If you want a general history of WWI then: The First World War, A Complete History - Martin Gilbert. This is a good introduction.
1914 Catastrophe - Max Hastings. This covers the war's first year. Very anti-British but a good read for the most part.
Castles of Steel - Robert K Massie. This is the dogs dangly bits of a book [&o][&o]
Thank you.
"A big butcher's bill is not necessarily evidence of good tactics"
- Wavell's reply to Churchill, after the latter complained about faint-heartedness, as he discovered that British casualties in the evacuation from Somaliland had been only 260 men.
I am reading Thunder at Twilight - Vienna 1913/1914 by Fredric Morton. While there are a couple of places I found myself reaching for the dictionary with the adjective choices, overall a very impressive immersion into a lost word of which I want to share this paragraph (opening of Chapter 12)
When thrust into a fresh expanse of future, the Viennese sought comfort in omens. They had a long established New Year's pastime. Into an ice bucket filled with cold champagne they would throw molten bits of lead, and then, with a pair of tongs, hold up each bit for interpretation. From the shape into which the lump congealed they would extract clues to thing to come. It was a game of fascinating ambiguities. Never had it been played more intensely than during the wee hours of that newest January first.
(note: January 1st, 1914)
A lot of social nuances, bits of gossip and the driving egos of major and mid-level players on this stage of histroy are all painted with a similar tone as the description above. Check it out.
The Commander's job is to orchestrate and direct the three major dimensions of combat - space, time and force. Shattered Sword, the Untold Story of the Battle of Midway
This custom, called Bleigiessen, is still around today.
Still haven't settled for a WW I book. I'll probably start with reading Sleepwalkers first, then go for books about the war. Max Hastings... I've read a couple books by him already. Let's see whether Catastrophe is as anti-British as warspite1 says. Remembering the other books I've read, Hastings likes to point fingers, sometimes justified, and more than sometimes unjustified. I just mention his views about the Australians in the Pacific War, Churchill's strategies and Montgomery. According to one review of Catastropheat Amazon, Hastings calls the assassination of Franz Ferdinand a "quirky little incident". Okay...
"A big butcher's bill is not necessarily evidence of good tactics"
- Wavell's reply to Churchill, after the latter complained about faint-heartedness, as he discovered that British casualties in the evacuation from Somaliland had been only 260 men.
Amongst other issues, the book really delves into how poorly Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie were treated, in life and in their death by the Royal Family. Another term I did not know before this "morganastic wife" And it seemed according to this narrative that Franz Joseph was almost relieved that Franz Ferdinand was assassinated - to somehow clear the stain of his willfull disregard of the old order.
A lot of interesting details I had not come across before. The overall drift of the work is what a sad tragic twist of fate, Franz Ferdinand being the main voice of peace with Serbia and for reform of the old order was murdered and used by forces from both sides determined to create the carnage that was sure to come.
For those who do not know a lot about the year and a half of troubles leading up to the ultimatum Austria-Hungry sent to Serbia (and why it was crafted and sent like it was), I recommend this book.
The Commander's job is to orchestrate and direct the three major dimensions of combat - space, time and force. Shattered Sword, the Untold Story of the Battle of Midway
Richard Overy's"Goering-Hitlers iron knight"not so much a biography as a synopsis of the german prewar and wartime economy.
As leader of the four year plans he exercised immense power and had his fingerprints on an extrodinary amount of elements of the reich.
This title sounds very interesting, Orm. Please let me know what you think about it.
I did enjoy reading Divide and Rule. The Partition of Africa, 1880-1914 by Henk Wesseling. But with that said I thought it lacked in describing the effects in Africa. The focus of the book was on the European powers and their treaties and diplomatic actions.
I was surprised that it was so few people involved in colonization (partition) of such a huge area. I was also dumbfounded by the fact that everyone knew that most treaties with the African rulers were not legal but every European nation treated them all as legal because if they begun to question the legality of another nations treaties then their own would be questioned. Such trickery as changing the wording when translating the treaty or worse seem to have been common when creating the colonies in Africa but this is not the focus of the book.
I preferred the book King Leopold's Ghost by Adam Hochschild that I read previously since it described, in depth, what happened in the colony but Divide and Rule provided a nice overview.
I did enjoy reading Divide and Rule. The Partition of Africa, 1880-1914 by Henk Wesseling. But with that said I thought it lacked in describing the effects in Africa. The focus of the book was on the European powers and their treaties and diplomatic actions.
I was surprised that it was so few people involved in colonization (partition) of such a huge area. I was also dumbfounded by the fact that everyone knew that most treaties with the African rulers were not legal but every European nation treated them all as legal because if they begun to question the legality of another nations treaties then their own would be questioned. Such trickery as changing the wording when translating the treaty or worse seem to have been common when creating the colonies in Africa but this is not the focus of the book.
I preferred the book King Leopold's Ghost by Adam Hochschild that I read previously since it described, in depth, what happened in the colony but Divide and Rule provided a nice overview.
Thank you, sounds like a title worth getting, just like another one, Scramble for Africa by Thomas Pakenham.
"A big butcher's bill is not necessarily evidence of good tactics"
- Wavell's reply to Churchill, after the latter complained about faint-heartedness, as he discovered that British casualties in the evacuation from Somaliland had been only 260 men.