Pilot losses

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Gratch1111
Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Sverige

Pilot losses

Post by Gratch1111 »

So playing Japan and losing a lot of pilots, and that would be ok if I also lost planes, but there are constantly numbers of 1-3 planes lost to AA, Ground or dogfight but 5-7 lost pilots. I have other planes lost to Ops.

Anyone know the logic behind this? Are the rest killed during training?
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20292
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Pilot losses

Post by BBfanboy »

Are you counting the loss of aircraft that were damaged in battle but didn't make it back to base?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Gratch1111
Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Sverige

Re: Pilot losses

Post by Gratch1111 »

Are op losses planes that didnt make it back? I thought it was planes that was written off as too damaged to repair meaning that the pilot got back.
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 13920
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: Pilot losses

Post by btd64 »

Gratch1111 wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:44 am Are op losses planes that didnt make it back? I thought it was planes that was written off as too damaged to repair meaning that the pilot got back.
No, those are writeoffs. Op loses are aircraft that didn't make it back....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
SCW Manual Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
Gratch1111
Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: Sverige

Re: Pilot losses

Post by Gratch1111 »

That doesnt make sense either, I had 2/3 planes shotdown, AA etc, lost 18 aircraft, so like 15-16 in op losses and 6 pilots KIA and one MIA. Maybe ops losses are both as you say and write offs?
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4894
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

Re: Pilot losses

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

If everything else fails, read the manual ;)

A search for "operational losses" yields several pieces of information from different chapters:

Planes that are damaged in combat will show up as either Flak or air combat losses if they don’t get home safely (and the enemy pilot will get credit for a kill).

Planes that are not damaged, but do not return safely are counted as operational losses.

Operational Losses (or Op Losses) occur due to accidents or other untoward events that are not a direct result of being shot at by the enemy.
These losses occur to squadrons based on several factors, including the range of the Mission, the experience of the pilot, and if the aircraft is flying from a carrier.
Any long-range Carrier-based aircraft strikes (of two or more hexes in distance) will cause an extra chance of operational losses to be incurred.
However, if a player’s base has sufficient supplies they may note that any damaged aircraft will likely be repaired before the next Orders Phase.
Op losses include planes lost returning to base and planes crashing, planes destroyed or damaged on take-off and landing, and pilots as a result getting killed, wounded, or captured.

Write offs are a new type of Ops loss for A/C. A write off may occur when a machine returns with too much damage to repair. Pilot survival rates are higher for write offs than Ops losses.
It is assumed that the plane is cannibalized for parts, and thus after 5 write offs an extra plane is considered repaired and becomes available.



So, planes damaged in combat may not return due to that damage and will then count as kills.

Planes undamaged in combat but not returning due to non-combat causes (mechanical problems, out of fuel, weather, navigation etc.) and accidents during take-off and landing are op losses.

Write-offs are op losses as well - planes that managed to return with damage too heavy to repair.

Leaves me wondering whether a plane damaged in combat and crashing on landing is counted as kill or as op loss. I guess it is considered as kill since damaged in combat and did not get home safely.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5445
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Pilot losses

Post by Yaab »

"Your Ki-84 Frank pilots have a high attrition rate".
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17659
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Pilot losses

Post by RangerJoe »

Aircraft that are damaged in combat and don't return to base are A2A losses.

If the pilot crash lands the aircraft, that is an OPs loss and can also kill/wound the pilot.

If the aircraft is a write-off, it is an OPs loss. The pilot can be WIA.

The pilot can be WIA if the aircraft is damaged in combat even if the damage is slight and the aircraft may still be available.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10266
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: Pilot losses

Post by PaxMondo »

Gratch1111 wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 8:55 pm So playing Japan and losing a lot of pilots, and that would be ok if I also lost planes, but there are constantly numbers of 1-3 planes lost to AA, Ground or dogfight but 5-7 lost pilots. I have other planes lost to Ops.

Anyone know the logic behind this? Are the rest killed during training?
So, LST and RJ gave you the real details on what is in Ops loss. I just want to clarify that as opposed to other losses (A2A, Flak, etc), this loss type can be most impacted by the player. AvSupport, Base Size, HQa, group rest, group distance being flown are just a few of the variables that go into Ops losses that the player has direct control over.
Pax
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7374
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: Pilot losses

Post by HansBolter »

Distance being flown is a factor I can't see most Japanese players reigning themselves in on.

It's the range advantage that Japanese players exploit most to their benefit.

Japanese players dream of setting up an 8 hex carrier strike.

What self respecting Japanese player isn't going to hinder Allied ship movements with his ultra long range ship killing Netties?

I can see Japanese players working to reign in all of the other factors, but not this one.
Hans

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24580
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Pilot losses

Post by Chickenboy »

Actually, knowing what my high repair costs are for many of my mid-late war planes, I *do* try to limit range (and other causes of airframe fatigue, OPS losses, etc.) where feasible. Japanese players that constantly stress out the maximum range on their sorties (including NavSearch) will find themselves with high levels of such losses. Just because you CAN stretch the range doesn't mean you SHOULD stretch the range.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10266
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: Pilot losses

Post by PaxMondo »

HansBolter wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 11:01 am Distance being flown is a factor I can't see most Japanese players reigning themselves in on.

It's the range advantage that Japanese players exploit most to their benefit.

Japanese players dream of setting up an 8 hex carrier strike.

What self respecting Japanese player isn't going to hinder Allied ship movements with his ultra long range ship killing Netties?

I can see Japanese players working to reign in all of the other factors, but not this one.
Hans,

Good to see you!

From the many AAR's, it isn't CV air group losses that are the major problem, it is LBA units being put on long range attacks with escorts and left there (maybe forgotten?) for many, many turns. There are AAR's where the IJ ops losses are well over 20% of the total losses, I've seen it in the 40's. Totally unsustainable, and all those free VP's for the allies.

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10266
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: Pilot losses

Post by PaxMondo »

Chickenboy wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 3:56 pm ... Just because you CAN stretch the range doesn't mean you SHOULD stretch the range.
Exactly. CB, you got perfectly. JFB's should take note!!

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”