AEaster Egg

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

AEaster Egg

Post by JWE »

Well, the Easter ham has 3 more hours to go and it’s either cut the grass, or do this, so …

Seems Japan had about 50 or so older 1st and 2nd class DDs (Momo, Momi, Kamikaze, Mutsuki, Whackytacky), that upgraded, converted, and refitted into darn near everything afloat.

Just taking Momi for example, there was 9 that were converted to PBs in ’39-’40 (what we would call APDs), 5 that were converted to training ships (and remilitarized, eventually), and 3 retained as DDs. Both the DDs and the APDs upgrade over the years, but there’s also a one-way conversion option for the DDs to go to APDs.

Neat thing is that some of the Momi upgrade/conversion options are shared with the Whackytackys, so the art becomes multi-class fungible (I call them Mo-Takes, in the art pile). That’s to say nothing about the Kamikaze and Mutsuki classes. Woof !!

So here’s some art for all the old, decrepit (but astonishingly useful, if you are smart) Japanese DDs.


Image
Attachments
JapanDD.jpg
JapanDD.jpg (43.08 KiB) Viewed 193 times
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Terminus »

Nice job, John, as always.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17543
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by John 3rd »

Very nice work.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by m10bob »

Surely the prolific details of all shipsides will look great on the combat screens, it is just too bad some of the artwork details will be lost on the ship detail screen due to the non-inclusion of some kind of magnification of that artwork by the original game engine.
That ships detail screen is after all, part of an encyclopaedia of sorts.
Image

User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm....magnification. That can surely be done, can it not, in lieu of a larger art frame? Obviously for some future patch/enhancement mind you.[8D]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by RevRick »

I just know you have it somewhere, John, just because your work is excellent. But, I think (dubious concept that it is) that I dimly remember seeing some info about the old four pipers in the USN - including my favorite conversion, the long range escort. Any details available on that little ditty?
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by castor troy »

Whackytackys???
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Whackytackys???

Haven't you read your WWII history? Their engines make a very distinctive sound when go to flank speed to attack submarines. The submarine crews described it as "wackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytacky".

[:'(]
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Terminus »

Since John isn't around at the moment... From top to bottom, pre-war DD Clemson, LR DD Clemson, LR DE Clemson (fewer torps):

Image
Attachments
clemson.jpg
clemson.jpg (33.8 KiB) Viewed 192 times
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by John Lansford »

Where did the aft stack go on the conversions?  Did they trunk the exhaust over to the 3rd stack, or just replace the entire engine room with something else?
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Terminus »

I seem to remember that they took some of the boilers out and replaced them with bunkerage, hence the increased range.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by m10bob »

Very nice!..
Image

User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by JWE »

Yepperino ! Brother Terminus has a good take on the DD evolution. Thanks Termie!

I love those old ‘cans’ too. Probably spent more time on the old IJN and old USN cans than anything else (btw, whackytacky = Wakatake). So here’s Clemson, in full array – also Wickes, and there’s also a lend-lease Wickes version that went to the Sovs, that AE calls the Viiks Class (since the Sovs didn’t have a name for them, just numbers).

M‘Kay, the top row is the DD evolution, the next row is some of them converted to DEs (replacing torps with more DC throwers), next row is DMS, APD, and AVD versions (tried to show Willie Keith coming out of the clip shack on the DMS, but ..).


Image
Attachments
FourStackers.jpg
FourStackers.jpg (14.22 KiB) Viewed 192 times
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: castor troy

Whackytackys???

Haven't you read your WWII history? Their engines make a very distinctive sound when go to flank speed to attack submarines. The submarine crews described it as "wackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytackywackytacky".

[:'(]

Yup... Came from them being powered by two-stroke moped engines...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: John Lansford
Where did the aft stack go on the conversions?  Did they trunk the exhaust over to the 3rd stack, or just replace the entire engine room with something else?
Yeah, They lost a fire room and had the stack removed as a consequence. Original Wickes could just barely (but not quite) cross the Atlantic on her bunkerage, Clemson was the version that just allowed them to do so.

In War-2, they both lost a fire room (and a stack) to increased bunkerage. Since their boiler rooms were pressurized, this was not a bad thing. It reduced top speed, somewhat, but cruise (escort) speed was unaffected, in the main.

Other versions lost two fire rooms, and two stacks, with the extra space given over to troop accommodations (APD) or air ops equipage (AVD). Stack trunking was incidental; you could strike the front fire room and kill the aft stack, or, as in the APDs strike the front 2 fire rooms and kill the front two stacks. Life is uncertain.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by witpqs »

Hey John - in WWI were the Wickes and Clemsons coal fired or were they oil from the get go?
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by JWE »

Oil, Bro.

And it was yet more bizarre. There were three different boiler mfgs (with three different designs), and four different construction yards, and a Bath, Maine built Wickes could perform the same as a Newport News Clemson ... oh, it gets simply scrump-diddly-ishous.
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by RevRick »

Spent a whole lot of time with Mr. Friedman in his explanation of them.. and then some. Also have a couple of other books in storage which have some incredible pictures of the DDs of the Allen type and some even earlier. Hardy souls, those old tin can men were.
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5187
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: RevRick

Spent a whole lot of time with Mr. Friedman in his explanation of them.. and then some. Also have a couple of other books in storage which have some incredible pictures of the DDs of the Allen type and some even earlier. Hardy souls, those old tin can men were.

Mr. Friedman is an excellent source, although it takes a bit of digging to follow the 4-piper upgrades. If you do not have it, be sure and get his Amphibious Ships Book.
Buck Beach
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Upland,CA,USA

RE: AEaster Egg

Post by Buck Beach »

ORIGINAL: JWE

Yepperino ! Brother Terminus has a good take on the DD evolution. Thanks Termie!

I love those old ‘cans’ too. Probably spent more time on the old IJN and old USN cans than anything else (btw, whackytacky = Wakatake). So here’s Clemson, in full array – also Wickes, and there’s also a lend-lease Wickes version that went to the Sovs, that AE calls the Viiks Class (since the Sovs didn’t have a name for them, just numbers).

M‘Kay, the top row is the DD evolution, the next row is some of them converted to DEs (replacing torps with more DC throwers), next row is DMS, APD, and AVD versions (tried to show Willie Keith coming out of the clip shack on the DMS, but ..).


Image

I'm looking forward to seeing the various ASW capabilities of these. I believe the Wickes class was pretty good in WITP in the early part of the war.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”