RUNNING POLL - gameplay features [Feature Requests Go Here]

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
User avatar
coolts
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:47 am
Location: Auf Wiedersehen, Pet

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by coolts »

ORIGINAL: Agathosdaimon

i think TOT is extremly important too but perhaps there are a few reasons why it is not polling higher:

- it appeared later in the poll and so many may have already selected an earlier option, but who would rather select TOT planner
- the name TOT Planner should be changed to at least 'Time of Target planner' - people may not know what TOT Planner is and so just go for the more obvious things like sound effects, which i dont personally think are so important as TOT planner


That's a valid point. In fact, there should be a "no acronyms day", on these forums every now and again!........or NAD for short [:D]
"Gauls! We have nothing to fear; except perhaps that the sky may fall on our heads tomorrow. But as we all know, tomorrow never comes!!" - Chief Vitalstatistix
JCR
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:40 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by JCR »

TINEFA
There is no escape from acronyms
User avatar
MR_BURNS2
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:19 am
Location: Austria

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by MR_BURNS2 »

Edit Patrol Area for Strike/Air Intercept mission.
Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;


User avatar
jdkbph
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by jdkbph »

ORIGINAL: riflebrigade

Would it be possible to be able to enter a Proficiency level for each unit?


I voted for something else a while back when the list was much shorter so now I can't vote for this. But for what it's worth, I would if I could.

JD
JD
User avatar
Sator
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:43 pm
Location: Italy

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Sator »

+1. I think admin could reset the poll and let we vote again.
Per aspera ad astra.
thbrix
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:29 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by thbrix »

Suggestion; "Jump to location" links in the message log.
Dimitris
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

Removed "Background music" (added in B465) and "Secondary windows should remember position & size" (added in B466). If you voted for these you can vote again.
damarafaka
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 9:59 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by damarafaka »

I would request that Command be tablet/touch ready allowing play on full windows capable tablets. It would be nice to pinch-zoom with fingers, micromanage with stylus instead of a mouse and being able to leave the physical keyboard completely out of the picture. Could open up a different way of playing the simulator. Could be fun.
tommo8993
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:37 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by tommo8993 »

The one think I would want is a simple "drag box" style of ASW missions. At the moment I cant do ASW, too complicated. But if it was just as simple as select an attack option, then drag a box in the area you want to search. Then I'm sorted for must have features in the game.
Dimitris
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: tommo8993
The one think I would want is a simple "drag box" style of ASW missions. At the moment I cant do ASW, too complicated. But if it was just as simple as select an attack option, then drag a box in the area you want to search. Then I'm sorted for must have features in the game.

I think you can already do that. Define an area (right-click on map, select "define area", left-drag mouse to define area rectangle), create an ASW mission using this area, assign the desired units to that mission, and off they go.
JCR
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:40 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by JCR »

Another small idea:
How about showing weapon mount arcs in the database viewer?
riflebrigade
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:07 am
Location: Australia

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by riflebrigade »

Sunburn has the ability to enter a Proficiency level for each unit been added to the game?

If so how is this accessed?

I asked if this could be added on the 11/19/2013 and your following post of 11/20/2013 advised "added", was this for unit Proficiency levels?
User avatar
ExMachina
Posts: 471
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:30 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by ExMachina »

Cavitation control.

How about a select-able option in the F2 menu for "No Cavitation"? When checked, the unit will never go fast enough to cavitate regardless of speed selected (evasive manuvers would over-ride).

For example, this option would allow the player to set subs to flank speed and, regardless of depth, they would always maintain their fastest possible speed below the cavitation threshold.
User avatar
snowburn
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:10 pm
Location: Bovril, Argentina

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by snowburn »

Time to remove: More sounds :)
Alex170g
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:51 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Alex170g »

Two interface improvement that I would love to see

1.- the ability to mark a contact not just neutral, hostile etc, but also add the ability to the human player to determine a class type for a contact, later, when the AI gets more data, it can show the correct class type.

Hmm!, this contact should be a enemy trawler, don´t overshoot SSM at her…..minutes later….-sir, remember that target that you suppose that was a trawler, in fact it’s krivak class warship

2.- the ability to know what each patform is detecting…this had been discussed in other threats, and to avoid a large list of contacts I think the best method can be selecting a single friendly unit and then select a single target unit , a command (key board combo, drop down menu or button)should bring a list with all the sensors from the friendly unit, and a single yes or no to show if the target unit is detected by that sensor.

example: I would like to know when my aircraft’s radar is breaking enemy jamming, and thus painting a target to attack it with SARH
Dimitris
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: riflebrigade

Sunburn has the ability to enter a Proficiency level for each unit been added to the game?

If so how is this accessed?

I asked if this could be added on the 11/19/2013 and your following post of 11/20/2013 advised "added", was this for unit Proficiency levels?

I meant it was added to the poll. Apologies for the confusion.
Dimitris
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: JCR

Another small idea:
How about showing weapon mount arcs in the database viewer?

Thanks, added.
Dimitris
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: ExMachina

Cavitation control.

How about a select-able option in the F2 menu for "No Cavitation"? When checked, the unit will never go fast enough to cavitate regardless of speed selected (evasive manuvers would over-ride).

For example, this option would allow the player to set subs to flank speed and, regardless of depth, they would always maintain their fastest possible speed below the cavitation threshold.

Nice idea! Added.
Dimitris
Posts: 15662
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: snowburn
Time to remove: More sounds :)

Tempted to do this, but I think we still need optional sounds for message types (or possibly integrating some of the SeaHag functionality). So leaving it open for a while yet.
thbrix
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:29 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by thbrix »

Hi

I am playing with the editor, and i miss the ability to "Draw" on the map. I would like to draw boxes, circles, corridors and write text, all this in different colours. I need this to be able to define areas of responsibility, airspacelimits and so forth.

This tool would also have value in "non-editor-mode". So the player can use the drawing tool in all missions.

The drawing should of course be saved with the missionfile.

Maybe its a crazy idea, what do i know, but i think it would a great tool, both in missiondesign and play.

Best regards.
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”