IJ production mistakes

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: Amoral

The next model of the Nell comes with radar, so you will want to turn Nell production back on at that time. When you do it will be nice to have a pool of Ha-33 to draw on.

The kotubuki engine should be stopped. It only powers obsolete airplanes. The same applies to the Amikaze, Hikari and both Early engines.

I can also see from your tracker screenshot that you are building Ha-5 engines, but not building any planes that use it. The Sally-IC (level bomber) and Sally MC-21 (transport) are both good planes that use that engine.

Thanks Amoral. Good eyeballs!! Funny you mentioned the Sally. I was just looking at the Sally in tracker in favor of the Lilly which has an armor rating of 1. Yes, mayby just increase the Lilly production. I noticed on tracker that the Sally carries a 3000lb bomb/transport load as the Lilly/Thalia is at 2200 lbs.
A. The Sally has a better load(50%greater load)
and range(10% greater) CARRING 4x250kg bombs, durability=40.
B. The LillyIIA has an armor rating of 1, carries 4x100kg,durability=32 and just started production.
C. Might be better to shut off the HA 5.
d. Increase the production run on the Lilly w/ corresponding increase on Ha 35 engines.
E. DIVE OR GLIDE. The Lilly in the 43 version becomes a dive bomber. So at 10 to 14k you can dive or at 15 to 19 you can glide on your enemy. At 20k you just level bomb him. Dont remember what a DB does under 10k.

What u think? Personally I would bet the armor rating will have a dramatic effect on servivability later as the allied fighters improve. Probably better to have a plane that can penatrate than nothing at all, so the question is:

1. Is it better to have the big bomb load of the Sally or the armor of the Lilly?
2. What is the effect of an armor rating specifically(mathmatically)?

For transport I was looking at the Thalia w/ the same engine Ha 35 as the Zero.
a. The Thalia is already in production easier to increase production.
b. To start Sally trans production I would need to convert a factory.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by bigred »

Well, so much for priorities. this is a view of my current tanker missions. Note most are on fuel transport duty. So I wonder if I have a serious issue w/ my tankers being used to fuel fleet ops.



Image
Attachments
tanker.jpg
tanker.jpg (106.59 KiB) Viewed 175 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by bigred »

So next I look at my oil consumption in honshu. the average decline from turn 102 to 126 is 136660 oil points/24 days is=
-5691 per day.

So roughly I need 6000 per day 42000 extra per week transported into Honshu to stabilize the oil situation.

Image
Attachments
OIL.jpg
OIL.jpg (81 KiB) Viewed 175 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by bigred »

If I get all the oil in the SRA I will still be short -4000 oil per day for Honshu. So I figure at some point I will need to shut down refineries and save oil. This issue indicates a need for me to possibly plan for the transport of fuel from the SRA to the fleet and also to Honshu.

I wonder how much of the oil is refined into fuel and how much of the oil is used for industrial production on a daily basis?

I hope alot of oil useage is fuel and notmuch is industrial.


Image
Attachments
extra.jpg
extra.jpg (83.79 KiB) Viewed 175 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Nomad »

Nope, multiply the repaired oil centers by 10. So when you repair Miri and Balikapapen you will have 260 * 10 = 2600 more oil per day.
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Nope, multiply the repaired oil centers by 10. So when you repair Miri and Balikapapen you will have 260 * 10 = 2600 more oil per day.


Good that helps. So instead of a -4400 I get a -1800 per day. Maybe Medan and Java will make the difference. On with the attack. What a logistics nightmare.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4759
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by n01487477 »

ORIGINAL: bigred
ORIGINAL: Nomad

Nope, multiply the repaired oil centers by 10. So when you repair Miri and Balikapapen you will have 260 * 10 = 2600 more oil per day.


Good that helps. So instead of a -4400 I get a -1800 per day. Maybe Medan and Java will make the difference. On with the attack. What a logistics nightmare.

You also have Anshan, Sian, Djambi etc to repair ...
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by bigred »

Damien gave me a look and sent me this nice email which he gave me permission to place on the thread.
Paul,
couple of things to add to what I said on forum.

1. Increase those port sizes as soon as possible from where you are loading offloading raw materials. Try to have some Naval support there as well.
2. You have loads of CS convoys at various ports not docking and some idle (bug I've seen before). You need to streamline your convoys and not have such a bottle neck at these ports.
A little of this I'm unsure about because I've not done great testing in this area but I think you'll find this loading inefficient when you have multi-Tf's drawing load points. Better to have one or two docked than none. Maximise TF efficiency with same size ships and max port size docking limits + Naval Support.
3. Muroran and Sapporo are not drawing enough fuel, this can be achieved by disbanding some shipping here and you'll also need to top up Hokkaido.
4. Fuel and Res are your priority to the Home Is. Oil is secondary. You need to be an importer of Fuel by at least 6~7 k a day because of shipping needs.
Repairing Miri's oil is a good idea, but remember your cargo loading capacity. A level port 2 = 6250 load points. Naval support and maximising the port size increases this. But you are limited by docking size of the TF/ ship composition. Balikpapan is similar.
5. By repairing all the oil C, you should be just about right; you're down 4000 / day; by repairing all the oil 390 * 10 = 3900. And that is without all of Java. The problem is shipping it. But remember you have a large stockpile of Oil; this is something that can be ridden down slowly.
6. Supplies on the Honshu are ok for now, but because you need to look at you engine and airframes which I'll do later ... you're going to use a bit of that. This will need a little changing and planning I'm afraid.
You have engine factories idle or never going to be used again; change them. You are down on a number of models; some of which are at levels where planes are not being produced. I see you notice them too... ;-)
Sorry ~ not enough time right now to do a detailed analysis about this, but tonight I'm free and will say more.


Q. Why are you shipping Res from Hong Kong to Takao ?

You can post this on the forum if you wish ...
Cheers and hope this helps a little.
Damian
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
Djordje
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:49 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Djordje »

ORIGINAL: bigred
ORIGINAL: Djordje

When you have large quantities of fuel at a base and port is too small, solution might be disbanding some ships in the port nearby (Palembang- Oosthaven for example). Ships in port increase base fuel demand so you will be able to load fuel at two places. It only works for fuel, you can't influence flow of oil and resources that way.
Increasing port size and putting important HQ like Southern Army is the only way to influence flow of oil and resources.

Wow, Southern Army attracks oil. What if you put the southern army at CamRanh Bay?
Would the resources at Singers move back to indochina? This would save 3 days on the convoy trips. Also for tactical purposes Southern army can provide an attack modifier to amy attacking army w/in 18 hexs. Later I planned to take SArmy to burma, but now I dont know.

It should, but it won't be as fast and as predictable as you might think. Note that rail link is broken in Thailand which slows the flow down.
There were some people reporting that once they cleared whole railroad network in middle China, together with joining major roads that oil and resources started finding their way all the way up to Port Arthur. I have not yet been able to clear China in my games but if that is really the case it makes things much easier for Japan... And pure fantasy when compared to reality.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15957
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: bigred

If I get all the oil in the SRA I will still be short -4000 oil per day for Honshu. So I figure at some point I will need to shut down refineries and save oil. This issue indicates a need for me to possibly plan for the transport of fuel from the SRA to the fleet and also to Honshu.

I wonder how much of the oil is refined into fuel and how much of the oil is used for industrial production on a daily basis?

I hope alot of oil useage is fuel and notmuch is industrial.



Using more oil than you get is never going to change. You have an excess of refineries from day one. Just keep refining oil into fuel. Keep in mind that when your oil surplus is gone, your refineries will not work at 100% capacity any more and your fuel and supply production will decrease.

10 oil get refined to 9 fuel and 1 supply. The only use for oil is to get refined. Heavy Industry uses fuel and resources. Light industry uses only resources.

Your decision is whether to use that fuel in your ships or your HI. Tough decision.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by ny59giants »

Repairing Miri's oil is a good idea, but remember your cargo loading capacity. A level port 2 = 6250 load points. Naval support and maximising the port size increases this. But you are limited by docking size of the TF/ ship composition. Balikpapan is similar.

You start the war with 2 BFs in Japan that come with Naval Support. I send both to Miri along with some engineers to expand the port to max size 3(0). I use two CS convoys of the small TKs (Capacity 1250) with about 5 TKs each and small PB/SC to and from Singapore. As an alternative is to build up Brunei and base some unused ships here to pull more fule into theis large port and use it vs Mirir to move Fuel and Oil.

Palembang can only get to size 4 port (48,000 capacity). I tend to send a large BF which has 120 Naval Support here and to my other large oil/fuel centers to speed up loading. I run two more CS convoys to and from Singapore using the 7950 capacity TKs with PB/SC.

Singapore with its large port size will expedite your loading of oil/fuel. For some reason the oil/fuel from Burma comes here (maybe having the Southern HQ) helps.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4759
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by n01487477 »

ORIGINAL: Djordje

ORIGINAL: bigred
ORIGINAL: Djordje

When you have large quantities of fuel at a base and port is too small, solution might be disbanding some ships in the port nearby (Palembang- Oosthaven for example). Ships in port increase base fuel demand so you will be able to load fuel at two places. It only works for fuel, you can't influence flow of oil and resources that way.
Increasing port size and putting important HQ like Southern Army is the only way to influence flow of oil and resources.

Wow, Southern Army attracks oil. What if you put the southern army at CamRanh Bay?
Would the resources at Singers move back to indochina? This would save 3 days on the convoy trips. Also for tactical purposes Southern army can provide an attack modifier to amy attacking army w/in 18 hexs. Later I planned to take SArmy to burma, but now I dont know.

It should, but it won't be as fast and as predictable as you might think. Note that rail link is broken in Thailand which slows the flow down.
There were some people reporting that once they cleared whole railroad network in middle China, together with joining major roads that oil and resources started finding their way all the way up to Port Arthur. I have not yet been able to clear China in my games but if that is really the case it makes things much easier for Japan... And pure fantasy when compared to reality.
Excellent point & what I'd do if I had time to play [:(]
Djordje
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:49 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Djordje »

ORIGINAL: bigred
ORIGINAL: Djordje

When you have large quantities of fuel at a base and port is too small, solution might be disbanding some ships in the port nearby (Palembang- Oosthaven for example). Ships in port increase base fuel demand so you will be able to load fuel at two places. It only works for fuel, you can't influence flow of oil and resources that way.
Increasing port size and putting important HQ like Southern Army is the only way to influence flow of oil and resources.

In china I moved the North China Army Hq up past Sian to support northern ops. In the center likewise I moved the China army HQ to Ichang to support ops. I have had a drop in resources at Port Arthur and Shanghia. Could the movement of these HQs have effected resource movement??? I could move the Kwangtung Army HQ to port Arthur to see what happens. When u take an enemy city the city falls under the control of the army/navy HQ w/the largest occuppying AV. I would bet when the HQ is located in a major port all resources from the conqured cities flows to these HQs.

Hypothesis:

My guess is based on the premise that is the same as when a TF belonging to 4thfleet has a button to allow it to return to the city where the 4th fleet is located. If u move the 4th fleet Hq then the selection changes to a new base location. Same logic for oil and resources.

So many questions in this thread, I'll try to answer at least some of them:

- While major HQ pulls stuff, one even more important thing is that base has to have a port... and port should be a large one. Since you have moved your HQs inland I doubt they have pulled oil and resources with them. You can check that easily, just look at stockpiles at their current locations.
How big was drop at Port Arthur that you mentioned? Maybe you were loading resources at some port in the area and you drained it for local resources, which got replenished from Port Arthur? All bases with industry try to stockpile some reserves for future production, don't know the exact ratio but it might be something like enough to cover 10 days of production. If you load those reserves on ships AI will try to bring them in again from nearby location where there is excess.
In general resources in Port Arthur should rise steadily, you should be able to lift at least 150k resources every week or so.

- Next thing, Amoral mentioned G3M3 Nell with radar in 42/5. Actually that is a common mistake by players, that radar becomes operational in 44/6. However even without that radar I consider G3M3 to be superior to G4M1 Betty so here is how I produce them:
41/12 - producing G4M1, G3M2 stopped but factory not converted, waiting for 42/5
42/5 - converting G3M2 to G3M3 (should happen automatically, you can do it manually once May starts for no cost) and starting its production, stopping G4M1
44/1 - stopping G3M3 and converting those factories to something else, starting G4M2 production

- Engines: ha-32 and ha-33 are somewhat linked, because various planes that replace each other switch from one engine to another during several years. Depending on your choice of aircraft numbers might differ, so best thing to do is go to Air Production tab in tracker, select Engines tab and then click on Planning. Click on each engine that interests you and sort planes that use it by availability date. That you give you general idea what to expect in months to come. To answer another question, by producing ha-33 when Nell production was stopped you did not waste anything as you will surely use those engines in the future (Emily needs 4 of them per plane for example)

- Stop Nakajima Kotobuki. Don't change factory to anything yet, wait for the time when you need to increase production of one of your engines and then see if you should maybe convert those that you stopped instead of increasing production in existing ones.

- Zero losses: So far most of the losses were surely operational losses. When those happen over friendly territory pilots have quite high chance of survival. Once the fight intensifies percentage of killed pilots will unfortunately rise...

- IJA bombers: Forget Ki-48 Lily, you need larger bombs and bombload. I suggest producing Ki-21 Sally until 42/9 when Ki-49 Helen with armor becomes available, then you should convert Sally to Helen and produce only Helen from that point onwards. There is one Helen version in 42/4 as well, it has 1 hex shorter range than Sally and in every category seem to be worse plane than Sally, except for slightly better defensive armament which is irrelevant.
For some reason in my PBEM I have switched Sally to that version of Helen on 42/4 and I see now it was mistake. Oh well.
Note that Helen needs its own engine, which no other plane in the game uses.

- Oil: I don't think Japanese player can ever bring enough oil back to HI to keep refineries 100% busy, so oil level will keep dropping since everything you bring in will be used and then some. However, that is not the end of the world, as industry needs fuel to work, not oil, so as long as you bring enough fuel from DEI you should be ok. Japanese players in general ship fuel first, only when DEI bases are sucked dry of fuel they start moving some oil back to Japan. Never shut down refineries, they don't cost anything but oil. When I think of it I don't think you can even shut them down at all.
As for the answer on how much oil is converted into fuel go to Industry screen in tracker, then select Witp Chart tab. In the upper right corner of the chart is oil, numbers you see there are from your actual game. Look for circle with Fuel +/- in it, that's the net result before fleet consumption.

- Few more things:
1. Watch for port capacity, never use TF that is larger than the port you use can support.
Sizes per port level: (Manual page 109)
1 - 9000
2 - 12000
3 - 24000
4 - 48000
5 - 60000
6 - 84000
7 - 104000
8 - 128000
9 - 172000
10 - 196000
When forming TF first select escorts, then fill it with transports until you get close to desired TF size for your target port. This limit suggest that two ports that have convoy between them should be of the same size to maximize efficiency.

2. There is some automatic daily transfer of every 4 resources (supplies, resources, fuel, oil) between two adjacent ports (Manual page 212). It is 500 x size of smaller port for supplies and resources and 100 x size of smaller port for fuel and oil. Therefore you should build some of the important bases up. If for example you build Tsushima to port size 4 (its maximum) you will connect Fusan in Korea with Japan and 2000 supplies and resources and 500 oil and fuel will flow in every day (not sure about Fusan port size at start of the game, if it is smaller than 4 it should also be increased to at least 4 (increasing it to its SPS maximum might bring in additional resources and oil which is handy since Japan in just 2 hexes away). The other good place for this is Ominato - Hakkodate link, it is even more important to increase these 2 ports to level 7. I also try to increase ports on Shikoku that have contact with bases on Honshu and Kyushu.

There are probably dozens of things I currently can't remember but for now this wall of text will have to do...
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
Repairing Miri's oil is a good idea, but remember your cargo loading capacity. A level port 2 = 6250 load points. Naval support and maximising the port size increases this. But you are limited by docking size of the TF/ ship composition. Balikpapan is similar.

You start the war with 2 BFs in Japan that come with Naval Support. I send both to Miri along with some engineers to expand the port to max size 3(0). I use two CS convoys of the small TKs (Capacity 1250) with about 5 TKs each and small PB/SC to and from Singapore. As an alternative is to build up Brunei and base some unused ships here to pull more fule into theis large port and use it vs Mirir to move Fuel and Oil.

Palembang can only get to size 4 port (48,000 capacity). I tend to send a large BF which has 120 Naval Support here and to my other large oil/fuel centers to speed up loading. I run two more CS convoys to and from Singapore using the 7950 capacity TKs with PB/SC.

Singapore with its large port size will expedite your loading of oil/fuel. For some reason the oil/fuel from Burma comes here (maybe having the Southern HQ) helps.

According to the manual, Naval Support only helps load/unload troops and cargo. They are not supposed to help loading fuel or oil.
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4759
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by n01487477 »

ORIGINAL: Nomad

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
Repairing Miri's oil is a good idea, but remember your cargo loading capacity. A level port 2 = 6250 load points. Naval support and maximising the port size increases this. But you are limited by docking size of the TF/ ship composition. Balikpapan is similar.

You start the war with 2 BFs in Japan that come with Naval Support. I send both to Miri along with some engineers to expand the port to max size 3(0). I use two CS convoys of the small TKs (Capacity 1250) with about 5 TKs each and small PB/SC to and from Singapore. As an alternative is to build up Brunei and base some unused ships here to pull more fule into theis large port and use it vs Mirir to move Fuel and Oil.

Palembang can only get to size 4 port (48,000 capacity). I tend to send a large BF which has 120 Naval Support here and to my other large oil/fuel centers to speed up loading. I run two more CS convoys to and from Singapore using the 7950 capacity TKs with PB/SC.

Singapore with its large port size will expedite your loading of oil/fuel. For some reason the oil/fuel from Burma comes here (maybe having the Southern HQ) helps.

According to the manual, Naval Support only helps load/unload troops and cargo. They are not supposed to help loading fuel or oil.
I'm not sure here too ... because the manual is ambiguous on this point for me. I thought it meant refuelling was not effected by NS ??
Djordje: 2. There is some automatic daily transfer of every 4 resources (supplies, resources, fuel, oil) between two adjacent ports (Manual page 212). It is 500 x size of smaller port for supplies and resources and 100 x size of smaller port for fuel and oil. Therefore you should build some of the important bases up. If for example you build Tsushima to port size 4 (its maximum) you will connect Fusan in Korea with Japan and 2000 supplies and resources and 500 oil and fuel will flow in every day (not sure about Fusan port size at start of the game, if it is smaller than 4 it should also be increased to at least 4 (increasing it to its SPS maximum might bring in additional resources and oil which is handy since Japan in just 2 hexes away). The other good place for this is Ominato - Hakkodate link, it is even more important to increase these 2 ports to level 7. I also try to increase ports on Shikoku that have contact with bases on Honshu and Kyushu.
Forgot to mention this to BigRed ... thanks Djordje

Edit: but I thought the Ominato - Hakkodate link doesn't work ??
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: Djordje

[snip]
2. There is some automatic daily transfer of every 4 resources (supplies, resources, fuel, oil) between two adjacent ports (Manual page 212). It is 500 x size of smaller port for supplies and resources and 100 x size of smaller port for fuel and oil. Therefore you should build some of the important bases up. If for example you build Tsushima to port size 4 (its maximum) you will connect Fusan in Korea with Japan and 2000 supplies and resources and 500 oil and fuel will flow in every day (not sure about Fusan port size at start of the game, if it is smaller than 4 it should also be increased to at least 4 (increasing it to its SPS maximum might bring in additional resources and oil which is handy since Japan in just 2 hexes away). The other good place for this is Ominato - Hakkodate link, it is even more important to increase these 2 ports to level 7. I also try to increase ports on Shikoku that have contact with bases on Honshu and Kyushu.

There are probably dozens of things I currently can't remember but for now this wall of text will have to do...

Ominato and Hakkodate are not adjacent movement wise. Nothing will flow between those ports. Notice the red hex side in the picture.


Image
Attachments
ominatoHakkadata.jpg
ominatoHakkadata.jpg (110.35 KiB) Viewed 176 times
Djordje
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 10:49 am

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Djordje »

ORIGINAL: Nomad
Ominato and Hakkodate are not adjacent movement wise. Nothing will flow between those ports. Notice the red hex side in the picture.

You are right Nomad, I never turned hexside details in home islands for some reason.
Even though nothing will flow it is still good idea to increase those ports to 7 to allow for larger CS convoys. It appears that Hokaido resources pile up 2/3 at Hakodate and 1/3 at Sapporo (at least in my game).
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Mynok »


Is it 100% certain it will not flow? In Witp, small amounts would flow between adjacent ports of sufficient size (3 I believe?), whether land movement could happen or not.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15957
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Nomad

ORIGINAL: Djordje

[snip]
2. There is some automatic daily transfer of every 4 resources (supplies, resources, fuel, oil) between two adjacent ports (Manual page 212). It is 500 x size of smaller port for supplies and resources and 100 x size of smaller port for fuel and oil. Therefore you should build some of the important bases up. If for example you build Tsushima to port size 4 (its maximum) you will connect Fusan in Korea with Japan and 2000 supplies and resources and 500 oil and fuel will flow in every day (not sure about Fusan port size at start of the game, if it is smaller than 4 it should also be increased to at least 4 (increasing it to its SPS maximum might bring in additional resources and oil which is handy since Japan in just 2 hexes away). The other good place for this is Ominato - Hakkodate link, it is even more important to increase these 2 ports to level 7. I also try to increase ports on Shikoku that have contact with bases on Honshu and Kyushu.

There are probably dozens of things I currently can't remember but for now this wall of text will have to do...

Ominato and Hakkodate are not adjacent movement wise. Nothing will flow between those ports. Notice the red hex side in the picture.


Image

That's not a big deal. One CS convoy between those two ports with ~8 or so xAKs and it'll keep Hakodate empty.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: IJ production mistakes

Post by Nomad »

removed

Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”