Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

You need to bring in fighters and 4E bombers to hit his airfields.

I have 10 BG and 7 FG headed for Wellington. They will end up at Melbourne within the month. [:)] Too bad some of the bombers are still the old Bolo, but they will be upgraded.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Joc,

I have my 5 American CVs with extra fighters on each plus 3 Brit CVs and Hermes until mid-July. The Wasp come in in less than a month. He would have to combine all his CVs in the same area to scare me off. The problem is to find his CVs and get him to fight. He had Mini-KB off Geraldton and operating out of Soerabaja. KB (minus Kaga) has not been seen for weeks. My subs around Truk just returned to Pearl for some fuel and quick repairs and didn't see anything.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Crackaces - Yes it would be nice to have a random trigger line, but somethings are just not possible with the code.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by Crackaces »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Crackaces - Yes it would be nice to have a random trigger line, but somethings are just not possible with the code.

I think there are some fundemental things Micheal does not want to touch .. but are very doable with programing ... this would be one .. instead of a hard coded line line .... function_to_genrate hex line from some random choice of possibilities(&varible_that_holds_results)

But I understand your point ..
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

May 15, 16, 17, 18: Perth and Manila attacked again

Key: TT = Torpedo; bb = ground bombardment; c = casualties; b = base hits; s = supply hits; r = runway hits; p = port hits; AV = Assault Value; DC = Depth Charged; (*) = destroyed aircraft;

Subs:
Seal @ Geraldton finds out she in NOT a minesweeper!![:D] She may not make it home.
S-37 @ Norfolk Island gets a single TT hit on a loaded xAK. The next day she is damaged enough by a close DC hit to require her to return to port for repairs.

CVs:
American CVs re-fuel at Aukland on 17th and head for Wellington. CV Enterprise gets her fighters to upgrade to F4F-4s (I now have three CVs and two Marines with these airframes). She is also the first to get an Avenger group. [:)]

India/Burma:[>:][>:]

China:
Yenan - up to 28 Sally hit AF daily

Changsha - 27 Oscars sweep empty skies daily;

Sieges:
Batavia - 7 Lily hit AF daily; 13 Nell now join the daily bombing runs on 17th;

Manila -
Night Naval bombardment of Manila at 79,77 on 15th

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Ise
CA Atago
DD Tatsuyuke
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Amatsukaze
DD Hatsukaze

Allied ground losses:
917 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 14 destroyed, 50 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 10 (2 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Manpower hits 2
Resources hits 1
Fires 3118
Runway hits 9
Port hits 1
Port fuel hits 1

Up to 57 Lily/Sally hit AF and troops daily;
Ground combat at Manila (79,77) on 16th

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 39722 troops, 454 guns, 491 vehicles, Assault Value = 1049

Defending force 46951 troops, 433 guns, 126 vehicles, Assault Value = 787

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 944

Allied adjusted defense: 343

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1064 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 128 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 64 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 68 disabled
Vehicles lost 45 (2 destroyed, 43 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1821 casualties reported
Squads: 53 destroyed, 88 disabled
Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 49 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 20 (5 destroyed, 15 disabled)

Assaulting units:
10th Garrison Unit
14th Division
20th Ind Engineer Regiment
21st Ind Engineer Regiment
3rd Ind Engineer Regiment
23rd Division
7th Tank Regiment
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
48th Field AA Battalion
6th RF Gun Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
Tonei Hvy Gun Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
5th Fleet
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
45th Field AA Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
14th Army
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Bn /4

Defending units:
1st PA Infantry Division
4th PA Constabulary Regiment
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
91st PA Infantry Division
4th Marine Regiment
45th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
41st PA Infantry Division
1st PA Constabulary Regiment
102nd PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
31st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
71st PA Infantry Division
51st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constblry HW Regiment
PAF Aviation
Clark Field AAF Base Force
Cavite USN Base Force
14th PS Engineer Regiment
Nichols Field AAF Base Force
II Philippine Corps
Far East USAAF
USAFFE
21st PA Infantry Division
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
194th Tank Battalion
803rd Aviation Engineer Battalion
192nd Tank Battalion
Asiatic Fleet
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
301st Construction Battalion

Western Australia:
Perth - 15 Zeros escort in up to 56 Sally to hit AF and/or troops daily (weather permitting);
Ground combat at Perth (49,147) on 15th

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 46853 troops, 397 guns, 363 vehicles, Assault Value = 1607

Defending force 21139 troops, 329 guns, 211 vehicles, Assault Value = 501

Japanese adjusted assault: 873

Allied adjusted defense: 395

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1494 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 272 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 35 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 24 disabled
Guns lost 21 (2 destroyed, 19 disabled)
Vehicles lost 23 (1 destroyed, 22 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1840 casualties reported
Squads: 34 destroyed, 47 disabled
Non Combat: 54 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 10 destroyed, 12 disabled
Guns lost 44 (8 destroyed, 36 disabled)
Vehicles lost 10 (1 destroyed, 9 disabled)

Assaulting units:
48th Division
9th Infantry Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
1st Engineer Co
2nd Tank Regiment
Imperial Guards Division
4th Guards Division

Defending units:
7th RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment
3rd Australian Brigade
Freemantle Fortress
18th British Division
2/16th Field Regiment
108th Anti Tank Regiment
13th Australian Brigade
III Australian
10th Avn Sup Afd
4th RAN Base Force
1st RAAF M/W Sqn

Trying to hold out in a clear terrain base even with well prepped troops is not a good thing. The forts are now down to 1 and the end is in sight, unfortunately.[:(]


Eastern Australia:
Alice Springs - Up to 16 Hudson attack Recon outside hex daily

South Pacific:
Just CVs and transports moving

Notes:
We got three turns in today, but not much is happening now.

No air attacks in eastern Australia for the last four days. (insert thinking smiley here).

Pending battle for Bourke (see screenshot). He has another 5 units marching in from east. I don't have any that close, but more are headed that way. Forts @ 2 (58%).

Image
Attachments
42May19Bourke.jpg
42May19Bourke.jpg (316.78 KiB) Viewed 370 times
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

With no turns in my inbox, so more future planning is being done. A possible target in 2 plus months 'may' be the Gilbert Islands. As of right now, there seems to be no activity here (see screenshot). Both the 1st & 2nd Marine Divisions plus various support units have already started prepping for some bases (Tabiteuea, Abemama, Tarawa, and Nonouti). We are playing with the new beta patch, so those units that come in as reinforcement are 100% prepped for a base. When I changed them over to one of these bases, they now have 25 to 33 prep levels which may allow a landing sooner. Since this mod is DBB based, I have to learn what all these various engineer type units can and cannot do.

Image
Attachments
42May19Gilberts.jpg
42May19Gilberts.jpg (117.17 KiB) Viewed 370 times
[center]Image[/center]
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Joc,

I have my 5 American CVs with extra fighters on each plus 3 Brit CVs and Hermes until mid-July. The Wasp come in in less than a month. He would have to combine all his CVs in the same area to scare me off. The problem is to find his CVs and get him to fight. He had Mini-KB off Geraldton and operating out of Soerabaja. KB (minus Kaga) has not been seen for weeks. My subs around Truk just returned to Pearl for some fuel and quick repairs and didn't see anything.

You think he will decline combat? I actually find it strange that so many IJ players happily go into combat with the ONLY thing can delay the Allied advance. Its russian roulette Japanese style I think?! [:D]

From what I have read in AARs it actually seems like 50/50 who comes out on top. Difference is that if the IJ player looses he can´t recover but the Allied can. So why are so many IJ players willing to take the chance?
Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

From what I have read in AARs it actually seems like 50/50 who comes out on top. Difference is that if the IJ player looses he can´t recover but the Allied can. So why are so many IJ players willing to take the chance?

Japan gets around 16 heavy CVs while the Allies get around 32 to 34 (I cannot remember the exact number). This doesn't even include the vast number of CVLs and CVEs the Allies produce. The thought is to sink the Allied CVs as early as possible and push back the time table of when the Allied carrier fleet is just too strong. In my other game, in which I'm Japan, the Allies sent some CVs to hit Tokyo in early 43. He lost many ships then and it will not be till mid 44 before he even has an equal number of heavy CVs. My mindset as Japan is to get to 46, if possible.

Hopefully, many Allied players are learning about the ability to place those Marine fighter groups on their American CVs and give you 45 fighters per CV. They may not be as good as the Zero, but shear numbers help and with some training, they can hold their own. Once the Americans get the Avenger TBs, they can get into a sword fight (range 5 or 6) vs wanting a knife fight (range 4 or less).

The game is still decided by your carriers or lack of them, IMO. I've been bashful about using them, but I think I've learned how to be assertive with them, but not reckless. [:D]
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by Crackaces »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
From what I have read in AARs it actually seems like 50/50 who comes out on top. Difference is that if the IJ player looses he can´t recover but the Allied can. So why are so many IJ players willing to take the chance?

Japan gets around 16 heavy CVs while the Allies get around 32 to 34 (I cannot remember the exact number). This doesn't even include the vast number of CVLs and CVEs the Allies produce. The thought is to sink the Allied CVs as early as possible and push back the time table of when the Allied carrier fleet is just too strong. In my other game, in which I'm Japan, the Allies sent some CVs to hit Tokyo in early 43. He lost many ships then and it will not be till mid 44 before he even has an equal number of heavy CVs. My mindset as Japan is to get to 46, if possible.

Hopefully, many Allied players are learning about the ability to place those Marine fighter groups on their American CVs and give you 45 fighters per CV. They may not be as good as the Zero, but shear numbers help and with some training, they can hold their own. Once the Americans get the Avenger TBs, they can get into a sword fight (range 5 or 6) vs wanting a knife fight (range 4 or less).

The game is still decided by your carriers or lack of them, IMO. I've been bashful about using them, but I think I've learned how to be assertive with them, but not reckless. [:D]

I might add to your well written explaination with the old addage of Space, Resources, and Time. I am in a scrap right now Oct 42, where the IJ have traded naval platforms [Resources] (4 CV's 2 CVL's 8 CA's, 6 CL's 20 DD's vs 6 BB's 1 Cl 12 DD's) for Space and Time. Though the USN took less sunk ships some of these platforms are out for a year. Even agaimst these losses it has been hard to get an offense going. I am just now securing the Gilberts and the IJ used the space and time to reinforce the Marshall's, Solomon's, Port Moresby, etc. I suspect the IJ will have much less resources to defend these areas once I get going, but I will be starting at a much later date than my first PBM game where the IJ experinced much less platform losses.
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Unless your transport fleet is also in a shamble, you can use this time to move as much supply and fuel you can from the West Coast to at least Pearl or beyond.

I'm finally getting around to reading, "Racing the Sunrise " which John 3rd recommended to me months ago. It goes through the the months just before Pearl and just after. The Americans were having trouble getting things to Luzon in sufficient numbers. Even the few P-40Es send there just before Pearl was pushing the Americans.

In this game, I already have decent pools of Air and GndB skilled pilots. The big problem for the Allies is the lack of airframes in 42. One or two bad days in the air can set you back for weeks to even months depending on the airframes lost. I try to use my limited number of fighters in situations in which I can get at least 1:1, but prefer 1.5:1 or greater. Need to get a good return on my airframes. That is probably why most of my air units do lots of training.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by 1EyedJacks »

Hey Michael,

Your "Daily siege" raids - how are you handling fatigue? Are you rotating units or flying something like 60/40 Attack/Rest?

TTFN,

Mike
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Mike,

I'm the one getting the daily 'siege' runs against my troops. [;)]

Normally, I try to build up a base as close as possible to cut down on distance and op losses. When an air unit gets below 70 morale, I rest them.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

May 19, 20, 21,:
Manila Falls!!
Major tank battle at Bourke

Key: TT = Torpedo; bb = ground bombardment; c = casualties; b = base hits; s = supply hits; r = runway hits; p = port hits; AV = Assault Value; DC = Depth Charged; (*) = destroyed aircraft;

Subs:
20th - 4 failed attacks by Allied subs around Australia vs one failed Japanese attacks. I don't include these type of attacks unless a ship or sub is hit.

CVs:
My 5 American CVs leave Wellington on 21st to escort in my major reinforcement efforts for southern Australia (Melbourne).

India/Burma:[>:][>:]

China:
Yenan - up to 31 Sally hits AF daily;

Sieges:
Batavia - 13 Nells & 9 Lily hit AF daily;

Manila - up to 57 Lily/Sally hit mainly troops vs AF daily;
Night Naval bombardment of Manila at 79,77 on 21st

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Ise
CA Atago
DD Tatsuyuke
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Amatsukaze
DD Hatsukaze

Allied ground losses:
397 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 18 destroyed, 52 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 6 (2 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Manpower hits 8
Repair Shipyard hits 1
Resources hits 1
Light Industry hits 2
Fires 2285
Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 49
Port hits 12
Port fuel hits 4
Ground combat at Manila (79,77) on 21st

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 34951 troops, 436 guns, 491 vehicles, Assault Value = 1001

Defending force 43579 troops, 390 guns, 123 vehicles, Assault Value = 604

Japanese adjusted assault: 972

Allied adjusted defense: 239

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Manila !!!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
O-47A: 2 destroyed

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1092 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 62 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 38 disabled
Guns lost 9 (1 destroyed, 8 disabled)
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
50948 casualties reported
Squads: 1808 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1703 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 126 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 425 (425 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 153 (153 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 32

Assaulting units:
23rd Division
3rd Ind Engineer Regiment
20th Ind Engineer Regiment
10th Garrison Unit
14th Division
21st Ind Engineer Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
48th Field AA Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
Tonei Hvy Gun Regiment
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
14th Army
45th Field AA Battalion
6th RF Gun Battalion
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
5th Fleet
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
5th RF Gun Battalion
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
4th Marine Regiment
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
1st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
31st PA Infantry Division
4th PA Constabulary Regiment
1st PA Constabulary Regiment
71st PA Infantry Division
91st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
51st PA Infantry Division
102nd PA Infantry Division
45th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
41st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constblry HW Regiment
803rd Aviation Engineer Battalion
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
194th Tank Battalion
192nd Tank Battalion
Clark Field AAF Base Force
21st PA Infantry Division
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
Nichols Field AAF Base Force
14th PS Engineer Regiment
Far East USAAF
II Philippine Corps
Asiatic Fleet
PAF Aviation
USAFFE
Cavite USN Base Force
301st Construction Battalion

This siege lasted a lot longer than I expected. He did one thing right, he didn't get his troops to suffer high disablement during the siege. Now, where will those two divisions plus lots of artillery go?? Burma, Australia, or where??

Western Australia:
Perth -
19th - 10 Zero & 29(1) Sally = 5b, 1s, 12r; 4 Zero & 27 Sally = 3b, 7r;
20th - 14 Zero & 26 Sally = 2b, 5s, 21r; 27 Sally = 1s, 23r;
21st - 14 Zero & 30 Sally = 114c on CD unit; 27 Sally = 89c;

Eastern Australia:
Newcastle - on 19th the Heavy Industry is attacked; 31 Sally & 54 Helen = Heavy Industry hits 10; 23 Helen = Heavy Industry hits 3;

Alice Springs - up to 11 Hudson from this base attack the Recon unit one hex out daily;

Broken Hills - I happen to have a BF moving from Alice Springs to Sydney for an upgrade be there the same turn Nick drops some paras in the hex. [:)]
Ground combat at Broken Hill (80,160) on 19th

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 352 troops, 4 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 26

Defending force 1089 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 10

Japanese adjusted assault: 4

Allied adjusted defense: 7

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: op mode(-), preparation(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
28 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
Yokosuka 1st SNLF /1

Defending units:
11th RAAF Base Force
20th - another para unit arrives and suffers a 4:24 combat result due to 6th Aus Cav Bde arriving in Strategic Mode [:)]

Bourke -
20th - 31 Oscar & 54(1) Helen attack one of my Cav Bde = 56c; 27 Helen = 66 c; 13 Oscars with 31 Sally & 36 Helen = 180 c;
21st - a major tank battle occurs and the Allies take a severe hit. [X(]
Ground combat at Bourke (86,160) on 21st

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 31489 troops, 249 guns, 539 vehicles, Assault Value = 1154

Defending force 13061 troops, 98 guns, 646 vehicles, Assault Value = 475

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 906

Allied adjusted defense: 217

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Bourke !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
943 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 84 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 61 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 201 (61 destroyed, 140 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
3264 casualties reported
Squads: 123 destroyed, 36 disabled
Non Combat: 396 destroyed, 51 disabled
Engineers: 31 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 65 (60 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Vehicles lost 561 (532 destroyed, 29 disabled)
Units retreated 11
Units destroyed 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
10th Tank Regiment
5th Guards Cav Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
6th Guards Division
4th Tank Regiment
6th Tank Regiment
5th Tank Regiment
16th Guards Regiment
15th Guards Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
5th Guards Engineer Regiment
1st Tank Regiment
17th Indpt Guards Regiment

Defending units:
Torres Strait Battalion
2/10th Armoured Regiment
2/9th Armoured Regiment
4th Aus Cav Brigade
754th Tank Battalion
2/1st Ind Coy
2/5th Armoured Regiment
2nd Aus Cav Brigade
1st RAAF Base Force
46th Construction Regiment
4th Australian Lt AA Regiment
II US Fighter Cmnd

I have lost months and months worth of tank replacements here. It will take until the fall of '42 before they can be replaced by the bi-monthly to monthly convoys to Cape Town dropping off tanks.


South Pacific:
BIG transport convoys leave Wellington on 21st for Melbourne. I have only 20k worth of fuel left in NZ, but my 6 large AOs are almost full with over 85k in fuel. The convoy should reach Melbourne in about 8 days.

Notes:
Tank vs Tank - I know about the importance of each devices Anti-Armor values, but as the Allied player will I need to wait until a particular tank arrives to take on the Japanese?? Do I need to have the infantry squads upgrade to their '43 version where most have their Anti-Armor values go from 15 to 75??

Southern Australia - What I see happening is Nick staying just above the Emergency Reinforcement line and driving to the west to try to take Broken Hills and then Port Augusta. I don't see him going south to take the rest of Australia until this happens. I might be wrong. I have two full divisions (6th Aussie and 32nd American) plus the last third of the Americal Division in route (arriving in less than 10 days). I have over 175 fighters and multiple bomber groups plus plenty of support troops (BFs). Adelaide is already a size 7 AF, so that will make the skies over Broken Hills dangerous for both sides. I want to make this theater secure, but not devote too much here. However, the 254 & 255 Armor Bde are loading at Karachi for the trip here via Cape Town.

Image
Attachments
42May22Bourke.jpg
42May22Bourke.jpg (482.39 KiB) Viewed 370 times
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Subs and more subs trying to make access to Melbourne expensive. However, I've yet to see any carriers this far south as I've got PBYs on the northern tip of NZ, Hobart (Tasmania), and Sydney which mean a very narrow gap to get through without detection.

Image
Attachments
42May22..Tasmania.jpg
42May22..Tasmania.jpg (326.01 KiB) Viewed 370 times
[center]Image[/center]
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by veji1 »

Logically once he secures Perth he will go all in except garrisons for Port Augusta and assess the situation from there on whether he should go any further. Him going for broke probably hinges on two things :
- How effectively could he start blockading southern Australia without having the whole KB stuck down there for months on end. Is it possible ? If you were him how would you try to do it ? Could Brisbane and Port Augusta be the major AFs from which he could do that ?
- Can he through blockade + Industry bombing get you in a supply crisis in a realistic time frame ? If possible than your forces would suffer from chines style penalties and it might be doable.

If not he should than abstain because the risk is too high of getting stuck in a protracted land battle that could turn very badly if you land on his back of just turn it around.

If I were him after analysing this I would probably decide that the safest route is a slow retreat, and just be happy with all the troops bagged and the slowdown given to the India buildup. At the end of the day Burma is always where doom comes from for the Jap, if this adventure in OZ led you to commit lots of troops there that are not building up the indian army, it might be a good trade off for the Jap.

Thoughts ?
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by witpqs »

Notes:
Tank vs Tank - I know about the importance of each devices Anti-Armor values, but as the Allied player will I need to wait until a particular tank arrives to take on the Japanese?? Do I need to have the infantry squads upgrade to their '43 version where most have their Anti-Armor values go from 15 to 75??

A particular unit? I doubt it.I would just look at the tanks that a unit has, plus their experience and leadership. You get tank upgrades in dribs and drabs. You could manage them to get them to chosen units first.

When the squads go to '43 standards they are pretty much no longer afraid of Japanese tanks. I'm not sure that you have to wait. But in general those '43 standard squad upgrades for the various Allies make their infantry quite fearsome.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

May 22, 23, 24, 25:
Newcastle industry hit and fires started
Paras wiped out at Broken Hill

Key: TT = Torpedo; bb = ground bombardment; c = casualties; b = base hits; s = supply hits; r = runway hits; p = port hits; AV = Assault Value; DC = Depth Charged; (*) = destroyed aircraft;

Subs:
S-38 hits an xAK with one TT @ Norfolk Island while Graeyback hits another xAK there
I-1 is hit 3x with DCs off Portland (Australia) by Brit DD and Aussie Minsweeper
I-23 misses my small xAKLs bringing resources back from Hilo to Pearl off Kona

CVs:
American CVs four days away from Melbourne with major reinforcement TFs.

India:[>:][>:]

China:
Yenan - up to 26 Sally hit AF daily

Philippines:
Cebu - up to 28 Helen & Sally hit AF on 24th and 25th;

Batavia: daily raids on AF by up to 13 Nell & 8 Lily

Western Australia:
Kalgoorlie -
22nd - 42 Oscar sweeps;
23rd - 42 Oscar sweeps;
24th - 42 Oscar with 57 Sally hit AF = 11b, 7s, 43b and 2 Kitty (caught up while training); 22(4) Zero straf the AF (why he does this with his valuable fighters is beyond me)
25th - 42 Oscars sweeps;

Perth -
22nd - 10 Zero with 28 Sally = 93c; (no AF attacks)
23rd - 14 Zero with 58 Sally = 153c; (no AF attacks)
Ground combat at Perth (49,147) on 23rd

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 54466 troops, 507 guns, 771 vehicles, Assault Value = 2008

Defending force 20507 troops, 330 guns, 219 vehicles, Assault Value = 475

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 990

Allied adjusted defense: 992

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
875 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 88 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 14 disabled
Guns lost 26 (2 destroyed, 24 disabled)
Vehicles lost 63 (5 destroyed, 58 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1548 casualties reported
Squads: 37 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 22 destroyed, 87 disabled
Engineers: 29 destroyed, 23 disabled
Guns lost 53 (42 destroyed, 11 disabled)
Vehicles lost 23 (3 destroyed, 20 disabled)

Assaulting units:
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
9th Infantry Regiment
Imperial Guards Division
20th Infantry Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
48th Division
1st Engineer Co
4th Guards Division
Guards Tank Division

Defending units:
Freemantle Fortress
3rd Australian Brigade
18th British Division
108th Anti Tank Regiment
III Australian
10th Avn Sup Afd
4th RAN Base Force
13th Australian Brigade
1st RAAF M/W Sqn
2/16th Field Regiment
7th RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment

Only a matter of time now.
24th - no attacks
25th - 31 Sally hit troops = 162c; 27 Sally = 139 c; forts back up to 1

Eastern Australia:
SE of Bourke -
22nd - 31 Sally & 54 Helen hit retreating troops = 234c; 62 Helen = 78c;
23rd - 31 Sally & 53 Helen hit by troops again = 184c; 26 Helen = 29c; 36 Helen = 203c;

Alice Springs - up to 18 Hudson continue to bomb the Recon unit one hex NE daily;

Broken Hill -
22nd - paras try a shock attack (2:49); OUCH! [:D]
23rd - 64 B-25 & B-26 from Adelaide hit hits paras;
24th - one of two paras is destroyed with attack of 125:1 [:)]
25th - the last of the paras is destroyed with a 76:1 attack [:D]

Newcastle - attacks here tell me he isn't interested in capture of the rest of southern Australia. If he was, he would not be destroying all this industry.
23rd - 27 Betty = Heavy Industry hits 21; 41 Betty = Heavy Industry hits 18; 36 Betty = Heavy Industry hits 25;
25th - 27 Betty = Light Industry hits 3; 35 Betty = Light Industry hits 5; 25 Helen = Manpower hits 4 & Fires 1056; 26 Helen = Manpower hits 6 & Fires 2640; 40 Oscars with 31 Sally & 27 Helen = Manpower hits 26 & Fires 12718; 36 Helen = Manpower hits 13 & Fires 13535;

3 west of Charleville on 24th - 186 Betty in 6 strikes give Newcastle a rest and hit my retreating troops from Cairns and Townsville;

South Pacific:[>:][>:]

Notes:
Southern Australia will see transports in four days at Melbourne. I will then have over 250 fighters here. I hope to be able to set a nice CAP/LRCAP around Sydney or Newcastle in over a week.

Fuel & Supply - Thankfully, massive amounts are in route from San Fran. 178k in Supply just to east of Vava'u; 168k in Supply 10 days from Aukland; 89k Fuel in slow AOs 3 days to east of Vava'u; 53k in Fuel 8 South of Christmas; 294k in Fuel 22 hexes south of San Fran (fast TKs & xAKs - 16 or 17 knot); slow TKs and xAKs loading Fuel at San Fran


Image
Attachments
42May26Tasmania.jpg
42May26Tasmania.jpg (187.25 KiB) Viewed 370 times
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

Got to LOVE Allied damage control.....[:D][&o][&o]

She went up slightly, but is close to safety (Nick has had very, very few subs operating off USA).

Image
Attachments
42May26BBPenn.jpg
42May26BBPenn.jpg (158.38 KiB) Viewed 370 times
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by 1EyedJacks »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Mike,

I'm the one getting the daily 'siege' runs against my troops. [;)]

Normally, I try to build up a base as close as possible to cut down on distance and op losses. When an air unit gets below 70 morale, I rest them.

I do this plus rotate. I'm not sure but rotating air groups seems to be better for my pilots. But I don't always have the ability to rotate.

lol - I caught that you were the allies - I was just tired and didn't frame the question right (I get kinda one-dimensional sometimes as I always play Japan <grin>).
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Australia Invaded!! NY59Giants (A) vs Olorin (J)

Post by ny59giants »

May 26, 27, 28,:
Newcastle industry hit again and fires still rage [:(]

Key: TT = Torpedo; bb = ground bombardment; c = casualties; b = base hits; s = supply hits; r = runway hits; p = port hits; AV = Assault Value; DC = Depth Charged; (*) = destroyed aircraft;

Subs:
S-36 @ Norfolk Island hits an AK with a TT, but later is hit with a DC.
S-45 @ Lord Howe Island get a TT into an AK.

CVs:
American CVs one day out of Melbourne with transports

India/Burma: [>:][>:]

China:
Yenan - up to 26 Sally hit AF daily;

Philippines:
Cebu - up to 12 Sally & 16 Helen hit AF daily;

Batavia: up to 13 Nell and 9 Lily hit AF daily

Western Australia:
Kalgoorlie - up to 38 Oscar sweep daily;

Perth -
26th - 9 Zero & 27 Sally = 14b, 3s, 41r; 27 Sally = 72c;
Ground combat at Perth (49,147) on 26th

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 54479 troops, 527 guns, 785 vehicles, Assault Value = 1967

Defending force 18654 troops, 292 guns, 219 vehicles, Assault Value = 432

Japanese adjusted assault: 839

Allied adjusted defense: 872

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1060 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 104 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled
Vehicles lost 11 (4 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2639 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 168 destroyed, 82 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 26 disabled
Guns lost 31 (14 destroyed, 17 disabled)
Vehicles lost 50 (33 destroyed, 17 disabled)

Assaulting units:
Imperial Guards Division
48th Division
7th Ind.Tank Brigade
2nd Tank Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
1st Engineer Co
20th Infantry Regiment
4th Guards Division
Guards Tank Division
8th RF Gun Battalion

Defending units:
3rd Australian Brigade
18th British Division
2/16th Field Regiment
III Australian
1st RAAF M/W Sqn
10th Avn Sup Afd
7th RAA Coastal Artillery Regiment
108th Anti Tank Regiment
13th Australian Brigade
4th RAN Base Force
Freemantle Fortress

Still holding, but everybody but the 18th UK Div taking more and more losses
27th - 9 Zero & 58 Sally = 9b, 8s, 43r;
28th - [>:][>:]

Eastern Australia:
Newcastle -
26th - 41(1) Betty = Heavy Industry hits 13 & Fires 2590; 27 Betty = Fires 2327; 15 Betty = Heavy Industry hits 6 & Fires 2226; 42 Oscars, 31 Sally, & 24 Helen = Manpower hits 14 & Fires 6158; 26 Helen = Manpower hits 4 & Fires 7368; 27 Helen = Manpower hits 4 & Fires 8578; 36 Helen = Manpower hits 11 & Fires 11603; 33 Betty;
27th - 34(1) Betty = Heavy Industry hits 4 & Fires 1687; 20 Betty = Heavy Industry hits 2 & Fires 1821; 36 Zeros; 42 Oscars with 31 Sally & 59 Helen = Manpower hits 81 &
Fires 22312; 25 Helen = Manpower hits 15 & Fires 30333; 27 Helen = Manpower hits 20 &
Fires 38649;
28th - 27 Zero & 52 Betty = Manpower hits 108 & Fires 20875; 27 Betty = Manpower hits 67 & Fires 28091; 25 Helen = Manpower hits 41 & Fires 31605; 31 Sally = Manpower hits 62 & Fires 41957; 42 Oscar & 27 Helen = Manpower hits 24 & Fires 64408; 35 Helen =
Manpower hits 51 & Fires 81980; 36 Betty = Manpower hits 65 & Fires 65464; 36 Zeros sweep;

South Pacific: [>:][>:]
Just moving supply and fuel forward

Notes:
BB Pennsylvania arrives at Alameda with damage @ 2-67(64)-11-0 and needs 204 days to repair.

The endless air attacks on my industry in Australia will soon be interrupted. [:D]
[center]Image[/center]
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”