Noosing the Bull: Scn.9, Toraq vs Timtom

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Noosing the Bull: Scn.9, Toraq vs Timtom

Post by timtom »

The number of Allied aircraft lost comes to 761 against 673 Japanese. The topscorer is the A6M2 Zero with 160 aircraft lost, followed by the P-38 (120), the A6M3 (110), the B-25 (109), and the P-40 (80). 93 Allied heavy bombers were lost, if the 10 PB4Y's lost are included. Somewhat curiously, the 6th most lost aircraft type is the D3A Val (64), even though they didn't make much of a spectable of themselves. Similarly, 43 F4U's were lost, all but one or two on the ground or operationally. Bringing up the rear is the Wirraway (2), which only saw deployment defending ports and airfields in Australia from potential long-range surprise attacks.

Losses were about equal, except to AAA, where, no surprise, I lost about a hundred more than Tony. The fact that Tony's losses were concentrated in fighters and my in strike aircraft naturally reflects the general nature of the scenario, but also the care with which Tony deployed his available bombers. The only anomality is in our respective losses in recon aircraft, where Tony's proportion of losses is in fact higher, as he frequently deployed his Betty's in the ASW role. Tony has already touched upon this, but I might add that the Japanese have more recon sqd's available and that Tony flew them harder and differently than me - he frequently deployed floatplanes as transports, fx. SOPAC's F4U's shot down 59 aircraft between them, while all other SOPAC fighters got 9 kills (!) in total. There was no A2A combat in the Solomons to speak of, and I'd hazard that 75% of kills were of recon types. However the recon planes flying opposite SWPAC suffered almost as badly. I fly naval search at between 10,000-15,000 feet in forward areas and find that that cut losses markedly. I always fly recon missions at the aircraft's max altitude and that helps too. Fx, even at 35,000 feet, I was loosing a F5A every 1-2 missions, which dropped to one every 5-6 missions at 40,000 feet.

Image
Attachments
Unavngivet1.jpg
Unavngivet1.jpg (38.28 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Noosing the Bull: Scn.9, Toraq vs Timtom

Post by timtom »

Except for March 14th "Black Sunday", when 62 Allied fighters were lost over Port Moresby, aircraft losses generally happened at a steady rate. Allied losses were usually about 60 a week, Japanese at 50. However, as the Allied flew 4 sorties for every 3 Japanese, it has to be noted that effective Japanese losses were in fact generally higher than that of the Allies. A relative high rate of Japanese operational loss (50% higher pr. sortie) is probably the main reason for this.

Image
Attachments
Unavngivet.jpg
Unavngivet.jpg (56.66 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Noosing the Bull: Scn.9, Toraq vs Timtom

Post by timtom »

Unfortunately the original endgame stats are lost (can't be saved). What follows is based on take two of the combat resolution, which of course differs a bit.

Total Allied VP:

Bases to start: 2,514
Added during game: +1,558 (+700 gained from Japanese)
Bases at finish: 4,072
Lost to lack of supply: - 11
Total base VP: 4,061

Casualties inflicted, land: 134
Casualties inflicted, air: 673
Casualties inflicted, sea: 601

Total: 5,469

Total Japanese VP:

Bases to start: 3,709
Added during game: +575 (-89 lost to Allied)
Bases at finish: 4,325
Lost to lack of supply: - 41
Total base VP: 4,284

Casualties inflicted, land: 57
Casualties inflicted, air: 757
Casualties inflicted, sea: 218

Total: 5,320

Obviously the most striking thing is the very few base points lost by Tony. I only took Marilinin, Nadzab, and Salamaua from him to a total of 89 VP. Basically, Allied expansions and a margin of casualties sufficied to close the VP gap, but the general failure to deprive Tony of VP secured him a draw.
Image
Attachments
Unavngivet.jpg
Unavngivet.jpg (29.86 KiB) Viewed 227 times
Where's the Any key?

Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”