Playtesting RA 6.0

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
miv792
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by miv792 »

What changes would like to know ?
Sorry for my english
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

More things. All of the USN F4U-x have worse stats than scenario 1. Is that intended?
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

What do you mean? Can you be specific and I will work on that. Haven't touched the Allied Aircraft (or Japanese for that matter) since aircraft stats and abilities are out of my pay grade...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

All models have worse maneuver bands and durability.


Image
Attachments
F4u_1.jpg
F4u_1.jpg (440.08 KiB) Viewed 428 times
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

And the other two

Image
Attachments
F4U_2.jpg
F4U_2.jpg (437.4 KiB) Viewed 428 times
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by witpqs »

Suggest you compare to Babes scenario 28 instead, as it is my understanding that is what RA is based on.
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

The British Corsair II, IV, and V are all worse in RA 6.0 from Scenario 1.
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Suggest you compare to Babes scenario 28 instead, as it is my understanding that is what RA is based on.

The Babes B has the same values as scenario 1.
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

First set

Image
Attachments
F4U_3.jpg
F4U_3.jpg (201.58 KiB) Viewed 428 times
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

second set

Image
Attachments
F4U_4.jpg
F4U_4.jpg (234.73 KiB) Viewed 428 times
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

That is fairly bizarre. I'll contact FatR and see what he says.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

Just Posted over in my AAR with Dan's game:


Hey Sir.

Just took the time to go through our Mod File. We’re in RA 5.7. The first three models of the P-38 are fine, however, the last three were set to ZERO production. While a great discovery, those three models come in later then where we are at: P-38H 6-43, P-38J 12-43, and P-38L is 6-44. This would have been a significant issue starting in June of 43 and I do not know how they could have been turned off but it is fantastic that you made me look. The earlier models are producing but the later ones are screwed up.

Gonna jump into 6.0 to see if the same issue is there as well.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

I think the F7F-3P Tigercat - Recon aircraft should be made carrier capable. The FB version is.
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

Same darned problem in 6.0. FIXED!

Am looking into the Corsair issue Cpt Sherwood.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

Playtesters: CHECK the Allied and Japanese plane production numbers and see if you spot any other 'weird' issues. Will spend time tomorrow going through the whole Allied Air side...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Cpt Sherwood
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:27 am
Location: A Very Nice Place in the USA

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Cpt Sherwood »

I see the J6M1 still has different 30mm guns for normal and extended range.

BB Washington and CL Helena still do not have float plane units assigned.

Ship class Chamois #767 - Weapons slots 2 and 9 do not show up in game display.

Ship Class Le Fantasque #774 - Weapons slots 11 and 12 still do not show weapons in game display.
“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: Cpt Sherwood

I think the F7F-3P Tigercat - Recon aircraft should be made carrier capable. The FB version is.

LIKE that idea: DEAL.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by ny59giants »

..
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17760
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by John 3rd »

Michael and I chatted while I drove through the rain to pick-up supplies for the store. MAN--we are getting a CRAPLOAD of rain right now! Flooding everywhere. We go from near drought to near flood. Only in Colorado...

ANYWAY...we spoke through the drive and will answers/fixes Posted by tomorrow morning. He and I agree that there are no problems with P-38 production. In do, in fact, get a small bump UP in RA. We'll go through everything and make a serious Posting tonight or tomorrow.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Peever
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Minnesota

RE: Playtesting RA 6.0

Post by Peever »

Just saw the news about all the flooding in Colorado. Don't get washed out, at least not until the new mod is released.[:D]
"Sergeant the Spanish bullet isn't made that will kill me," Bucky O'Neil seconds before receiving a fatal shot to the head at the battle of San Juan Hill.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”