Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Fury Games has now signed with Matrix Games, and we are working together on the next Strategic Command. Will use the Slitherine PBEM++ server for asynchronous multi-player.

Moderators: MOD_Strategic_Command_3, Fury Software

User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6520
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by BillRunacre »

Thanks Duedman, this is very strange but I will get these things fixed.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
Duedman
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by Duedman »

Oh and while we are at it.... I (Allies) grabbed Ireland after US was in. Don't know why that never occured to me before. Lots of MPP and nearly no defense.
Got me a whole lot of funny complaints like from long dead France :D
Duedman
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by Duedman »

A few more things:
Russian Special forces also do get lvl3 guns
Turkey still has the Western style units (infantry gets lvl3 guns too. Did not check whether that makes them more powerful than usual Russian Inf.)

Capturing Oslo does not seem to drop Axis morale (is there a table of the NM Values of Cities like there is in ACW?)
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6520
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by BillRunacre »

There is a script for Oslo but it might be that it needs to be duplicated in order to apply to every situation in which Norway can fall to the Axis.

As to Turkey, as a Minor of the USSR they can upgrade to level 3 and this will make them pretty good. There's no real solution to this, but at least they do not have too many units and upgrading is expensive.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
Duedman
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by Duedman »

Next! :P

Submarines do not loose supply when blocking Canadian infrastructure (not sure about Convoy raiding)

This one at 14:55 is raiding for the third time
https://youtu.be/7BxIMaIs0-E

Next turn at 2:43 it still got 10 supply.
https://youtu.be/IcZPzL_6ZqY

Subs not losing supply even when retaliating is already pretty annoying. But maybe good for overall game balance. But raiding should burn their supplies
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6520
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by BillRunacre »

Only convoy raiding will lose supply, and sometimes if you have lots of vessels on the convoy route, only some will raid. The rest will not use up supply because everything is being sunk by their colleagues.

Hopefully that explains it?
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
Duedman
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by Duedman »

BillRunacre wrote: Wed Dec 21, 2022 6:27 pm Only convoy raiding will lose supply, and sometimes if you have lots of vessels on the convoy route, only some will raid. The rest will not use up supply because everything is being sunk by their colleagues.

Hopefully that explains it?
Oh ok.
I never noticed that disrupting stuff did not cost supply. But why? What are they doing there if not shooting stuff?
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6520
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by BillRunacre »

It could be argued that they should, but it would require a significant engine change, instead think of it as their presence scaring local merchant shipping and causing disruption that way.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
OxfordGuy3
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:44 pm
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by OxfordGuy3 »

Duedman wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 5:46 pm Shock Armies on the other hand lost their damage buff for mobility (and do not get lvl3 guns)
@BillRunacre - Yes, I noticed this too - previously adding level 1 mobility to Shock Armies gave +1 Attack and Defence bonuses for many target types, but no AP increase, but now gives +1 AP (like for most/all other units) - was removing the +1 Attack and Defence bonuses intentional or was that just bugged previously (seeing as I don't think any other units get attack/defence bonuses for Mobility)?
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his" - George S. Patton
User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6520
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by BillRunacre »

I didn't actually know it gave (or have forgotten if I did) any attack/defense bonuses, and if it did, it should not have done.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
OxfordGuy3
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:44 pm
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by OxfordGuy3 »

BillRunacre wrote: Sun Mar 26, 2023 8:08 pm I didn't actually know it gave (or have forgotten if I did) any attack/defense bonuses, and if it did, it should not have done.
Thanks, I always thought that was a bit odd!
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his" - George S. Patton
User avatar
OxfordGuy3
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:44 pm
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by OxfordGuy3 »

"1939 Campaign
- If the USSR has been offered, and rejected, a Revised Borders Treaty then it will now swing only 3-5% towards the Allies rather than 7-10% if Germany annexes Lithuania via DE 633 or DE 634 (AshFall).
- If the USSR has been offered, and rejected, a Revised Borders Treaty then it will now swing 7-10% towards the Axis if it annexes Lithuania, should Germany have failed to do so. To make this work, dummy Decisions 457 & 458 have been added, and Lithuania now starts pro-Allied rather than purely neutral, though still at 0% Mobilization. (AshFall)."

Can the USSR annex the Baltic States without also annexing Lithuania now (i.e. just annex Estonia and Latvia), if they reject the Treaty (and if Germany doesn't annex Lithuania itself), to avoid the 7-10% diplo hit?
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his" - George S. Patton
AshFall
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:20 am

Re: Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe - v1.25.00

Post by AshFall »

OxfordGuy3 wrote: Wed Apr 12, 2023 1:14 pm "1939 Campaign
- If the USSR has been offered, and rejected, a Revised Borders Treaty then it will now swing only 3-5% towards the Allies rather than 7-10% if Germany annexes Lithuania via DE 633 or DE 634 (AshFall).
- If the USSR has been offered, and rejected, a Revised Borders Treaty then it will now swing 7-10% towards the Axis if it annexes Lithuania, should Germany have failed to do so. To make this work, dummy Decisions 457 & 458 have been added, and Lithuania now starts pro-Allied rather than purely neutral, though still at 0% Mobilization. (AshFall)."

Can the USSR annex the Baltic States without also annexing Lithuania now (i.e. just annex Estonia and Latvia), if they reject the Treaty (and if Germany doesn't annex Lithuania itself), to avoid the 7-10% diplo hit?
From experience (and by design): no. :)

It's part of the risk calculus you've got to do when choosing whether or not to accept.
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII War in Europe”