Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Crackaces »

Ok so I think very soon the following units show up:


44th British Division

Cape Town


9th Australian Division

Aden


2nd British Para Brigade

Cape Town


7th South African Armoured Brigade

Cape Town


27th Rhodesian Brigade

Cape Town


1st AA Brigade
Aden


Natal Mounted Rifles Regiment
Cape Town

The mobilization convoy also has planes. I will have 50 Mitchell II, 50 Vengeance I, and as many Spitfires. Australian squadrons operating around Singapore are on their way back home. Other fighter squadrons, notably those from Luzon, are moving in too. Unless everything happens much faster than I think, I should soon have a nice defense force down under.


India is another possibility .. these forces plunging into Burma in late 1942 (saying no AV) is a possibility also ...

BTW) Your play is a testament against the "Brave Sir Robin" play .. Well Done! [&o]

Those 32 Spitfires are deadly .. use wisely ..
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

Hi Crackaces,
I have received these troops (except the 9th Australian, which is nowhere in sight), most of them are now sailing to Australia.


January 9th 1942

Sydney


During the night, two light cruisers tried to bombard Sydney, but one of them found the minefield, the other met the PT boats. Abukuma shows up as sunk on Tracker, I very much doubt it, but every little damage helps.

TF 216 encounters mine field at Sydney (90,167)
Japanese Ships
CL Abukuma, Mine hits 1

Night Time Surface Combat, near Sydney at 90,167, Range 1,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CL Kinu
CL Abukuma, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
PT-43
PT-44
PT-45
PT-46
PT-47, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
PT-48, Shell hits 1, and is sunk


Later, there was another deliberate attack, which reduced the forts, but failed to achieve 1:1 odds. I am not destroying as many enemy squads as I wish, but a regiment worth of squads were disabled, and the enemy will need to rest, to repair its disruption, which should help my boys recover. Sydney will fall within a week though.

Ground combat at Sydney (90,167)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 52452 troops, 457 guns, 134 vehicles, Assault Value = 1559
Defending force 28355 troops, 412 guns, 334 vehicles, Assault Value = 424
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0
Japanese adjusted assault: 801
Allied adjusted defense: 937
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
1865 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 138 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 15 disabled
Allied ground losses:
1335 casualties reported
Squads: 58 destroyed, 80 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 54 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 17 disabled
Guns lost 39 (5 destroyed, 34 disabled)
Vehicles lost 16 (4 destroyed, 12 disabled)


It seems that KB will stay a bit longer. After sailing north of Newcastle, the Japanese fleet returned to its previous position, off Sydney.

Elsewhere, in Australia, two Indian brigades are disembarking in Perth, and the First AVG just arrived in Geraldton. I will soon have enough to confront his air force.
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

January 10th 1942

Singapore


After a long delay, the Japanese crossed the causeway today. There were two divisions (Imperial Guards and 18th), two infantry regiments (124th and 143rd), three engineer regiments and four artillery outfits. More troops are probably getting ready in Johore and will soon join the fray. Overall, the enemy had 1157, I have 564, behind level three forts.

I was bloody (it always is). The engineers failed to reduce the forts, odds ended below par, which means disruption for the attackers, and two regiment equivalents were lost, one destroyed, one disabled.

Japanese ground losses:
4123 casualties reported
Squads: 170 destroyed, 130 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 79 disabled
Engineers: 10 destroyed, 57 disabled
Guns lost 40 (20 destroyed, 20 disabled)
Vehicles lost 12 (2 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1723 casualties reported
Squads: 36 destroyed, 88 disabled
Non Combat: 17 destroyed, 40 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 32 (7 destroyed, 25 disabled)


After the rapid Japanese advance I had thought Singapore would be captured before mid-January. It seems it might hold a little longer.

An interesting question is arising. I have evacuated all the planes and ships in Singapore, except a few few patrol boats, which are doing a great job discouraging naval and port attack, and a handful of ships that were in the yards. Over the last weeks, most of those ships repaired (my opponent has been targeting the airfield), and managed to flee to Batavia. Two are left today, a transport that should be ready in a few days, and BC Repulse, which is in very bad shape, but which my opponent most likely believes is already sunk.

A few days ago, I took her off the yards, and she should be ready tomorrow. I want to try to sail her to Singkep and disband, and then to Muntok and disband, and again to Toboali, and so on to Batavia. Her system damage is in the 80s, so the probability she sinks on the way is quite real, but she is worth a try.

Joseph has been careless with his naval search in the area. I managed to sail several cargoes from Manila along the coast of Borneo, and none of my evacuees from Singapore got attacked by bombers.

A convoy too far

After the failed attack on Balikpapan, the Japanese have been reinforcing Samarinda, and several task forces were detected in the harbor. As I had success with my cruisers so far, a squadron under CL Java and Marblehead was sent, in the hope to catch a few ships on their way back. They found Kongo and Takao instead, and then another task force led by CA Mogami, Mikuma, Suzuya and Kumano. We did put a few shells into the cruisers, most certainly sunk at least one destroyer (helps by a collision during the battle), but my two cruisers and four destroyers were lost with all hands

This brings the toll to six cruisers lost, three lights and as many regulars, and four destroyers. Three Japanese cruisers (one regular two lights) and a dozen of destroyer types (including APD and DMS) were sunk in return.

Little blessings

Bathurst, the base north of Sydney seized by paras a few days ago, was recaptured today. My opponent had tried to air transport infantry reinforcements, but there were too few of them to make a difference. This is a very small success: we’re too close to Sydney to even hope to hold the place, and damage was light, but this was the second time the paras of the 1st raiding regiment were defeated, and I am pretty sure Joseph has very little air transport capabilities left now.

My Australians will now retire towards Wagga Wagga, to try and confront the enemy armored spearheads. Anything that can damage the advance on Canberra and Melbourne is good.

And now for the serious things

Christmas is upon us, and with it, the harsh responsibility of choosing wine for the family lunch. And so, I spent the best part of the morning rummaging in the cellar. My house has a decent cellar, half buried, walls of stone, earth on the floor, opening to the north, bottle rack on the north wall, and I have been using it to keep and age wine. I have about 170 bottles now.

Today, the main course is a leg of lamb with greens, so we obviously need a bottle of red, with one of the same in reserve in case we drink all of it. I am set on a Bordeaux, because most of my other vineyards need a few more years. The usual choice for lamb is a Pauillac (because they raise lambs in this area, and so you match the vineyard with the local products). I have two bottles left of Chateau Haut Bages Averous, which was the second wine of Chateau Lynch Bages (a famous Pauillac, quite above my budget). They changed its name since, to Echo de Lynch Bages (I suppose it makes more sense from a marketing standpoint, and will help drive the prices high), so the 2007 bottles are the last of this wine. They should go well with the local cheese too, we live in the Brie area, and have all sorts of this famous cheese (today, Melun, Montereau and Nangis).

We will also need a white for the salmon and the starters (and I do like white on cheese anyway). I have some Riesling left from Christmas eve, and there is some Champagne that needs to be drunk anyway.

Merry Christmas, readers.
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by ny59giants »

Singapore - I don't know why Joseph came across with some Rgt. In my experience they get trashed. I don't bring any infantry over unless its in a rebuilt division.

Christmas dinner - I'm having a family favorite, a James Beard recipe of "Filet of Roast." 6 pound top round roast, with lots of slivers of garlic in her side, rubbed with Tabasco, salt, pepper, and marinated in olive oil, soy sauce, red wine, bay leaf, and thyme for two days. I should have come here and asked you for wine choice.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Rio Bravo »

I had Spam, Ritz Crackers, and a bottle of Gallo..a mixture of red and white as I had two half gallons left; one red and one white.

Merry Christmas,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Crackaces »

Hi Crackaces,
I have received these troops (except the 9th Australian, which is nowhere in sight), most of them are now sailing to Australia.


I would look in the LCU screen for this unit .. it should be in Aden .. a nice complement to India/Burma ....or taking the long way to OZ
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I would look in the LCU screen for this unit .. it should be in Aden .. a nice complement to India/Burma ....or taking the long way to OZ

I just checked in the editor. It seems that whereas the 9th Australian comes in the mobilization package, and arrives in 1943 instead, in stock, this unit has been removed from the OOB in DaBabes.
Another thing I found curious : the mobilization package provides me with a lot of Matilda II replacements, but it looks like I don't have units that can use them (either having them in their OOB, or having devices that can upgrade to Matildas, according to Tracker, there is only one).

Francois
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

We’re back after a brief Christmas truce.
January 11th 1942

China


I haven’t mentioned this theater in a while. Very little is happening here. Joseph has conquered the central plains, except Loyang which will fall as soon as he moves in as it is hardly garrisoned. Elsewhere, the roads to Sian are garrisoned, up to the stacking limit, with empty hexes behind so that they can retreat, and most units there have field fortifications level two or above. Elsewhere inn the north, my garrisons are dug in, slowly repairing morale and disablements, and Japan doesn’t seem interested in moving forward.

In Central China, enemy troops are concentrating around Pingsiang and Chuhsien. Kukong and Pucheng should be next, but this is slow, and it suits me. I have transferred one squadron of Warhawks from the Philippines, they never saw real action, but it makes my opponent careful about committing his bombers, and this is fine. In Changsha, forts will reach level five in a few days, enemy buildup is going on, but I suspect it is too late for a move against central China.

The South is calm, maybe because troops are moving in, maybe because Japan is focused on Changsha.

Overall, the situation is good. I have lost units to the initial retreats, but the rest of the KMT is nicely recovering, and the supply situation is good: we went from 70K supplies at game start, to 145K right now, and the total is going up. This means I can afford to rebuild a few corps, build forts, and wait for the Japanese advance, while still getting the Burma road bonus.

Singapore

There were no attacks today. The enemy is licking his wounds. BC Repulse made it to Singkep and disbanded at no additional damage. I am trying Muntok tomorrow, and sending a pair ofDD to escort her to Batavia.

Sydney

Another attack, today, ended in 1:2 odds, and disruption. I am suffering more than my opponent, but he had reinforced his beachhead (with a tank regiment), yet did not break through. 100 more enemy squads were disabled: I am buying time.

Allied cruisers bombarded Rockhampton . My infantry should arrive there the day after tomorrow, and with a little luck, the base will fall at once.

South of Sydney, Canberra was invaded by a tank regiment. They will attack tomorrow, and I will try to bomb and prevent them from capturing the base. The rest of the armored spearheads seem to be retreating from Goulburn. It needs to be confirmed, but together with the tank regiment reinforcing Sydney, this seems to suggest the Japanese advance towards Melbourne had slowed, and this is very good news.

Wine and stuff

Ny59giants, with roast beef, the usual recommendation is a tannic wine, Cabernet Sauvignon, or Sirah/Shiraz, aged in wood barrels. The age would depend on whether you serve it rare or well done. Basically, the more you cook the meat, the older the wine, to get a more “round” taste. Personally, I like Spanish wines over beef, Rioja, or Tempranillo, Toro if you can find some. I like my beef rare, so I’d go for the crianza, which are the younger wines (the older vintages are known as reserva or gran reserva). For French wine, a Haut Medoc would probably be very good (Sociando Mallet is my favorite), but a Côtes du Rhône would do as well. In the US, I think California has good Cabernet, but the better Washington state wines would probably do well. But as always, you’ve got to try, and see what you like best.

Today was my birthday, and we had beef stew and carrots (boeuf carottes in French), with a bottle of Fronsac, a small area north of the more famous vineyards of Bordeaux (St Emilion, Pomerol). I now need to rest, and get ready for New Year, and more interesting stuff, to try to forget about the loss of Sydney and Singapore.

User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by ny59giants »

I went with the Cabernet Sauvignon as the wine selection in this part of Tennessee is not very good. I may have to join an on line wine club or something else to get a better selection. Thanks for the feedback. [;)]
[center]Image[/center]
Kofiman
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:03 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Kofiman »

How effective were the B-17 squadrons in China?
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

January 12th 1942

Fun with the buffs


My B-17 squadrons (and a few LB-30 upgrades) have many uses. I have 45 B-17, and 3 LB-30 in Chungking, 22 B-17 in Melbourne, and seven more B-17 and as many LB-30 in Clark Field, awaiting transfer. I have lost 12 B-17 so far, have 15 in the pool, hav 20 more arriving as reinforcements at the end of the month, and will produce about 20 four engine bombers a month for the rest of the year. The situation is stable.

In China, Chungking is now a level six airfield, which means my B17 operate a full efficiency, and out of enemy reach. I have been bombing units in clear terrain, and troops about to attack, and usually disable half a dozen squads every day. This is not a lot, but I am confident it plays its role. My best results were achieved against armored units, and I try to target them whenever I can find them.

In Australia, after a couple of missions against Rockhampton, to prevent the base from building, my buffs are flying from Melbourne, against the tank column near Canberra. They fly every other day, but on a typical day, I get to destroy five tanks, and disable 15 more.

From Clark Field, I flew a few missions against Hong Kong, damaging the industry.

As for efficiency, I am not too impressed so far, but I suspect this is because I change target often, and usually operate against targets with low detection levels. I am considering moving recon unit to China and Australia, and coordinate them with my bombers. I suspect it would change a lot of things.

Small turns, big wonders

I have little to report today. The Japanese are resting in Singapore and Sydney, KB has not retired, and seems to be sailing around Sydney, together with a number of transports. I find this puzzling. I can understand why KB might wait for Sydney to fall, protecting his beachhead against cruisers, and perhaps Allied carriers, but why keep the transports at sea when he could just leave them in one of the two ports he captured ?

I am also wondering what his next move might be. Keeping KB so far south, and in need of refill and perhaps repairs in Truk, suggests his advance in the DEI will remain slow. After Sydney, his next move should be either Brisbane or Melbourne. I don’t see the point of landing so many troops and not going for a large campaign in Australia. On the other hand, since the invasion began, I didn’t see any attempt to blockade western or eastern Australia, and limit my ability to reinforce. At this point, KB should be harassing the coast, and trying to prevent convoys from moving in or out of the continent, this is not the case.

Could he be planning to reembark troops once Sydney fall, and invade elsewhere? This would explain KB and the transports, and a division or more could certainly capture New Caledonia, and even Fiji. But this would probably limit his options in Australia, and doom his beachhead once the reinforcements arrive. In the end, the net result of his Australian attack would be me getting mobilization troops, in exchange for losses on both sides.

He could reembark for a nearer destination : Tasmania, and some bases closer to Melbourne. But I am not sure I understand the benefit of it. Tasmania could be had earlier, and another landing means more risk, and more losses, probably, for little strategic benefit (I have nothing he can cut off between Sydney and Melbourne).
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Crackaces »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

I went with the Cabernet Sauvignon as the wine selection in this part of Tennessee is not very good. I may have to join an on line wine club or something else to get a better selection. Thanks for the feedback. [;)]

There are certainly "exclusive" wines made available to wine club members like the 2011 Stags Leap Cellars Fay Fifty, but I just saw at Costco a 2012 Stags leap Cellars Cask 23 for $190 .. club price was $225 Also BevMore and other discount retail outlets offer great wines at reasonable prices .. Just requires a trip to the big city .. [:)] Sometimes the savings is worth the trip ..

There is always the excuse to travel to Napa and find wines you like and join a club [8D]


Ok back to the War
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: fcharton
ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I would look in the LCU screen for this unit .. it should be in Aden .. a nice complement to India/Burma ....or taking the long way to OZ

I just checked in the editor. It seems that whereas the 9th Australian comes in the mobilization package, and arrives in 1943 instead, in stock, this unit has been removed from the OOB in DaBabes.
Another thing I found curious : the mobilization package provides me with a lot of Matilda II replacements, but it looks like I don't have units that can use them (either having them in their OOB, or having devices that can upgrade to Matildas, according to Tracker, there is only one).

Francois

All of the Aussie infantry divisions have been removed in DBB to my knowledge. You have to fight with brigades for the duration.
The Moose
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

January 13th 1942

Wasted Matilda


Today was a big day for the Empire, both Sydney and Canberra were captured, and Japanese victory points went up 3 000 (yeah, three thousand).

Ground combat at Sydney (90,167)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 51928 troops, 464 guns, 203 vehicles, Assault Value = 1462
Defending force 26276 troops, 399 guns, 338 vehicles, Assault Value = 183
Japanese adjusted assault: 1315
Allied adjusted defense: 629
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Sydney !!!
Japanese ground losses:
1325 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 27 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 19 destroyed, 14 disabled
Guns lost 9 (3 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Units destroyed 1
Allied ground losses:
6822 casualties reported
Squads: 348 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 761 destroyed, 73 disabled
Engineers: 109 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 287 (275 destroyed, 12 disabled)
Vehicles lost 177 (172 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Units retreated 16
Units destroyed 3
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


An engineer regiment (the 56th if the combat animation is to be trusted) was destroyed. The assaulting stack was 1462 AV strong, to be compared with the 1720 of the first attack (and knowing that a tank regiment reinforced the attackers during the battle). The defenders have retreated off the road network, which is a good thing as it means pursuing them will take a while.

The fall of Sydney frees a lot of troops. 320 AVwill be needed for garrison duty, and about 300 seems to have been lost so far (some will be back), which means about 1600 AV are free to march on Melbourne or Brisbane. Here is the disposition of forces.

Image

As you see, two columns, each an infantry regiment and an armored unit (tank or recon regiment) are in Canberra, and on the road north of Newcastle. Neither of them can do much damage. If they advance too fast, they run the risk of being cut off, and I probably have enough troops to resist them anyway. The main force is in Sydney, where about 1100 AV should be available for further rampaging.

Both Brisbane and Melbourne have level three forts, Melbourne will certainly reach four by the time he arrives. I have 200 AV west of Melbourne (two Indian brigades), and 250 around Rockhampton, which should be available once the enemy beachhead is destroyed. The first contingents from Cape Town should be arriving at the end of the month. By mid-February, about 1000 AV and a lot of tanks will be around.

KB seems to be retiring. If it goes back to Truk to rearm, there is no way it can be back before the end of the month. A small CV force has been spotted off Rockhampton, probably two or three light and escort carriers, but it is much smaller, and runs the risk of an attack if is sails too close to my coastal bases.

So, there. Joseph holds a central position between Brisbane and Melbourne. If he splits his forces, he might have just enough for Brisbane, but I don’t think he can capture Melbourne before I reinforce it. So his best course of action would be to focus on one objective (this is what the central position is all about). I would love him to go for Brisbane, because I think it will buy me enough time to build the counter attack, and sweep him northwards, but Melbourne seems the more likely choice. I don’t see the point of landing so many troops, so far south, triggering reinforcements, just to stop at Sydney and settle for the northeast.

If he goes for Melbourne, the debate will revolve around the time he needs to get close, and the amount of troops he needs to use to prevent spoiling attacks on his northern flank, build enough air bases to support his assault (he needs the air superiority, and having KB parked in the straits between Melbourne and Tasmania looks like a bad idea), and garrison enough to defend his supply lines. But in any case, I am pretty hopeful.


[Edit]I forgot to mention... when a port is captured, all the ships in port and most of those in the yards, materialize at once as a series of task forces. As a result, 70 ships just appeared in Sydney, in various states of damage, but all with full bunkers. I organised them into small task forces, sorting the cripple from the valid and grouping them by speed, and tried to send them in as many direction as possible. I am certain Joseph will have submarines, and planes, and maybe even surface ships looking for them, but as I was expecting to lose all, every ship saved is a bonus. I wonder how many I can get to port...

Attachments
postsydney2.jpg
postsydney2.jpg (95.42 KiB) Viewed 381 times
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

I don't know if you've played DBB before; your comment re the 9th Aussie suggests it's as new to you as it is to me. If you haven't you might spend some time looking at the Aussie OOB, queue, and withdrawals. They're very different than stock.

The LH units in the eastern part of the country almost all withdraw very early. Some you may lose in the next month; don't recall dates. Also, your early "armor", which is full of Improvised AFVs (pickup trucks more or less), also withdraws at inconvenient times for an early invasion. In my game it's Brisbane and Perth under siege, but still . . .

There is a new base north of Melbourne on the DBB map. Puly-something. It's small, but it's the arrival base for the follow-on real armor you get in late March/early April. Those units arrive with over 80% disabled devices, but when they heal up they are good armor units. That base is worth defending if you can. I don't know if the arrivals will bump elsewhere if the base is lost.

You also get high-level Aussie HQs pretty soon. They're useful of course for leveraging AV points.

Just a few thoughts.
The Moose
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

Hi Bullwinkle,

This is my first time playing the Allies after the first few weeks, so the OOB (DBB or stock) is all news to me.

For what I understand, if their arrival base is occupied, reinforcements arrive in the "national home base" instead, at no cost and with no delay. For Australia, this is Sydney and Melbourne. So long I can keep Melbourne, all reinforcements from occupied bases will arrive there. But this is not happening anytime soon. Next month reinforcements (three brigades, a tank regiment, an AA unit and a pioneer battalion) arrive in Aden. The next batch is in two months, and arrives split between Colombo and Adelaide, so even if all my bases are theirs by then, I still get a significant part of the package. As for the tanks and the Puckapunyal units, they are due in three months, which is when most of the LH withdrawals happen. By then (late April or early) I am pretty certain the fate of Australia will be decided, but I am moving US troops to the South Pacific just in case.

I might be wrong, but I think Joseph's strategy is predicated on a quick capture of Southern Australia. If he cannot capture Melbourne soon, reinforcements will start arriving, and his task will become more and more difficult, unless he reinforces, and therefore slows his capture of the East Indies.

Francois

User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

If you don't know the stock OOB then you can't miss those fantastic Aussie IDs, the best fighters you have after the USMC. [:)]

DBB is more historical, but it isn't built to withstand a major Oz invasion. You are doing very well, better than I am with a lot more Allied experience. You seem unflappable, which is a good thing to be in 1942.

I have also learned a lot from your wielding of the Allied navy in the early days. I did a Sir Robin and am near auto-victory ratios due to it in April 1942.
The Moose
User avatar
Rio Bravo
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Grass Valley, California
Contact:

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by Rio Bravo »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

If you don't know the stock OOB then you can't miss those fantastic Aussie IDs, the best fighters you have after the USMC. [:)]

DBB is more historical, but it isn't built to withstand a major Oz invasion. You are doing very well, better than I am with a lot more Allied experience. You seem unflappable, which is a good thing to be in 1942.

I have also learned a lot from your wielding of the Allied navy in the early days. I did a Sir Robin and am near auto-victory ratios due to it in April 1942.

Moose-

I thought the same thing as I followed Francois' AAR: Unflappable!

Best Regards,

-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »


January 14th 1942

The hunt


Of the seventy ships that left Sydney yesterday, seventeen were sunk today. Among them were three good tankers, a troop transport, and DD Voyager. I will lose more ships tomorrow, but I have good hope of saving about half the ships. This keeps KB, and Japanese cruisers, and Japanese submarines, busy around Sydney, which is fine by me. In the meantime I am landing troops in Noumea and Pago Pago, and my mobilization reinforcements are about to arrive on map.

I am patrolling the sea lanes between Perth and Cape Town, and have moved Catalinas to Western Australia, to try and detect submarines around the coast. I am more than a bit worried about Joseph trying to sink my reinforcements. That would not be sufficient to derail the planned counterattack, but it wouldn’t be nice…

The fall of Rockhampton

Five Australian regiments attacked Rockhampton today, and easily dispatched the base force and air and port units there. This frees about 300 AV between Townsville and Brisbane. I will lightly reinforce the coast, and send the rest to Brisbane and Toowoomba. I should be able to have about 400 AV in Brisbane soon, which will not resist a full-fledged assault, but should be enough to prevent a small force from capturing the coast.

I am abandoning all the area between Brisbane and Melbourne. Let Joseph occupy it. I am also retiring my bombers. He has too many fighters around, and KB. I am now waiting for the reinforcements to arrive, and for Joseph to reveal his axis of advance.

A bad day in China

Several days ago, I relocated a squadron of Warhawks from the Philippines to China. I had based them in Kukong, waiting for the bombers. Joseph apparently noticed the move, and sent Oscars sweeping, and I lost fifteen fighters (and no Oscars were shot down). This hurts all the more as my fighter pools are very low, but fighters in China seem to be helping, as my opponent is new bombing my troops less often than in December.

The Warhawks will transfer to Chungking and rebuild. They will be joined by a squadron of Hurricanes that might be better used here than waiting in Burma. I don’t plan to use them aggressively, but I hope they can make Joseph a bit careful, and therefore reduce the bombing runs against the KMT.

fcharton
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:51 pm
Location: France

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

Post by fcharton »

January 15th 1942

Almost there


HMS Repulse made it to Toboali today. She was spotted by a squadron of Nells which, operating at extreme range, failed to do any damage. Tomorrow, I will convoy her to Merak and from there to Batavia. She is still a long way home, but extricating her from Singapore is a small victory already. The last ships and planes in Singapore were evacuated today. We are now ready for the enemy onslaught.

Balikpapan

The 146th infantry regiment, having failed to capture Balikpapan in December, was reinforced by three SNLF units. They attacked today, and reduced the forts one level. I believe Balikpapan will be captured within a week, but it will have been a nice roadblock (and I have good hope that the long siege result in damage to the oilfields).

Enemy advance in the Dutch Indies is stalled. Balikpapan and Ambon still need to be captured, there were no further landings in the Celebes, or on Mindanao. This suits me fine.

To flap or not to flap

In Australia, I am waiting for the cavalry, in this case, the 7th South African, the British paras and the 7th Hussars, which should all arrive in a couple of weeks. Today, the Japanese were busy attacking my fleeing merchants (eleven more were sunk, which means I will have saved about 40 of the 70 merchies in Sydney), and KB fighters patrolled over Canberra, shooting a few B17 down.

I am happy with this state of affairs. I am bidding for time, and the more methodical my opponent is, the more he focuses on defending his territory, or on chasing my merchants, the more time I have to reinforce Melbourne.

The first reinforcements convoys have appeared today on the Cape Town to Perth lane. Their vanguard is a small cargo force, with a few motorized support squads from the 7th SA. So far, no enemy ships or submarines have been detected, but those will be two frightening weeks.

But overall, I can’t help thinking prospects are very good. So far, the Japanese advance was very slow in the East Indies, in Burma and in China (in China, the supply situation is actually improving, thanks to the lack of combat), and if I can land most of the reinforcements, I very much doubt the move against Australia can be long lived. The only downside is that my pools, planes and replacements both, are very low

Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”