Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10295
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Have I said lately that i hate Windows?
[:D]

Billy-ware ... if it wasn't indigenous I'd shoot it. [;)]
Pax
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by obvert »

About the Lily and the upgrades. It seems that the extra 15-35 I will build will be indispensable during the first months of the war.

First, some of those units do upgrade for free to the Lily.

Second, it functions MUCH better in ASW than even the Ann, and at longer range. I don't think the 100kg bomb size matters as much as the 4 bombs, and I've already had attack and hit messages several times. I don't think I really will hit any subs at this point in the war with Low Nav skill and ASW skill so low, but those subs won't be hitting my transports that turn either.

Third, against airfields the 4 bombs do very well, and these will only be used in China where they can fly low and hit often. Again the range really changes the game over the 1E, and there are several size 3 fields to move them around between. I move the big base away from Anking immediately and bring it north and somewhere with a bigger field. This many extra Lilys give me a buffer and let the first Sally groups really do the big lifting while these can take on added tasks.

In a week or two or three, depending on the situation at the time, I'll convert this factory to Oscar Ic production. I think my decision depends a lot on how my opponent responds. Currently, the AVG is nowhere to be found. There are few serious threats to my targeted invasions and campaigns, so it makes better sense to have more better bombers quickly than more better fighters. If this changed, I might decide to pull the plug early and get more Oscars quicker. Right now, the Nate is working fine as extra CAP and occasional escort where little resistance is thought to be present.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10295
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

I'll watching to see how they do for you.  BANZAI!!
Pax
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
So, no, I don't think it is gamey. You lose some to waste across some of the hexes, but not nearly as much as you will to subs. And you free up hundreds of ships and save a LOT of fuel. Towards the end of the war, IJ got pretty close in RL, so that vets it even more.

Not to help you lean one way or another but I do not believe there are any losses to Oil and Resources when moved overland - only Supplies and Fuel suffer this.

Xargun
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: obvert
In a week or two or three, depending on the situation at the time, I'll convert this factory to Oscar Ic production. I think my decision depends a lot on how my opponent responds. Currently, the AVG is nowhere to be found. There are few serious threats to my targeted invasions and campaigns, so it makes better sense to have more better bombers quickly than more better fighters. If this changed, I might decide to pull the plug early and get more Oscars quicker. Right now, the Nate is working fine as extra CAP and occasional escort where little resistance is thought to be present.

In my current PBeM my opponent used the AVG in Burma mostly and after moving a sentai of Zeros there and sweeping them I crushed them down to normal levels of experience. The AVG (in my game) pose no more threat than any other fighter unit. The key is finding them and sweep them until they are full of normal skill level pilots.

Xargun
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24580
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Thanks Damian. Giving it a shot now. [:)]

Hey Mike: Do you mean to tell me that you're 104 posts into this AAR and there's been no shooting yet? [:'(]
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10295
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

[:D][:D][:D]

[&o][&o][&o]

105 and counting! We're still planning!! [;)]
Pax
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Cribtop »

Giving it the Full Rimmer Salute, eh, Pax?

Just kidding, this stuff is pure gold.

PS - I hope y'all are Red Dwarf fans or you might think I'm being a bit risqué. [:D]
Image
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Xargun

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
So, no, I don't think it is gamey. You lose some to waste across some of the hexes, but not nearly as much as you will to subs. And you free up hundreds of ships and save a LOT of fuel. Towards the end of the war, IJ got pretty close in RL, so that vets it even more.

Not to help you lean one way or another but I do not believe there are any losses to Oil and Resources when moved overland - only Supplies and Fuel suffer this.

Xargun

That's the way I understand it, Xargun.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Thanks Damian. Giving it a shot now. [:)]

Hey Mike: Do you mean to tell me that you're 104 posts into this AAR and there's been no shooting yet? [:'(]

Hell, I still can't open AE. Damn windows.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10295
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Thanks Damian. Giving it a shot now. [:)]

Hey Mike: Do you mean to tell me that you're 104 posts into this AAR and there's been no shooting yet? [:'(]

Hell, I still can't open AE. Damn windows.
Nope. Its the Apple! [:D][:D][:D]
Pax
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Very funny wise guy! [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mynok »

I suspect the user. [:D]

What's the error you're getting Mike?

Oh gah! Have to go make supper. Well, post and I'll catch it later.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

I can't argue there either. That's a fact.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
pws1225
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Tate's Hell, Florida

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by pws1225 »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Thanks Damian. Giving it a shot now. [:)]

Hey Mike: Do you mean to tell me that you're 104 posts into this AAR and there's been no shooting yet? [:'(]

Hell, I still can't open AE. Damn windows.

I feel your pain. Compared to Windows, the Japanese economy is a snap!
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Mynok

I suspect the user. [:D]

What's the error you're getting Mike?

My resolution is greyed out at 800x600. It's using Standard VGA Graphics Adapter. Does that mean anything to you?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: pws1225

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




Hey Mike: Do you mean to tell me that you're 104 posts into this AAR and there's been no shooting yet? [:'(]

Hell, I still can't open AE. Damn windows.

I feel your pain. Compared to Windows, the Japanese economy is a snap!

[:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4759
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by n01487477 »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Mynok

I suspect the user. [:D]

What's the error you're getting Mike?

My resolution is greyed out at 800x600. It's using Standard VGA Graphics Adapter. Does that mean anything to you?
You need to determine what video card you have, download the drivers under Mac for Win7 (if the internet is still not working) and then come back to windows and install that sucker. ..

Then it should be OK.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15893
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

I think I found it. Downloading now. Fingers crossed.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10295
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Mynok

I suspect the user. [:D]

What's the error you're getting Mike?

My resolution is greyed out at 800x600. It's using Standard VGA Graphics Adapter. Does that mean anything to you?
That is very low resolution these days. you need 1024x768 minimum to run AE.

Hopefully you can get the right drivers .... they should install easily and you should see more choices for screen rez ...


Pax
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”