Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
Koniev
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 9:20 pm
Location: Shawnee, Kansas

Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by Koniev »

I've been reading the manual. In section 13.2.2, under Aircraft Factories, it states the following:

"In order for these aircraft to be added to the replacement pool, there must be an equal number of aircraft engines of the appropriate type(see Engine Factories, below) required by the aircraft built(only for Japanese aircraft, Allied aircraft do not require engines) ......."

Have I have discovered the real reason we won the war? What'd they use...levitation?...magic carpets?...devine inspiraton?....warp drive?

Or does all the boilerplate about engine production/airframe apply only to the Japanese?

"Those who don't remember History are condemned to relive it" George Santayana
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by Terminus »

Only the Japs need to build aircraft engines.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by USSAmerica »

Engine production, along with a lot of other Allied industry is abstracted. 
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by Mistmatz »

ORIGINAL: Koniev

...
Have I have discovered the real reason we won the war? What'd they use...levitation?...magic carpets?...devine inspiraton?....warp drive?

...

I sense a good start for japanese fanboyism here. [8D][;)]
If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

User avatar
wwengr
Posts: 680
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Contact:

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by wwengr »

Everyone knows that that Allies won the war because a modern Nuclear Attack Carrier ran into some mysterious fog and was transported back to WWII.
I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!
Knavey
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 4:25 am
Location: Valrico, Florida

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by Knavey »

The Final Countdown!
 
Feinder worked on that a scenario a few years back.  Modelled the whole thing from the CVN to the F-14s.
 
Wonder if it is still out there?
x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"
User avatar
madgamer2
Posts: 1235
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:59 pm

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by madgamer2 »

ORIGINAL: wwengr

Everyone knows that that Allies won the war because a modern Nuclear Attack Carrier ran into some mysterious fog and was transported back to WWII.
alas to many of them old movies LOL

Kawrence
If your not part of the solution
You are part of the problem
rogue
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:14 am

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by rogue »

Actually the old solitare board game Carrier (focus was on the South Pacific Campaign) had the Final Countdown as an option for playing.  The designers said the game was a little difficult for the US player, so they could subsitute the entire US WWII Pacific Fleet for the Nimitz and its strike aircraft. Actually seeing the Final Countdown as a scenerio would really be cool.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7452
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: rogue

Actually the old solitare board game Carrier (focus was on the South Pacific Campaign) had the Final Countdown as an option for playing.  The designers said the game was a little difficult for the US player, so they could subsitute the entire US WWII Pacific Fleet for the Nimitz and its strike aircraft. Actually seeing the Final Countdown as a scenerio would really be cool.


I have that game!

On those same lines, in another Victory Game, Panzer Command, they included a modern tank unit counter as a comparison to teh WWII tanks.

In addition, didn't Squad Leader havd a Seargent Steiner counter?
Hans

User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by Gem35 »

I wonder what that Nuclear Carrier's Commander's ratings were....
Also, what about pilot morale and what would be a good altitude for those f-14s to bomb at?
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
wwengr
Posts: 680
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Contact:

RE: Befuddled Newbie Question No. 24

Post by wwengr »

ORIGINAL: Gem35

I wonder what that Nuclear Carrier's Commander's ratings were....
Also, what about pilot morale and what would be a good altitude for those f-14s to bomb at?

Leadership - 50
Inspiration - 50
Naval - 01
Agression - 99

Obviously he had to be clueless and wreckless to go charging into a mysterious teleporting fog.[:D]
I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”