Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderator: MOD_WarintheWest

Post Reply
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

My reading of the current activity (almost certainly wrongly interpreted) is that he left the Med fairly early and is already prepped, or very close to and waiting for a chance break in the weather to start early. Based on his past behaviour I wouldn't be surprised if actually he has taken every possible TF north and more divisions from the Med than historical. His focused bombing/attacks on the Winter line are designed to a) take no unnecessary risk but b) keep my attention and prevent as many units from leaving this theatre as possible. I don't think he has any anticipation of his attacks breaking through, and from his recce I'm sure he has a good idea that a landing at Anzio would be highly difficult, but the more divisions I keep committed the better for him. From the occasional recce I put up I think he has at least 13, maybe 16 divisions on the mainland. Its more difficult to judge whats also on the islands and in africa. There is possibly something prepped but not major.
Meanwhile on the winter line we currently have:
10th Army (Balck) - some mech regiments held at army level
LI Gebirgs (Schoerner) - 15 PzGn, 4 FJ, 5 Gebirgs, 114 Jaeger
LXXXV (Kreysing) - 188 Gebirgs, 305 Inf, 1 FJ (-)
LVIII Pz Corps (Von Schweppenburg) - 16SS PzGn, 26 Pz, HG Pz, 44 Inf

Behind the lines is 14th Army (Von Mackensen) - 162 Inf
XIV Pz (Hube) - 29 PzGn, 159 Inf, 266 Inf
Kneiss (Von Manteuffel) - 3 PzGn, 165 Inf, 362 Inf
I FJ (Meindl) - 157 Gebirgs
XI Flieger (Student) - 90 PzGn, 276 Inf (both actually in North Italy but available to deploy)

Over the winter there was also II SS Pz Korps of 9 ss Pz, 10 SS Pz in Rome & 130 Pz Lehr on the east coast. The later just left for France and the others withdrew to Russia.

I was fairly confident this bunch could deal with any winter landing, and quietly confident they acted as a force in being to deter QBall from risking anything. I guess at some point we'll hear that side of the story. Whats now in theatre is not wildly different from historical I think, but we might consider drawing down a little. So the screenshot is what was, and now I need to work on the what next... Which may well be a more pressing concern than usual.
Up in France its a work in progress jockeying troops into position, and to be honest continuing to shift around a bit in order to try to make the intel he planned on be obsolete because by now he has almost certainly committed to a plan.


Image
Attachments
gustav.jpg
gustav.jpg (221.9 KiB) Viewed 283 times
"Stay low, move fast"
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Walloc »

ORIGINAL: Gunnulf

In other news we have noticed that we are suffering from a severe lack of armaments and assault guns in our ToEs. Which is strange as none of the Stug factories are damaged and the armament factories pretty much the only things untouched. Across the board though divisons on refit fill up with infantry and tanks but miss artillery, anti-tanks guns and assault guns. Which isn't good obviously and I need to study the chain and work out why fast... There seem to be plenty in the pools; 3200 Pak40, 4500 81mm Mtr, 900 105mm howitzers, though only 24 StugIIIG. But none seems to be going where it is needed and artillery bltns arriving depleted at OKW stay empty too. The manual and forum need to be scoured again.

Just to eliminate the more obvious reasons. How is the Manpower situasion? potentially u could have no men to man the stugs/AT guns.
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

ORIGINAL: Walloc
ORIGINAL: Gunnulf

In other news we have noticed that we are suffering from a severe lack of armaments and assault guns in our ToEs. Which is strange as none of the Stug factories are damaged and the armament factories pretty much the only things untouched. Across the board though divisons on refit fill up with infantry and tanks but miss artillery, anti-tanks guns and assault guns. Which isn't good obviously and I need to study the chain and work out why fast... There seem to be plenty in the pools; 3200 Pak40, 4500 81mm Mtr, 900 105mm howitzers, though only 24 StugIIIG. But none seems to be going where it is needed and artillery bltns arriving depleted at OKW stay empty too. The manual and forum need to be scoured again.

Just to eliminate the more obvious reasons. How is the Manpower situasion? potentially u could have no men to man the stugs/AT guns.

Yes I wondered that but I have 855k manpower in the pool, losses really haven't been heavy as the temp of ground fighting has been very very low, and I've been conscious of trying to avoid the temptation to refit every Infantry division to fill their ToE unless they are needed at a key point or at the front. As above the pools for 75mm Pak 40 et all are good, and from the log every artillery type produced new pieces this turn. It just doesn't seem to want to end up in divisions.

Also of great frustration this turn is we have just noticed that at some point in the recent past Loehr (Air trait 7) has been replaced as head of Luftwaffe Reich... with Richard Heidrich (air trait 2!!! though at least his Infantry trait is 6...) A strange appointment. I didn't see a message here but from the air battle screen shots until recently can't have been too long ago (though at first I thought it might explain alot...). Pretty disastrous and needless to say I haven't got 22 AP to replace him so we have to sideline him and shift all his aircraft to Luftflotte 3. Not sure if I need to bother changing all the flak assigned to him, thats going to be a lot of clicks...
"Stay low, move fast"
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Walloc »

ORIGINAL: Gunnulf



Yes I wondered that but I have 855k manpower in the pool, losses really haven't been heavy as the temp of ground fighting has been very very low, and I've been conscious of trying to avoid the temptation to refit every Infantry division to fill their ToE unless they are needed at a key point or at the front. As above the pools for 75mm Pak 40 et all are good, and from the log every artillery type produced new pieces this turn. It just doesn't seem to want to end up in divisions.

With 855k Manpower I hafta assume u play with the EF box and some how u not feeding it replacements or it has been some odd figthing there. Its a high number and well historicly u hadnt seen that many casulties by this point in Sicily/Italy.

To give a point of refererence. 855k manpower is close to the total replacements received in both the entire MTO/ETO recieved from the 1st of july 1943 until the end of the war on 4/5 May 1945. Including the purely replacement part of the rebuilding after the Sep 1944 "miracle".
U sure that is what is alone in the german Manpower pool? and not the axis combined?, just wondering.

Kind regards,
Rasmus
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

ORIGINAL: Walloc

ORIGINAL: Gunnulf



Yes I wondered that but I have 855k manpower in the pool, losses really haven't been heavy as the temp of ground fighting has been very very low, and I've been conscious of trying to avoid the temptation to refit every Infantry division to fill their ToE unless they are needed at a key point or at the front. As above the pools for 75mm Pak 40 et all are good, and from the log every artillery type produced new pieces this turn. It just doesn't seem to want to end up in divisions.

With 855k Manpower I hafta assume u play with the EF box and some how u not feeding it replacements or it has been some odd figthing there. Its a high number and well historicly u hadnt seen that many casulties by this point in Sicily/Italy.

To give a point of refererence. 855k manpower is close to the total replacements received in both the entire MTO/ETO recieved from the 1st of july 1943 until the end of the war on 4/5 May 1945. Including the purely replacement part of the rebuilding after the Sep 1944 "miracle".
U sure that is what is alone in the german Manpower pool? and not the axis combined?, just wondering.

Kind regards,
Rasmus

EF box is off. We have a few divisions and regiments on refit and they receive squads fine at the 20% of need rate that we would expect. Its the artillery and AT that seems to be hoarding in the pools and only trickling though at 20 or so per turn across the whole army. Its particularly noticable that the 150mm howitzer battalions that arrive at OKW depleted do not fill out at all so far. Clearly its getting to the point where I'm going to need these. I've raised a question in the general forum as at this point I'm certainly confused.
"Stay low, move fast"
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Walloc »

ORIGINAL: Gunnulf

EF box is off. We have a few divisions and regiments on refit and they receive squads fine at the 20% of need rate that we would expect. Its the artillery and AT that seems to be hoarding in the pools and only trickling though at 20 or so per turn across the whole army. Its particularly noticable that the 150mm howitzer battalions that arrive at OKW depleted do not fill out at all so far. Clearly its getting to the point where I'm going to need these. I've raised a question in the general forum as at this point I'm certainly confused.

Ok... well the replacement rates has been out of wack since Alpha. Its been forever since i played, but if that is true its incredible. Unfortunatly some ppl that thought they knew any thing about this, came with figurs that was totally out of touch with reality and common sense during testing. This was pointed out.

Well Qball better start to use his airforce, as ur capable of inflicting losses far beyond reality with both the LW and Allied airforces in order to combat that pool of men. Or live with an eternally over strength german heer and finding other ways to win, where casulties inflicted does really matter that much.


Smiles,
Rasmus



User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

I don't think this is manpower related as the pool is about 855k. Aside from losing 14k in Sardinia and that one battle on the winter line the tempo of fighting and losses has been low. I don't expect to face many problems here once the fighting starts in earnest in France. But I do need heavy weapons, and it looks like I do have enough for about 50 battalions of 105mm howitzers, but they are sitting in rows outside the factories. I expect some logistical choke, but hardly anything is shifting. Hopefully they are not going to end up sold on the black market...
"Stay low, move fast"
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33494
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Joel Billings »

Thanks for the very enjoyable AAR. I answered your replacement question in your main thread, but to summarize, you have only 1300 active German manpower (840k Italian which is not important), and those will tend to go to AFVs. Little combat means little churn and few men coming back as replacements each turn. You will get some infantry from excess support squads, but fundamentally you will get few replacements and have to look at ways to maximize what you have. You probably will need to lower Max TOE of units, and possibly disband some units. It may be possible to funnel replacements into a few artillery support units but using the CR screen to quickly lower the Max TOE of your other units so that they don't take replacements and the few you have go to the units you've left with higher TOEs. Otherwise, it may indeed be hard to get them into support units as I don't know if they meet the requirements for top priority when in a national supply depot.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33494
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Joel Billings »

BTW, I noticed the Allies only got 9 VPs for bombing and 10 overall in the last turn. The heady days of 1943 (in terms of VPs per turn seem to be gone for the moment). Thanks again for writing this AAR.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Walloc »

Gunnulf,

I still wonder if u by accident are looking at the combined axis manpower pool and not the german manpower pool alone, when u come up with the 855k number.

Rasmus

P.S Joel alrdy answered that question
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

Yep, looks like the big number was leading me to a false sense of security. Now I know I can deal with it and purge a few units to help a bit.
Shame we can't teach those spare Italians to speak Deutsche. Thanks everybody for taking the time to point this out. Clearly need to look at it a bit different from WITE
"Stay low, move fast"
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

BTW, I noticed the Allies only got 9 VPs for bombing and 10 overall in the last turn. The heady days of 1943 (in terms of VPs per turn seem to be gone for the moment). Thanks again for writing this AAR.

Yes, the bombing VP is lower now, though we have to remind ourselves that the underlying damage is still being done! No time for complacency just yet. I think once he starts adding more cities to his empire (ok, ok, 'liberating' if you must... :) ) then I really need to cause some serious delays to stop this slipping towards an allied victory. Time will tell...
"Stay low, move fast"
Walloc
Posts: 3143
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:04 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Walloc »

ORIGINAL: Gunnulf

Shame we can't teach those spare Italians to speak Deutsche. Thanks everybody for taking the time to point this out. Clearly need to look at it a bit different from WITE

Maybe u can convience Joel....

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2 ... l-austrian

/Highjack over
Rasmus
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

Nice article. Its a interesting anomaly from not even quite 100 years ago. A beautiful part of the world either way and certainly strange when you go just a short distance from Trento to Bolzano to see such a shift in culture within nominally the same country. But I must admit given the choice I'd rather have Italian food and wine to Austrian... But you are right. Stick a uniform on them and give them a rifle, we need pixel-truppen in numbers.
A few forts that I was going to disband sooner or later as they are manned by other troops now they are build and we lift the (German) manpower pool a bit. But costs us a few APs we were starting to save towards a commander change. We need Paks more than Generals right now though I think.
"Stay low, move fast"
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

Turn 39 - 25 Mar '44

Heavy rain from north to south grounds most flights. Only a single recce flight observed over the Romanian oil fields, which of course we expect to get hammered sooner rather than later. There is a 5 nation air force in the area, and extra flak has been deployed but no doubt he will come in force.
Given my new found enlightenment about the German pool being more like the population of a Tyrol mountain village rather than a major city we have re-organised a few air bases we had mothballed as FOBs in Italy, disbanded a few fort units that are built and now occupied so are surplus to requirements. This gives us a more healthy pool of 46k and many of the artillery units at OKW start to fill out and will be ready to assign soon so crisis averted.

A few thoughts on the developments on the Atlantic wall which is getting close to as well developed as we can probably hope for.

7th Army has responsibility for Brittany with 3 Infantry Korps, 2 on the north coast and 1 on the south. We were late to occupy the region in force as we kinda wanted QBall to be tempted to see this as a soft touch and start planning and prepping. No idea yet whether he took the bait but now we are deploying here in reasonable strength. Its still the weak spot as Dollman is a pretty poor commander, but now it will cost him to get ashore if he comes. All these divisions bar one are mobile though if we need to march out.

1st Army commands Normandy with 2 Infantry Korps and 1 Pz Korps, they are in reasonable shape to slow any invasion here, with a little defense in depth.

15th Army then covers Le Havre to the Pas de Calais as per historical with 3 Infantry Korps. We have optimised all armies at or slightly below 30 CP in order to maximise command rolls.

1 Fallshirmjaeger Army will arrive next week and take command of 1 Korps in Belgium and 2 Korps in the Netherlands. This is a fairly strong position as I've always had a suspicion that QBall would quite like to punch here to take the shortest route, or at the least set up airbases here. But we demonstrated early by putting extra units to work on forts so hopefully he was dissuaded at his planning stage, or if not he will be coming ashore on the polders fortified to level 3 and the ports at 4. Its no paper-tiger now.

5 Pz Army is in reserve, currently 1 Pz Korps but the 2nd arrives very soon. As mentioned above we have 1 Pz Korps opcom 1 Army for geographic convenience, plus to be honest due to better command ratings. We do have a priority now to find a better army commander for 5 Pz Army as 3 Mech Trait is not going to cut it. Thats a 20AP change though so need to wait a couple weeks. Once done we may consolidate all 3 Pz Korps under him.

Finally, and not to forget, Denmark has a reasonable force, just 1 strong Korps covering the main beaches and choke points. If he does come this way we can slow him sufficiently until the cavalry arrives. But QBall rightly values the power of flight and I don't think he will risk landing outside cover as seen last year where if he was reckless he would have taken a shot at Rome before he could be sure Sardinia would be ready in time.

Thats it really, everything taking shape and every man and dog are dug in and on alert. All we need now is somebody to shoot at.

Image
Attachments
wall.jpg
wall.jpg (84.13 KiB) Viewed 283 times
"Stay low, move fast"
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by loki100 »

Good summary but I'd discount Denmark. There have been a few Allied disasters there (one was mine) and I think the port/rail layout makes it at best a dead end and at worst a death trap?
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

I'd tend to agree, from every AAR I've seen this tried then yes its proved to be a cul de sac. But I don't want this to be remembered as that AAR where QBall pulled off the 'Reverse Viking' gambit and was in Berlin by July... :) So, I've got 4 divisions there, generating a share towards VPs for slight over garrison and available to draw down as a strategic reserve of fresh troops once QBall plays his hand. If I had a massive gap in the line anywhere then I'd release them already but even 19th Army down south is relatively well dug in with a regiment on every beach and the ports fortified to 4. The only weak spot is SW France (run WMBf.France HQ) which is just marginally above garrison and more of an occupying army on partisan duty than a battle formation. Much of those are security troops ready to protect the lines of communication if/when the French revolt and is a place where tardy skill 3 & 4 generals get posted to sip wine outside cafes and (we hope) get bumped off by Marquis drive-bys with sten guns. If he lands in the SW we will welcome that move of course but I very highly doubt it for a multitude of reasons.
"Stay low, move fast"
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

Turn 41 - 8 April '44

I'll chalk today up as a rare victory over the skies which should cause QBall to at least consider for a minute dialing back a bit. He had been running rampant over Germany as usual but also switched some of Bomber command to day missions over France bombing ports and railyards west of Paris, and tactical bombers east and north-east of Paris. We had been marshalling our forces to try to catch him off guard and this was a relative success. 150 Fw190s operate from west of Paris, 300 Bf109s south of Paris and another 150 Fw190 east of Paris, with the 2 Fw190 hunter groups interlocking with the Bf109s. Over Nantes and Remmes they run havoc with unescorted groups of 50 Halifax & Lancasters taking down in some cases 22 of the 50 for no loss. Its a turkey shoot here and I think he loses at least 87 for the loss of just 2 Bf109s. East of Paris against the tactical bombers its less one sided as at least some are escorted by Spitfires, but still we get a healthy tally. In total with the intercepts we focus over Vienna and Pommerania we get 212 bombers and 126 others for 'just' 84 pilots. Not sustainable every week, but every other week maybe just about, and almost certainly he will have to reign in bomber command and only hit targets escorted. He has plenty of fighters but the Mustangs can't run AS in force everywhere so I think we are playing hide and seek here and this time we got lucky.
Of course this is isolated success and the overall trend is still sliding to oblivion but small victories can be milked in our radio broadcasts.

Image
Attachments
rails.jpg
rails.jpg (274.75 KiB) Viewed 283 times
"Stay low, move fast"
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: Gunnulf

Turn 41 - 8 April '44

I'll chalk today up as a rare victory over the skies ...
Of course this is isolated success and the overall trend is still sliding to oblivion but small victories can be milked in our radio broadcasts.

Agree, I still have a warm fuzzy glow after catching out my last opponent when he was a bit casual at bombing S Germany and I'd redeployed most of day fighters to the region. Didn't see much of 15 Air for some time after that.
User avatar
Gunnulf
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:26 pm

RE: Panzers, rückwärts! Gunnulf (GHC) vs QBall (WA)

Post by Gunnulf »

I maybe should have been a bit less impatient and done this ambush very close to the expected invasion time to force him to switch at a more critical time. As it is no doubt we will just see spitfires on escort, maybe some Mustang AS. But a little yes railyard damage for relatively few loses is as good as I could expect. Other good news is there are plenty of Fw190s in the pools. Maybe one for every pilot before long..! Ok, maybe our pilot losses aren't quite that bad yet :)

Rest of the turn is just jockeying reserves about a bit. 9 Pz & 116 Pz arrive and go to Berlin to refit before joining Von Schweppenbergs (8-7) in Pas de Calais. LXXVI Pz (Herr - 7-7) with 2 Pz & Pz Lehr is in Normandy & Brittany, while I SS Pz (Dietrich 6-6) has 2 SS Pz 12 SS Pz 17 SS PzGN & 21 Pz in Picardy. Dietrich could be better and we really should switch this Korps HQ for XIV Pz Korps from Italy. Anyway this gives us 8 mechanised division in the north, another will join from Italy very soon and if the invasion doesn't come early then 1 SS Pz & 11 Pz are packing up and moving to the railheads in Russia for a total of 11.
I'll keep 6 Mech divisions in Italy for the moment but might draw down more in May. Its not likely he will launch an invasion anytime soon but it would be prudent to not be too careless, worst case if the fighting remains light then they are a potential strategic reserve for the future.
"Stay low, move fast"
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”