ORIGINAL: Flaviusx
Bletchley, you're just quibbling here. My point stands.
You made several points in your post. One was that the Soviet launched a concerted operation along 2/3 of the front, without giving a time frame for that statement. The other was that I was absolutely wrong, when I gave a time frame but dismissed the effort of the Kalinin, Western and Central fronts as a side show.
I said that the major effort, from August to March 1944, was done along the curve that goes from Kharkov to Lvov, south of the Pripyat marshes. You say that's absolutely wrong, while the dates clearly point to all major efforts taking place south of the Pripyat from November to March. I was partially wrong [:)]
I might be quibbling - just raising objections? - but I don't like being thrown into a sack with unpalatable companions which I haven't chosen.
Now that we get so embroiled in semiotics, let's discuss about the meaning of "staggered" and "broad".
Staggered as in what? As in one operation waiting for another to succeed? Or staggered as in operations overlapping to catch Germans flatfooted on purpose (Mars and Uranus comes to my mind) or because of problems with planning and deploying the forces to execute them or because spent troops having to stop and refit? Because, if it's "staggered" as in the second case, then indeed the Soviets executed staggered operations.
Now, broad as in what? Or, better, broader than what? Than Case Blue? Than Barbarossa? Than Case Yellow? Were broad front offensive something particular to the Soviet Art of Operational War? Germans did a few "broad" offensives when they had the resources for it.
Really, I hate getting like this. But guys, seems that posting on these forums without getting pelted, scolded or blatantly rejected, is sometimes harder than convincing editors of a scientific journal that the draft research note you sent them isn't a joke, a fake or both.