wish list for patch

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: ASW patrol

Post by hithere »

ORIGINAL: BoerWar
I'd like to see CV based bombers fixed so that no matter what orders they have they would default to attack an enemy CV if it was located within range. If they were planning to do an airfield/ground attack the torp bombers can attack with bombs in the first round. I am in a PBEM game as the Japanese. Op infield popped up and my genius bombers flew right on by 3 CV's in route to a suprise attack on PH despite that fact that the U.S. CV's were the real target. We conduct a suprise attack and the U.S. CV's get in the first licks. AAAArrrggghhh.

Set them to primary Naval attack and secondary Port attack.


< Message edited by Kid -- 7/20/2004 3:16:14 AM >

Ok, will you be programing the "historical first turn" attack on PH this way? Currently if you play a "variable turn one" with a "historical first turn" the result if operation infield turns up is highly questionable. I don't get to change settings with "historical first turn" selected and I don't think we should have to create a bunch of house rules to prevent shenanigans if "hstorical first turn" isn't selected.

not to debate this here....but if you choose variable turn one and get infield, thus hammered...that is the chance you take....it is not "shenanigans", it is the game. if that is what really happened, KB would not have had time to rearm 300 aircraft, they went there to bomb PH, hopfully with the CV's in port. As proof, as mentioned before, look at midway..really almost the exact same situation as infield
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
User avatar
MadmanRick
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: New York City, U.S.A.

RE: wish list for patch

Post by MadmanRick »

I would like to see the date that a ship is sunk added, that way one could tell if it was sunk right away or if it succombed to its' damage later.

Rick

Image

already on the list
Attachments
art11.jpg
art11.jpg (84.91 KiB) Viewed 221 times
Image
"Our lives begin to end the moment we become silent about things that matter". Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
User avatar
pry
Posts: 938
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 7:19 am
Location: Overlooking Galveston Bay, Texas

RE: ASW patrol

Post by pry »

ORIGINAL: hithere

I just skimed the 240+ wishes but didn't see this...i'm sure it's there

- a summary at the end of the turn for unit's that came during the turn...i try to keep up with the coming units but miss them sometimes....also because when they are listed at the bottom of the screen..i have the scroll sped up to save time..so i miss them somtimes

This is already in the game ships, airgroups and land units are listed at the bottom of the daily Operations report, However between the next to last beta and the retail version this somehow got broken. It is on the list to be fixed.
hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: ASW patrol

Post by hithere »

Thanks
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
User avatar
MadmanRick
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: New York City, U.S.A.

RE: wish list for patch

Post by MadmanRick »

Ok, this one is harder than my last one, but something I've desired since early on in UV. I would like to see an "undo" button. I sometimes transfer aircraft to bases/ships, but to the wrong one. My favorite mistake used to be Lunga and Lungaville (sic) in UV. It is easier to transfer by using the map option, but I still have accidentally transferred to the wrong base/ship from time to time. I would prefer that an "undo" button ONLY be available for transferring a/c and for no other purpose. Thanks,

Rick

Image
Attachments
art11.jpg
art11.jpg (84.91 KiB) Viewed 223 times
Image
"Our lives begin to end the moment we become silent about things that matter". Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Mr.Frag »

I would like to see an "undo" button.

<chuckle>

That is #1 on my list of wishes, but for a whole lot of very technical reasons, it will probably never make it. It is actually a fundimental difference to the way things were coded and will require a huge investment in rewrite time.
Banquet
Posts: 1190
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 9:04 pm
Location: England

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Banquet »

I'd like to see a different icon on the map for a sighted enemy TF if it includes a CV sighting.

An icon similiar to the friendly air combat TF should be used. CV's are a big deal and any TF containing a CV should be easy to differentiate.
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: wish list for patch

Post by DrewMatrix »

I would like to see an "undo" button.

They have one. "Q". But it only works if you use the "F" button frequently <G>
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Jaws_slith »

The same short keys as used in Pacific War.
Ability to train extra aviation units.
Quick Save option.
Simple cancel option when loaded wrong troops into ships.
Country computer control option.
Good Hunting
User avatar
Cmdrcain
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Rebuilding FLA, Busy Repairing!
Contact:

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Cmdrcain »

ORIGINAL: Jaws43
ORIGINAL: Jaws43

Extra switches in the preferences

1: Activate Russians rule on/off
2: Auto replenish on/off
3: Auto convoy on/off (for the big and small scenario's)

The sound for my SB audigy fixed and last but not least... a sort option and date for ships that were sunk.


Very good game and I like the complexity[:)]

And ehh....
Fix accept replacement bug in preferences (on is off and off is on now)
Sort LCU's country wise option



Is it really?

On = OFf no Replacements and Off = On yes get replacements... what Version talking of?

Not talking of accept replacemenys in unit screens?
Noise? What Noise? It's sooooo quiet and Peaceful!
Image
Battlestar Pegasus
User avatar
Cmdrcain
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Rebuilding FLA, Busy Repairing!
Contact:

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Cmdrcain »

ORIGINAL: Jaws43
ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

Could we ask for some LARGER "buttons" on the screen for opening, closing, returning,
and the like. These get used a lot, and require more precision with the mouse printer
than seems necessary . It might not be as astethically pleasing, but on the 10,000th
click astethics is a very secondary feature compared to ease of use.

Aldo glasses are a good alternative I agree complete[;)]


Sometimes I resort to using my Magnifying glass [:'(]
Noise? What Noise? It's sooooo quiet and Peaceful!
Image
Battlestar Pegasus
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: wish list for patch

Post by freeboy »

Bridges are fundenmetal for moving troops and supplies in Asia, and south east Asia/Burma.. how about a whole new level of complexity by adding bridges.. abstractly as a number between 1 and 4 with 1 being very little, barges and the like and 4 being many mulitilande highway and rail bridges.... and giving air a destroy bridges command.. I knoe this is just a sic way to make a game that is flawless more complex[:-][:-]

I had this though looking at the map of Korea as myu first order of business in the korean war game.. name of which has been forgotten was to target bridges.
"Tanks forward"
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Mike Scholl »

TWO things I would like to see....
1) A zoom-in/zoom-out feature. Quite often I would like to see a larger portion of
the map for a while---like to see if the computer has routed my TF's right past a
hostile base. Other times it would be nice to see a smaller area in greater detail
when trying to decide how to juggle assets
2) Would it be possible to keep the Land units showing on the map when you are
picking TF destinations? It's damned annoying when you have a couple of land
units you would like to pick up among several bases, but when you go to set the
destination for the TF the unit's aren't visible and you have to guess or go through
the whole routine again.
User avatar
MadmanRick
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: New York City, U.S.A.

RE: wish list for patch

Post by MadmanRick »

Would it be possible to keep the Land units showing on the map when you are
picking TF destinations? It's damned annoying when you have a couple of land
units you would like to pick up among several bases, but when you go to set the
destination for the TF the unit's aren't visible and you have to guess or go through
the whole routine again.
Mike,
I also dislike that quirk of the programming, however I've found my own little work around. If you run the cursor over the lower right corner of the bases, it will give you a message of which units are at that particular base. Now the only problem with that workaround is that you need to know the unit designation(s) of the LCU's you want to load. I agree that I would prefer to visually see the units, but this works for me in the meantime.

Rick

Image
Attachments
art14.jpg
art14.jpg (77.68 KiB) Viewed 222 times
Image
"Our lives begin to end the moment we become silent about things that matter". Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Halsey »

I would like to be able to change mission parameters from the dropdown Land Based Air and Naval Based Air charts. Then I wouldn't have to scroll to each and every base and TF on the map to change each air units settings.

Or, a set all air units of this type on the entire map button.[;)]
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Jaws_slith »

ORIGINAL: Cmdrcain
ORIGINAL: Jaws43
ORIGINAL: Jaws43

Extra switches in the preferences

1: Activate Russians rule on/off
2: Auto replenish on/off
3: Auto convoy on/off (for the big and small scenario's)

The sound for my SB audigy fixed and last but not least... a sort option and date for ships that were sunk.


Very good game and I like the complexity[:)]

And ehh....
Fix accept replacement bug in preferences (on is off and off is on now)
Sort LCU's country wise option



Is it really?

On = OFf no Replacements and Off = On yes get replacements... what Version talking of?

Not talking of accept replacemenys in unit screens?

1.0 I had problems with the 1.11 version. But is it fixed there? No we are not talking about the units screens.
Good Hunting
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: wish list for patch

Post by DrewMatrix »

A "TF that is at its DH and on Patrol/or at its Homebase" (i.e. a "TF that isn't going anywhere this turn") listing. So we can more easily find assets that can be put back to work.
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
User avatar
BoerWar
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Arlington, VA

RE: wish list for patch

Post by BoerWar »



quote:

ORIGINAL: BoerWar

quote:

I'd like to see CV based bombers fixed so that no matter what orders they have they would default to attack an enemy CV if it was located within range. If they were planning to do an airfield/ground attack the torp bombers can attack with bombs in the first round. I am in a PBEM game as the Japanese. Op infield popped up and my genius bombers flew right on by 3 CV's in route to a suprise attack on PH despite that fact that the U.S. CV's were the real target. We conduct a suprise attack and the U.S. CV's get in the first licks. AAAArrrggghhh.

Set them to primary Naval attack and secondary Port attack.


< Message edited by Kid -- 7/20/2004 3:16:14 AM >

Ok, will you be programing the "historical first turn" attack on PH this way? Currently if you play a "variable turn one" with a "historical first turn" the result if operation infield turns up is highly questionable. I don't get to change settings with "historical first turn" selected and I don't think we should have to create a bunch of house rules to prevent shenanigans if "hstorical first turn" isn't selected.


not to debate this here....but if you choose variable turn one and get infield, thus hammered...that is the chance you take....it is not "shenanigans", it is the game. if that is what really happened, KB would not have had time to rearm 300 aircraft, they went there to bomb PH, hopfully with the CV's in port. As proof, as mentioned before, look at midway..really almost the exact same situation as infield

_____________________________

Let's debate, because the orders for KB in the "historical first turn" need to be fixed. So you're saying that the Japanese strike force would have flown directly over the US CV task force that they hoped to find and which had been spotted 120nm NW of PH enroute to attack BB's in port. I don't think so. Midway is a poor example. At PH the Japanese had strategic and tactical suprise while at Midway the US had both due to good intel, luck and great shipyard work on Yorktown. Midway happened because the Japanes didn't expect the CV's to be in the area so fast and they didn't locate the US force until after the bombers were already at Midway and they had already suffered an attack. What happens in the game is apparently the result of a game mechanism, the units have port/airfield attack orders instead of Naval attack with port/airfield attack secondary. The way its currently set the Japanese don't even react in the pm air phase because they are still set to port/airfield attack. It's a game problem not a luck or tactics problem and it certainly doesn't simulate historical reality.
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

Entry Hex or delayed TF arrival

Post by pad152 »

Allow for the creation of a entry/exit hex or delayed entry for TFs to enter or exit the main campaign map.
Williamb
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Dayton Ohio

RE: wish list for patch

Post by Williamb »

Wuldnt mind option to turn off FOW for reports. Just to get accurate info on battle losses.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”