Stuped Mestakes

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Knavey
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 4:25 am
Location: Valrico, Florida

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Knavey »

In the rush to get the game, I accidentally did NOT order the manual. I only did the digital download and did not realize it. Oh well.
x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"
User avatar
jomni
Posts: 2827
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:31 am
Contact:

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by jomni »

January 42:  I left my bomber groups in Indochina in Naval mode despite having cleared South China Sea of Allied ships.  Naval transports appear at Burma (Moulmein).  Bombers go for them unescorted because of the long range.  Most of my fighters are busy gaining air supperiority in Singapore.  Result: 30 bombers shot down by the notorious AVG.  3 Air Groups now out of action until enough replacements are shipped. [:@]
Hokum
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 9:00 pm
Location: France

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Hokum »

Thinking that 4 heavy cruisers and of bunch of DDs would do the trick against the Boise at Davao.
User avatar
gladiatt
Posts: 2578
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:19 pm

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by gladiatt »

original WITP, not AE, but still:

thinking 2 australians CA (Canberra and can't remenber the other)+4DD could match a jap surface TF.....and discover 6CA 2CL and 12 DD.....jap player just loose CL Katori for all australians ships [8|]
User avatar
Gilbert
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Hendaye, France

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Gilbert »

ORIGINAL: gladiatt

original WITP, not AE, but still:

thinking 2 australians CA (Canberra and can't remenber the other)+4DD could match a jap surface TF.....and discover 6CA 2CL and 12 DD.....jap player just loose CL Katori for all australians ships [8|]

Probably HMAS Australia.
Regards
Gilbert
UMI YUKABA
"If I go away to sea, I shall return a corpse awash, if duty calls me to the mountain, a verdant will be my pall, thus for the sake of the Emperor, I will not die peacefully at home...."
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12428
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Sardaukar »

Trying to send 3 AGPs from DEI to Sydney via Perth (planned to use then to support PTs in SW Pac, especially in Port Moresby). They were all proptly torpedoed and sunk by same IJN submarine during same 2-day turn just south of Melbourne....
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
Evacuating the AVG squadrons but forgetting the AVG ground staff
I never took them off rest and they got slaughtered sitting around the bar. Planes never took to the air!

I did this with Bataan. Got distracted, thought I had another day of pesky Japanese bombardment, left "lots" of units resting and--BAM! 74,500 POWs. (Sorry about that Death March, guys.)

Good thing I'm restarting Any Day Now . . .

Two interface dreams: 1. A "Rest X Days then revert to Combat" right-arrow, and an 2. "Auto-convert back to Combat at destination" toggle.
The Moose
User avatar
Swayin
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Swayin »

Sending my Carrier TFs into Betty range for negligible reasons .. and then regretting it.
The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

Image
Djordje
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:49 am

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Djordje »

Being lazy with sending japanese invasions, thinking "I have time"... Sending troops that took HK north to inland China... It's middle of March now and I am still fighting for Singapore, Moulmein is a fortress and all I managed to conquer is north of Borneo and few worthless cities in China.
User avatar
Swayin
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Swayin »

Two interface dreams: 1. A "Rest X Days then revert to Combat" right-arrow, and an 2. "Auto-convert back to Combat at destination" toggle.

Nice. Or even a "rest until disruption reaches X, then revert to combat" ...
The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

Image
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Alikchi2 »

I spelled 'mistake' wrong once.. pretty ironic..

Or how about sailing into carrier battle with half of your Kates grounded [X(]
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Terminus »

Only half? Pfffft... I've gone in with an entire CAG sitting on the deck, and the crews listening to a VD lecture.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24580
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Only half? Pfffft... I've gone in with an entire CAG sitting on the deck, and the crews listening to a VD lecture.
Geez, Terminus. Where was their last port of call? I've got to reroute some convoys...
Image
User avatar
morganbj
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:36 am
Location: Mosquito Bite, Texas

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by morganbj »

San Fransico, obviously.
Occasionally, and randomly, problems and solutions collide. The probability of these collisions is inversely related to the number of committees working on the solutions. -- Me.
User avatar
Tazo
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:31 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Tazo »

Playing too often with threat tolerance, direct ways and remain on station or reaction radius buttons... got involved several times in stupid fights or undesired withdrawals or having dozen of subs pursuing a few convoys instead of reaching their patrol zones just by forgoting about coming back to the appropriate status/radius... Not big mistakes just annoying. To avoid checking this up all the time I decided to apply systematic doctrines when defining missions - no order change later[:-].
 
A classical one. Having once a big invasion convoy loading troops/supply then puting it in stand by a few days to coordinate with the incoming naval sweeping operation to repulse various TFs - thus secretly unloading[8|] - then sending it empty for a 6 day dangerous but crucial travel... then sending it back when realizing[&:] but of course the crucial target hex was lost[:@] before reloading the desappointed soldiers[X(]...
 
I should add that sending a 12DD TF to raid my fast BB Surf TF[8D] was a big experimental mistake of an opponent. Indeed allied DD's had always been no match vs jap BB/CA's in my multiple surface combats - at long/medium range during day combat BBs are now real monsters against small ships exploding one by one whereas during night CA LR torp are even more terrible - and the beta patch seems to allow catching DD escorts+convoys more often than before - no more quasi-automatic escape[:D] so by insisting... my "moonlight night convoy hunting jap surface TFs" achieved bloody surprises and hurted repeatedly my opponents this week. A lot of marines swimming back...
 
TZ
There is only two kinds of operational plans, good ones and bad ones.
The good ones almost always fail under unexpected circumstances that often make the bad ones succeed.
-- Napoléon.

With AE immortality is no more a curse.
-- A lucky man.
Smeulders
Posts: 1879
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:13 pm

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Smeulders »

Important ships in front line bases should never be placed under pierside repair for minor damage. If you do, they can't get away when the KB comes calling.
The AE-Wiki, help fill it out
User avatar
devoncop
Posts: 1410
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:06 pm

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by devoncop »

Not changing the combat mode of an amphibious task force that having successfully invaded Guadalcanal was then loaded up with supplies and oil and confused with a second amphib task force and sent to amphibiously assault another Jap held island..... It gloriously stormed ashore with full bombardment support....... and unloaded half the oil and supplies to the grateful Jap garrison ....[:@].... [:D]
"I do not agree with what you say, but I shall defend to the death your right to say it"
Smeulders
Posts: 1879
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:13 pm

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Smeulders »

Consider it a plot to confuse the Japanese intelligence [:)]
The AE-Wiki, help fill it out
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by John Lansford »

ORIGINAL: Smeulders

Important ships in front line bases should never be placed under pierside repair for minor damage. If you do, they can't get away when the KB comes calling.

I had PoW sitting at Surabaya undergoing pierside repair (too big for the shipyard) when a mini-KB showed up and began sinking all my transport TF's. I sweated bullets for several turns until they left, having never bombed Surabaya's port.
User avatar
Kull
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: El Paso, TX

RE: Stuped Mestakes

Post by Kull »

ORIGINAL: Grognerd

I thought I read a post to send all your AP's to Cape Town for troops and your tankers and AK's to Aden to pick up oil and supplies. It was the other way around. Took a month to sort out that routing mess.
ORIGINAL: devoncop

Not changing the combat mode of an amphibious task force that having successfully invaded Guadalcanal was then loaded up with supplies and oil and confused with a second amphib task force and sent to amphibiously assault another Jap held island..... It gloriously stormed ashore with full bombardment support....... and unloaded half the oil and supplies to the grateful Jap garrison ......

I love these logistics "Tales of Folly" even more than the combat "oopsies". They immediately convey a visual of some poor Lieutenant (who drew the short straw) quivering before the Admiral's desk, as the be-starred one looks up over his glasses and loudly exclaims, "You people did WHAT??!!??"

[:D]
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”