Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

After Action Reports
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

Turn 7
Well, this is interesting. Ben goes hard to breakout from the Huntsville Crossing. This is now going to develop into an all-out fight. Not super concerned however because my rail capacity just jumped to 24,000. From now on, until I run out of excess units, I reinforce faster then Ben does.

[Edit: I will learn that I’m not correct in the faster reinforcements. Equal at best due to the fact that Axis units are significantly lighter than Allied units]

All that turns out not to matter however as my counterattack drives Ben’s Panzergrenadiers all the way back to the Huntsville crossing.

Ben lands an Italian Airbourne Division at Quebec which reminds me that the choke point laden north flank is very vulnerable to being cut off by airbourne operations. Not a big deal if you can smash the paratroopers immediately when they land and a disaster if you can’t. I rail in a Commonwealth Armoured Division and stick it is deep reserve here. Move up an American one as well. I’ll want a couple more.

In the West it looks like Ben is heading east to secure the Mississippi crossings or maybe to advance north through the rougher terrain?

Atlanta: 65%
Dallas: 59%
Allied defenses in the West. Primarily Infantry with an Armoured Division, Cavalry Division and their very own Engineer.
Allied defenses in the West. Primarily Infantry with an Armoured Division, Cavalry Division and their very own Engineer.
Fall Grau JB 07.jpg (870.44 KiB) Viewed 972 times
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Turn 8:
Jeremy shoved me back from Huntsville, doing some damage to my panzergrenadiers. What I'd like to do is drop my two airborne divisions behind him here to put him in the trap, but with no "observed" hexes in the Allied rear this would be extremely hazardous: I don't know which locations are blocked by more American units. I take a punt on a hex which has no reason to contain any Allied units, and this pays off. It also reveals an empty hex adjacent where I can add a second division. I then try to get around both Allied flanks to cut supply to this force (last turn's two armoured divisions plus two infantry and four HQs), but there's another armoured division at Decatur which I'll have to see if I can dislodge. As we're having a nice big battle here, I deliver two panzer divisions to this front this turn, plus more engineers.

Texas is as planned: my mechanised force lunges off towards Little Rock, Arkansas, SS Das Reich moving to within two hexes of the city. My problem here will be that my engineers are too far in the rear: still at Texarkana and may not be able to get onto the river to support until turn 10. With Jeremy having destroyed his own bridges at Muskogee, it will be difficult for him to move his reserve from Oklahoma over to the east. To my satisfaction, the Italians capture San Antonio with a minimum of fuss.

I reach Maine and find the Allied line runs all the way to Portland, precluding a quicker landing here unless I fight for the anchorage hex. Instead, I remove one of the three divisions I have over here and send it back to the St. Lawrence. Jeremy has five divisions here that I know about and probably several others, tied down blocking an offensive I'm not making. Meanwhile, I throw 1. Panzer over the Ottawa into the more or less unprotected rear of the Allied position at Montreal. With all his bridges blown here his main body may be unsupplied; I also put my infantry over the river closer to the city to make the situation even more difficult. I land three Italian divisions here this turn for a potential assault on Montreal, plus a panzergrenadier division to increase the pressure on its west flank.

My attacks at Huntsville and Decatur come off as planned, and the whole Allied force here (including most of the 3rd armoured division from Decatur) go out of supply, and I also link up with my own paratroops. The trap is quite loose, so I expect all or almost all of it to be broken out, and I also expect my own panzergrenadier divisions at Decatur to be hit pretty bad in return, but I think the Allies are coming off the worse for this, and next turn my infantry is going to be up to provide relief to the now-battered panzergrenadiers- and behind them are the panzers. The key thing I suppose is if Jeremy is putting all his energy into fighting this battle instead of building the next defensive line further back. In principle, I'm ahead of schedule here. Allied strength peaks around turn 15, so that would be a bad time to be trying to break into southern Illinois- better more like turns 20-25.

The developing Battle of Huntsville
FG8.png
FG8.png (1.31 MiB) Viewed 939 times
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

Turn 8
Oh crap. Just when I think things are going along really well Ben sends both the south front around Huntsville into a total crisis with an airbourne landing followed by vigorous attacks and the area near Montreal gets cut off by a flanking river crossing to the west.

In Montreal I give up on the city falling back across The St. Lawrence while counter attacking near Ottawa. I am sending reinforcements here but am reminded that the Commonwealth, early on, is very armour heavy. Not actually what I am looking for in this battle, but I will have to make do.

Huntsville is counter attacks to try and drive the Airbourne off. I am also able to cut off some of Ben’s Panzergrenadiers in this fight but the line is a patchy mess and bad things could be happening next turn. Ben is also pushing up to the Appalachians in several areas which is revealing that I don’t have full lines here. That was fine when I had an ample reserve of Armour in the area to counterattack but now everything is stuck in at Huntsville.

Ben finally presents me with a morsel in the west. A Colombian Division dies as I jump on it and leave.

All and all things are not exactly going according to plan. Ben just removed the Entrenchment from a large part of my northern flank, and I am now going to be stuck trying to fight my way backward in more of a stand-up fight. The story is essentially the same around Huntsville.

Axis Loss Rate = 14 / Allied Loss Rate =38 / Spread = 24
Canadian and Commonwealth forces retreat from Montreal as it is outflanked
Canadian and Commonwealth forces retreat from Montreal as it is outflanked
Fall Grau JB 08.jpg (2.54 MiB) Viewed 911 times
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
StuccoFresco
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Italy

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by StuccoFresco »

The Duluth Move can indeed punch a big hole in the American lines. What's the strength of the cut-off units?
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Turn 9:
Well I get a good going over from Allied armour around Huntsville and as expected two of my divisions are out of supply but nothing's actually dead and now I'm very much over the river here. Actually this turn I'm outgunned by the Allies as there are three fresh armoured divisions here this turn in addition to the three battered ones, as well as plenty of infantry and artillery, but I have a huge chunk of infantry coming up at the limit of its move which will either dig in on the line or be ready to fight from the start of next turn. My panzers are also coming up, and I add another division this turn

My shoestring offensive into Virginia (I have about four divisions here, all infantry) is also going well. Jeremy only has a screen on the southern border of the state, and I'm able to brush enough of it aside to threaten cutting off one division- in fact this is achieved with another bridge strike in the unit's rear.

Over in the west, I find the Arkansas crossings lightly held by newly formed infantry: two will be assaulted this turn but the blown bridges don't carry supply so I'm wary of busting over these right now, with my engineers not quite able to get onto the river this turn. Both defenders fold instantly and I decide, to hell with it, I'm crossing over. There's a lot of hexes between the Arkansas and the Missouri and Jeremy has to, first, realise my supply is vulnerable and, second, block them properly if he wants to put these guys out of supply completely. I'll take that bet- and it puts 2. Panzer adjacent to Memphis. This ought to give Jeremy a fit as I'm absolutely not supposed to be in this part of the map at this point in the scenario, but it's not actually on my hit list: the real point is to get the bridge just east of Poplar Bluff. I'm sure Jeremy will spoil the party but I am within one turn's drive of this location. I don't see his western reserve: I wonder if it's still at Oklahoma City?

To my somewhat surprise, Jeremy abandoned Montreal. I think he's pretty proud of locking me out of the northeast and to be fair I now have a challenge as to how I keep this great big Allied army from melting away off to the real battlegrounds in the south: he'll have a division fortified in every hex in rough terrain behind rivers. There MIGHT be a weakspot east of Montreal, which I hit this turn with my infantry- getting through the first couple of hexes it does look like there's an opportunity here and I'll keep pressing, while in the meantime I start work clearing Montreal. By the end of the turn, I see fresh air in the Allied rear. Should I be looking at an airdrop here next turn...?

Jeremy's inspired me: I figured out a use for Japanese aircraft (which arrived a couple of turns ago) before I'm ready to land the Japanese armies (which won't be for a very long time): bombing rail bridges. Just one rail bridge approaches Vancouver from the east, and only three approach Seattle from the southeast. Knock out all four and 1) this sector drops to low supply and 2) the Allies can't rail troops directly to the beaches. Apart from anything else, this ought to put the wind up Jeremy and make him consider moving engineers or fighters over here. I managed to get all of them in a single turn. I have the vague idea that this isn't really how the scenario is supposed to go, though, so I suggest to Jeremy that I can quit it if he wants.

A nice bloody turn in Tennessee. Multiple rounds of combat in open terrain and most of Jeremy's units are trash (though he still has good armour over in Alabama). 12th Armored actually evaporates in the line of combat, and this unit was unsupplied so all those tanks are gone. He's going to have to fall back here or I'm really going to tear him up next turn, and in any case he'll need the remains of this force to hold the Ohio- certainly he can't withdraw troops from the northeast, not yet. Six industrial cities down puts Allied replacements at 53%; Allied replacements increase next turn but I'm likely to get Montreal which makes 72%. He ought to sit on that level for a while as it will take me a few turns to capitalise on Birmingham, Mobile, New Orleans and Norfolk: those four by turn 19 make 47% then 71% again on turn 20. This is just as well as the Allied loss penalty remains fairly low at 52.

Unopposed panzertruppen lunge for the Mississippi crossings
FG9.png
FG9.png (1.45 MiB) Viewed 884 times
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

StuccoFresco wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 10:38 am The Duluth Move can indeed punch a big hole in the American lines. What's the strength of the cut-off units?
Err - not sure what you are saying here? Duluth is an American city on the eastern tip of Lake Superior. It is darn rare that it is a big part of the match. I must be missing something here?

Because this is week long turns cut off units can be in real trouble very quickly. TOAW treats them as having been cut off for 7 days.
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

Turn 9
OK no true insane crisis just serious aggression north of Huntsville and against the British which, to be fair could have gone poorly, he cleared the road south just as he ran out of turn.

Ben’s also pushing up to me around Birmingham. I elect to stay though the defense is little more than Armoured Brigades as I don’t have other forces in the area.

The odd thing Ben does is he charges his more mobile units in the West toward the east east – he has a Panzer Division up by Memphis. I look at the map for a few minutes and decide that its time my Western armies got stuck in. I’d love to have a fight with him between Memphis and Little Rock.

OK that seemed to go well. I caught the German 1st Calvary Division in the West and destroyed it. Meanwhile near Huntsville I cut off a Panzer Division and reduced it to a single regiment.

On the downside the Huntsville line is kind of patchy and I can expect Ben to go nuts on it on his turn.

How long again until I get 36,000 rail transport?

San Antonio: 53%
Both Allied Western and Eastern Armies.
Both Allied Western and Eastern Armies.
Fall Grau JB 09.jpg (986.92 KiB) Viewed 871 times
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Turn 10:
Another furious response from Jeremy around Huntsville: 3. Panzer is cut off an almost annihilated, while a number of my other units get a fair going over too. Thing is I think it suits me to keep battering away here so I'm content with it. The main problem here is my lack of supply, so I start work on assaulting Birmingham this turn [Allied industrial cities inland generate a temporary supply point for the Axis when captured].

Incredibly, there's no sign of the Allies in the west [OK evidently I missed Jeremy eating the German cavalry division]. As such, I drop SS Das Reich into southern Illinois. Wow- this is not what I was expecting. For the time being, at least, I'm very thin on the ground here, with just my six mechanised divisions over the Arkansas River, but apart from odd scraps I only run into one Allied division and I'm able to block all the roads heading west. At some point, Jeremy's attention will shift from Huntsville to here and then I had better be ready. Getting forces up is slow and painful but the rail is moving forward quickly so that improves things a bit, although I'm vaguely worried Jeremy will raid it and mess up my rail engineers- I move the Italians from San Antonio in this direction plus a Colombian division.

In the northeast, I'm over the New York state line, and Jeremy has brought up his armoured reserve to plug the gap here. These units are fresh and formidable but I'll work through a weak hex on their flank and see if I can hit them to any effect later in the turn. This does effectively come off and I'm able to rout one of these two divisions, but my own force is looking rather worse for wear: this can only be a demonstration to keep Jeremy here another ten turns as I can't afford to divert troops here now.

My bridge attacks in Washington produced a happy result: Jeremy diverted six fighter units to Washington state. This ought to really give the Luftwaffe a bit of a break: I immediately make an airfield attack on one stack, though the results aren't super favourable so I lay off this for now.

Touch and go- but the battle of Huntsville looks to still be good for me. I cut off and destroy a very battered armoured division and put the best troops at the centre of the Allied line out of supply. However if Jeremy has fresh troops on the rail (and there's no reason why he wouldn't) then I can expect to take another battering on the Allied turn. I also give the armour south of the Tennessee river a going over. I think if Jeremy's still in place here next turn he'll be extremely vulnerable to being pushed back against the western side of the river bend here, and I have one airborne division in hand which I could drop on one of the two bridges along this stretch. Really, though, I expect a significant retrenchment on the Allied turn: two armoured divisions will come out of Alabama and swing north either to Memphis or Nashville, while the western half of the main line here is extricated as much as possible (most of these units are very battered and quite tangled up with my troops). I have eight more divisions on their way up the road here but they need time to get into place so I'm hoping this comes to pass.

Of course, it's worth noting that SS Das Reich is pretty much in the full rear of the Allied army of Tennessee now. What will Jeremy do about it? Will he set about demolishing more of his own bridges and make his position even more difficult?

Overextended German troops struggle to maintain offensive momentum as both sides pour reinforcements into central Tennessee.
FG10.png
FG10.png (1.17 MiB) Viewed 865 times
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
PaxAmericana
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 2:28 am

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by PaxAmericana »

Fascinating AAR, will be following this. I've wanted to play this scenerio myself but I'm a bit shit at this game so I've never had the balls to tackle it.
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

PaxAmericana wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 12:46 am Fascinating AAR, will be following this. I've wanted to play this scenerio myself but I'm a bit shit at this game so I've never had the balls to tackle it.
You might be able to get one of the newer players to play it - maybe. Thing is the scenario is big but not nearly as big or complex as many scenarios and it is somewhat simpler in execution. Infantry Division, Cavalry Division, Armoured Division - You are not trying to figure out how to most effectively deploy your AT guns and 88's because the scale does not include that. In some ways it is a pretty good scenario for getting a grasp on the basics.
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

Turn 10
The loss rating is jumping up for both of us currently. I am not super happy with the way I am just sort of stuck in with Ben on a significant part of the front but some of these fronts just can’t be abandoned. Really just a retreat Ottawa area back down the Niagara Peninsula which I begin arranging this turn by ordering a unit to start digging in back there. This is just for the forces north of the St. Lawrence. I can’t see me making a retreat out of the area south of the St. Lawrence unless I am seriously defeated because the terrain here is so good for the defense. Otherwise, this turn I decide that there does not appear to be any real prospect of Ben attacking the fortified line between Portland and Lake Champlain and I start breaking many of the Divisions here down into brigades and trying to quickly dig them in with Engineers to free up more Divisions.

I also noticed Ben beginning to send some units west out of Quebec, either a grand flanking maneuver or an eventual threat to Sault St. Marie – could be both.

Meanwhile the ignored north flank near Norfolk is no longer so ignored. Still fairly small amounts of units trying to cut each other off here but things are now clearly mobile. I continue to defend Norfolk this turn but if Ben makes a serious drive forward, I’ll probably have to abandon it. It is too easily cut off.

Fighting around Huntsville remains a mess. I’m counter attacking hard because the integrity of my line is poor and counter attacks can mask that somewhat. Reinforcements are arriving in a constant stream, So I have some hope of getting this front back together again.

In the south I rebuild the line with Tank Brigades and dig them in only to conclude that it was probably a mistake to stay here this turn. The flank is too exposed, the units too weak. If I am still around next turn it will be time to fall back toward Memphis.

The West is weird. Ben continues to race northeast with scattered mobile divisions. Strategically I am assuming he is trying to get behind the Huntsville front? That is all that makes sense here. It is not super clear; my Western Army continues to pick off individual Infantry Divisions this turn and here I bag two German Infantry Divisions. I am really wondering what Ben has going that makes the continued sacrifice of his divisions worthwhile?

Allied Production Boost: 80%
Allied view of the Strategic Situation on Turn 10.
Allied view of the Strategic Situation on Turn 10.
Fall Grau Turn 10 Overview.jpg (2.21 MiB) Viewed 834 times
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Jeremy Mac Donald wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 1:02 am You might be able to get one of the newer players to play it - maybe. Thing is the scenario is big but not nearly as big or complex as many scenarios and it is somewhat simpler in execution. Infantry Division, Cavalry Division, Armoured Division - You are not trying to figure out how to most effectively deploy your AT guns and 88's because the scale does not include that. In some ways it is a pretty good scenario for getting a grasp on the basics.
The caveat to that is that if you go west you are always operating in the wide open. It's a lot easier to learn the game in dense scenarios where you have continuous lines. That happens here in the east but in the west it starts to feel almost like the 18th century where you're concentrating your force in one or two large masses while calculating how broad a base you need to launch your operation without a risk that your opponent will cut your supply line.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Turn 11:
Not too bad: Jeremy counterattack again in Tennessee but this wasn't super devastating. He's too strong here still for me to risk a small airdrop in his rear, so I continue the running battle here while working on Birmingham to improve my supply situation. More and more infantry is on the way up but it's painfully slow going from Savannah to here: soon, I hope to open up the anchorage near Mobile which is actually a bit closer.

In the west, as I expected Jeremy is trying to infiltrate units into my long western flank. I can block these with the infantry I have coming up, but this stops me from adequately reinforcing further north. Most of what I have in Missouri is occupied with cutting off and destroying the lead Allied brigades here, but I still have two divisions available to push into Illinois, where just one Allied brigade is blocking me and should be easily shoved aside, giving me a bit of freedom to run amok in the rear of Jeremy's army of Tennessee. Annoyingly, this guy actually holds out two rounds before evaporating so I'm not able to interfere with the bridges over the lower Tennessee just yet.

The northeast is moribund. I note that Jeremy has already started thinning out his line across the top of New England and so as a diversion this operation hasn't really worked. I have one more trick up my sleeve here, with mountain and mobile troops moving southwest towards the upper Ottawa, where next turn I may drop two airborne divisions in the rear of the Allied position here and force my way through to Niagara, but this isn't going to be a war winner. As I rearrange my infantry on the other bank of the St. Lawrence, I discover the Allies are furiously entrenching here, too. I pull everything back either to resupply or to try this scheme to get west. I'd be tempted to hit Jeremy where he's just started reducing the strength of his position to discourage him, but I have no intention of fighting my way through the difficult country of Vermont hex by hex.

A somewhat uncomfortable turn. I don't feel like I'm getting anywhere fast in terms of destroying the Allied armies, but I may at last have them in a very difficult situation in Tennessee, which is beginning to feel like a salient between my forces around Huntsville and those in southern Illinois. I also now have the supply point at Birmingham, and may imminently be putting a ring around the two armoured divisions and change he still has in Alabama. It'll be interesting to see if he clings on or bugs out.

SS Das Reich enters Illinois, but the strength of Axis spearhead so far forward is too attenuated to be decisive
FG11.png
FG11.png (1.98 MiB) Viewed 815 times
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Jeremy Mac Donald wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 1:29 am The West is weird. Ben continues to race northeast with scattered mobile divisions. Strategically I am assuming he is trying to get behind the Huntsville front? That is all that makes sense here. It is not super clear; my Western Army continues to pick off individual Infantry Divisions this turn and here I bag two German Infantry Divisions. I am really wondering what Ben has going that makes the continued sacrifice of his divisions worthwhile?
A couple of things are going on here:
1) as per my outline strategy I'm hyper focused on getting into position in Southern Illinois and then using that position to open a decisive battle in the space between there and Cleveland. I also have visions of seizing all the bridges on the upper Tennessee suddenly and putting a chunk of your force into a trap south of here.
2) I'm consistently underestimating both your strength and your appetite for a major battle south of the Arkansas. It's not really until a few turns later that I realise that you're a) stronger than me here and b) prepared to make a major battle of it. Until then I'm just trying to shove everything NNE so that I can keep the road from Texarkana to Poplar Bluff open
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

golden delicious wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 2:49 pm
Jeremy Mac Donald wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 1:29 am The West is weird. Ben continues to race northeast with scattered mobile divisions. Strategically I am assuming he is trying to get behind the Huntsville front? That is all that makes sense here. It is not super clear; my Western Army continues to pick off individual Infantry Divisions this turn and here I bag two German Infantry Divisions. I am really wondering what Ben has going that makes the continued sacrifice of his divisions worthwhile?
A couple of things are going on here:
1) as per my outline strategy I'm hyper focused on getting into position in Southern Illinois and then using that position to open a decisive battle in the space between there and Cleveland. I also have visions of seizing all the bridges on the upper Tennessee suddenly and putting a chunk of your force into a trap south of here.
2) I'm consistently underestimating both your strength and your appetite for a major battle south of the Arkansas. It's not really until a few turns later that I realise that you're a) stronger than me here and b) prepared to make a major battle of it. Until then I'm just trying to shove everything NNE so that I can keep the road from Texarkana to Poplar Bluff open
Yes well I probably should not have been fighting south of the Arkansas...
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

Turn 11
Interesting developments abound on this turn. I get my 32,000 rail transport which I think is going to be pretty critical. The fighting is not going to be slowing down in this match. Well except maybe up around Montreal. Here Ben pulls back this turn. Not sure his plan up here but I certainly think it has become his lowest priority front. He sends no reinforcements here and the attacks on the Allied front line cease.

Now to be sure the Allied frontline here along most of it makes little sense to attack. The terrain is great for the defense and it is miles to anywhere. Ben has airbourne here so there is a solid chance he will go for a flank attack and then maybe try an airbourne attack to cut off my counter attack.

North Carolina/Virginia see’s Ben pushing to cut off Norfolk while I kill An Axis unit on the western part of this line and cut off a couple of other Brigades. Bit of a swirling battle with a low unit count on both sides. I do want to find maybe a unit or two to hold Norfolk as Ben is not trying that hard to take it.

Fighting near Huntsville continues this turn I think this story is coming to a close.

The real story is that we going to see a serious fight on both sides of the Mississippi from Paducah all the way south to maybe Greenville. Ben will swing his forces coming from the east and try and advance north between the Tennessee River and Memphis linking up with the forces he has already stabbed forward with on a line Texarkana – Little Rock – Paducah. If Ben can hold this, and especially if he can break out north of Paducah I am going to be in a world of hurt.

All that said I have a reasonable amount of confidence in the battle that is about to take place as my high transport rate should allow me to feed in large numbers of forces for this conflict.

I abandon Birmingham, which has fallen in any case. Some units don’t manage to get out which is unfortunate but it is not to bad so far as retreats go.

Montreal: 72%
The Fighting in the south
The Fighting in the south
Fall Grau JB 11.jpg (2.51 MiB) Viewed 790 times
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Jeremy Mac Donald wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:05 am Yes well I probably should not have been fighting south of the Arkansas...
I don't know about that. We're getting ahead of ourselves in the AAR but I think when the Allied player sees an opportunity he should dive right in- but then dive right out again immediately before the cavalry arrives.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by golden delicious »

Turn 12:
Not too bad- I was worried SS Das Reich and 2. Panzer over in Illinois would be gone, but they're merely marked by modest Allied forces. What did happen is that the Allied western reserve showed up in western Arkansas, pouncing on a couple of my infantry divisions. Looks like Jeremy has at least six divisions here, but he's in a bit of an awkward spot, with no road behind him, trapped between the Arkansas river and my own infantry. As such, I throw everything forward to try to put him in a trap, while at the same time the Italians move on Oklahoma City, now far behind. The Herman Goering division cuts the only Allied rail line here, and I'll see if some heroics can put the whole force out of supply. The big challenge is that he has a load of engineers here which could give him a back door over the Arkansas, so I also shift some of my mechanised troops in Missouri back down to fall in their rear. This means sitting on the defensive in Illinois but I'm feeling rather vulnerable there anyway- multiple Allied divisions are arriving here by rail. Of course for me defending can also mean attacking, so I push two brigades north, put 3rd Armored (the only Allied division actually on the line) out of supply and form something of a defensive position facing north. There's a hole in this line but I hope to plug it later once 2. Panzer is done with some engineers.

Tennessee is relatively calm but there are some vulnerable Allied hexes here which I can hit to try to create a breach and stop anything being withdrawn from here while keeping in mind the potential for the linkup in Illinois. In Alabama, the Allies are gone- or more or less. I catch three brigades on their way out, one of which may escape but the others not. Jeremy is making a bit of an effort to fight a mobile defence in Virginia but this front for me is winding down as I'm at the gates of Norfolk, and so bring in a corps of Italians to assault the city directly.

In Canada, I go ahead with my plan, positioning mountain troops to cross the upper Ottawa while the regular infantry blasts through. I'm not sure how much the former was necessary as I get through pretty easily. Anyway this ought to provoke a reaction from Jeremy, as he now needs a serious force to stop me moving into Niagara. I do still have two airborne divisions available here which I can consider committing next turn.

I feel like I've really failed to kill a lot of Allied units so far this match. If Jeremy doubles down instead of bugging out of Arkansas, then that could be about to change. Even if he does get out, I'm on track to exceed my turn 20 objectives. If I clear the south and bag Norfolk that's 12, which makes only 64% replacements on turn 20. Possibles are then Oklahoma City and Toronto for 51%. That's without breaking into the US heartlands: Jeremy may try to force me out of my bridgehead here in the next several turns, if this fails I'm quite well placed to execute my main strategy here.

A complicated situation in the centre as the Allies withdraw from the threat of being cut off by Axis troops in Illinois- but these troops are too weak to accomplish the task
FG12.png
FG12.png (1.91 MiB) Viewed 775 times
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Jeremy Mac Donald
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by Jeremy Mac Donald »

Turn 12
Well Ben is not giving up anywhere and I am definitely seeing his general strategy of trying to threaten the Allies in as many places as possible hoping the Allied Player drops the ball. I am dropping balls but overall things don’t seem to be spiraling out of control.

I think, in general, Ben simply is not as strong as all these threats are implying and I’ve, so far, been able to capitalize on that roughly as often as I think Ben has been able to catch me out.

I will say that lots of reinforcements and a high transport rating is allowing me to rectify a lot of sins at this stage in the game and the fact that Ben for a very low sea transport means he really can’t have all that much to pressure me with.

He makes a move near Ottawa this turn with a Panzergrenadier Division trying to flank and pushes hard to shove a Fortified Infantry Division back, but I have a large Armoured reserve in this area and catch and destroy the Panzergrenadier Division before plugging the line though my counter attack to restabilize the line does not succeed. Here again Ben does not reinforce at all.

I am stripping out parts of the line here among the American forces and they will be sent to the fighting in the south.
The Carolina/Virginia front see’s Ben sending some Italians to help with clearing the area around Norfolk and Ben stabilizes the western part of the line. I shut my drive down there as well because I want reinforcements in the fighting around Norfolk and the easiest place to get them is from shutting this part of the line down.

So my call on what was happening around Huntsville is totally wrong. Ben pushes hard against my line here but in pushing forward opens things up so that I manage to surround and destroy another of his Panzer Divisions. Things are a bit mobile here again but not to concerning. Ben also does not swing around for an attack between the Tennessee and the Mississippi as I had expected. He is just cleaning up my units that got left behind. He will finish with that shortly however.

The fighting in the West is very concerning. I’m supposed to be threatening Ben’s line of communication but he turns the tables on me and my Western Army is now being threatened by being cut off by a threat to my western rear. Instead of me pinning him to the Mississippi he is threatening to pin me against the Arkansas and maybe even cut me off.

We can very much see that this is developing into the main fight at this stage of the match with Ben pouring in the lions share of his reinforcements here. Despite the setbacks my plan remains the same – try and keep things from falling apart along this line while trying to pin Ben to the Mississippi. I still think that is very much a possibility at this point in the match as loads of Allied reinforcements pour into the area – though I am now increasingly feeling like I am on a clock to make hay here before I really run out of reinforcements and the balance of power starts shifting back in Ben’s favour.

Birmingham: 65%

Axis Loss Rate = 33 / Allied Loss Rate =49 / Spread = 16
The fighting continues to heat up as Axis and Allied forces start to heavily engage west of the Mississippi.
The fighting continues to heat up as Axis and Allied forces start to heavily engage west of the Mississippi.
Fall Grau JB 12.jpg (3.24 MiB) Viewed 759 times
Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"
StuccoFresco
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Italy

Re: Fall Grau 2.27 Ben (Axis) versus Jeremy

Post by StuccoFresco »

Jeremy Mac Donald wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 6:56 am
StuccoFresco wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 10:38 am The Duluth Move can indeed punch a big hole in the American lines. What's the strength of the cut-off units?
Err - not sure what you are saying here? Duluth is an American city on the eastern tip of Lake Superior. It is darn rare that it is a big part of the match. I must be missing something here?

Because this is week long turns cut off units can be in real trouble very quickly. TOAW treats them as having been cut off for 7 days.
I meant Decatur, not Duluth, my mistake.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”