Questions Regarding Aspects of the Game

Battlefront features the power of battalion-level combat in some of this period's most bloody and intense conflicts: Saipan, Market Garden, Novorossisk, and Gazala. Players will have realistic control over their soldiers, with a tactical scale just large enough to make a telling difference in the strategic picture.

Moderators: Gregor_SSG, alexs

Post Reply
User avatar
Adam Parker
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:05 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Questions Regarding Aspects of the Game

Post by Adam Parker »

These are some questions I posted elsewhere that I'd love to hear some feedback from when people start to receive their games. Look forward to everyone's input:

1. How does this game handle the scale at 2 turns per day as opposed to Panzer Campaigns' 2 hours per turn? Is this indeed the time setting?

2. How is the game handling never before tracked elements in SSG's titles - namely; artillery restricted by organization and command & control?

3. Is it true that there is no close combat? How is direct combat manifesting itself and performing?

4. How is the supply engine handling itself and is it different from Decisive Battles? Can artillery run out of ammo and can units run low on fuel?

5. How is the AI performing and is it still reliant on players keeping solid lines of units side by side? That is, how does this game handle maneuver or does the handful of scenarios included in the game not focus on the fluid aspects of WW2?

6. How long does a turn take to run through both human and AI? Will this suit larger DYO battles (should anyone ever bother to make them) such as Fall Blau, Moscow, Kharkov, Normandy (full) or Bagration (the biggest blessing of Decisive Battles being imo the comparatively fewer regimental-sized units to manage and move).

Happy gaming,
Adam.
User avatar
Gregor_SSG
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:22 am
Contact:

RE: Questions Regarding Aspects of the Game

Post by Gregor_SSG »


Adam,

I just thought I would answer some of your questions as they raise important points.

Artillery can fire in support of any combat, i.e. it is not restricted by formation. However, artillery will only get Attack Supply, i.e. the shells it needs to fire at the enemy, if it is within Command Range of its HQ. So while you can move an artillery unit to the other end of the map away from its HQ and the men it should be supporting, it will only be good for a couple of shots and then it will indeed run out of bullets and stay that way. There are penalties associated with moving HQs such that you won't be casually shuttling them around the map either.

There most certainly is close combat, working similarly to the Decisive Battles combat system.

As for the AI, just envisage the situation at Market Garden, where there is no semblance of a continuous front for either side and no possibility of creating one. The new AI system copes well with this situation, the old one would have struggled.

Gregor

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.
Post Reply

Return to “Battlefront”