Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Pilots as of December 7, 1941
Nishizawa Hiroyoshi
Nishizawa was a naturally gifted fighter pilot who joined Chitose Ku S shortly before the outbreak of the Pacific War. His flying skills were immediately impressive – by February 1942, he had already scored his first aerial victories against American aircraft. Always daring, he soon transferred to the celebrated Tainan Kōkūtai, where he achieved over 80 confirmed kills. In October 1944, he briefly returned as an instructor but rejoined combat missions and died in a transport crash returning from Leyte. He passed away just weeks before his 25th birthday.
Yoshino Satoshi
Ensign Yoshino commanded a squadron of outdated A5M4 "Claude" fighters within Chitose Ku S, stationed in the Marshall Islands. Known for his calm determination, he successfully led interception missions against Allied bombers in February 1942. Shortly afterward, he was transferred to Tainan Kōkūtai. In June 1942, his plane was shot down over New Guinea during combat with U.S. fighters – a loss deeply felt by his unit.
Kobayashi Masashi
Kobayashi was the commanding officer of Chitose Ku S on December 7, 1941. As a seasoned officer, he led the unit equipped with obsolete A5M4 "Claude" fighters based in the Marshall Islands. Despite their technical inferiority, Kobayashi emphasized discipline and tactical precision. Under his leadership, the unit remained operational and ensured air defense of Japan’s central Pacific outposts. His organizational skills became evident during the later reformation into 201 Ku. Though not a combat ace, his steady leadership and strategic foresight significantly shaped early IJN fighter doctrine.
Pilots after December 7, 1941
Iwamoto Tetsuzō
Iwamoto began the war aboard fleet carriers like Zuikaku before being transferred to Chitose/201 Ku S. Famous for his precise and controlled attack style – favoring fast dive approaches over risky dogfights – he became Japan’s second highest-scoring ace with approximately 90 confirmed victories. In early 1944, he was recalled to Japan to help train new pilots.
Okumura Takeo
Okumura was a spirited pilot from Fukui who initially served in China. In 1942/43, he flew with the Zuikaku and later Tainan Ku S before joining 201 Ku S in Rabaul. On September 14, 1943, he achieved the remarkable feat of downing ten enemy aircraft in a single mission over Bougainville. He died shortly after in aerial combat.
Sugita Shōichi
A young and dedicated pilot who joined 201 Ku S in 1943 and quickly proved himself in air combat. Rising to squadron leader, he survived several dogfights and became one of the few survivors of his elite unit. He was widely respected for his resistance to the adoption of kamikaze tactics.
Seki Yukio
Originally trained as a dive-bomber pilot, Seki rose to the rank of Lieutenant Commander in autumn 1944. As leader of the first official kamikaze unit – the “Shikishima Squadron” – he carried out the first organized suicide attack in history, sinking a U.S. escort carrier with his own plane and life.
Kawai Shirō
Kawai led a squadron within 201 Ku S during fierce air battles over Rabaul and Bougainville in October 1942. His leadership made the unit more aggressive and effective. He outlived many of his comrades and was apparently transferred to another unit in 1944.
Ranking by Significance:
• Nishizawa Hiroyoshi – undisputed top ace
• Iwamoto Tetsuzō – second-best ace, tactically brilliant
• Okumura Takeo – hero with record-setting kill mission
• Yoshino Satoshi – experienced commander, bomber interception expert
• Sugita Shōichi – young elite leader, long-time survivor
• Kawai Shirō – tactically bold squadron leader
• Seki Yukio – first organized kamikaze pilot, historically pivotal
• Kobayashi Masashi – early-phase organizer, shaped unit development
Pilots as of December 7, 1941
Nishizawa Hiroyoshi
Nishizawa was a naturally gifted fighter pilot who joined Chitose Ku S shortly before the outbreak of the Pacific War. His flying skills were immediately impressive – by February 1942, he had already scored his first aerial victories against American aircraft. Always daring, he soon transferred to the celebrated Tainan Kōkūtai, where he achieved over 80 confirmed kills. In October 1944, he briefly returned as an instructor but rejoined combat missions and died in a transport crash returning from Leyte. He passed away just weeks before his 25th birthday.
Yoshino Satoshi
Ensign Yoshino commanded a squadron of outdated A5M4 "Claude" fighters within Chitose Ku S, stationed in the Marshall Islands. Known for his calm determination, he successfully led interception missions against Allied bombers in February 1942. Shortly afterward, he was transferred to Tainan Kōkūtai. In June 1942, his plane was shot down over New Guinea during combat with U.S. fighters – a loss deeply felt by his unit.
Kobayashi Masashi
Kobayashi was the commanding officer of Chitose Ku S on December 7, 1941. As a seasoned officer, he led the unit equipped with obsolete A5M4 "Claude" fighters based in the Marshall Islands. Despite their technical inferiority, Kobayashi emphasized discipline and tactical precision. Under his leadership, the unit remained operational and ensured air defense of Japan’s central Pacific outposts. His organizational skills became evident during the later reformation into 201 Ku. Though not a combat ace, his steady leadership and strategic foresight significantly shaped early IJN fighter doctrine.
Pilots after December 7, 1941
Iwamoto Tetsuzō
Iwamoto began the war aboard fleet carriers like Zuikaku before being transferred to Chitose/201 Ku S. Famous for his precise and controlled attack style – favoring fast dive approaches over risky dogfights – he became Japan’s second highest-scoring ace with approximately 90 confirmed victories. In early 1944, he was recalled to Japan to help train new pilots.
Okumura Takeo
Okumura was a spirited pilot from Fukui who initially served in China. In 1942/43, he flew with the Zuikaku and later Tainan Ku S before joining 201 Ku S in Rabaul. On September 14, 1943, he achieved the remarkable feat of downing ten enemy aircraft in a single mission over Bougainville. He died shortly after in aerial combat.
Sugita Shōichi
A young and dedicated pilot who joined 201 Ku S in 1943 and quickly proved himself in air combat. Rising to squadron leader, he survived several dogfights and became one of the few survivors of his elite unit. He was widely respected for his resistance to the adoption of kamikaze tactics.
Seki Yukio
Originally trained as a dive-bomber pilot, Seki rose to the rank of Lieutenant Commander in autumn 1944. As leader of the first official kamikaze unit – the “Shikishima Squadron” – he carried out the first organized suicide attack in history, sinking a U.S. escort carrier with his own plane and life.
Kawai Shirō
Kawai led a squadron within 201 Ku S during fierce air battles over Rabaul and Bougainville in October 1942. His leadership made the unit more aggressive and effective. He outlived many of his comrades and was apparently transferred to another unit in 1944.
Ranking by Significance:
• Nishizawa Hiroyoshi – undisputed top ace
• Iwamoto Tetsuzō – second-best ace, tactically brilliant
• Okumura Takeo – hero with record-setting kill mission
• Yoshino Satoshi – experienced commander, bomber interception expert
• Sugita Shōichi – young elite leader, long-time survivor
• Kawai Shirō – tactically bold squadron leader
• Seki Yukio – first organized kamikaze pilot, historically pivotal
• Kobayashi Masashi – early-phase organizer, shaped unit development
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Origins and Role of the Chitose Kōkūtai at the Outbreak of the Pacific War
At the start of the Pacific War, the Chitose Kōkūtai served as a well-organized, though technically outdated, fighter unit. Equipped with A5M4 “Claude” fighters, it was stationed in the Marshall Islands and tasked with air defense of Japan’s central Pacific outposts. Under the leadership of experienced officers like Kobayashi Masashi, the unit placed strong emphasis on discipline, tactical skill, and high training standards. Though not a frontline spotlight unit, Chitose Ku S was an essential proving ground for young, talented pilots.
Two of these pilots were Nishizawa Hiroyoshi and Yoshino Satoshi. Both had already demonstrated exceptional flying skill while serving with Chitose Ku S. In early 1942, they were transferred—along with other capable pilots—to the Tainan Kōkūtai. This was not a voluntary application, but rather a military reassignment, though most pilots saw it as a great honor. The Tainan Ku S was regarded as the elite among Imperial Navy air units.
The Tainan Kōkūtai at that time was equipped with the advanced A6M2 Zero and formed the spearhead of Japan’s naval air force. Its pilots were considered the best in Japan—many becoming celebrated aces. The unit fought on the frontlines in Southeast Asia, over the Philippines, and across New Guinea. Its reputation was legendary, not only among Japanese forces but also among the Allies, who viewed the "Zero aces" with awe.
Comparison of the Units:
Chitose Ku S – solid, defense-oriented, tradition-conscious – a place to prove oneself
Tainan Ku S – aggressive, prestigious, elite – a unit for those who had already proven themselves
Transferring to Tainan Ku S meant joining the most exclusive circle of Japanese fighter pilots—and also facing the deadliest missions of the entire Pacific War. For men like Nishizawa, this path led to legend. For many others, it marked the beginning of the end.
At the start of the Pacific War, the Chitose Kōkūtai served as a well-organized, though technically outdated, fighter unit. Equipped with A5M4 “Claude” fighters, it was stationed in the Marshall Islands and tasked with air defense of Japan’s central Pacific outposts. Under the leadership of experienced officers like Kobayashi Masashi, the unit placed strong emphasis on discipline, tactical skill, and high training standards. Though not a frontline spotlight unit, Chitose Ku S was an essential proving ground for young, talented pilots.
Two of these pilots were Nishizawa Hiroyoshi and Yoshino Satoshi. Both had already demonstrated exceptional flying skill while serving with Chitose Ku S. In early 1942, they were transferred—along with other capable pilots—to the Tainan Kōkūtai. This was not a voluntary application, but rather a military reassignment, though most pilots saw it as a great honor. The Tainan Ku S was regarded as the elite among Imperial Navy air units.
The Tainan Kōkūtai at that time was equipped with the advanced A6M2 Zero and formed the spearhead of Japan’s naval air force. Its pilots were considered the best in Japan—many becoming celebrated aces. The unit fought on the frontlines in Southeast Asia, over the Philippines, and across New Guinea. Its reputation was legendary, not only among Japanese forces but also among the Allies, who viewed the "Zero aces" with awe.
Comparison of the Units:
Chitose Ku S – solid, defense-oriented, tradition-conscious – a place to prove oneself
Tainan Ku S – aggressive, prestigious, elite – a unit for those who had already proven themselves
Transferring to Tainan Ku S meant joining the most exclusive circle of Japanese fighter pilots—and also facing the deadliest missions of the entire Pacific War. For men like Nishizawa, this path led to legend. For many others, it marked the beginning of the end.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Question About Leader Assignment in the Editor – Chitose Kōkūtai, December 7, 1941
I am currently conducting research on the Chitose Ku S and have found that Kobayashi Masashi was historically the commanding officer of the unit as of December 7, 1941. So far, so clear.
However, I've encountered a problem in the scenario editor:
In the list of leaders, I cannot find a specific entry named "Kobayashi Masashi." There is only a "Kobayashi, M.," whose stats (e.g., leadership, experience, aggression) seem to match those of a seasoned unit commander.
This raises several questions:
1. Is “Kobayashi, M.” in the editor actually Kobayashi Masashi—the historical commander?
→ If so: Is this simply a shortened version of the name? Is there any reliable way to confirm this definitively?
2. If it is indeed the same officer, how can I explicitly assign him as the leader of the Chitose Ku S within the editor—without disrupting other historical structures?
→ For example: Is it possible to assign him via direct ID linkage or by manually editing the unit entry?
3. If they are two different individuals:
Is there a clean way to create a new leader entry for Kobayashi Masashi and integrate him without causing conflicts in the rest of the OOB (Order of Battle)?
I would greatly appreciate any advice—be it from editor experience, historical insight, or scenario mechanics.
My goal is to represent the Chitose Ku S as authentically as possible on December 7, 1941.
Thanks in advance!
I am currently conducting research on the Chitose Ku S and have found that Kobayashi Masashi was historically the commanding officer of the unit as of December 7, 1941. So far, so clear.
However, I've encountered a problem in the scenario editor:
In the list of leaders, I cannot find a specific entry named "Kobayashi Masashi." There is only a "Kobayashi, M.," whose stats (e.g., leadership, experience, aggression) seem to match those of a seasoned unit commander.
This raises several questions:
1. Is “Kobayashi, M.” in the editor actually Kobayashi Masashi—the historical commander?
→ If so: Is this simply a shortened version of the name? Is there any reliable way to confirm this definitively?
2. If it is indeed the same officer, how can I explicitly assign him as the leader of the Chitose Ku S within the editor—without disrupting other historical structures?
→ For example: Is it possible to assign him via direct ID linkage or by manually editing the unit entry?
3. If they are two different individuals:
Is there a clean way to create a new leader entry for Kobayashi Masashi and integrate him without causing conflicts in the rest of the OOB (Order of Battle)?
I would greatly appreciate any advice—be it from editor experience, historical insight, or scenario mechanics.
My goal is to represent the Chitose Ku S as authentically as possible on December 7, 1941.
Thanks in advance!
- Attachments
-
- Chitose Ku S.png (241.61 KiB) Viewed 606 times
-
- Kobayashi.png (59.95 KiB) Viewed 606 times
-
- Chitose Ku S in the Witp AE Editor.png (56.77 KiB) Viewed 606 times
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Following in-depth research, I was able to identify additional historical pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai. Their names have been added to further enhance the unit’s authenticity as of December 7, 1941.
Chitose Ku S-1
Nishizawa Hiroyoshi
Yoshino Satoshi
Takaiwa, Kaoru
Tanaka, Jiro
Wajima, Yoshio
Watanabe, Hideo
Yamamoto, Tomezo
Yamashita, Sahei
Yoshizawa, Tokushige
Atake, Tomita
Iida, Fusata
Kobubun, Takeichi
Ogiya, Nobuo
Oishi, Hideo
Shibagaki, Hiroshi
Shibayama, Sekizen
Takahashi, Shigeru
Chitose Ku S-1 Detachment
Okano, Hiroshi
Shiga, Masami
Shiozura, Toshio
Pilots of the Chitose Ku S-1 (December 7, 1941 – until disbandment)
Nishizawa Hiroyoshi
A born fighter pilot from Nagano, who joined the Chitose Kōkūtai in October 1941 and quickly became known for his deadly precision in aerial combat. In the final week of January 1942, he was transferred to the Tainan Kōkūtai, where he gained fame through spectacular victories, later remembered as the "Devil of Rabaul".
Yoshino Satoshi
A young pilot assigned to the Chitose unit as early as October 1940. He saw successful combat on December 7 over the Marshall Islands. In February 1942, he was deployed to Rabaul and Lae, where he claimed three aerial victories (two confirmed), before falling in action over New Guinea on June 9, 1942.
Atake Tomita
Little is known about his brief service, except that he was assigned to Chitose Ku S-1 in December 1941 and participated in missions over Luzon. His name appears mainly in the unit’s operational reports, with no personal victories recorded.
Iida Fusata
Known from casualty reports dated December 7, 1941 — flying an A5M Claude over Luzon. He perished that same day, confirming his assignment to the Chitose division.
Kobubun Takeichi, Ogiya Nobuo, Oishi Hideo, Shibagaki Hiroshi, Shibayama Sekizen, Takahashi Shigeru, Takaiwa Kaoru, Tanaka Jiro, Wajima Yoshio, Watanabe Hideo, Yamamoto Tomezo, Yamashita Sahei, Yoshizawa Tokushige
These pilots were clearly identified as members of Chitose Ku S-1 through service records and mission reports. They took part in air operations over Luzon, Java, and New Guinea. Some fell in action, others survived and quietly returned home as veterans — often without publicly documented kill counts.
Okano Hiroshi, Shiga Masami, Shiozura Toshio
Military records confirm their assignment to the unit. They flew missions over Luzon and the Southwest Pacific, but due to a lack of surviving data, they remain largely unnoted in later reports.
Chitose Ku S-1
Nishizawa Hiroyoshi
Yoshino Satoshi
Takaiwa, Kaoru
Tanaka, Jiro
Wajima, Yoshio
Watanabe, Hideo
Yamamoto, Tomezo
Yamashita, Sahei
Yoshizawa, Tokushige
Atake, Tomita
Iida, Fusata
Kobubun, Takeichi
Ogiya, Nobuo
Oishi, Hideo
Shibagaki, Hiroshi
Shibayama, Sekizen
Takahashi, Shigeru
Chitose Ku S-1 Detachment
Okano, Hiroshi
Shiga, Masami
Shiozura, Toshio
Pilots of the Chitose Ku S-1 (December 7, 1941 – until disbandment)
Nishizawa Hiroyoshi
A born fighter pilot from Nagano, who joined the Chitose Kōkūtai in October 1941 and quickly became known for his deadly precision in aerial combat. In the final week of January 1942, he was transferred to the Tainan Kōkūtai, where he gained fame through spectacular victories, later remembered as the "Devil of Rabaul".
Yoshino Satoshi
A young pilot assigned to the Chitose unit as early as October 1940. He saw successful combat on December 7 over the Marshall Islands. In February 1942, he was deployed to Rabaul and Lae, where he claimed three aerial victories (two confirmed), before falling in action over New Guinea on June 9, 1942.
Atake Tomita
Little is known about his brief service, except that he was assigned to Chitose Ku S-1 in December 1941 and participated in missions over Luzon. His name appears mainly in the unit’s operational reports, with no personal victories recorded.
Iida Fusata
Known from casualty reports dated December 7, 1941 — flying an A5M Claude over Luzon. He perished that same day, confirming his assignment to the Chitose division.
Kobubun Takeichi, Ogiya Nobuo, Oishi Hideo, Shibagaki Hiroshi, Shibayama Sekizen, Takahashi Shigeru, Takaiwa Kaoru, Tanaka Jiro, Wajima Yoshio, Watanabe Hideo, Yamamoto Tomezo, Yamashita Sahei, Yoshizawa Tokushige
These pilots were clearly identified as members of Chitose Ku S-1 through service records and mission reports. They took part in air operations over Luzon, Java, and New Guinea. Some fell in action, others survived and quietly returned home as veterans — often without publicly documented kill counts.
Okano Hiroshi, Shiga Masami, Shiozura Toshio
Military records confirm their assignment to the unit. They flew missions over Luzon and the Southwest Pacific, but due to a lack of surviving data, they remain largely unnoted in later reports.
- Attachments
-
- Chitose KuS-1 Det.png (233.91 KiB) Viewed 524 times
-
- Chitose KuS-1.png (245.33 KiB) Viewed 524 times
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Following thorough research, I was able to confirm Captain Ohashi Fujiro as the commanding officer of the Chitose Kōkūtai on December 7, 1941.
Accordingly, I have assigned him to his historically accurate position in the editor. His inclusion strengthens the unit's authenticity and honors his strategic role in the early stages of the Pacific War.
Ohashi Fujiro
Captain Ohashi Fujiro served as the commanding officer of the Chitose Kōkūtai from September 15, 1941. Under his leadership, the unit transitioned into a dual-role force comprising both bomber and fighter elements. He was instrumental in preparing and executing the Chitose Ku S-1’s first major operation: the air raids on Wake Island during the opening days of the Pacific War in December 1941.
Ohashi coordinated a mix of G3M “Nell” bombers and A5M or A6M fighters, ensuring strategic bombing capabilities were combined with air superiority elements. His leadership emphasized discipline, efficiency, and adaptability — vital traits as the unit was later tasked with providing air support during the campaigns across the South Pacific, including Rabaul and the Dutch East Indies.
Though his name is not as widely recognized as the ace pilots he commanded, his organizational skill and calm demeanor helped solidify the Chitose Ku S-1’s early successes. He remained in command until the unit’s dissolution in late 1942, after which he likely assumed a staff role in the expanding and increasingly strained Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service.
Accordingly, I have assigned him to his historically accurate position in the editor. His inclusion strengthens the unit's authenticity and honors his strategic role in the early stages of the Pacific War.
Ohashi Fujiro
Captain Ohashi Fujiro served as the commanding officer of the Chitose Kōkūtai from September 15, 1941. Under his leadership, the unit transitioned into a dual-role force comprising both bomber and fighter elements. He was instrumental in preparing and executing the Chitose Ku S-1’s first major operation: the air raids on Wake Island during the opening days of the Pacific War in December 1941.
Ohashi coordinated a mix of G3M “Nell” bombers and A5M or A6M fighters, ensuring strategic bombing capabilities were combined with air superiority elements. His leadership emphasized discipline, efficiency, and adaptability — vital traits as the unit was later tasked with providing air support during the campaigns across the South Pacific, including Rabaul and the Dutch East Indies.
Though his name is not as widely recognized as the ace pilots he commanded, his organizational skill and calm demeanor helped solidify the Chitose Ku S-1’s early successes. He remained in command until the unit’s dissolution in late 1942, after which he likely assumed a staff role in the expanding and increasingly strained Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
The Path to Elite Status: From Chitose Ku S to Tainan Ku S
At the outbreak of the Pacific War, the Chitose Kōkūtai served as a well‑organized, if technically outdated, fighter unit. Equipped with A5M4 “Claude” fighters, it was stationed on the Marshall Islands, tasked with defending Japan’s central Pacific outposts. Under the leadership of seasoned officers such as Captain Ohashi Fujiro, the unit placed great emphasis on discipline, tactical finesse, and pilot training. Although not in the spotlight, Chitose was a crucial proving ground for young, talented pilots.
Two of those pilots were Nishizawa Hiroyoshi and Yoshino Satoshi. Both had demonstrated exceptional aerial skill while with Chitose Ku S. In early 1942, they – along with other capable pilots – were transferred to the elite Tainan Kōkūtai. This transfer was not voluntary but a military reassignment widely regarded as a tremendous honor.
The Tainan Ku S was then equipped with the modern A6M2 Zero and served as the spearhead of the Imperial Japanese Navy’s air power. Its pilots were considered Japan’s best – many achieving “Ace” status. The unit fought on the front lines—from Southeast Asia to the Philippines and New Guinea—and earned a legendary reputation both within the Japanese forces and among Allied forces, who held the “Zero Aces” in awe.
You can characterize the two units as follows:
Chitose Ku S: Solid, defensive, steeped in tradition – a place where one could prove themselves.
Tainan Ku S: Aggressive, prestigious, elite – reserved for those who had already proven their worth.
The transfer to Tainan Ku S thus meant entry into the most prestigious circle of Japanese fighter pilots—but it also meant facing the most dangerous missions of the entire Pacific War. For men like Nishizawa, this path became legendary; for many others, it marked the beginning of the end.
At the outbreak of the Pacific War, the Chitose Kōkūtai served as a well‑organized, if technically outdated, fighter unit. Equipped with A5M4 “Claude” fighters, it was stationed on the Marshall Islands, tasked with defending Japan’s central Pacific outposts. Under the leadership of seasoned officers such as Captain Ohashi Fujiro, the unit placed great emphasis on discipline, tactical finesse, and pilot training. Although not in the spotlight, Chitose was a crucial proving ground for young, talented pilots.
Two of those pilots were Nishizawa Hiroyoshi and Yoshino Satoshi. Both had demonstrated exceptional aerial skill while with Chitose Ku S. In early 1942, they – along with other capable pilots – were transferred to the elite Tainan Kōkūtai. This transfer was not voluntary but a military reassignment widely regarded as a tremendous honor.
The Tainan Ku S was then equipped with the modern A6M2 Zero and served as the spearhead of the Imperial Japanese Navy’s air power. Its pilots were considered Japan’s best – many achieving “Ace” status. The unit fought on the front lines—from Southeast Asia to the Philippines and New Guinea—and earned a legendary reputation both within the Japanese forces and among Allied forces, who held the “Zero Aces” in awe.
You can characterize the two units as follows:
Chitose Ku S: Solid, defensive, steeped in tradition – a place where one could prove themselves.
Tainan Ku S: Aggressive, prestigious, elite – reserved for those who had already proven their worth.
The transfer to Tainan Ku S thus meant entry into the most prestigious circle of Japanese fighter pilots—but it also meant facing the most dangerous missions of the entire Pacific War. For men like Nishizawa, this path became legendary; for many others, it marked the beginning of the end.
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Wow very nice job! Very impressive research! I've never used the editor much except to fix a few errors here and there. You should talk to the beta patch group about this and if your mod could be included in the new beta!
Last edited by Tanaka on Sun Jun 15, 2025 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Many thanks, Tanaka – I truly appreciate your kind words!
This research is a personal passion project for me, and I'm very happy to see that it resonates with other fans of historical accuracy.
I deliberately posted the two threads (Tainan and Chitose) to get a sense of how the community would respond. For now, I’m developing this project for myself – but if there’s interest later on, I’d definitely be open to having it included in future versions.
What surprised me most during my research: I initially assumed that almost all Japanese pilots in WitP AE were procedurally generated. But when looking into the editor, it's clear that there is actually a historical core – which is then supplemented by generated pilots. Unfortunately, there's no visible difference between them at first glance, since all are only listed with initials rather than full first names.
I understand that many users may not care whether a pilot has a full name or not – and on the surface, it doesn't seem to affect gameplay.
But I decided to take this further:
Especially when it comes to commanders, having accurate historical attribution opens up a lot of potential. When you know a commander’s personality – through biographical sources, for example – you can adjust their stats in the editor much more authentically. And that realistically affects the whole squadron.
Examples:
A calm, tactical leader like Kobayashi Masashi could be assigned a moderate Aggression rating (e.g., 30–40) but high Leadership and Inspiration values. That might be reflected in more conservative patrol routes and better squadron coordination.
A hot-headed front-line officer like Yamada Masao – who made a name for himself early on through bold actions – might have a high Aggression score (e.g., 80–90), but a lower Organization value. This could lead to higher kill counts but also more losses in the long run.
For me, it’s exactly this emotional depth and character detail that brings a whole new layer to the game:
When I lose a squadron leader whose background I’ve researched, it doesn’t feel like just another number disappearing – it’s a real blow to the unit.
Thanks again for your encouragement!
This research is a personal passion project for me, and I'm very happy to see that it resonates with other fans of historical accuracy.
I deliberately posted the two threads (Tainan and Chitose) to get a sense of how the community would respond. For now, I’m developing this project for myself – but if there’s interest later on, I’d definitely be open to having it included in future versions.
What surprised me most during my research: I initially assumed that almost all Japanese pilots in WitP AE were procedurally generated. But when looking into the editor, it's clear that there is actually a historical core – which is then supplemented by generated pilots. Unfortunately, there's no visible difference between them at first glance, since all are only listed with initials rather than full first names.
I understand that many users may not care whether a pilot has a full name or not – and on the surface, it doesn't seem to affect gameplay.
But I decided to take this further:
Especially when it comes to commanders, having accurate historical attribution opens up a lot of potential. When you know a commander’s personality – through biographical sources, for example – you can adjust their stats in the editor much more authentically. And that realistically affects the whole squadron.
Examples:
A calm, tactical leader like Kobayashi Masashi could be assigned a moderate Aggression rating (e.g., 30–40) but high Leadership and Inspiration values. That might be reflected in more conservative patrol routes and better squadron coordination.
A hot-headed front-line officer like Yamada Masao – who made a name for himself early on through bold actions – might have a high Aggression score (e.g., 80–90), but a lower Organization value. This could lead to higher kill counts but also more losses in the long run.
For me, it’s exactly this emotional depth and character detail that brings a whole new layer to the game:
When I lose a squadron leader whose background I’ve researched, it doesn’t feel like just another number disappearing – it’s a real blow to the unit.
Thanks again for your encouragement!
-
- Posts: 8566
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
- Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
"Unfortunately, there's no visible difference between them at first glance, since all are only listed with initials rather than full first names."
That is exactly the same with allied pilots. Thus you have LCDR J.S.Thach commanding VF-3.
That is exactly the same with allied pilots. Thus you have LCDR J.S.Thach commanding VF-3.
fair winds,
Brad
Brad
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
I don’t want to get too far ahead with my thoughts, but here’s an example of how I imagine a numerically-based leader evaluation could look.
The foundation is the eight key attributes of a leader:
Skill, Inspiration, Air, Naval, Land, Admin, Aggression, Political.
Skill
General leadership ability. Influences combat outcomes and subordinate performance.
·1–10: Catastrophic – causes disorganization, logistical errors, units act slowly and inefficiently.
·11–20: Very weak – only suited for basic supply bases. Combat units under this command panic easily.
·21–30: Poor – can handle simple tasks but overwhelmed by complexity.
·31–40: Below average – basic understanding, ineffective under pressure.
·41–50: Average – no major mistakes, but brings no improvement.
·51–60: Solid – leads units stably, handles small crises.
·61–70: Good – adapts well, optimizes resources.
·71–80: Very good – noticeably improves efficiency and morale.
·81–90: Elite – units operate far more effectively under this leader.
·91–100: Genius – like Rommel or Yamashita; legendary strategic mind.
Inspiration
Measures how well a leader motivates and influences morale.
·1–10: Demoralizing – undermines confidence, lowers morale.
·11–20: Weak – no disciplinary or morale support.
·21–30: Neutral – no positive or negative influence.
·31–40: Average – maintains unit cohesion.
·41–50: Disciplinary – reduces panic, fosters unity.
·51–60: Motivator – boosts resilience and reactions.
·61–70: Role model – strengthens cohesion and readiness.
·71–80: Inspiring – troops follow willingly, ideal for elite units.
·81–90: Heroic – enhances combat performance.
·91–100: Legendary – like General Patton; troops exceed expectations.
Naval
Ability to lead naval operations, fleet coordination, ASW, escorts.
·1–10: Incompetent – jeopardizes own ships.
·11–20: Port officer – theory without practice.
·21–30: Coast Guard level – very limited use.
·31–40: Basic abilities – suitable for simple escort or transport.
·41–50: Solid coordination – effective with convoys and minor sea battles.
·51–60: Competent – understands operations and ASW basics.
·61–70: Tactical – skilled fleet commander, uses weather and formations.
·71–80: Offensive expert – leads carriers and naval offensives.
·81–90: Naval warfare expert – like Spruance or Yamamoto.
·91–100: Genius – creates new strategies, unbeatable at sea.
Air
Air unit leadership – includes mission planning, coordination, interception, and strike execution.
·1–10: Chaotic – missions fail, high losses.
·11–20: Inexperienced – random patrols, poor strike planning.
·21–30: Basic defense only – inefficient interceptions.
·31–40: Average – no gross errors, limited effectiveness.
·41–50: Competent – secure planning and execution.
·51–60: Tactically solid – good fighter use and mission balance.
·61–70: Coordinated – uses altitudes, rotations, surprise effectively.
·71–80: Strategist – excels in combined operations.
·81–90: Air warfare master – maximizes strike impact, minimizes losses.
·91–100: Legendary – like Genda Minoru or Dowding.
Land
Command of ground troops – tactical knowledge, terrain usage, defensive/offensive coordination.
·1–10: Catastrophic – lost units, bad orders, high losses.
·11–20: Poor – ignores supply lines and flanks.
·21–30: Basic knowledge – slow response, rigid defense.
·31–40: Works in static defense only.
·41–50: Functional – basic handling of standard combat.
·51–60: Tactically aware – good terrain and support usage.
·61–70: Skilled – executes flanking, exploits weakness.
·71–80: Strategic – strong offense and fallback planning.
·81–90: Battlefield master – reshapes lines, adaptive.
·91–100: Staff genius – like Manstein or Yamashita.
Admin
Ability to manage logistics and administration effectively.
·1–10: Total chaos – supply failure, organizational breakdown.
·11–20: Poor efficiency – shortages, delays.
·21–30: Operational weakness – sloppy structure.
·31–40: Basic – unit operates, but with friction.
·41–50: Acceptable – no major issues.
·51–60: Coordinated logistics – stable process.
·61–70: Tactical logistics – aware of routing and resupply.
·71–80: Optimized – minimal waste, efficient transitions.
·81–90: Admin expert – ideal for supply HQs.
·91–100: Genius – like Gen. Somervell, total logistical control.
Aggression
Measures tendency toward offensive or defensive decisions.
·1–10: Ultra-defensive – won’t attack, even with overwhelming odds.
·11–20: Cautious – attacks only with clear superiority.
·21–30: Patient – fits elite units rebuilding or reserves.
·31–40: Situational – takes chances only with good intel.
·41–50: Balanced – engages when odds look decent.
·51–60: Decisive – willing to fight at even odds.
·61–70: Offensive-minded – looks for initiative.
·71–80: Bold – presses attacks even at some risk.
·81–90: Reckless – accepts high losses.
·91–100: Fanatic – will attack under any condition.
Political
Represents political backing – determines Political Point cost to replace.
·1: Unknown – no support, easily replaced.
·2: Low rank – no higher protection.
·3: Average officer – low PP cost to replace.
·4: Tolerated – some resistance, moderate PP cost.
·5: Supported – needs justification to remove.
·6: Staff ally – PP cost becomes significant.
·7: Well-connected – high PP cost, semi-protected.
·8: Favored – hard to justify replacement.
·9: Shielded – almost immune without major PP loss.
·10: Untouchable – removal is politically disastrous.
The foundation is the eight key attributes of a leader:
Skill, Inspiration, Air, Naval, Land, Admin, Aggression, Political.
Skill
General leadership ability. Influences combat outcomes and subordinate performance.
·1–10: Catastrophic – causes disorganization, logistical errors, units act slowly and inefficiently.
·11–20: Very weak – only suited for basic supply bases. Combat units under this command panic easily.
·21–30: Poor – can handle simple tasks but overwhelmed by complexity.
·31–40: Below average – basic understanding, ineffective under pressure.
·41–50: Average – no major mistakes, but brings no improvement.
·51–60: Solid – leads units stably, handles small crises.
·61–70: Good – adapts well, optimizes resources.
·71–80: Very good – noticeably improves efficiency and morale.
·81–90: Elite – units operate far more effectively under this leader.
·91–100: Genius – like Rommel or Yamashita; legendary strategic mind.
Inspiration
Measures how well a leader motivates and influences morale.
·1–10: Demoralizing – undermines confidence, lowers morale.
·11–20: Weak – no disciplinary or morale support.
·21–30: Neutral – no positive or negative influence.
·31–40: Average – maintains unit cohesion.
·41–50: Disciplinary – reduces panic, fosters unity.
·51–60: Motivator – boosts resilience and reactions.
·61–70: Role model – strengthens cohesion and readiness.
·71–80: Inspiring – troops follow willingly, ideal for elite units.
·81–90: Heroic – enhances combat performance.
·91–100: Legendary – like General Patton; troops exceed expectations.
Naval
Ability to lead naval operations, fleet coordination, ASW, escorts.
·1–10: Incompetent – jeopardizes own ships.
·11–20: Port officer – theory without practice.
·21–30: Coast Guard level – very limited use.
·31–40: Basic abilities – suitable for simple escort or transport.
·41–50: Solid coordination – effective with convoys and minor sea battles.
·51–60: Competent – understands operations and ASW basics.
·61–70: Tactical – skilled fleet commander, uses weather and formations.
·71–80: Offensive expert – leads carriers and naval offensives.
·81–90: Naval warfare expert – like Spruance or Yamamoto.
·91–100: Genius – creates new strategies, unbeatable at sea.
Air
Air unit leadership – includes mission planning, coordination, interception, and strike execution.
·1–10: Chaotic – missions fail, high losses.
·11–20: Inexperienced – random patrols, poor strike planning.
·21–30: Basic defense only – inefficient interceptions.
·31–40: Average – no gross errors, limited effectiveness.
·41–50: Competent – secure planning and execution.
·51–60: Tactically solid – good fighter use and mission balance.
·61–70: Coordinated – uses altitudes, rotations, surprise effectively.
·71–80: Strategist – excels in combined operations.
·81–90: Air warfare master – maximizes strike impact, minimizes losses.
·91–100: Legendary – like Genda Minoru or Dowding.
Land
Command of ground troops – tactical knowledge, terrain usage, defensive/offensive coordination.
·1–10: Catastrophic – lost units, bad orders, high losses.
·11–20: Poor – ignores supply lines and flanks.
·21–30: Basic knowledge – slow response, rigid defense.
·31–40: Works in static defense only.
·41–50: Functional – basic handling of standard combat.
·51–60: Tactically aware – good terrain and support usage.
·61–70: Skilled – executes flanking, exploits weakness.
·71–80: Strategic – strong offense and fallback planning.
·81–90: Battlefield master – reshapes lines, adaptive.
·91–100: Staff genius – like Manstein or Yamashita.
Admin
Ability to manage logistics and administration effectively.
·1–10: Total chaos – supply failure, organizational breakdown.
·11–20: Poor efficiency – shortages, delays.
·21–30: Operational weakness – sloppy structure.
·31–40: Basic – unit operates, but with friction.
·41–50: Acceptable – no major issues.
·51–60: Coordinated logistics – stable process.
·61–70: Tactical logistics – aware of routing and resupply.
·71–80: Optimized – minimal waste, efficient transitions.
·81–90: Admin expert – ideal for supply HQs.
·91–100: Genius – like Gen. Somervell, total logistical control.
Aggression
Measures tendency toward offensive or defensive decisions.
·1–10: Ultra-defensive – won’t attack, even with overwhelming odds.
·11–20: Cautious – attacks only with clear superiority.
·21–30: Patient – fits elite units rebuilding or reserves.
·31–40: Situational – takes chances only with good intel.
·41–50: Balanced – engages when odds look decent.
·51–60: Decisive – willing to fight at even odds.
·61–70: Offensive-minded – looks for initiative.
·71–80: Bold – presses attacks even at some risk.
·81–90: Reckless – accepts high losses.
·91–100: Fanatic – will attack under any condition.
Political
Represents political backing – determines Political Point cost to replace.
·1: Unknown – no support, easily replaced.
·2: Low rank – no higher protection.
·3: Average officer – low PP cost to replace.
·4: Tolerated – some resistance, moderate PP cost.
·5: Supported – needs justification to remove.
·6: Staff ally – PP cost becomes significant.
·7: Well-connected – high PP cost, semi-protected.
·8: Favored – hard to justify replacement.
·9: Shielded – almost immune without major PP loss.
·10: Untouchable – removal is politically disastrous.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Biography: Captain Ohashi Fujiro – Commander of the Chitose Kōkūtai (1941–1942)
Year of Birth: Unknown
Rank (as of 1941): Kaigun Daisa (海軍大佐 – Naval Captain)
Unit: Chitose Kōkūtai → later: 703rd Naval Air Group
Position: Squadron Commander, later organizational leader
Early Career & Rise
Little is known about Captain Ohashi Fujiro’s early career. However, his appointment as commander of a key Naval Air Squadron before the outbreak of the Pacific War suggests he had already proven himself through discipline, organizational skills, and tactical acumen.
By September 1941, he had assumed command of the Chitose Kōkūtai, which at that time consisted of light bombers (Mitsubishi G3M "Nell") and fighter aircraft. The unit reported directly to the 24th Air Flotilla and was slated for strategic operations in the Western Pacific.
Wake Island & the Early Pacific War
At the start of the Pacific War, Captain Ohashi led his bomber groups in multiple air raids on Wake Island. Between December 8 and 23, 1941, the island was repeatedly bombed by his unit in preparation for the later amphibious invasion.
These precisely coordinated air strikes earned the nickname “Ohashi Butai” (大橋部隊 – “Ohashi Group”) in the field – a sign of his authority and the central role he played within his unit.
Central Pacific Operations & Reorganization
Throughout 1942, his squadron was relocated several times – including to Roi, Truk, and Rabaul. Missions under Ohashi’s leadership included long-range bombing raids, reconnaissance, and fighter escorts across vast distances in the Central Pacific.
In November 1942, the Chitose Kōkūtai was reorganized into new formations. The bomber contingent became the newly established 703rd Kōkūtai, which Captain Ohashi also led. He oversaw its restructuring until its eventual disbandment in March 1943.
Leadership Style & Military Impact
Captain Ohashi Fujiro was not a famous ace or charismatic daredevil but rather a methodical commander known for clarity, logistical discipline, and reliable tactical planning. He emphasized solid preparation, realistic assessment of enemy conditions, and maintaining operational cohesion over great distances.
The fact that his bomber group was named after him reflects the high regard he earned within the Imperial Navy – even if he held little political clout beyond operational command.
Captain Ohashi Fujiro was not a soaring hero, but a dependable architect of Japan’s early Pacific campaigns. As commander of the Chitose and later 703rd Naval Air Group, he embodied the backbone of tactical leadership: calm, organized, and effective.
Year of Birth: Unknown
Rank (as of 1941): Kaigun Daisa (海軍大佐 – Naval Captain)
Unit: Chitose Kōkūtai → later: 703rd Naval Air Group
Position: Squadron Commander, later organizational leader
Early Career & Rise
Little is known about Captain Ohashi Fujiro’s early career. However, his appointment as commander of a key Naval Air Squadron before the outbreak of the Pacific War suggests he had already proven himself through discipline, organizational skills, and tactical acumen.
By September 1941, he had assumed command of the Chitose Kōkūtai, which at that time consisted of light bombers (Mitsubishi G3M "Nell") and fighter aircraft. The unit reported directly to the 24th Air Flotilla and was slated for strategic operations in the Western Pacific.
Wake Island & the Early Pacific War
At the start of the Pacific War, Captain Ohashi led his bomber groups in multiple air raids on Wake Island. Between December 8 and 23, 1941, the island was repeatedly bombed by his unit in preparation for the later amphibious invasion.
These precisely coordinated air strikes earned the nickname “Ohashi Butai” (大橋部隊 – “Ohashi Group”) in the field – a sign of his authority and the central role he played within his unit.
Central Pacific Operations & Reorganization
Throughout 1942, his squadron was relocated several times – including to Roi, Truk, and Rabaul. Missions under Ohashi’s leadership included long-range bombing raids, reconnaissance, and fighter escorts across vast distances in the Central Pacific.
In November 1942, the Chitose Kōkūtai was reorganized into new formations. The bomber contingent became the newly established 703rd Kōkūtai, which Captain Ohashi also led. He oversaw its restructuring until its eventual disbandment in March 1943.
Leadership Style & Military Impact
Captain Ohashi Fujiro was not a famous ace or charismatic daredevil but rather a methodical commander known for clarity, logistical discipline, and reliable tactical planning. He emphasized solid preparation, realistic assessment of enemy conditions, and maintaining operational cohesion over great distances.
The fact that his bomber group was named after him reflects the high regard he earned within the Imperial Navy – even if he held little political clout beyond operational command.
Captain Ohashi Fujiro was not a soaring hero, but a dependable architect of Japan’s early Pacific campaigns. As commander of the Chitose and later 703rd Naval Air Group, he embodied the backbone of tactical leadership: calm, organized, and effective.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Current Stats in Game Editor – Ohashi Fujiro
Original Values:
Revised Evaluation Based on Biographical Analysis
Contextual Justification:
Conclusion
Captain Ohashi Fujiro was a competent mid-level squadron leader – not an exceptional tactician, but no liability either. His strengths lay in discipline, steady leadership, and adaptability during Pacific combat operations.
Ideal command assignments:
Original Values:
- Skill: 60
- Inspiration: 57
- Naval: 47
- Air: 58
- Land: 19
- Admin: 52
- Aggression: 62
- Political: 3
Revised Evaluation Based on Biographical Analysis
Contextual Justification:
- Operational leadership of Chitose Ku S-1 in the South Seas
- Early coordination of fighter missions against US recon aircraft
- Supervision of new pilot integration before Wake and Rabaul
- Militarily efficient, no record of major strategic failures
- Low political influence, not a high-profile figure
- Skill: 65 – Stable leadership and solid tactical decisions; no major blunders.
- Inspiration: 61 – A respected officer with strong unit cohesion, though not charismatic.
- Naval: 50 – Basic knowledge through maritime patrols; not a naval warfare expert.
- Air: 66 – Tactical air experience, proven A6M2 Zero coordination.
- Land: 20 – No recorded ground operations; minimal ground warfare knowledge.
- Admin: 58 – Well-organized, competent in staff coordination and pilot assignment.
- Aggression: 55 – Leads offensives, but in a calculated, measured fashion.
- Political: 3 – Accurate; lacked political patrons or strategic clout.
Conclusion
Captain Ohashi Fujiro was a competent mid-level squadron leader – not an exceptional tactician, but no liability either. His strengths lay in discipline, steady leadership, and adaptability during Pacific combat operations.
Ideal command assignments:
- Routine missions
- Training squadrons with frontline exposure
- Airbase command during early-stage buildup
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:30 pm
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Hello Peiper1944, allow me to put my 2¢ in... I have a copy of Hata's Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units in World War II, and under Chitose Air Group (pp.103-5), CAPT Ōhashi Fujiro is indeed the commanding officer at Roi just before the start of the war...
But at the end of november 1941, some planes were detached to Taroa Island (in the Maloelap atoll) under the command of group leader LCDR Igarashi Chikamasa... That would be Chitose KuS-1 Det.
There is also a chapter on Tainan Air Group (pp.132-8)
You can ''borrow'' a copy of the book by signing in on this site :
https://archive.org/details/japanesenav ... 9/mode/2up
But at the end of november 1941, some planes were detached to Taroa Island (in the Maloelap atoll) under the command of group leader LCDR Igarashi Chikamasa... That would be Chitose KuS-1 Det.
There is also a chapter on Tainan Air Group (pp.132-8)
You can ''borrow'' a copy of the book by signing in on this site :
https://archive.org/details/japanesenav ... 9/mode/2up
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Hi kanadanoyamaneko,
thank you very much for your reply – and especially for pointing me to Hata’s Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units on archive.org! I tested the site right away and borrowed the book – what an amazing resource!
The amount of information, especially all the pilot biographies, is simply impressive. I've already spent hours reading the chapters on Chitose and Tainan. It's a real treasure for anyone interested in the topic.
Unfortunately, I couldn’t find a dedicated biography of Group Leader LCDR Igarashi Chikamasa online. Still, it was great to see him mentioned in the book – and I was able to assign him as commander of the Chitose KuS-1 Det in-game. A great historical detail for immersion!
Once again, a thousand thanks for your fantastic tip!
Best regards,
Peiper1944
Hi kanadanoyamaneko,
thank you very much for your reply – and especially for pointing me to Hata’s Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units on archive.org! I tested the site right away and borrowed the book – what an amazing resource!
The amount of information, especially all the pilot biographies, is simply impressive. I've already spent hours reading the chapters on Chitose and Tainan. It's a real treasure for anyone interested in the topic.
Unfortunately, I couldn’t find a dedicated biography of Group Leader LCDR Igarashi Chikamasa online. Still, it was great to see him mentioned in the book – and I was able to assign him as commander of the Chitose KuS-1 Det in-game. A great historical detail for immersion!
Once again, a thousand thanks for your fantastic tip!
Best regards,
Peiper1944
- Attachments
-
- Igarashi Chikamasa.png (233.43 KiB) Viewed 174 times
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:30 pm
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
Sadly, in the game, Cdr Igarashi Chikamasa has the skills of a torpedo bomber pilot, and I haven't found a way yet to change them in the editor, or if it is even possible.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
I assigned LCDR Igarashi Chikamasa as the group commander of Chitose KuS-1 Detachment after locating him in the scenario editor under the “Leaders” tab.
Since he has no biography and is not listed as a pilot, I decided to use him exclusively as a commander.
Since he has no biography and is not listed as a pilot, I decided to use him exclusively as a commander.
- Attachments
-
- Igarashi.png (280.34 KiB) Viewed 105 times
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/jap ... china-1937. . . on 16 August )1937) six of Kaga’s Type 90 fighters led by Lt Chikamasa Igarashi encountered four Chinese fighters, claiming three of them shot down over Jiangwan, Shanghai. . . .
There is other information about other Japanese fighter pilots here as well, this is in the footnotes:
https://military-history.fandom.com/wik ... rrier_Kaga#5 footnote Lieutenant Chikamasa Igarashi led the six fighters in the 16 August engagement. Also participating in that engagement was future ace Akio Matsuba.
http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/china_ji-chun.htmOn 7 September three A5Ms led by Lieutenant Chikamasa Igarashi escorted six Type 96 carrier bombers from the Kaga. At 07:50 they were intercepted by a three-aircraft formation of Curtiss Hawk IIIs including Lieutenant Lai Ming-Tang, squadron vice-commander of the 22nd PS (Hawk III no. New-1), Flight leader Lieutenant Lu Ji-Chun (Hawk III no. 2303) and Chou Geng-Hsu of the 25th PS near Tai Hue.
Lu and Chou attacked the bombers and claimed one each. The Chinese fighters were then engaged by the A5Ms and tangled with them for half an hour before being able to disengage and return to Nanking at 08:30. When returning Lai’s Hawk had been hit 61 times and Lu had been hit in the buttock. He made an emergency landing and touched ground safely at Nanking Base. In the hospital, he told his fellow pilots how he felt when he was hit:
“When the bullet entered my leg muscles it felt cool and not burning hot. I did not feel any pain then, but realized that a bulging item has lodged in my flesh. Then blood gushed out and soaked my flight suit. It also felt cool, but the sensation of pain increased every second and every ensuing minute. When I landed the plane, the pain was almost unbearable.”
When returning to the Kaga the Japanese fighters reported that they had been involved in combat with seven Curtiss Hawks while supporting a carrier attack unit. The Japanese fighters claimed five Chinese aircraft of which Igarashi claimed three and PO1c Watari Handa (flying as number two) claimed one. No Chinese aircraft was lost in this combat.
More sources possibly:
Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units in World War II - Ikuhiko Hata and Yasuho Izawa, translated by Don Cyril Gorham, 1989 United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, ISBN 0-87021-315-6
Polikarpov I-15, I-16 and I-153 Aces - Mikhail Maslov, 2010 Osprey Publishing, Oxford, ISBN 978-1-84603-981-2
According to this site, he was the air officer on the Taiyo:
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic ... start=1950LCDR IGARASHI Chikamasa (56) - 11 April 1942 - 22 October 1942
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
later on the site:11 April 1942:
Arrive at Rabaul. Bombed that same day, no damage. LtCdr (later Cdr) Igarashi Chikamasa (56) (former Wing Leader, Chitose Air Group) is appointed Air Officer. LtCdr Sakinaga is appointed an Equipping Officer of JUNYO.
http://www.combinedfleet.com/taiyo.htm22 October 1942:
Air Officer LtCdr Igarashi is reassigned and leaves the ship. A successor is not appointed.
I hope that this information does give him credit as a fighter pilot and as a leader.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
@RangerJoe
You're absolutely right – and thank you very much for gathering and sharing those detailed sources.
My earlier comment was poorly phrased, and I realize now that I should have clarified better: what I actually meant is that biographical details on Igarashi Chikamas are relatively sparse, especially compared to more famous aces with postwar records or memoirs.
That was entirely my mistake – I appreciate your correction and will strive to be more precise in the future.
The combat reports from August and September 1937, his leadership in the Chitose Kōkūtai, and his later role aboard the Taiyō clearly show that Igarashi was not only a combat-experienced pilot, but also a capable leader at squadron and carrier group level.
Based on the evidence you've pointed out (and some of the sources I reviewed after your post), I’ll adjust the in-game values I had originally set for him in my mod project. I agree: his early leadership, operational experience, and command role in a high-tension theater like Rabaul definitely deserve recognition – just perhaps not on the same tier as the very top-tier IJN aces, but certainly well above average.
Thanks again for pointing it out – I learned something in the process.
Best regards,
Peiper1944
You're absolutely right – and thank you very much for gathering and sharing those detailed sources.
My earlier comment was poorly phrased, and I realize now that I should have clarified better: what I actually meant is that biographical details on Igarashi Chikamas are relatively sparse, especially compared to more famous aces with postwar records or memoirs.
That was entirely my mistake – I appreciate your correction and will strive to be more precise in the future.
The combat reports from August and September 1937, his leadership in the Chitose Kōkūtai, and his later role aboard the Taiyō clearly show that Igarashi was not only a combat-experienced pilot, but also a capable leader at squadron and carrier group level.
Based on the evidence you've pointed out (and some of the sources I reviewed after your post), I’ll adjust the in-game values I had originally set for him in my mod project. I agree: his early leadership, operational experience, and command role in a high-tension theater like Rabaul definitely deserve recognition – just perhaps not on the same tier as the very top-tier IJN aces, but certainly well above average.
Thanks again for pointing it out – I learned something in the process.
Best regards,
Peiper1944
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:41 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Historical Pilots of the Chitose Kōkūtai – as of December 7, 1941
LCDR Igarashi Chikamas – Biography
Name: Igarashi Chikamas (五十嵐 親正)
Rank: Lieutenant Commander (possibly later Commander)
Year of birth: Unknown
Units:
· Kaga Carrier Fighter Unit (1937)
· Chitose Air Group (until December 1941)
· Taiyō Escort Carrier – Air Officer (April–October 1942)
Early Career and Air Battles in China (1937)
During the Second Sino-Japanese War, Igarashi served as a combat pilot and flight leader of the Type 90 carrier fighters (A2N) aboard the aircraft carrier Kaga.
· August 16, 1937: He led six of his pilots against four Chinese fighters over Jiangwan (Shanghai). Three enemy aircraft were reportedly shot down—this action was part of the opening phase of the Shanghai Incident.
· September 7, 1937: Igarashi led three A5Ms escorting six Type 96 carrier bombers. During the aerial clash near Tai Hue, they encountered Curtiss Hawk IIIs of the Chinese Air Force, including Lt. Lu Ji-Chun and Lt. Lai Ming-Tang.
His formation claimed five kills—Igarashi himself claimed three. Chinese sources confirmed no actual losses. PO1C Watari Handa, flying as his wingman, claimed an additional kill.
Leadership Role – Chitose Air Group (1941)
By December 1941 at the latest, Igarashi had become the Wing Leader of the Chitose Kōkūtai, one of the principal carrier groups in the central Pacific.
The unit was stationed in the Marshall Islands (Roi & Taroa) and was responsible for both air defense and the training of young carrier pilots.
Taiyō Escort Carrier – South Pacific (1942)
With the outbreak of the Pacific War, Igarashi was appointed Air Officer aboard the escort carrier Taiyō.
· April 11, 1942: Arrival at Rabaul—bombed that same day, but no damage occurred.
· He assumed operational command of the onboard air group.
· October 22, 1942: Igarashi was relieved of his post as Air Officer aboard Taiyō. No immediate replacement was appointed.
Assessment & Significance
LCDR Igarashi Chikamas was one of the early carrier fighter group leaders of the Imperial Japanese Navy.
His active role in the initial air operations over China, later as a commanding officer in the Marshall Islands, and as Air Officer in the South Pacific war zone at Rabaul underscore his strategic importance.
His name appears repeatedly in combat reports, squadron rosters, and aerial action logs—not just as a participant, but as a coordinator of entire combat formations.
Within the structured hierarchy of the IJN’s carrier aviation, Igarashi served as a crucial link between flight decks and the front line.
Name: Igarashi Chikamas (五十嵐 親正)
Rank: Lieutenant Commander (possibly later Commander)
Year of birth: Unknown
Units:
· Kaga Carrier Fighter Unit (1937)
· Chitose Air Group (until December 1941)
· Taiyō Escort Carrier – Air Officer (April–October 1942)
Early Career and Air Battles in China (1937)
During the Second Sino-Japanese War, Igarashi served as a combat pilot and flight leader of the Type 90 carrier fighters (A2N) aboard the aircraft carrier Kaga.
· August 16, 1937: He led six of his pilots against four Chinese fighters over Jiangwan (Shanghai). Three enemy aircraft were reportedly shot down—this action was part of the opening phase of the Shanghai Incident.
· September 7, 1937: Igarashi led three A5Ms escorting six Type 96 carrier bombers. During the aerial clash near Tai Hue, they encountered Curtiss Hawk IIIs of the Chinese Air Force, including Lt. Lu Ji-Chun and Lt. Lai Ming-Tang.
His formation claimed five kills—Igarashi himself claimed three. Chinese sources confirmed no actual losses. PO1C Watari Handa, flying as his wingman, claimed an additional kill.
Leadership Role – Chitose Air Group (1941)
By December 1941 at the latest, Igarashi had become the Wing Leader of the Chitose Kōkūtai, one of the principal carrier groups in the central Pacific.
The unit was stationed in the Marshall Islands (Roi & Taroa) and was responsible for both air defense and the training of young carrier pilots.
Taiyō Escort Carrier – South Pacific (1942)
With the outbreak of the Pacific War, Igarashi was appointed Air Officer aboard the escort carrier Taiyō.
· April 11, 1942: Arrival at Rabaul—bombed that same day, but no damage occurred.
· He assumed operational command of the onboard air group.
· October 22, 1942: Igarashi was relieved of his post as Air Officer aboard Taiyō. No immediate replacement was appointed.
Assessment & Significance
LCDR Igarashi Chikamas was one of the early carrier fighter group leaders of the Imperial Japanese Navy.
His active role in the initial air operations over China, later as a commanding officer in the Marshall Islands, and as Air Officer in the South Pacific war zone at Rabaul underscore his strategic importance.
His name appears repeatedly in combat reports, squadron rosters, and aerial action logs—not just as a participant, but as a coordinator of entire combat formations.
Within the structured hierarchy of the IJN’s carrier aviation, Igarashi served as a crucial link between flight decks and the front line.