Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Ah, will add that to the list of things I did not consider.
Ok, I guess the vote is "stop your armour corps buildup". Ok. HQs next then.
Terje
Ok, I guess the vote is "stop your armour corps buildup". Ok. HQs next then.
Terje
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 46
Overall
The Axis are content with forcing 6 partisan units to retreat, while we once more launch as many aerial attacks as possible. For ground strikes we have the following priority;
Panzer > Mechanized > Motorized > Mountain > Infantry.
For airfield strikes we prioritize like this;
Recon > Fighters > Level Bombers > Tactical Bombers.
Apart from that, all is quiet. Losses are once more low on both sides, with 25.000 Axis losses to our 54.000.
Units
We recieve on division, and form one cavalry corps this turn. Overall strength increase is 131.000 this turn.
Worries
I need more fronts to distribute my forces along...

Overall
The Axis are content with forcing 6 partisan units to retreat, while we once more launch as many aerial attacks as possible. For ground strikes we have the following priority;
Panzer > Mechanized > Motorized > Mountain > Infantry.
For airfield strikes we prioritize like this;
Recon > Fighters > Level Bombers > Tactical Bombers.
Apart from that, all is quiet. Losses are once more low on both sides, with 25.000 Axis losses to our 54.000.
Units
We recieve on division, and form one cavalry corps this turn. Overall strength increase is 131.000 this turn.
Worries
I need more fronts to distribute my forces along...

- Attachments
-
- pbem51.jpg (347.02 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 47
Overall
The campaign season opens for the Axis. They launch 4 attacks on partisan units causing 4 retreats. This time however, it is our line that takes the brunt of the attack. 71 attacks on our line causing 7 held, 33 retreats, 19 routs and 2 shatters id not good, but on the other hand, the Axis are not capable of following up in all locations, allowing us to send a new brigade back in to occupy the front. We saw an option and launched a total of 3 deliberate attacks this turn, although they scored 1 1.2:1 ratio, the defender held in all 3. Our airforce however performed rather well, killing off alot of Axis troops and planes this turn. Our losses in the air are still 3 times higher than those of the Axis, however if I can continue to empty 4 of his airfields every turn, that has got to hurt him....I hope.
The only thing I wish had gone differently was the retreat path of our southern most stack, they retreated the wrong way and are now completely cut off, and will die next turn.
At the end of this turn, losses are reported at 54.000 Axis troops to our 176.000, or a 3:1 to the Axis advantage.
Units
We lose two divisions this turn and no reinforcements arrive. Since losses are up quite alot compared to the winter months, our strength increase overall is quite small, only 50.000. But of course, if we continue to GROW by 50.000 troops every month I will be very happy. I doubt that will happen though.
Worries
The production rate of alot of equipment is painfully low. I am thinking about equipment like heavy artillery pieces, rocket artillery etc.

Overall
The campaign season opens for the Axis. They launch 4 attacks on partisan units causing 4 retreats. This time however, it is our line that takes the brunt of the attack. 71 attacks on our line causing 7 held, 33 retreats, 19 routs and 2 shatters id not good, but on the other hand, the Axis are not capable of following up in all locations, allowing us to send a new brigade back in to occupy the front. We saw an option and launched a total of 3 deliberate attacks this turn, although they scored 1 1.2:1 ratio, the defender held in all 3. Our airforce however performed rather well, killing off alot of Axis troops and planes this turn. Our losses in the air are still 3 times higher than those of the Axis, however if I can continue to empty 4 of his airfields every turn, that has got to hurt him....I hope.
The only thing I wish had gone differently was the retreat path of our southern most stack, they retreated the wrong way and are now completely cut off, and will die next turn.
At the end of this turn, losses are reported at 54.000 Axis troops to our 176.000, or a 3:1 to the Axis advantage.
Units
We lose two divisions this turn and no reinforcements arrive. Since losses are up quite alot compared to the winter months, our strength increase overall is quite small, only 50.000. But of course, if we continue to GROW by 50.000 troops every month I will be very happy. I doubt that will happen though.
Worries
The production rate of alot of equipment is painfully low. I am thinking about equipment like heavy artillery pieces, rocket artillery etc.

- Attachments
-
- pbem52.jpg (287.97 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 48
Overall
Mud strikes again nd slows things down. The Axis limit themselves to 6 anti partisan attacks, causing 5 retreats and 1 surrender, and 1 attack against my isolated units causing a surrender. The bad part is that I have been negligent somewhere during the last few turns, so that stack contained 2 cavalry corps and 1 rifle division. That was a stupid thing to do, to place those cavalry corps at the front like that.
On our part we only flew aerial attacks this turn, and one of our bomebrs reported a direct hit on what seemed like a staff car.
At the end of the turn losses are reported as 33.000 Axis troops and 75.000 of our gallant soldiers.
Nevertheless a record is set today, as the Red Army passes the 7.000.000 mark [&o]
Intel report
From: OKH
To: AH
We regret to inform our Führer that Hans-Jürgen von Arnim has been killed today. Von Arnim was directing anti aircraft fire when his car was hit by a direct hit from one of the bombers.
Units
We lose 2 cavalry corps and 1 rifle division. To counter this, we recieve three rifle divisions, and order the production of three more. With low losses this turn, our overall strength increase by 111.000 troops.
Worries
It seems the Axis have alot of spare aircrafts, as numbers go up almost as fast as we kill them on the ground. Breaking the Luftwaffe might be a very hard goal after all.

Overall
Mud strikes again nd slows things down. The Axis limit themselves to 6 anti partisan attacks, causing 5 retreats and 1 surrender, and 1 attack against my isolated units causing a surrender. The bad part is that I have been negligent somewhere during the last few turns, so that stack contained 2 cavalry corps and 1 rifle division. That was a stupid thing to do, to place those cavalry corps at the front like that.
On our part we only flew aerial attacks this turn, and one of our bomebrs reported a direct hit on what seemed like a staff car.
At the end of the turn losses are reported as 33.000 Axis troops and 75.000 of our gallant soldiers.
Nevertheless a record is set today, as the Red Army passes the 7.000.000 mark [&o]
Intel report
From: OKH
To: AH
We regret to inform our Führer that Hans-Jürgen von Arnim has been killed today. Von Arnim was directing anti aircraft fire when his car was hit by a direct hit from one of the bombers.
Units
We lose 2 cavalry corps and 1 rifle division. To counter this, we recieve three rifle divisions, and order the production of three more. With low losses this turn, our overall strength increase by 111.000 troops.
Worries
It seems the Axis have alot of spare aircrafts, as numbers go up almost as fast as we kill them on the ground. Breaking the Luftwaffe might be a very hard goal after all.

- Attachments
-
- pbem53.jpg (203.89 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 49
Overall
So, the Axis pierce the front and send their panzers east through the gap. Unfortunately for them, they are not capable to penetrate far, so the line reforms. Even better is the fact that my armoured corps are starting to gain proper strength, this will allow me some atatcks further down the line.
That being said, there are still some concerns. The main issue is that my divisions falter too eaily. Thankfully we can soon start to form Rifle Corps as well.
An oppertunity arose, and we promptly sent a Rumanian division running back west. Sadly that was our only ground attack this turn. Compared to the Axis that is nothing, as they launched a total of 79 attacks this turn.
Losses are shown as 50.000 Axis troops to our loss of 167.000.
Units
We lose 3 divisions and 3 brigades to shatter results this turn while we recieve 3 divsions, so a slight decrease in number of units. Strength wise however, our numbers increase by 59.000 this turn. That means that the Axis needs to bea bove 200.000 casualties per turn to have any hope of breaking us in terms of numbers.
Worries
No real worries, just more curious as to what the Axis will do with Crimea, as they are slowly pushing us into the peninsula.

Overall
So, the Axis pierce the front and send their panzers east through the gap. Unfortunately for them, they are not capable to penetrate far, so the line reforms. Even better is the fact that my armoured corps are starting to gain proper strength, this will allow me some atatcks further down the line.
That being said, there are still some concerns. The main issue is that my divisions falter too eaily. Thankfully we can soon start to form Rifle Corps as well.
An oppertunity arose, and we promptly sent a Rumanian division running back west. Sadly that was our only ground attack this turn. Compared to the Axis that is nothing, as they launched a total of 79 attacks this turn.
Losses are shown as 50.000 Axis troops to our loss of 167.000.
Units
We lose 3 divisions and 3 brigades to shatter results this turn while we recieve 3 divsions, so a slight decrease in number of units. Strength wise however, our numbers increase by 59.000 this turn. That means that the Axis needs to bea bove 200.000 casualties per turn to have any hope of breaking us in terms of numbers.
Worries
No real worries, just more curious as to what the Axis will do with Crimea, as they are slowly pushing us into the peninsula.

- Attachments
-
- pbem54.jpg (303.06 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 50
Overall
Mud this turn makes everything come to a standstill. We do not launch any attacks this turn, but instead focus on a little bit of reshuffling of the line. The Axis launch 4 attacks on our partisans causing 4 retreats, that is all that happens. Losses are reported as 29.000 Axis troops to our 50.000.
Units
4 divisions report in, ready to join the action. Our forces have a net gain of 133.000 troops this turn.
Worry
The slow porduction rate of certain types is a slight concern. Altough, I can make do without them, it would still be able to have them available...

Overall
Mud this turn makes everything come to a standstill. We do not launch any attacks this turn, but instead focus on a little bit of reshuffling of the line. The Axis launch 4 attacks on our partisans causing 4 retreats, that is all that happens. Losses are reported as 29.000 Axis troops to our 50.000.
Units
4 divisions report in, ready to join the action. Our forces have a net gain of 133.000 troops this turn.
Worry
The slow porduction rate of certain types is a slight concern. Altough, I can make do without them, it would still be able to have them available...

- Attachments
-
- pbem55.jpg (190.87 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 51
Overall
Another one of those important turns. We are now able to build Infantry Corps as well, and that is what we start to do. Due to the mud we do not launch any attacks this turn either, while the Axis are down to 2 partisan attacks which both result in retreats.
A new front arrive, and Mikhail Kovalev takes chare. Unfortunately a front seem to be somewhat more than he was prepared for, so three of his skills falls by 1 point each.
Losses are light this turn too, at 25.000 and 47.000, with the latter being ours.
Units
We recieve a new front, this is badly needed as all our other fronts are overloaded. However CPs is an issue as this is also the turn where we are allowed to create infantry corps.
21 rifle corps are created, 3 being of Guard status. This sucked up 42 rifle divisions and 21 rifle brigades, so in terms of counters, we are down by 42.
Although our losses were low this turn, so was the reinforcement rate, and we end up with 129.000 more troops than we started the turn with.
Worries
How many divisions to keep as divisions and how many to form into corps seems to be my biggest issue. Any thoughts? As I see it, it makes sense to have more corps than divisions since they should have a higher fighting power, but at the same time, there is a good defensive value in numbers too.

Overall
Another one of those important turns. We are now able to build Infantry Corps as well, and that is what we start to do. Due to the mud we do not launch any attacks this turn either, while the Axis are down to 2 partisan attacks which both result in retreats.
A new front arrive, and Mikhail Kovalev takes chare. Unfortunately a front seem to be somewhat more than he was prepared for, so three of his skills falls by 1 point each.
Losses are light this turn too, at 25.000 and 47.000, with the latter being ours.
Units
We recieve a new front, this is badly needed as all our other fronts are overloaded. However CPs is an issue as this is also the turn where we are allowed to create infantry corps.
21 rifle corps are created, 3 being of Guard status. This sucked up 42 rifle divisions and 21 rifle brigades, so in terms of counters, we are down by 42.
Although our losses were low this turn, so was the reinforcement rate, and we end up with 129.000 more troops than we started the turn with.
Worries
How many divisions to keep as divisions and how many to form into corps seems to be my biggest issue. Any thoughts? As I see it, it makes sense to have more corps than divisions since they should have a higher fighting power, but at the same time, there is a good defensive value in numbers too.

- Attachments
-
- pbem56.jpg (196.39 KiB) Viewed 212 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 52
Overall
And when the mud dries up, the soldiers starts bleeding again. Alot of attacks from the Axis this turn, 4 partisan attacks resulting in 4 retreats was followed by 84 attacks on the line. Of these 84 attacks, 49 retreats and 25 routs were made, and in 10 battles our galant troops held their ground. We on the other side launched a mere 5 attacks, scoring 4 retreats and 1 held. The held ressult was annoying as we got a 1.8 : 1, so close.
In the end losses are reported at 58.000 Axis troops and 172.000 brave soldiers of the USSR.
The ggod thing is that the enemy is not capable of pushing on more than one hex per turn, and now our infantry corps are starting to report CV values around 6. That means we will be even harder to push back, and alot more dangerous on the counterattack.
Enemy attacks
Although attacks were made all along the front, the only place the enemy gained anything was at the approaches to the Crimea where our Guard Infantry Corps let us down and retreated from their fort, allowing the German/Rumanina divisions to take hold over their position.
Units
We recieve a new HQ this turn, which we badly need. However no new troops arrived this turn, but we did order the formation of 3 new infantry corps nevertheless. Due to a high ammount of casualties this turn, we still saw an overall growth of 40.000 in our armed forces this turn.
Worries
Am I reading the map correctly as to where he will push?

Overall
And when the mud dries up, the soldiers starts bleeding again. Alot of attacks from the Axis this turn, 4 partisan attacks resulting in 4 retreats was followed by 84 attacks on the line. Of these 84 attacks, 49 retreats and 25 routs were made, and in 10 battles our galant troops held their ground. We on the other side launched a mere 5 attacks, scoring 4 retreats and 1 held. The held ressult was annoying as we got a 1.8 : 1, so close.
In the end losses are reported at 58.000 Axis troops and 172.000 brave soldiers of the USSR.
The ggod thing is that the enemy is not capable of pushing on more than one hex per turn, and now our infantry corps are starting to report CV values around 6. That means we will be even harder to push back, and alot more dangerous on the counterattack.
Enemy attacks
Although attacks were made all along the front, the only place the enemy gained anything was at the approaches to the Crimea where our Guard Infantry Corps let us down and retreated from their fort, allowing the German/Rumanina divisions to take hold over their position.
Units
We recieve a new HQ this turn, which we badly need. However no new troops arrived this turn, but we did order the formation of 3 new infantry corps nevertheless. Due to a high ammount of casualties this turn, we still saw an overall growth of 40.000 in our armed forces this turn.
Worries
Am I reading the map correctly as to where he will push?

- Attachments
-
- pbem57.jpg (302.11 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 53
Overall
Mud again, so there are only two Axis partisan attacks, both resulting in retreats. The Axis however should be somewhat concerned by the fact that our partisan forces are growing in size (meaning each unit contains more men, not that there are alot more of them). Our only action was aerial bombardments of German forces and airfields. It seems AFVs are really hard to hit from the air, but we still hope a panzer division that loses 500 men and 20 guns is somewhat weaker after the attack. Total losses were light this turn at 31.000 Axis troops to our 47.000 killed troops.
Intel
From : OKH
To : AH
The enemy seems to be placing their infantry in larger formations called corps. We spotted one of these units today, and they look like trouble.
Units
We form 3 new infantry corps and are back down to 7 CP. The only fresh units on the map is a new airfield. Soon I will have to limit the creation of infantry corps to 1 per turn and then also try to create 2 divisions and 1 brigade per turn.
With such low losses, we get a troop increase of 163.000 soldiers this turn.
Worries
For the time being, nothing.

Overall
Mud again, so there are only two Axis partisan attacks, both resulting in retreats. The Axis however should be somewhat concerned by the fact that our partisan forces are growing in size (meaning each unit contains more men, not that there are alot more of them). Our only action was aerial bombardments of German forces and airfields. It seems AFVs are really hard to hit from the air, but we still hope a panzer division that loses 500 men and 20 guns is somewhat weaker after the attack. Total losses were light this turn at 31.000 Axis troops to our 47.000 killed troops.
Intel
From : OKH
To : AH
The enemy seems to be placing their infantry in larger formations called corps. We spotted one of these units today, and they look like trouble.
Units
We form 3 new infantry corps and are back down to 7 CP. The only fresh units on the map is a new airfield. Soon I will have to limit the creation of infantry corps to 1 per turn and then also try to create 2 divisions and 1 brigade per turn.
With such low losses, we get a troop increase of 163.000 soldiers this turn.
Worries
For the time being, nothing.

- Attachments
-
- pbem58.jpg (208.07 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 54a
Overall
The Axis breakthrough in two places, but attacks are made all along the line.
First the most serious breakthrough, in the centre.

Overall
The Axis breakthrough in two places, but attacks are made all along the line.
First the most serious breakthrough, in the centre.

- Attachments
-
- pbem59a.jpg (277.11 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 54b
Overall
But a minor breakthrough also occurs on the Crimea.

Overall
But a minor breakthrough also occurs on the Crimea.

- Attachments
-
- pbem59b.jpg (194.89 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 54c
Overall
The Axis also tries to breakthrough in the north, but fail

Overall
The Axis also tries to breakthrough in the north, but fail

- Attachments
-
- pbem59c.jpg (350.17 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 54d
Overall
We are just a little shy of really cutting off those panzers, but I think our response should be scary for the Axis.

Overall
We are just a little shy of really cutting off those panzers, but I think our response should be scary for the Axis.

- Attachments
-
- pbem59d.jpg (311.13 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 54e
Overall
Due to some stupid retreat-paths, I am weaker than I like to in the Crimea. We cut off those pesky motorized units neverthless. The gap will be opened by the Axis, but we could always hope for a good/poor roll next turn.

Overall
Due to some stupid retreat-paths, I am weaker than I like to in the Crimea. We cut off those pesky motorized units neverthless. The gap will be opened by the Axis, but we could always hope for a good/poor roll next turn.

- Attachments
-
- pbem59e.jpg (206.62 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 54
Overall
My troops swear they saw a kitchen sink thrown at them this turn.
Attacks all along the line, and a serious breakthrough. The upside however is that our corps sized units now have a better CV value than alot of those units trying to hold the Axis flanks. Unless his troops are capable of digging in really fast, things could get nasty for them the next few turns. Due to the fact that the Axis are attacking, their troops are often caught out in the open, and we launch 16 attacks this turn, scoring 7 held and 9 retreats. I guess the good thing about those held results are that our adjusted CV was higher than 1:1, so it seems our adjustments are not as severe as before.
Teh Axis launched 5 partisan attacks, all resulting in retreats. Aside this, they launched no less than 74 attacks, scoring 9 held, 47 retreats, 21 routs and 2 shatter. I really do not like to see entire divisions shatter like that, but not much I can do about it.
Losses at the end of the turn are 52.000 Axis troops to our 176.000, so the Axis still score a 3:1 here.
Units
The only fresh unit is yet another airfield. Something I really do not need anymore as I have spare room on those I allready have. The need for mobile troops made, me in a moment of weakness, to form three new armoured corps this turn.
On the downside, we lost two rifle divisions and one artillery regiment this turn. Espesially the artillery regiment was an unnecessary loss.
Despite these losses, we recorded a net strength increase of 74.000 troops this turn.
Worries
Can I find the troops to halt the enemy breakthrough?
Also, I am lacking some info about aerial attacks it seems, so I am off to read in the manual again.
Overall
My troops swear they saw a kitchen sink thrown at them this turn.
Attacks all along the line, and a serious breakthrough. The upside however is that our corps sized units now have a better CV value than alot of those units trying to hold the Axis flanks. Unless his troops are capable of digging in really fast, things could get nasty for them the next few turns. Due to the fact that the Axis are attacking, their troops are often caught out in the open, and we launch 16 attacks this turn, scoring 7 held and 9 retreats. I guess the good thing about those held results are that our adjusted CV was higher than 1:1, so it seems our adjustments are not as severe as before.
Teh Axis launched 5 partisan attacks, all resulting in retreats. Aside this, they launched no less than 74 attacks, scoring 9 held, 47 retreats, 21 routs and 2 shatter. I really do not like to see entire divisions shatter like that, but not much I can do about it.
Losses at the end of the turn are 52.000 Axis troops to our 176.000, so the Axis still score a 3:1 here.
Units
The only fresh unit is yet another airfield. Something I really do not need anymore as I have spare room on those I allready have. The need for mobile troops made, me in a moment of weakness, to form three new armoured corps this turn.
On the downside, we lost two rifle divisions and one artillery regiment this turn. Espesially the artillery regiment was an unnecessary loss.
Despite these losses, we recorded a net strength increase of 74.000 troops this turn.
Worries
Can I find the troops to halt the enemy breakthrough?
Also, I am lacking some info about aerial attacks it seems, so I am off to read in the manual again.
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
- TulliusDetritus
- Posts: 5581
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: The Zone™
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
ORIGINAL: terje439
Worries
Can I find the troops to halt the enemy breakthrough?
You can't find them because you didn't create Strategic Reserves [:)]
Everyone is at the frontline and that, the Soviets never did it. You should strip the front of MANY troops (starting with the areas where you ONLY face harmless infantry) and keep them behind the front. It really can be done. On my other game I had 100 rifle divisions as strategic reserves (+ the many tank and cavalry corps). The Strategic Reserves is a must if you are a Soviet. The Germans, oh well, they simply can't afford them [:D]
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Yes, it seems I have a "minor" flaw in my planning there [:)]
Terje
Terje
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Turn 55
Overall
Alot of attacks this turn too, but the ammount of Axis attacks are fewer than the last turn, I think this might have to do with the increased number of fractioned German units at the front. Orders were given to shorten our front somewhat to free up some more units, we will see if that is a decision that comes back to kick us in the butt or not.
We launched 16 attacks this turn, for 10 held and 6 retreats. What is really annoying is that all of those held results came at 1.2 : 1 and up to 1.8 : 1.
The Axis scored 1 shatter, 8 rout, 38 retreat and 11 held this turn, of which one of the retreats was against a partisan unit. That gives a grand total of 57 Axis attacks on the line, and the one partisan attack.
Losses are reported at 58.000 Axis troops, and 171.000 Soviet troops.
Enemy breakthrough
As expected, the enemy open the pockets again. In the south there is not much I can do, so a slow withdrawal towards Kerch is under way.
In the center the enemy expands his beachead, but it is costing him, as he is breaking down more and more divisions. due to no less than 5x 1.8:1 attacks this turn, we did not succeed in breaking the bottleneck this turn either.
Units
We lost 1 rifle division in the north. We order (somewhat belately) the construction of 6 rifle divisions, and Stavka gives us a new airfield.
A net gain of 129.000 troops is recorded this turn.
Worries
What I need to do right now, is to prevent the enemy panzers from breaking through to the west again.

Overall
Alot of attacks this turn too, but the ammount of Axis attacks are fewer than the last turn, I think this might have to do with the increased number of fractioned German units at the front. Orders were given to shorten our front somewhat to free up some more units, we will see if that is a decision that comes back to kick us in the butt or not.
We launched 16 attacks this turn, for 10 held and 6 retreats. What is really annoying is that all of those held results came at 1.2 : 1 and up to 1.8 : 1.
The Axis scored 1 shatter, 8 rout, 38 retreat and 11 held this turn, of which one of the retreats was against a partisan unit. That gives a grand total of 57 Axis attacks on the line, and the one partisan attack.
Losses are reported at 58.000 Axis troops, and 171.000 Soviet troops.
Enemy breakthrough
As expected, the enemy open the pockets again. In the south there is not much I can do, so a slow withdrawal towards Kerch is under way.
In the center the enemy expands his beachead, but it is costing him, as he is breaking down more and more divisions. due to no less than 5x 1.8:1 attacks this turn, we did not succeed in breaking the bottleneck this turn either.
Units
We lost 1 rifle division in the north. We order (somewhat belately) the construction of 6 rifle divisions, and Stavka gives us a new airfield.
A net gain of 129.000 troops is recorded this turn.
Worries
What I need to do right now, is to prevent the enemy panzers from breaking through to the west again.

- Attachments
-
- pbem60.jpg (298.05 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen
("She is to be torpedoed!")
("She is to be torpedoed!")
- TulliusDetritus
- Posts: 5581
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: The Zone™
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Terje, the problem I see is that your expensive -and yet really fragile- Tank Corps might be easily spanked. It's the only thing you threw to the enemy spearhead. They are totally unprotected on that screenshot [:)]
But you need lots of rifle divisions (and some corps when you can afford them). The fragile corps would be hiding behind a wall of rifle divisions (strategic reserves committed to meet an enemy threat), always ready to hit and run.
But you need lots of rifle divisions (and some corps when you can afford them). The fragile corps would be hiding behind a wall of rifle divisions (strategic reserves committed to meet an enemy threat), always ready to hit and run.
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
- TulliusDetritus
- Posts: 5581
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: The Zone™
RE: Disaster in the making. Oloren (axis) vs Terje (USSR)
Still, he has mostly panzer REGIMENTS in a really dangerous place (the bottleneck)... his operation might end in disaster [:)]
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934

