Beaufighter Experiences?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Mistmatz »

I'm struggling with the short legs of most of my fighter planes in the middle of '43. Especially in Burma where my opponent has established a strong foothold just out of reach for most of my fighters. I'm hard pressed to gain any momentum without air superiority.

Hence I was thinking to activate my pool of Beaufighter VI's, and maybe even some old Mk I's, for sweeping enemy bases?

Range and armament wise they seem comparable to the P-38's, which I have used with good success in the sweeping capacity. But their lack of maneuverability, combined with the low max speed might be a death sentence fighting against contemporary Japanese fighters. Anybody who has used them in that capacity or can give advise on how to use them in the game?

If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

rockmedic109
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by rockmedic109 »

I've used them as fighter bombers in Ground Attack. Underwhelming. But I am probably using them wrong. I could try to lower the alt to 100' and go strafing but their target is Jungle and that just seems wrong.
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by CaptBeefheart »

They usually do daycap in rear areas or nightcap on the front lines for me. I would think they'd get shredded on sweeps, but who knows until it's tried?

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by jdsrae »

Not tried it but I assume it wouldn’t end well against the 1943 model enemy fighters
Perhaps try sweeping with P-38 and send the Beaufighters in same day on a 100ft airfield strike to try and destroy planes on the ground?
Do you know what AA they have at the airbase?
If against a human, don’t try it two days in a row in case they react.
Historically they had success in anti-barge and small ship attacks

This link also has some details of daylight raids on enemy airfields in New Guinea:
http://www.adf-serials.com.au/2a19.htm
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42118
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by warspite1 »

Ahh the Whispering Death - alongside the Avenger, probably the most beautiful of the Allied aircraft in WWII

Image
Attachments
1434593136759.jpg
1434593136759.jpg (100.16 KiB) Viewed 837 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5445
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Yaab »

I tested Beaufighters on Gnd Attack at 1000 feet. Due to their 38 durability, they can survive 7.7mm AAMG fire, and never get destroyed by it outright, only damaged. As fighter-bombers they don't get penalties to bombload/morale/fatigue when flaying at 100-1000 feet so you can use them non-stop until they get stand down for maintenance. They would be good for harassing moving LCUs which only have 7.7mm AAMGs for cover. Plus, the Beau pools are shallow, so use them sparingly.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12425
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Sardaukar »

Historically they were really deadly against Japanese barges.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

I have used them as escorts,

Allies has plenty of bombers but a deficit in long ranged fighters
GetAssista
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: Mistmatz
But their lack of maneuverability, combined with the low max speed might be a death sentence fighting against contemporary Japanese fighters. Anybody who has used them in that capacity or can give advise on how to use them in the game?
They suck as sweepers in a PBEM, and you named the main reasons. They are pretty good as fighter-bombers but unfortunately there are not that many roles in the game for Allied fighter-bombers. So for me, it is mostly rear CAP and training duties.
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by spence »

They suck as sweepers in a PBEM

+1
User avatar
Anachro
Posts: 2506
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:51 pm
Location: The Coastal Elite

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Anachro »

They do not do well in the air; use them for ground attack or, only if you really need to, as long-range escorts.
"Now excuse me while I go polish my balls ..." - BBfanboy
Big B
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Big B »

FWIW:
Beaufighters are not to be thought of as fighters - they are your premier anti-shipping attack aircraft.

If you train your squadrons for Naval Attack altitude 100 feet, and they become proficient to the 65% range in this attack - they will obliterate any ships short of heavy cruisers(though still a horrible danger to them) and battleships.
Even for aircraft carriers they are bad news, destroyers are easy meat for them, and merchant shipping doesn't stand a chance.
The key of use is top cover from good fighters when necessary, and training.

B
User avatar
Anachro
Posts: 2506
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:51 pm
Location: The Coastal Elite

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by Anachro »

Big B is right, I do use them in strafing naval attack role if opportunity presents itself. Very effective.
"Now excuse me while I go polish my balls ..." - BBfanboy
oaltinyay
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:52 pm

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by oaltinyay »

Train their crews in Low level bombing and strafind and set them on Naval attack missions at 1000 ft or 100. They will shred any Japanese convoy. Any target below a CA is fair game for them. They need to be escorted if there is a some CAP. But use them sparingly since you wont get a lot of them.

For your situation, ( and I maybe in the same spot with you there ) , here is what I did...

1. Magwe is a nice location. Place a decent support unit and fly in P38s or P40Ks and keep it supplied. They may not get a lot of kills but they will disrupt those Lily's.

2. Build Chittagong to level 6 higher...
3. Base any and every 2E+ LB to that base and start bombing. Your 4E engines such as Wellington and Lib can hit as far as Rangoon and any Japanese LCU caught in the open will be bombed to 0+.
3. Keep changing the "target of the day" randomly to keep him off balance.
4. If you know where his main AF is, then you can work on that if you have around 40 4Es and fly over 10K, you will take losses but there is no way Japanese airframes can keep a high level of ops.

User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7450
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: Anachro

Big B is right, I do use them in strafing naval attack role if opportunity presents itself. Very effective.


By '45 you can get the crews high enough in experience to turn them into night strafers.

Of course by late '45 all that's left to strafe are MTBs and SCs. [:D]
Hans

User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Ahh the Whispering Death - alongside the Avenger, probably the most beautiful of the Allied aircraft in WWII

Image
Nooooo, not beautiful, but a very effective fighter bomber, even efficient as a defending fighter against poorly escorted bombers.

Beautiful is the Westland Whirlwind.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by JeffroK »

Attachments
PC4TheWe..hirlwind.jpg
PC4TheWe..hirlwind.jpg (76.42 KiB) Viewed 837 times
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
apbarog
Posts: 3821
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 6:54 am

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by apbarog »

In the morning:

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Ic x 13

Allied aircraft losses
Beaufighter Ic: 1 damaged
Beaufighter Ic: 1 destroyed by flak

Japanese Ships
APD Numakaze, Bomb hits 1, on fire
APD Nokaze, Bomb hits 7, and is sunk
DD Maikaze, Shell hits 4

Japanese ground losses:
487 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 44 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 22 (8 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
12 x Beaufighter Ic bombing from 100 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb


and in the afternoon

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Ic x 11

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
DD Nowaki, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CL Naka, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Maikaze, Shell hits 5, Bomb hits 1, on fire

Japanese ground losses:
308 casualties reported
Squads: 14 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 7 (2 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x Beaufighter Ic bombing from 100 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb


I've learned to love the Beaufighters. Especially in a PDU OFF game.
bradfordkay
Posts: 8579
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by bradfordkay »

ORIGINAL: JeffroK

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Ahh the Whispering Death - alongside the Avenger, probably the most beautiful of the Allied aircraft in WWII

Image
Nooooo, not beautiful, but a very effective fighter bomber, even efficient as a defending fighter against poorly escorted bombers.

Beautiful is the Westland Whirlwind.

In an AI game I have an RAAF squadron of Beaufighter 1C aircraft that has 67 kills, mostly Betties but quite a few A6M2 Zeros as well. Nine of their Beaufighters have gone down in the defense of northern Australia, but only 1 pilot has been killed with three wounded. I believe that it helps that the Zeroes were at the end of their range.
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Beaufighter Experiences?

Post by JeffroK »

I wasnt going to mention it, its only against the AI, but my Beaus' defend Darwin and I have 3 aces with 30+ kills, mostly bombers.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”