Tiger vs JS-II and JS- III

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

Post Reply
Egg_Shen
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 3:15 am
Location: North Korea

Tiger vs JS-II and JS- III

Post by Egg_Shen »

****!

How come I can't punch through the front of a JS-II with 88/71L from the Tiger 2!!! (6 shots)
and then the JS - II can then kill the Tiger 2 in 1 shot. I think it was a JS-II hmm maybe it was a JS-III but the pen tables still say I can get through that much armour.

Or does this have something to do with the armour sloping too?








:mad:
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

Most definately. Hit angle, armor slope, armor quality modifiers etc etc play in. Oh yeah, and range! ;)

Hit alt+L during combat and check the combat.txt in the main directory afterwards. There you will see how the game calculates pen.

Check my thread in the AAR/DAR forum. I hit an IS-2 in the front turret and achieved a pen of 134. The corresponding armor thickness was in this case, after angles etc. were calculated, 136 mm. Ouch. 2mm short. The IS-2 then hit the Tiger on top of the turret since it (the IS-2) was standing on a hill. No need to say, Tigers are quite vulnerable to head bonking. :p

The 88/L71 is a great gun, but the IS-2s features a 122 mm gun. :eek: Enough to kill a Tiger II in any case. You need to be careful with your cats.
Image
Got StuG?
Egg_Shen
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 3:15 am
Location: North Korea

Post by Egg_Shen »

so what is the diff. between a Js-2 and a Js-3?
User avatar
stevemk1a
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Penticton B.C.

Post by stevemk1a »

I believe the JSIII incorporated armour sloping improvements over the JSII ... the troops nicknamed it the 'Pike' because of it's pointed front glacis. If you look at a pic of the JSIII it looks remarkably like a modern MBT with the ballistic armour and a turret that looks like an upside down frying pan. IIRC the JS family of tanks carries a small ammo load though, and I believe it had some reliability problems. The T-44 became the forerunner of the postwar Soviet tank family instead ... Still its a very scary beast indeed :D :eek:
Voriax
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Finland

Post by Voriax »

Originally posted by Egg_Shen
so what is the diff. between a Js-2 and a Js-3?
Quite a lot, especially if you look at the turret..I recall some fierce discussions about what would be the correct slope to be used in the OOB.. :)

Some info: http://www.skalman.nu/soviet/ww2-equipment-tank-is2.htm
and http://www.skalman.nu/soviet/ww2-equipment-tank-is3.htm

Voriax
Oh God give Me strength to accept those things I cannot change with a firearm!
siemerc
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 8:26 am
Location: Pacific North West
Contact:

Post by siemerc »

Here's more info and pictures on the IS-2 and IS-3 at my web site:

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/html/ussr/is.html
User avatar
CCB
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 9:14 pm

Post by CCB »

An interesting comparison: the JS3 and the Pz IV h/j in the background.

Image

I believe this is at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland.
Peux Ce Que Veux
in den vereinigten staaten hergestellt
Heide
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Brockton, MA

Post by Heide »

Yeah, that's APG. I have several (relatively poor quality) photos I took there when I was working for DOD back in '95.
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

Thanks, CCB. I thought the IS-3 was a lot bigger... :p
Image
Got StuG?
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”