Carrier Loading
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:30 am
Carrier Loading
Hey guys,
So you can supposedly load a carrier to 110% of its capacity and still have it fly normal operations, right?
Is it that you can load a carrier to 110% and still have it function normally, or once you hit 110% you start seeing bad things?
More specifically.... If I put exactly 99 planes on one of the allied CV's that has capacity of 90, will they fly normally, or will I see negative effects?
So you can supposedly load a carrier to 110% of its capacity and still have it fly normal operations, right?
Is it that you can load a carrier to 110% and still have it function normally, or once you hit 110% you start seeing bad things?
More specifically.... If I put exactly 99 planes on one of the allied CV's that has capacity of 90, will they fly normally, or will I see negative effects?
- castor troy
- Posts: 14331
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
- Location: Austria
RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: TommyBoy84
Hey guys,
So you can supposedly load a carrier to 110% of its capacity and still have it fly normal operations, right?
Is it that you can load a carrier to 110% and still have it function normally, or once you hit 110% you start seeing bad things?
More specifically.... If I put exactly 99 planes on one of the allied CV's that has capacity of 90, will they fly normally, or will I see negative effects?
IIRC it´s 115%. 99 aircraft on a 90 aircraft CV shouldn´t be a problem
RE: Carrier Loading
Beyond the capacity limitation, the runway will no longer allow take-offs..This becomes important if you lose a a flat-top and her planes land on a remaining carrier..
When that happens, ya' gotta get outta Dodge!
When that happens, ya' gotta get outta Dodge!

RE: Carrier Loading
Don't forget the max of 5 groups regardless of total #
If you are in the orange they will fly. Red will not
If you are in the orange they will fly. Red will not
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003
"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:30 am
RE: Carrier Loading
So up to 115%, my planes will fly normally, but beyond 115%, there won't be any take-offs?
- Misconduct
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:13 am
- Location: Cape Canaveral, Florida
- Contact:
RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: TommyBoy84
So up to 115%, my planes will fly normally, but beyond 115%, there won't be any take-offs?
Correct. I've done it and it works quite well, either you get extra cap/bombs or whatever.
Make sure you split a 24 plane squadron up and use no more then 8 aircraft on the CV, or it will go in the red.
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z Intel Core I7 2800k Corsair Hydro Heatsink Corsair Vengeance DD3 24GB EVGA GTX 580 Western Digital 1.5TB Raid 0 Windows 7
RE: Carrier Loading
The only real danger of overloading your carriers to 115% is that, if you lose a (different) carrier in a battle, the squadron fragments from the stricken carrier may divert to your over-loaded one, which will then shut-down your over-loaded carrier.
-F-
-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: Feinder
The only real danger of overloading your carriers to 115% is that, if you lose a (different) carrier in a battle, the squadron fragments from the stricken carrier may divert to your over-loaded one, which will then shut-down your over-loaded carrier.
-F-
Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
RE: Carrier Loading
Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?
I haven't found the "jettison aircraft" button on the CV panel in WitP yet...
[;)]
-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

- Historiker
- Posts: 4742
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
- Location: Deutschland
RE: Carrier Loading
Maybe you'll find it in some weeks...ORIGINAL: Feinder
Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?
I haven't found the "jettison aircraft" button on the CV panel in WitP yet...
[;)]
-F-
I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.
What does that mean?
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!
There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
RE: Carrier Loading
I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.
What does that mean?
Oh boy. There's a can o' worms...
I'll let some of the JFBs chime in on that one to start things off...

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

- castor troy
- Posts: 14331
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
- Location: Austria
RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: Historiker
Maybe you'll find it in some weeks...ORIGINAL: Feinder
Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?
I haven't found the "jettison aircraft" button on the CV panel in WitP yet...
[;)]
-F-
I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.
What does that mean?
you just don´t want to ask what that silly number is for... [:@][:@][:@]
RE: Carrier Loading
speaking of overloaded carriers, the planes should either divert to the nearest land base, or if unavailable, should land on the closest carrier with the most room, or split between carriers. especially as with most carrier engagements carriers lose a portion of their planes.
but i suppose that would be too hard to program[:D]
as for the pilots, i dont think they should commit metaphorical hari kari when their carrier goes down. they should be on another ship or carrier somehow. or at least a portion of them, i mean cmon some have to be rescued right?
i mean what happens? do they crash and just float there saying *Help help!* as the destroyers just cruise on by while meanwhile everyone says, *sorry, you lost your carrier, automatic fail and death sentence in shark infested waters!*
that should be fixed[:D]
but i suppose that would be too hard to program[:D]
as for the pilots, i dont think they should commit metaphorical hari kari when their carrier goes down. they should be on another ship or carrier somehow. or at least a portion of them, i mean cmon some have to be rescued right?
i mean what happens? do they crash and just float there saying *Help help!* as the destroyers just cruise on by while meanwhile everyone says, *sorry, you lost your carrier, automatic fail and death sentence in shark infested waters!*
that should be fixed[:D]
RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: Feinder
I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.
What does that mean?
Oh boy. There's a can o' worms...
I'll let some of the JFBs chime in on that one to start things off...
-F-
ok, now I am curious. What does that number mean ? Inquiring minds want to know.
ok, just found this thread ( geez, I never thought about this ) :
tm.asp?m=851446&mpage=1&key=air%2Cbalance󏺘
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


RE: Carrier Loading
Airbal is the relative air strength at given location. Postive is favorable to you. Negative is favorable to the enemy. All types of AC project airbal. Some type project more than others (per plan). All project at range: so squadron of PBYs project a smaller total airbal for a longer range than a squadron of F4Fs which only project their airbal to a range of 4. That airbal number is the composite of every AC within range of the hex. Which is a LOT of AC, when you consider that Bettys project airbal out to 20 or whatever their max range is. Now those Bettys probably won't ever do anything at a range of 20, but they still project their airbal.
There's a big squawk over whether it's "fair" or not. I'm of the opinion of "fair" because it's available to both players, and frankly, it's a lot of work to make it useful. If there is any advantage for the Allies, if they so choose to be anal enough to worry about airbal, it perhaps gives some help toward the woefully inadaquate SigInt reports.
Either way, it's completely moot, because it's going away in AE (as I understand it).
You'll have to take my word for it, that I tested airbal extensively, and that I that I figured out the algorithm. Frankly, it was an amusing evening, and even when you know all the 11 herbs and spices, I have better things to do with my PBEM game than to get all knotted up over air-bal (even in my rare game as Japan).
My old Post about the "feel" of airbal (I rather liked it's metaphore, so I'll share it again) -
Airbal, is just like any other intel. The more you put into, the more you get out of it. Furthermore, AirBal is not a bug or an exploit. The exact same data is available to both players, if they so choose to do anythign with it.
A good example is Sigint. It's usually just a bunch of coords. If you look at it once a week, it tells you nothing. But if you take the time (and effort) to keep up with it, it's useful.
(* raises "wanker" hand *)
I equate airbal to noise. It's also a lot more "realistic" than many other things in this game. Tampa International is a busy airport, much more so than Trinity Corporate near my home. There's a lot more noise at TIA (both litterally, and more applicably, in air-traffic chatter).
An example, if you're hosting a party, the noise level in the room is fairly static. It might be loud, but it's constant. Maybe Fred with his big mouth shows up at the party. You can tell about where he is, because he's got a bigger mouth than anybody else. Maybe he brings his girlfriend, who also has a big mouth. If they're together, they make so much noise it's hard to tell them apart, but you know where they are. You can tell when the go outside, altho it's impossible to tell exactly where they are outside; but you know they're -not- in the room with you, because it's -not- loud.
You hear a loud crash in the kitchen, so somebody goes in to clean it up. The kitchen stays louder for a while. You don't necessarily know what dropped, or who specifically is in the kitchen. But you can hear the voices talking as long as they're there. Fred & girlfriend enter the kitchen, and now the kitchen is REALLY loud. One of them leaves. You don't know WHO left, but you know the kitchen is a little quieter. But you also know that whoever it was, went outside, because the noise in your room is still "normal".
If you stay at the party all night, you see where people like to stand. One couch is comfortable, another is not. You can tell who likes to play together. You see that nobody likes Fred, so he roams around constantly, increasing the volume of whatever room he's in. His girlfriend is angry, and as been making out with Bill out on the porch since since the crash in the kitchen. Fred discovers his GF with Bill, so he chases Bill with a stapler (Fred is also drunk). You're surprised and don't know what's coming, but it's loud and you have one second to get out of the way.
But if you just walk into the party an look around, all you see is somebody passed out on a couch, a drunk guy waving a stapler at another, and a couple smooching on the porch. You don't know the whole story, and everything almost seems normal.
It's not voo-doo magic. It's an algorithm.
-F-
There's a big squawk over whether it's "fair" or not. I'm of the opinion of "fair" because it's available to both players, and frankly, it's a lot of work to make it useful. If there is any advantage for the Allies, if they so choose to be anal enough to worry about airbal, it perhaps gives some help toward the woefully inadaquate SigInt reports.
Either way, it's completely moot, because it's going away in AE (as I understand it).
You'll have to take my word for it, that I tested airbal extensively, and that I that I figured out the algorithm. Frankly, it was an amusing evening, and even when you know all the 11 herbs and spices, I have better things to do with my PBEM game than to get all knotted up over air-bal (even in my rare game as Japan).
My old Post about the "feel" of airbal (I rather liked it's metaphore, so I'll share it again) -
Airbal, is just like any other intel. The more you put into, the more you get out of it. Furthermore, AirBal is not a bug or an exploit. The exact same data is available to both players, if they so choose to do anythign with it.
A good example is Sigint. It's usually just a bunch of coords. If you look at it once a week, it tells you nothing. But if you take the time (and effort) to keep up with it, it's useful.
(* raises "wanker" hand *)
I equate airbal to noise. It's also a lot more "realistic" than many other things in this game. Tampa International is a busy airport, much more so than Trinity Corporate near my home. There's a lot more noise at TIA (both litterally, and more applicably, in air-traffic chatter).
An example, if you're hosting a party, the noise level in the room is fairly static. It might be loud, but it's constant. Maybe Fred with his big mouth shows up at the party. You can tell about where he is, because he's got a bigger mouth than anybody else. Maybe he brings his girlfriend, who also has a big mouth. If they're together, they make so much noise it's hard to tell them apart, but you know where they are. You can tell when the go outside, altho it's impossible to tell exactly where they are outside; but you know they're -not- in the room with you, because it's -not- loud.
You hear a loud crash in the kitchen, so somebody goes in to clean it up. The kitchen stays louder for a while. You don't necessarily know what dropped, or who specifically is in the kitchen. But you can hear the voices talking as long as they're there. Fred & girlfriend enter the kitchen, and now the kitchen is REALLY loud. One of them leaves. You don't know WHO left, but you know the kitchen is a little quieter. But you also know that whoever it was, went outside, because the noise in your room is still "normal".
If you stay at the party all night, you see where people like to stand. One couch is comfortable, another is not. You can tell who likes to play together. You see that nobody likes Fred, so he roams around constantly, increasing the volume of whatever room he's in. His girlfriend is angry, and as been making out with Bill out on the porch since since the crash in the kitchen. Fred discovers his GF with Bill, so he chases Bill with a stapler (Fred is also drunk). You're surprised and don't know what's coming, but it's loud and you have one second to get out of the way.
But if you just walk into the party an look around, all you see is somebody passed out on a couch, a drunk guy waving a stapler at another, and a couple smooching on the porch. You don't know the whole story, and everything almost seems normal.
It's not voo-doo magic. It's an algorithm.
-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

-
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:01 pm
- Location: UK
RE: Carrier Loading
the one thing i do enjoy about reading old posts is the avatars and names of people youve never seen before - where do they go? whats happened to the 'disappeared'?
RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: m10bob
Beyond the capacity limitation, the runway will no longer allow take-offs..This becomes important if you lose a a flat-top and her planes land on a remaining carrier..
When that happens, ya' gotta get outta Dodge!
I think this is sad, WITP / AE shoild allow you to dump the planes into the sea, like was done in real life in a few battles.
-
- Historiker
- Posts: 4742
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
- Location: Deutschland
RE: Carrier Loading
Thank you VERY much, Feinder!
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!
There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
- castor troy
- Posts: 14331
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
- Location: Austria
RE: Carrier Loading
ORIGINAL: Feinder
Airbal is the relative air strength at given location. Postive is favorable to you. Negative is favorable to the enemy. All types of AC project airbal. Some type project more than others (per plan). All project at range: so squadron of PBYs project a smaller total airbal for a longer range than a squadron of F4Fs which only project their airbal to a range of 4. That airbal number is the composite of every AC within range of the hex. Which is a LOT of AC, when you consider that Bettys project airbal out to 20 or whatever their max range is. Now those Bettys probably won't ever do anything at a range of 20, but they still project their airbal.
There's a big squawk over whether it's "fair" or not. I'm of the opinion of "fair" because it's available to both players, and frankly, it's a lot of work to make it useful. If there is any advantage for the Allies, if they so choose to be anal enough to worry about airbal, it perhaps gives some help toward the woefully inadaquate SigInt reports.
Either way, it's completely moot, because it's going away in AE (as I understand it).
You'll have to take my word for it, that I tested airbal extensively, and that I that I figured out the algorithm. Frankly, it was an amusing evening, and even when you know all the 11 herbs and spices, I have better things to do with my PBEM game than to get all knotted up over air-bal (even in my rare game as Japan).
My old Post about the "feel" of airbal (I rather liked it's metaphore, so I'll share it again) -
Airbal, is just like any other intel. The more you put into, the more you get out of it. Furthermore, AirBal is not a bug or an exploit. The exact same data is available to both players, if they so choose to do anythign with it.
A good example is Sigint. It's usually just a bunch of coords. If you look at it once a week, it tells you nothing. But if you take the time (and effort) to keep up with it, it's useful.
(* raises "wanker" hand *)
I equate airbal to noise. It's also a lot more "realistic" than many other things in this game. Tampa International is a busy airport, much more so than Trinity Corporate near my home. There's a lot more noise at TIA (both litterally, and more applicably, in air-traffic chatter).
An example, if you're hosting a party, the noise level in the room is fairly static. It might be loud, but it's constant. Maybe Fred with his big mouth shows up at the party. You can tell about where he is, because he's got a bigger mouth than anybody else. Maybe he brings his girlfriend, who also has a big mouth. If they're together, they make so much noise it's hard to tell them apart, but you know where they are. You can tell when the go outside, altho it's impossible to tell exactly where they are outside; but you know they're -not- in the room with you, because it's -not- loud.
You hear a loud crash in the kitchen, so somebody goes in to clean it up. The kitchen stays louder for a while. You don't necessarily know what dropped, or who specifically is in the kitchen. But you can hear the voices talking as long as they're there. Fred & girlfriend enter the kitchen, and now the kitchen is REALLY loud. One of them leaves. You don't know WHO left, but you know the kitchen is a little quieter. But you also know that whoever it was, went outside, because the noise in your room is still "normal".
If you stay at the party all night, you see where people like to stand. One couch is comfortable, another is not. You can tell who likes to play together. You see that nobody likes Fred, so he roams around constantly, increasing the volume of whatever room he's in. His girlfriend is angry, and as been making out with Bill out on the porch since since the crash in the kitchen. Fred discovers his GF with Bill, so he chases Bill with a stapler (Fred is also drunk). You're surprised and don't know what's coming, but it's loud and you have one second to get out of the way.
But if you just walk into the party an look around, all you see is somebody passed out on a couch, a drunk guy waving a stapler at another, and a couple smooching on the porch. You don't know the whole story, and everything almost seems normal.
It's not voo-doo magic. It's an algorithm.
-F-
if airbalance number would be fair then the world would be flat... the reason why it´s not fair is the fact that the Allied player always is one round ahead the Japanese, no matter if airbalance numbers or in fact getting recon of aircraft transfers just done during the Japanese´s orders phase. So it can´t be anymore unfair as this has nothing to do with the better Allied intel they had in real life, it was just bad design or programming. It´s changed in AE though.