posted?

[Dino]

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

lol....did anyone chk the link posted?

[:D]

I didn't even notice the link... I thought it was one of those hickup posts.[:o]

[dtravel]

Don't go near the drunk fat bunny waving the chainsaw!&nbsp; [X(]&nbsp; It can't end well.
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
(The link is to a previous discussion of bombardments and the results of test that Nik ran more than a year ago.)

[jwilkerson]

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

lol....did anyone chk the link posted?

I think this is my biggest nuke to date ... (this one's been posted several times by my opponent who was more "proud" of it than I was - he though he was on the receiving end ) ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Soerabaja, at 23,66


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 3 destroyed
A-24 Dauntless: 5 destroyed
Kittyhawk I: 3 destroyed
Wirraway: 2 destroyed
P-38F Lightning: 2 destroyed
Beaufort V-IX: 3 destroyed
Hurricane IIb: 5 destroyed
Hawk 75A: 1 destroyed
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 3 destroyed
CW-21B Demon: 3 destroyed
PBY Catalina: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
DD Oboro
DD Amagiri
DD Yugiri
DD Ayanami
DD Shikinami
DD Uranami
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Shirayuki
DD Isonami
DD Shirakumo
DD Usugumo
DD Shinonome
DD Fubuki
DD Natsushio
CL Jintsu
CA Suzuya
CA Myoko
CA Takao
BB Yamato
BB Kirishima
BB Hyuga
BB Ise
BB Hiei
BB Haruna
BB Kongo

Allied Ships
AR Castor, Shell hits 1, on fire
CL Mauritius, Shell hits 1


Allied ground losses:
14450 casualties reported
Guns lost 135
Vehicles lost 72

Airbase hits 32
Airbase supply hits 14
Runway hits 322
Port hits 3

[Nikademus]

ORIGINAL: Dino

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

lol....did anyone chk the link posted?

[:D]

I didn't even notice the link... I thought it was one of those hickup posts.[:o]

I need one of those hand slaps forhead smilies..... [:D]


Three relevent points were:

1) Yes Virginia......Fortifications do reduce casualties/

2) Yes Virginia......Recon (i.e. Detection Level) is critical. It doubles bombardment effectiveness.

3) Yes Virginia.....there is an Easter Bunny....and he's kicking ass!

[Terminus]

4) Yes, Virginia... There is an Easter Bunny... and he's quite mad, you know...[8|]

[dtravel]

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

I need one of those hand slaps forhead smilies..... [:D]

(Sorry, don't have one with bunny ears.)