Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

CT Grognard
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by CT Grognard »

The Seikan Tunnel connecting Honshu and Hokkaido was only opened in 1988.

A 3.6km single-track railway tunnel was completed in 1942 as a fixed link between Kyushu and Honshu. Another single-track tunnel was completed in 1944. The double-track Shin Kanmon Tunnel was completed in 1975.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10337
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by PaxMondo »

Really seems like I recall a tunnel between Shikoku and Honshu.  Wasn't big, and it was old ... I might be wrong though.  A lot of years have passed ....
 
Pax
CT Grognard
Posts: 694
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by CT Grognard »

Not sure at all - I only know of three bridges currently connecting Shikoku and Honshu.
User avatar
Wirraway_Ace
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Austin / Brisbane

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Wirraway_Ace »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Chickenboy, I'm still torn with the PDU thing. I'll ask Ted, though he didn't care one way or the other last time.

Anyway, I've been thinking of my numerous mistakes this game and what to do differently next time.

Here's the initial list off the top of my head. Comments are welcome.

1. Conversion of Yusen-A (7) and Husimi(15+) to AK immediately.

2. Conversion of all Ansyu-C to PB immediately.

3. Convert all AK (above and Yusen-S) to AK-t immediately.

4. Combine elements of land units as soon as possible. I didn't do this in this game because I wanted to have the ability to task organize. Unfortunately, it resulted in many of the smaller units being trashed in combat. I think losses (and possibly disruption) would be lower if the divisions are combined before major combat.

5. Faster invasion timelines, especially in the DEI. Q-Ball and Chickenboy harped on me incessantly to speed up my timeline. They were right.

6. Take Ambon early! They harped on me to take this base in the initial round of invasions. I did't take it until late January. Japanese control of this base with Netties & recon there will cause more Allied shipping losses and cut off the northern DEI very effectively. I won't make that mistake again.

7. Take Singapore faster. I made two crucial mistakes here. I ran out of supply (stupid!). I'm going to send supply convoys from Japan at the beginning of the war this time. Too much supply is far better than too little. Second mistake was to not have enough ground strength. Here's my intent for initial invasions. I'll need some help tweaking this because I'll need to figure out how to get at least another division to the DEI.


Thanks. I look forward to your comments.
Mike,

I do not convert to AK-t. My rationale: when the amphib bonus runs out, you need every AK to move heavy equipment and off-load it rapidly on the beach or small port. The infantry can simply be loaded onto a large number of xAKs and xAPs; it takes about 30 to offload all the infantry squads of an IJA division in one turn, but you have plenty of these to conduct Corps sized ops. Save the AKs for your artillery, armor and engineer vehicle that simply won't offload over the beach from an xAK or xAP.

my 2 cents
Mike
erstad
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by erstad »

ORIGINAL: Xargun

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Pretty sure that Shikoku resources do not need independent pickup, Mike. They are magically transported across the water, IIRC. Hey, it frees up a bunch of your shipping!

Do we have confirmation of this ?

Xargun
s

Yes. Use the "r" key - you will see there is an in-game major road connecting Shikoku to Honshu.

User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by inqistor »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Inqistor, I guess I was unclear. I will use the Nates in the frontline until they are replaced. Actually, I plan on upgrading 1 chutai to Oscars immediately. There are enough Nates in the pool to fill out all the Nate units in the 3 & 5 Air Divisions. The concern is that there won't be any spares to replace losses until I get enough Oscars to upgrade other Nate units. It's something I'll have to live with.
Actually, I am saying, that it is worth considering running NATEs production for a short time. They have nothing in the upgrade path, so factories will be damaged during conversion. That way, if you leave them on production, you will have extra 30 NATEs at the end of month, if you will change, you will have only about 12 OSCARs, hardly enough to even convert something. And remember, that it is good to have reserve planes, as they will come into repired planes place.
Good point on the 1E bombers & level 2 airfields. I was unclear here too I guess. I will use them until they are upgraded. Initially, they are very effective against Allied merchant shipping but become less effective as the merchant shipping becomes more scarce.
Hmm, and why are they actually more effective, than normal level bombers? In WITP they were DB, but I do not think in AE they dive, or even glide, so they should have similar hit ratio, as SALLYs (even worse, because medium bombers carry more bombs).
ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

The Seikan Tunnel connecting Honshu and Hokkaido was only opened in 1988.

A 3.6km single-track railway tunnel was completed in 1942 as a fixed link between Kyushu and Honshu. Another single-track tunnel was completed in 1944. The double-track Shin Kanmon Tunnel was completed in 1975.
So, there was no land connection between islands before war?
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace
Mike,

I do not convert to AK-t. My rationale: when the amphib bonus runs out, you need every AK to move heavy equipment and off-load it rapidly on the beach or small port. The infantry can simply be loaded onto a large number of xAKs and xAPs; it takes about 30 to offload all the infantry squads of an IJA division in one turn, but you have plenty of these to conduct Corps sized ops. Save the AKs for your artillery, armor and engineer vehicle that simply won't offload over the beach from an xAK or xAP.

my 2 cents
Mike

Mike, great comments and really good points. I'm very cautious with my xAPs and keep them out of the front line. If I were to perform an invasion after the bonus period, I wouldn't fully load the AKs because it would take quite a while to unload them. More thinking needed about this now.

The xAPs have 123k troop space and 78k cargo space. Granted, they are most efficient between large ports (hubs) so the AKs will need to do the hauling from the hub to the final destination. I need to find out what the AKs actually can carry. They may be needed for basic troop movement. I need to dig into this more. Thanks.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: erstad

ORIGINAL: Xargun

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Pretty sure that Shikoku resources do not need independent pickup, Mike. They are magically transported across the water, IIRC. Hey, it frees up a bunch of your shipping!

Do we have confirmation of this ?

Xargun
s

Yes. Use the "r" key - you will see there is an in-game major road connecting Shikoku to Honshu.


Bingo! Thanks, erstad.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: inqistor
ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Inqistor, I guess I was unclear. I will use the Nates in the frontline until they are replaced. Actually, I plan on upgrading 1 chutai to Oscars immediately. There are enough Nates in the pool to fill out all the Nate units in the 3 & 5 Air Divisions. The concern is that there won't be any spares to replace losses until I get enough Oscars to upgrade other Nate units. It's something I'll have to live with.
Actually, I am saying, that it is worth considering running NATEs production for a short time. They have nothing in the upgrade path, so factories will be damaged during conversion. That way, if you leave them on production, you will have extra 30 NATEs at the end of month, if you will change, you will have only about 12 OSCARs, hardly enough to even convert something. And remember, that it is good to have reserve planes, as they will come into repired planes place.
Good point on the 1E bombers & level 2 airfields. I was unclear here too I guess. I will use them until they are upgraded. Initially, they are very effective against Allied merchant shipping but become less effective as the merchant shipping becomes more scarce.
Hmm, and why are they actually more effective, than normal level bombers? In WITP they were DB, but I do not think in AE they dive, or even glide, so they should have similar hit ratio, as SALLYs (even worse, because medium bombers carry more bombs).
ORIGINAL: CT Grognard

The Seikan Tunnel connecting Honshu and Hokkaido was only opened in 1988.

A 3.6km single-track railway tunnel was completed in 1942 as a fixed link between Kyushu and Honshu. Another single-track tunnel was completed in 1944. The double-track Shin Kanmon Tunnel was completed in 1975.
So, there was no land connection between islands before war?

The comments about Nates make sense, but I view it somewhat differently. I want to get my Oscar production increased as quickly as possible. But, if I do keep the Nate factory producing Nates for Dec, 41 and then convert it, I'm a month behind in producing Oscars for it and lose 30 Oscars in Jan 42. That's a Sentai of Nates that won't get converted to Oscars in Jan. By the end of Dec 41, I expect to have about 100 Oscars producing a month. With 3 factories producing, I'll have produced about 60 Oscars. I will have upgraded a Nate sentai to Oscars and have an extra 30-40 Nates in the pool.

Here are some stats:

I want to max out the Nates in the 3 & 5 Air Divisions. On 7 Dec, here are the Nate shortages:

3 AD:

1 S - 42 of 42
11 S - 38 of 42
84 IFC - 9 of 12
64 S Det - 6 of 12 (I'm upgrading to 11 Ki-43-Ic, cleaning out that pool & putting 6 more Nates in the pool)
77 S - 15 of 42
77 S Det A - 9 of 12
77 S Det B - 12 of 12

5 AD:

24 S - 36 of 42
50 S - 36 of 36

The following Nate shortages exist:

3 AD: 37
5 AD: 6

So, there are 43 shortages and 39 (+6 from 64 S Det) or 45 Nates in the pool. All shortages can be filled with 2 spare Nates.

The Oscar Ic factory is producing 32 a month with that factory and 2 others increasing their size by 32 each. The 32 in existence will produce 1 a day or 24 by the end of the month. Each factory that is increasing will produce about 12 in Dec for a grand total of 60 Oscars. By about 15 or 16 Dec, I'll have enough Oscars in the pool to upgrade a 12 plane chutai, putting 10-12 Nates in the pool. That should be sufficient to replace losses. After that, Oscar production should speed up, accelerating upgrades and putting more Nates in the pool. If there is a shortage of either Oscars or Nates, it'll only be for a week to 10 days tops. I don't expect to lose too many Nates or Oscars at the beginning of the war.

1E bombers. It's not that they are more effective than 2E bombers. They can fly from level 2 airfields, which makes them valuable at the start of the war. There are a lot of level 2 airfields that can be used by them to support operations.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Duplicate
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Next thing to think about...

The Zuiho carries 18 torpedoes. Looks like I'll reconfigure her daitai to carry 21 Zeros and 9 Kates. Two full sorties. Two spares of each and she's good.

Now the Ryujo. She carries 48 planes (or is it 53 - for some reason that number sticks in my mind). Anyway, she carries 27 torpedoes. Here's the problem. I don't want her to have 27 Kates. That's too many. What if she has 18? After one round of torps, she'll have only 9 left. Will an 18 plane daitai sortie with half with torps and half with bombs for a naval target? I guess that's the question. If not, she'll have to carry 13 Kates and 35 Zeros. I guess that's ok. I'd like some more Kates though.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10337
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

The comments about Nates make sense, but I view it somewhat differently. I want to get my Oscar production increased as quickly as possible. But, if I do keep the Nate factory producing Nates for Dec, 41 and then convert it, I'm a month behind in producing Oscars for it and lose 30 Oscars in Jan 42. That's a Sentai of Nates that won't get converted to Oscars in Jan.
Mike, this is exactly how I think it through as well.

I understand that my total fighter production is down, but I don't care about that. What I do care about is getting my total Oscar production up as fast as I can.

Great to read someone else is thinking along the same lines. Sometimes I worry if I'm missing something really obvious. [:D]
Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10337
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Now the Ryujo. She carries 48 planes (or is it 53 - for some reason that number sticks in my mind). Anyway, she carries 27 torpedoes. Here's the problem. I don't want her to have 27 Kates. That's too many. What if she has 18? After one round of torps, she'll have only 9 left. Will an 18 plane daitai sortie with half with torps and half with bombs for a naval target? I guess that's the question. If not, she'll have to carry 13 Kates and 35 Zeros. I guess that's ok. I'd like some more Kates though.
I don't know the answer here for a fact, but I suspect that they will go out partial. I only say that because many times I have ended up with 0 torps on a CV, but didn't have an even number of planes to have flown them all. Does that make sense?
Pax
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Yeah, it does. Thanks Pax.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Erkki
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:03 am

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Erkki »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Now the Ryujo. She carries 48 planes (or is it 53 - for some reason that number sticks in my mind). Anyway, she carries 27 torpedoes. Here's the problem. I don't want her to have 27 Kates. That's too many. What if she has 18? After one round of torps, she'll have only 9 left. Will an 18 plane daitai sortie with half with torps and half with bombs for a naval target? I guess that's the question. If not, she'll have to carry 13 Kates and 35 Zeros. I guess that's ok. I'd like some more Kates though.
I don't know the answer here for a fact, but I suspect that they will go out partial. I only say that because many times I have ended up with 0 torps on a CV, but didn't have an even number of planes to have flown them all. Does that make sense?

All of them will fly - some will attack with torpedoes, others with bombs.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Excellent, thanks erkki
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by inqistor »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

The comments about Nates make sense, but I view it somewhat differently. I want to get my Oscar production increased as quickly as possible. But, if I do keep the Nate factory producing Nates for Dec, 41 and then convert it, I'm a month behind in producing Oscars for it and lose 30 Oscars in Jan 42. That's a Sentai of Nates that won't get converted to Oscars in Jan. By the end of Dec 41, I expect to have about 100 Oscars producing a month. With 3 factories producing, I'll have produced about 60 Oscars. I will have upgraded a Nate sentai to Oscars and have an extra 30-40 Nates in the pool.
There is plenty factories producing planes, and change fighter-fighter model do not gives any more benefit, than bomber-fighter factory. I am planning to begin at last GC as Japan, and NATEs production seems to be my current planning problem. In March/April there arrives few new NATE units, which will need around 100 planes to fill them. So around two months production could be needed. Problem is, I do not see to what then change this factory. A6M3 seems reasonable, but it arrives few months later.
1E bombers. It's not that they are more effective than 2E bombers. They can fly from level 2 airfields, which makes them valuable at the start of the war. There are a lot of level 2 airfields that can be used by them to support operations.
Well, in that case, it is better to use VALs. Problem is finding spare units with them [:D]
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 15948
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Wohoo! It's finally done and off to Ted! Now is my turn to wait. Shouldn't take too long though. He really doesn't have much to do though.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Mac Linehan
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Denver Colorado

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mac Linehan »

Mike -

It's Great to have you and Ted back at it!

Mac
LAV-25 2147
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10337
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Wohoo! It's finally done and off to Ted! Now is my turn to wait. Shouldn't take too long though. He really doesn't have much to do though.
Great news!

You're ahead of me, still working through my first turn, but I am close now ...
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”