Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Commander – Europe at War Gold is the first in a series of high level turn based strategy games. The first game spans WW2, allowing players to control the axis or allied forces through the entire war in the European Theatre.
User avatar
highpocrisy
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:04 am

Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by highpocrisy »

What a disappointment... here I was, ready to shell out a hard earned $50 bones on a half decent wargame and I get the 1024x bombshell again.
Now I am not one that will put graphics, sound or even interface above gameplay, but come on!
No one sports a CRT anymore!
I understand it's too much code to redesign older games to please everyone's native resolution and people should deal with a black stripe if they went for a wide screen,but how many of your costumers still run anything at 1024?!
Me and my friends already missed out on a whole bunch of games from Matrix and other publishers but I refuse to pay 50 for a game that doesn't at least support 1280 anymore.
No matter how good the gameplay.
And that's a shame because that has already meant a lot of older republished games, but now I see even recent wargames go the same route.
Obviously this genre has some of the most hardcore fans willing to put up with with ASCII graphics in 2007 just so the genre doesn't die out, but eventually people will vote with their money...
Anyhow, this is not a bitching rant, just word to the wise.
Doesn't make sense designing games in a resolution not even ~10% of your consumer base runs.
User avatar
Magpius
Posts: 1746
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by Magpius »

wholeheartedly agree.

"I don't believe in reincarnation because I refuse to come back as a bug or as a rabbit". -New Order
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39653
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by Erik Rutins »

While I hear you and we are always looking to have all new game support higher resolutions, a few comments about CEAW:

1. It runs just fine in higher resolutions and looks great, even scaled. This is not some situation where you get a pixelated, nasty mess.

2. It has a windowed mode if you don't want any scaling at all.

3. Way more than 10% of our customers still run/support 1024x768

Regards,

- Erik
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
User avatar
Stryder
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:01 pm

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by Stryder »

this is basically a table top like game ported to the computer.. not sure what higher graphics would do.. but it's your money so keep it....[;)]
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by pad152 »

Erik

I just went shopping for a new monitor and was suprised that stores Best Buy, Circuit City, CompUSA, Office Depot, Walmart, Staples, etc. have 75-90% monitors in now wide-screen. I don't know what is driving the wide-screen monitors but finding any monitor less than 19" and non-wide screen are getting harder to find.

Most Monitors are now 19" with default res of 1280x1024 and wide-screen 19" with a default res of 1440x900 and anything less than the default res. looks like crap!

Matrix isn't the only one behind the curve, I've yet to see any game designed for to take advantage of wide screens. I just downloaded the Strategic Command 2 Weapons and Warfare Demo and it has a max res of 1280x1024. [8|]


User avatar
Magpius
Posts: 1746
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE:solution

Post by Magpius »

1. It runs just fine in higher resolutions and looks great, even scaled. This is not some situation where you get a pixelated, nasty mess.
Q: How can you set a full screen resolution higher than 1024x768?

"I don't believe in reincarnation because I refuse to come back as a bug or as a rabbit". -New Order
davetheroad
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:05 am

RE: RE:solution

Post by davetheroad »

I use a 17" Dell with 1280X1024 (5:4)resolution and Commander looks just fine although there must be some distortion as the screen ratio is not the same as 1024x768 (4:3)
 
Theoretically the game should look just as good on any display.
User avatar
lomyrin
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: San Diego

RE: RE:solution

Post by lomyrin »

J  have a 22 inch widescreen monitor with 1680 x 1050 resolution.  This game, as well as any other game I have tried with this monitor, fills the screen nicely without any distortion.
 
Lars
User avatar
IainMcNeil
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:01 am
Location: London
Contact:

RE: RE:solution

Post by IainMcNeil »

Development teams for these type of games are small - very small. One guy did everything really. It means you wont get as many features as games from big teams but they dont make this type of game because the market is too small. So it's catch 22 ;)
Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games
Major Victory
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:03 pm

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by Major Victory »

Just play the game, get over it, your tears are unbecoming!
User avatar
Irish Guards
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:09 pm

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by Irish Guards »

LMAO ... [&o][:'(][8|][X(][:'(]
IDG
User avatar
Fred98
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Wollondilly, Sydney

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by Fred98 »

I have a Dell 22" widescreen set to 1,680 x 1,050.  The game runs just fine with no distortion.
 
I never hit the "1,024 bombshell".
 
-
 
 
fh
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:14 am

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by fh »

ORIGINAL: pad152
Matrix isn't the only one behind the curve, I've yet to see any game designed for to take advantage of wide screens. I just downloaded the Strategic Command 2 Weapons and Warfare Demo and it has a max res of 1280x1024. [8|]

I just ran the demo on my laptop higher at 1440x900 and Blitzkrieg runs on my desktop at 1650x1080. Maybe your system maxes out at 1280x1024?
User avatar
Fred98
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Wollondilly, Sydney

RE: RE:solution

Post by Fred98 »

ORIGINAL: Agent S
Q: How can you set a full screen resolution higher than 1024x768?

Close all programs.

On your Windows desktop right click

Choose Options and go from there
-



User avatar
Magpius
Posts: 1746
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Should be in tech thread...

Post by Magpius »

What don't I get here.
I run a Dell laptop at 1920x1200 native resolution.
When the game starts, the switches to 1024x768. (full screen).
When playing the game toggled to window mode, yes, it appears high res in the top left corner of the screen, but modifying the desktop resolution only makes the windowed mode larger.
As far as I can tell if playing the game in full screen mode, no other resolution other than 1024x768 is available.
-and hey Major Victory; I enjoy this game as much as anyone else here, but if this issue is not raised, then there is always the likelihood that games in development could also fail to consider high resolution values as standards.

"I don't believe in reincarnation because I refuse to come back as a bug or as a rabbit". -New Order
YohanTM2
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 5:43 am
Location: Toronto

RE: Should be in tech thread...

Post by YohanTM2 »

You always have to take into account the time Major Victory and IDG post - especially if it is later on a Saturday evening if you get my drift...this 40oz opinion may impact others as well on occasion.

ORIGINAL: Agent S

What don't I get here.
I run a Dell laptop at 1920x1200 native resolution.
When the game starts, the switches to 1024x768. (full screen).
When playing the game toggled to window mode, yes, it appears high res in the top left corner of the screen, but modifying the desktop resolution only makes the windowed mode larger.
As far as I can tell if playing the game in full screen mode, no other resolution other than 1024x768 is available.
-and hey Major Victory; I enjoy this game as much as anyone else here, but if this issue is not raised, then there is always the likelihood that games in development could also fail to consider high resolution values as standards.
User avatar
IainMcNeil
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:01 am
Location: London
Contact:

RE: Should be in tech thread...

Post by IainMcNeil »

Screen res is certainly somethign we like to deal with if we can, so don;t worry about that. The problem is sometimes its possible and sometimes it's not. If a game is 3D then you can resize without any issues. If a game is 2D then it can be much more complex, possibly requiring the UI to be written for each resolution with matching graphics - and that's just not possible and is the case for CEAW. It depends how things are structured.
Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games
User avatar
ravinhood
Posts: 3829
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:26 am

RE: Should be in tech thread...

Post by ravinhood »

Ever notice how the techies say that NOBODY ELSE uses such n such? LOL Just because you have a 19" monitor doesn't mean everyone does. I certainly used a CRT monitor 15" up until just a few weeks ago. And I'd still use it today if it hadn't started giving me some issues and I have 10 years of use out of it. ;)

Wide Screen is nice an all makes things huge, but, I find 1024 x 760 just fine even on a wide screen. The font looks bigger and it doesn't shrink it down to microscopic views like the 1260 and the 1400 and most especially the 1600.

Matrixgames should well cater to it's old guard of consumers us old farts with the money to buy their games (when we feel like it) as oppose to some whiney techie who thinks everything should be made to his systems standards instead of anyone elses lol.
WE/I WANT 1:1 or something even 1:2 death animations in the KOIOS PANZER COMMAND SERIES don't forget Erik! ;) and Floating Paratroopers We grew up with Minor, Marginal and Decisive victories why rock the boat with Marginal, Decisive and Legendary?


User avatar
highpocrisy
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:04 am

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by highpocrisy »

well maybe you should hint for your grand grandkids to get you glasses for next Christmas [8D]
SMK-at-work
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: New Zealand

RE: Another good game skipped because of ancient sub 1280x1024 resolution!

Post by SMK-at-work »

I've got 3 15" CRT monitors - at $5 each they should last me for several years yet.
Meum est propisitum in taberna mori
Post Reply

Return to “Commander - Europe at War Gold”