2 questions

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Admiral Scott
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Syracuse, NY USA

2 questions

Post by Admiral Scott »

1. Does it matter if I have fighter groups with leaders that are best suited as a bomber group leaders? They start that way, should I change them to fighter suited leaders who are more aggressive?

2. Do air units suffer higher operational losses if they fly in bad weather, including search missions with float type planes?
When its a blizzard or thunderstorm should I ground all flights and then resume them when the weather is better, or isnt this programed into the game?
User avatar
madflava13
Posts: 1501
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Alexandria, VA

RE: 2 questions

Post by madflava13 »

1. Pretty sure it doens't matter... But I am not 100%.
2. Planes definitely take more op losses in bad weather. Not as important to the allies, but be careful if you are playing Japan. Also it's a good idea to limit flights in the Arctic regions when the winter effects are on.
"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."
Djordje
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:49 am

RE: 2 questions

Post by Djordje »

ORIGINAL: Admiral Scott

1. Does it matter if I have fighter groups with leaders that are best suited as a bomber group leaders? They start that way, should I change them to fighter suited leaders who are more aggressive?

2. Do air units suffer higher operational losses if they fly in bad weather, including search missions with float type planes?
When its a blizzard or thunderstorm should I ground all flights and then resume them when the weather is better, or isnt this programed into the game?

1. There was a thread few months ago (can't remember who did the testing, but he did a great job) that explained a few things about fighter, bomber and third class (recon?) leaders. In short, things are little messed up here, but I'll try to explain:
- Leaders above certain value in air operations are "fighter" leaders, no matter about other stat values
- Leaders that are not "fighter" leaders and have land operations above certain value are "bomber" leaders
- Leaders that have both air operations and land operations above certain value are "fighter" leaders. This is the reason why you have so many fighter leaders, and so few bomber leaders. To be a bomber leader pilot has to be really bad as fighter leader. This also means that some of the fighter leaders are also good (and some probably even better) as bomber leaders, but there is no way you can tell which one, except by looking into the editor.
"Air operations" and "Land operations" are values that can only be seen in the editor, don't look for them in the game.
So, to answer your question now, if you have figher squadron led by a bomber leader, you are in trouble, change him ASAP. If you have bomber squadron led by a fighter leader, you really can't tell if he is good or not, so if he has good leadership and inspiration leave him be, if not replace him.

2. Bad weather is BAD. I really hate when I transfer my squadrons from one place to another and forget to look at the weather, and end up with few planes and pilots missing... Loosing good pilots just because I was lazy to look is bad [:)]
I don't bother with cancelling air mission because of the weather, if it is bad in base hex or at destionation hex they will cancel it on their own. It is much worse to have your base bombed and no CAP, so half of the planes get destroyed because your enemy was not so careful about weather and his pilots...
User avatar
Admiral Scott
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Syracuse, NY USA

RE: 2 questions

Post by Admiral Scott »

I had a fighter leader disappear and replaced by a brilliant bomber leader for the AVG.
His name is Burgard, but he isnt in the editor.
He kept morale up, but the AVG didnt perform well in air to air combat.

Are all the leaders that are available actually free for assignment, not assigned elswhere?
Djordje
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:49 am

RE: 2 questions

Post by Djordje »

ORIGINAL: Admiral Scott

I had a fighter leader disappear and replaced by a brilliant bomber leader for the AVG.
His name is Burgard, but he isnt in the editor.
He kept morale up, but the AVG didnt perform well in air to air combat.

Are all the leaders that are available actually free for assignment, not assigned elswhere?

Your new AVG leader was not good for fighter role. If he had been described as bomber leader by the game it meant that he has too low fighter value to be a fighter leader. Always replace bomber leaders leading your fighter squadrons, no matter how good they are. You can then reasign those now free bomber leaders to bomber squadrons.
kypros
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:00 pm

RE: 2 questions

Post by kypros »

At the risk of hijacking the thread....on a similar topic:

What is the difference between leadership and inspiration??

I searched the manual and found no explanation. Only the obvious: high values are a good thing.
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: 2 questions

Post by dtravel »

ORIGINAL: kypros

At the risk of hijacking the thread....on a similar topic:

What is the difference between leadership and inspiration??

I searched the manual and found no explanation. Only the obvious: high values are a good thing.

You're not cleared for that information. For that matter, you're not cleared to even be asking.

Fnord.
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: 2 questions

Post by Grotius »

So planes take higher operational losses not just when transferring, but also when flying missions? That makes sense; just checking to be sure.
Image
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: 2 questions

Post by mogami »

ORIGINAL: kypros

At the risk of hijacking the thread....on a similar topic:

What is the difference between leadership and inspiration??

I searched the manual and found no explanation. Only the obvious: high values are a good thing.

Hi, If I was to guess I would say one impacts how a unit does in combat how often parts break/repair and the other impacts the units morale (that is used in combat and recovering from combat) For airgroups one would be used to see who has the bounce and the other when the pilot will break off and head for home. (And one for how many aircraft are ready the next day and the other how many of the ready aircraft take off)
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
Roger Neilson
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: England

RE: 2 questions

Post by Roger Neilson »

The strange leadership ratings will I guess remain a mystery wrapped in an enigma.... I have no conception of why a simpe two sentences could not tell us what they mean?

Maybe it adds to the mystery of the game... but a bigger mystery would be had the designers not told us any ratings for the leadership, just said the leaders were rated but you can't find out!

Roger
User avatar
BlackVoid
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 11:51 pm

RE: 2 questions

Post by BlackVoid »

In UV I changed missions based on weather, in WITP it is just not worh it. Not even as Japan.
You need search planes all the time. You need CAP all the time. Don't touch these.

I only check for the weather before major air offensives and when transfering.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”