Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

44-5-3:
Attachments
a1.jpg
a1.jpg (2.94 MiB) Viewed 997 times
a3.jpg
a3.jpg (2.31 MiB) Viewed 997 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18030
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by RangerJoe »

Going back to the atoll invasions, if overstacking causes such severe problems for the attackers, load forces just shy of the 6k stacking limit in separate task forces and label them something like "Round 1", Round 2", and so on with a final one labeled "Occupation and engineering" for a series of invasions of that one atoll. Unloading in one turn, then reloading the next turn while the next wave unloads for their attack. If there is another base or bases nearby with extra support, the invasion units can reform there and repeat as necessary until the base is captured. Bombardment forces can also reload there as well. Both sides can do this depending upon the initiative. Also, stripping out any "soft" elements from armored or armoured forces might also help.

While the Allies have a lot of Large Slow Targets, they also have a lot of Slow But Deadly bombers which were called that during the war.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20332
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by BBfanboy »

OK, so the Frances raid missed CVL Jacksonville, but the pic shows Jills attacking - what were the results of that raid?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

BBfanboy wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:10 pm OK, so the Frances raid missed CVL Jacksonville, but the pic shows Jills attacking - what were the results of that raid?
All missed
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:53 am Going back to the atoll invasions, if overstacking causes such severe problems for the attackers, load forces just shy of the 6k stacking limit in separate task forces and label them something like "Round 1", Round 2", and so on with a final one labeled "Occupation and engineering" for a series of invasions of that one atoll. Unloading in one turn, then reloading the next turn while the next wave unloads for their attack. If there is another base or bases nearby with extra support, the invasion units can reform there and repeat as necessary until the base is captured. Bombardment forces can also reload there as well. Both sides can do this depending upon the initiative. Also, stripping out any "soft" elements from armored or armoured forces might also help.

While the Allies have a lot of Large Slow Targets, they also have a lot of Slow But Deadly bombers which were called that during the war.
You are correct, this is exactly what is happening at Midway currently. The whole 24th div was prepped for Midway. Earlier problems has lead me to split the division into A/B/C. If you look closely at the post about midway you will note "C" went first followed by "B". I got lucky because john saw me picking up a disorganized C and Attacked as I was landing the B element, which lead to his entire force becoming disorganized. He still has a level 6 fort. Look at the ground bombardment results. This Midway campaign may be historical. Look at the Pelau campaign history with the 1st marine div.
Attachments
a2.jpg
a2.jpg (464.54 KiB) Viewed 954 times
Last edited by bigred on Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18030
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by RangerJoe »

bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:10 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:53 am Going back to the atoll invasions, if overstacking causes such severe problems for the attackers, load forces just shy of the 6k stacking limit in separate task forces and label them something like "Round 1", Round 2", and so on with a final one labeled "Occupation and engineering" for a series of invasions of that one atoll. Unloading in one turn, then reloading the next turn while the next wave unloads for their attack. If there is another base or bases nearby with extra support, the invasion units can reform there and repeat as necessary until the base is captured. Bombardment forces can also reload there as well. Both sides can do this depending upon the initiative. Also, stripping out any "soft" elements from armored or armoured forces might also help.

While the Allies have a lot of Large Slow Targets, they also have a lot of Slow But Deadly bombers which were called that during the war.
You are correct, this is exactly what is happening at Midway currently. The whole 24th div was prepped for Midway. Earlier problems has lead me to split the division into A/B/C. If you look closely at the post about midway you will note "C" went first followed by "B". I got lucky because john saw me picking up a disorganized C and Attacked as I was landing the B element, which lead to his entire force becoming disorganized. He still has a level 6 fort. Look at the ground bombardment results. This Midway campaign may be historical. Look at the Pelau campaign history with the 1st marine div.
I don't know if you know this or not but armored units will also lower forts even if they don't get a 1:1 odds or better. If you strip out the non-armor devices and squads, they are not as vulnerable to enemy fire. The Combat Engineer units are nice but are much more fragile.

I was reading about a US Marine LT commanding a platoon of Stuarts leading the way in the jungle and his platoon with specifically his tank took out Japanese pillboxes with the 37mm gun. The infantry lost no men unless they lost some later after he quit using his tank because he only had three 37mm rounds left. From an attack 2 days prior, there were a lot of US Marine casualties along with US Naval Corpsmen.
Attachments
of course im not normal.jpg
of course im not normal.jpg (24.3 KiB) Viewed 967 times
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:33 pm
bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:10 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:53 am Going back to the atoll invasions, if overstacking causes such severe problems for the attackers, load forces just shy of the 6k stacking limit in separate task forces and label them something like "Round 1", Round 2", and so on with a final one labeled "Occupation and engineering" for a series of invasions of that one atoll. Unloading in one turn, then reloading the next turn while the next wave unloads for their attack. If there is another base or bases nearby with extra support, the invasion units can reform there and repeat as necessary until the base is captured. Bombardment forces can also reload there as well. Both sides can do this depending upon the initiative. Also, stripping out any "soft" elements from armored or armoured forces might also help.

While the Allies have a lot of Large Slow Targets, they also have a lot of Slow But Deadly bombers which were called that during the war.
You are correct, this is exactly what is happening at Midway currently. The whole 24th div was prepped for Midway. Earlier problems has lead me to split the division into A/B/C. If you look closely at the post about midway you will note "C" went first followed by "B". I got lucky because john saw me picking up a disorganized C and Attacked as I was landing the B element, which lead to his entire force becoming disorganized. He still has a level 6 fort. Look at the ground bombardment results. This Midway campaign may be historical. Look at the Pelau campaign history with the 1st marine div.
I dont have any armor prepped for midway. I did use a CBT unit but it got evac ed after the first failed attack. I have noted armor can go into a invasion hex with less prep and survive.

I don't know if you know this or not but armored units will also lower forts even if they don't get a 1:1 odds or better. If you strip out the non-armor devices and squads, they are not as vulnerable to enemy fire. The Combat Engineer units are nice but are much more fragile.

I was reading about a US Marine LT commanding a platoon of Stuarts leading the way in the jungle and his platoon with specifically his tank took out Japanese pillboxes with the 37mm gun. The infantry lost no men unless they lost some later after he quit using his tank because he only had three 37mm rounds left. From an attack 2 days prior, there were a lot of US Marine casualties along with US Naval Corpsmen.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:33 pm
bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:10 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:53 am Going back to the atoll invasions, if overstacking causes such severe problems for the attackers, load forces just shy of the 6k stacking limit in separate task forces and label them something like "Round 1", Round 2", and so on with a final one labeled "Occupation and engineering" for a series of invasions of that one atoll. Unloading in one turn, then reloading the next turn while the next wave unloads for their attack. If there is another base or bases nearby with extra support, the invasion units can reform there and repeat as necessary until the base is captured. Bombardment forces can also reload there as well. Both sides can do this depending upon the initiative. Also, stripping out any "soft" elements from armored or armoured forces might also help.

While the Allies have a lot of Large Slow Targets, they also have a lot of Slow But Deadly bombers which were called that during the war.
You are correct, this is exactly what is happening at Midway currently. The whole 24th div was prepped for Midway. Earlier problems has lead me to split the division into A/B/C. If you look closely at the post about midway you will note "C" went first followed by "B". I got lucky because john saw me picking up a disorganized C and Attacked as I was landing the B element, which lead to his entire force becoming disorganized. He still has a level 6 fort. Look at the ground bombardment results. This Midway campaign may be historical. Look at the Pelau campaign history with the 1st marine div.
I don't know if you know this or not but armored units will also lower forts even if they don't get a 1:1 odds or better. If you strip out the non-armor devices and squads, they are not as vulnerable to enemy fire. The Combat Engineer units are nice but are much more fragile.

I was reading about a US Marine LT commanding a platoon of Stuarts leading the way in the jungle and his platoon with specifically his tank took out Japanese pillboxes with the 37mm gun. The infantry lost no men unless they lost some later after he quit using his tank because he only had three 37mm rounds left. From an attack 2 days prior, there were a lot of US Marine casualties along with US Naval Corpsmen.
I dont have any armor prepped for midway. I did use a CBT unit but it got evac ed after the first failed attack. I have noted armor can go into a invasion hex with less prep and survive. Also I just dropped an LTV (amtrack) into hex at 100 prep.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18030
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by RangerJoe »

bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:36 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:33 pm
bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:10 pm
You are correct, this is exactly what is happening at Midway currently. The whole 24th div was prepped for Midway. Earlier problems has lead me to split the division into A/B/C. If you look closely at the post about midway you will note "C" went first followed by "B". I got lucky because john saw me picking up a disorganized C and Attacked as I was landing the B element, which lead to his entire force becoming disorganized. He still has a level 6 fort. Look at the ground bombardment results. This Midway campaign may be historical. Look at the Pelau campaign history with the 1st marine div.
I don't know if you know this or not but armored units will also lower forts even if they don't get a 1:1 odds or better. If you strip out the non-armor devices and squads, they are not as vulnerable to enemy fire. The Combat Engineer units are nice but are much more fragile.

I was reading about a US Marine LT commanding a platoon of Stuarts leading the way in the jungle and his platoon with specifically his tank took out Japanese pillboxes with the 37mm gun. The infantry lost no men unless they lost some later after he quit using his tank because he only had three 37mm rounds left. From an attack 2 days prior, there were a lot of US Marine casualties along with US Naval Corpsmen.
I dont have any armor prepped for midway. I did use a CBT unit but it got evac ed after the first failed attack. I have noted armor can go into a invasion hex with less prep and survive. Also I just dropped an LTV (amtrack) into hex at 100 prep.
I do believe that the LTV is armor and any infantry can support its attack. Some LVTs are better than others and the LVT(4) has a 75mm cannon in a turret.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:36 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:33 pm

I don't know if you know this or not but armored units will also lower forts even if they don't get a 1:1 odds or better. If you strip out the non-armor devices and squads, they are not as vulnerable to enemy fire. The Combat Engineer units are nice but are much more fragile.

I was reading about a US Marine LT commanding a platoon of Stuarts leading the way in the jungle and his platoon with specifically his tank took out Japanese pillboxes with the 37mm gun. The infantry lost no men unless they lost some later after he quit using his tank because he only had three 37mm rounds left. From an attack 2 days prior, there were a lot of US Marine casualties along with US Naval Corpsmen.
I dont have any armor prepped for midway. I did use a CBT unit but it got evac ed after the first failed attack. I have noted armor can go into a invasion hex with less prep and survive. Also I just dropped an LTV (amtrack) into hex at 100 prep.
I do believe that the LTV is armor and any infantry can support its attack. Some LVTs are better than others and the LVT(4) has a 75mm cannon in a turret.
Last edited by bigred on Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

RE: Reducing Fortifications
Post by Alfred » Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:00 am

Tanks per se do not reduce fort levels.  Only Combat Engineers per se can do so.
 
Otherwise fort reduction is entirely dependent on achieving a positive adjusted AV ratio.
 
Alfred
Attachments
a2.jpg
a2.jpg (129.81 KiB) Viewed 921 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

bigred wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:10 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 11:53 am Going back to the atoll invasions, if overstacking causes such severe problems for the attackers, load forces just shy of the 6k stacking limit in separate task forces and label them something like "Round 1", Round 2", and so on with a final one labeled "Occupation and engineering" for a series of invasions of that one atoll. Unloading in one turn, then reloading the next turn while the next wave unloads for their attack. If there is another base or bases nearby with extra support, the invasion units can reform there and repeat as necessary until the base is captured. Bombardment forces can also reload there as well. Both sides can do this depending upon the initiative. Also, stripping out any "soft" elements from armored or armoured forces might also help.

While the Allies have a lot of Large Slow Targets, they also have a lot of Slow But Deadly bombers which were called that during the war.
You are correct, this is exactly what is happening at Midway currently. The whole 24th div was prepped for Midway. Earlier problems has lead me to split the division into A/B/C. If you look closely at the post about midway you will note "C" went first followed by "B". I got lucky because john saw me picking up a disorganized C and Attacked as I was landing the B element, which lead to his entire force becoming disorganized because he is overstacked also and forgot to check before he attacked. He still has a level 6 fort. Look at the ground bombardment results. This Midway campaign may be historical. Look at the Peleliu campaign history with the 1st marine div.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

Upcoming attack at Midway. Supported by 1 BB TF and 1 CA tf bombardment. One CV TF with 48 sbd and 40TBF ground attack. I have a dim view of this assault. CCB of the 24th DIV landed 4 days ago.
Attachments
a4.jpg
a4.jpg (234.07 KiB) Viewed 867 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by John 3rd »

May 5, 1944

May the 5th is my birthday IRL (born in 1966 NOT 1944!)

I got a HUGE gift from the IJN I-168 this day.

BANZAI!

Don't get to shout those out too often after losing the war...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

John 3rd wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 5:20 pm May 5, 1944

May the 5th is my birthday IRL (born in 1966 NOT 1944!)

I got a HUGE gift from the IJN I-168 this day.

BANZAI!

Don't get to shout those out too often after losing the war...
44-5-3: In the great span of modern history, today is just another day. No post today.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by John 3rd »

5-5-44.jpg
5-5-44.jpg (50.9 KiB) Viewed 784 times
May 5, 1944
East of Kuriles
[/b]

The morning of May 5th opens with I-168 spotting nearly a dozen Allied Task Forces moving close to the central Kuriles. Going deep, the commander listens to the deep thrum of dozens of propellers passing overhead. Edging back up to periscope depth, the commander is startled to see a huge, new Essex-Class American Carrier passing just 1,800 yards away. He immediately fires four torpedoes and is rewarded with two hits followed by a large explosion severely wounding the target.

Only three American DDs counter-attack in a very half-hearted manner. He takes the I-Boat to maximum depth and carefully reloaded the forward tubes.

Two hours later, while maneuvering by sound detector, he eases back up to look again. There--less then 800 yards away--barely making headway is the stricken carrier. Four more torpedoes are fired with two solidly connecting followed by yet another secondary blast. The carrier heels over to port and goes down by the bow just minutes later.

The carrier and her entire complement of aircraft are later identified as the USS Intrepid.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by John 3rd »

As Paul will attest, in the greater scheme of things, it isn't much but it IS something! Over my 18+ years of playing, I have sunk several Essex but never by sub. Very nice.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
durnedwolf
Posts: 896
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 5:05 am
Location: Nevada, US of A

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by durnedwolf »

John 3rd wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 12:46 am As Paul will attest, in the greater scheme of things, it isn't much but it IS something! Over my 18+ years of playing, I have sunk several Essex but never by sub. Very nice.
Nice to see some Japanese sub-action. Back in the day, I had a sub (I think it was the I-158) that took out an American DD on convoy escort to Hawaii. Images in my head of a flinty-eyed Japanese captain firing his tubes down the throat of a fast-charging destroyer flitted about in my mind as I read the report. I was a happy camper as I puttered about work that day. :D

I just finished catching myself up on this AAR today. I retired last year and since my last games with Roger and Joe, we moved to Reno, where my wife and I are having a blast. Thanks to you and Bigred for sharing your game - it almost gives me that itch to fish for another dance partner <laughter>.

DW

I try to live by two words - tenacity and gratitude. Tenacity gets me where I want to go and gratitude ensures I'm not angry along the way. - Henry Winkler.

The great aim of education is not knowledge but action. - Herbert Spencer
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

44-5-5:
Attachments
a1.jpg
a1.jpg (1.76 MiB) Viewed 717 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Rising Sun, Falling Skies: BTSL Bigred vs John 3rd

Post by bigred »

44-5-6:
Attachments
a3.jpg
a3.jpg (1.84 MiB) Viewed 712 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”