War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Brady »


I agree with what Kid just posted 100%, aircraft should not nead to be operational, befor they can take them apart for rail shipment.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Cap Mandrake »

This pilot pool thing makes my head hurt.

So is there a "named pilot pool" and a "pilot pool"? Aj Caramba!
What is the difference?
Are they both heated?

Folks were moving groups around just to game pilot experience?? Just bombing a poorly defended base isn't good enough? Aj Carmaba again!

Please use only two syllable words in your explanation.
Thanks.
Image
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5192
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

This pilot pool thing makes my head hurt.

So is there a "named pilot pool" and a "pilot pool"? Aj Caramba!
What is the difference?
Are they both heated?

Folks were moving groups around just to game pilot experience?? Just bombing a poorly defended base isn't good enough? Aj Carmaba again!

Please use only two syllable words in your explanation.
Thanks.

Read This:
tm.asp?m=1137365&mpage=2?


Hum - how many syllables in "read" and "this"??
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Kid
give the ability to load airgroups without planes onto transport ships and make the automatic supply “push” to outlying bases smarter and more efficient.

You know what esle is needed along these lines is the Ability to move these types of units by rail. Or units that have all damaged planes. Think about it, here is an air unit that wants to be moved by rail and the conductor insist that they have at leat one operational plane before they can board.

Don,

Yes to what Kid said! In addition, the ability to move air units by rail for short distances (within the a/c transfer range). Consider what happens now.

Example:
You ship a bunch of air units to a port. The port is not the final destination, and base units are very dear at the time, so the base only has a small cadre of air support. Aircraft can be shipped by rail to a distant base with no problem. But to send them to a base within range - forget about it! You have to wait forever while they are reassembled.

This makes no sense. At the trans-shipping point the crates get load on flatcars or trucks. In the game, everything flies out if the destination is within range. Nuts.

In a place like Australia or on the Asian mainland you might ship by rail/truck several turns in a row before beginning to assemble the aircraft.
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5192
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Don Bowen »


I need to let you all know that I am not the one that decides what will be done in WITP.

Anything that is not an obvious bug needs to be posted in the WIPT Wish List thread for consideration. This saves us searching through all the various threads looking for suggestions.

tm.asp?m=687130&mpage=19&key=


I know that there are a lot of things that you-all think do not work like they should, but the proper definition of a bug is "not working as designed". If it is a disagreement with the design - it really needs to go to the wish list.

Don
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by witpqs »

Aw, come on - we all know you're really the power behind the throne! [;)]

User avatar
scout1
Posts: 3124
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:26 pm
Location: South Bend, In

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by scout1 »

Question regarding the disband feature. Don't have the save, but noticed a trend.

Brought back a Jake outfit and disbanded, no problem. Back to the pool for the boys. However, brought back a 2nd group of Jakes and didn't get the question whether to put them into the named pool. Is this becuase they didn't go there or once answered, don't ask again ? had a similar experience with another pbem with another type of unit, but again was a 2nd similar unit disband. Had the same experience......
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5192
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: scout1

Question regarding the disband feature. Don't have the save, but noticed a trend.

Brought back a Jake outfit and disbanded, no problem. Back to the pool for the boys. However, brought back a 2nd group of Jakes and didn't get the question whether to put them into the named pool. Is this becuase they didn't go there or once answered, don't ask again ? had a similar experience with another pbem with another type of unit, but again was a 2nd similar unit disband. Had the same experience......

This is a confirmed bug. Not actually part of the new Disband function but was exposed by it.

The Disband function is detecting another group in the base without checking to see if that group has a delayed arrival.

Working on it...
User avatar
scout1
Posts: 3124
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:26 pm
Location: South Bend, In

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by scout1 »

Thank you ..... Always good to know that I'm not alone ....
User avatar
Major SNAFU_M
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:36 pm

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Major SNAFU_M »

I just logged into the member's area to down load this update and I cannot find it.

There is patch listed as available under WitP (looking from my registered user page), and if I go to the general pages I see neither the 1.8 patch or the 1.801 patch.

Am I missing something here?

Thanks!
"Popular Opinion? What I suggest you do with 'Popular Opinion' is biologically impossible and morally questionable." -

"One ping to find them all,
One ping to link them;
One ping to promote them all,
and in the darkness sink them"
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Erm, it's right there in the GAMES section for WitP, under "Downloads" (second from the top)...[&:]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Major SNAFU_M
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:36 pm

RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801

Post by Major SNAFU_M »

Okay. I'll look again.

I didn't see it the first time (or second or third).

I'll look again.

Thanks[8|]
"Popular Opinion? What I suggest you do with 'Popular Opinion' is biologically impossible and morally questionable." -

"One ping to find them all,
One ping to link them;
One ping to promote them all,
and in the darkness sink them"
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”