ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: november 1942

Post by aztez »

Pacific (november 22nd - 27th 1942)


In china two significant developments to be noted. First the japanese airforce is launching large raids againts Chunghking. The chinese paper airforce is having tough time indeed.

Near Kweiyang it seems Dave is withdrawing his troops towards south. There are now some 2800av left standing on the battlefield. I'am tempted to launch an ground assault here but too risky business a the moment.

In Burma an large enemy CA TF has visited Cox's Bazar. The damaged inflicted is minimal but he still has big naval assets most likely on Rangoon.

In Australia my recon indicates that Cairns and couple of other places are mildly garrisoned. I have sent couple of units to check this out. I'am not trusting my flight recons on these matters.

Image
Attachments
map.jpg
map.jpg (155.78 KiB) Viewed 182 times
User avatar
offenseman
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:05 pm
Location: Sheridan Wyoming, USA

RE: november 1942

Post by offenseman »

I don't understand the Midway move especially this late in the game when he knows you have to have high fort levels there and a monstrous Air force not too far away.  I am interested to see how some of this plays out because I just do not understand why.
Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.
Smeulders
Posts: 1879
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:13 pm

RE: november 1942

Post by Smeulders »

Might very well be an attempt to draw out the allied CVs now that he still has the advantage, otherwise this doesn't seem like a particularly good move, certainly as his LCU don't seem properly prepared to attack the island.
The AE-Wiki, help fill it out
User avatar
offenseman
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:05 pm
Location: Sheridan Wyoming, USA

RE: november 1942

Post by offenseman »

Good point and that is probably the reason.  He is dangling his CVs close enough to be bait but not close enough to be in serious jeopardy from LBA at Pearl.  He probably knows that Wasp is hurt or maybe even thinks she is sunk and that he has a numerical advantage.  

I'd not fall into this one. Wait for a few Essex' and a lot of Hellcats first.
Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: november 1942

Post by aztez »

Midway (november 28th - 29th 1942)


Things toned down a bit from initial shockwave.

KB remained in position south of Midway and it is quite obviously trying to perform an welcoming committee to anykind of US naval intervention here.

The enemy carrier force launched an strike againts Midway on 29th...


Afternoon Air attack on 6th Marine Defense Battalion, at 158,91 (Midway Island)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 160 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 60 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 15
D3A1 Val x 116



Japanese aircraft losses
D3A1 Val: 2 destroyed, 42 damaged


Allied ground losses:
25 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (0 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (0 destroyed, 1 disabled)


As you can see the raid did not amount to much and I expect these to continue.

I did mention that US marines were set on ground assault last turn. Things went well if you view these in the bigger picture.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Midway Island (158,91)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1233 troops, 53 guns, 5 vehicles, Assault Value = 70

Defending force 7376 troops, 108 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 192

Allied adjusted assault: 14

Japanese adjusted defense: 4

Allied assault odds: 3 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
4234 casualties reported
Squads: 127 destroyed, 65 disabled
Non Combat: 89 destroyed, 109 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 46 (31 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Units destroyed 2


Allied ground losses:
457 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 21 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
116th USAAF Base Force
6th Marine Defense Battalion

Defending units:
67th Naval Guard Unit
144th Infantry Regiment
47th Naval Guard Unit
65th Naval Guard Unit
Guards Mixed Bde /6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Midway Island (158,91)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 863 troops, 53 guns, 5 vehicles, Assault Value = 42

Defending force 4908 troops, 71 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 121

Allied adjusted assault: 0

Japanese adjusted defense: 6

Allied assault odds: 1 to 99

Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
22 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
549 casualties reported
Squads: 30 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (0 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (0 destroyed, 1 disabled)


Assaulting units:
116th USAAF Base Force
6th Marine Defense Battalion

Defending units:
144th Infantry Regiment
Guards Mixed Brigade
47th Naval Guard Unit


Not bad at all. The total of +4500 enemy troops reported wounded/killed and we lost 1000 men.

We might lose this base BUT this was an very good performance in terms of casualties inflicted.

Our submarines were unable to attack any naval forces he has here but I will continue the aggressive use of them here.

Dave did withdraw his transports too which was the only thing to do after the casualties inflicted here.

Intresting to see what he has in store here though.

At Pearl Harbour the fleet is ready allthough at the moment no orders are given.

The lba fighters/bombers are also in combat mode here.

Image
Attachments
midway.jpg
midway.jpg (94.57 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: november 1942

Post by aztez »

Burma (november 28th - 29th 1942)


The enemy has landed or transported some new elements into Akyab. There are now 6 units reported and strenght is below 10 000 men,

His cruisers were back in action last turn and visited Cox's Bazar.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Cox's Bazar at 54,43

Japanese Ships
CA Mikuma
CA Mogami
CA Ashigara
CA Myoko
CA Maya
CA Atago
CA Chikuma
DD Shinonome
DD Hibiki
DD Hayashio


Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


...not much in terms of damage inflicted though. Next turn I moved SBD's into area and set them on navalstrike mission. We shall see whether they take off and hopefully with fighter escorts this time around.

Talking about escorting bombers. Well, much has been talked lately and this time things "smiled" on me. We managed to shoot down some 15-20 Sally's flying unescorted missions.

So, it wasn't that good of an turn in the imperial HQ.

Image
Attachments
burma.jpg
burma.jpg (256.59 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: november 1942

Post by aztez »


offenseman: I think there might be few reasons of these kind of behaviour in addition to the bushido spirit ofcourse.
 
a) As Smeulders pointed out the most likely thing is that he wants to duke it out with my carriers. This shows that he still feels confident about his forces and he knows I'am growing stronger by the day.
 
b) Bufferzone. This very likely too since the position of Midway serves as an such. Same thing is likely key idea behind the Aleutians adventure too.
 
c) Our previous game in the classic Witp. I hammered him straight through the middle and to be honest yet again very tempting idea.
 
d) The X-factor! ... I guess he could have some other ideas too but most likely combination of the three above.
 
No idea what his FOW looked but I can confirm that none of the CV''s were sunk earlier. The longerst to be repaired is CV Wasp which +100 days off of full battle readiness.
 
Smeulders: Agreed! He has stayed out of the lba range and most likely will remain so.
 
I know Dave has an allied game too so he knows about the allied carriers coming into service.
 
Looking and and adding numbers and this really isn't such odd move from the KB.
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: november 1942

Post by LoBaron »

I think Midway is far away from being useless for the Japanese at this time of the war.

Just think of it: It brings the Hawaian bases in range of LB naval search. Midways best use is
as an early warning base for the central pacific. As soon as loads of ships show up at PH erstad knows
theres something in the bush...
Image
User avatar
offenseman
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:05 pm
Location: Sheridan Wyoming, USA

RE: november 1942

Post by offenseman »

True but the supply line is so long.  I'd rather put an AV and some Mabels in Marcus. You wouldn't see PH but would see ships coming down the middle from pretty far out.  As with many things in this game, I am anxious to see how it plays out.
Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.
cfulbright
Posts: 2782
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:12 pm

RE: november 1942

Post by cfulbright »

Aztez - Do you have any sub's converted to SST's? You might want to transport some fresh ground troops to Midway, even if it's just part of a small USMC Raider Battalion. You lost a lot on that very last ground attack.
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: november 1942

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: offenseman

True but the supply line is so long.  I'd rather put an AV and some Mabels in Marcus. You wouldn't see PH but would see ships coming down the middle from pretty far out.  As with many things in this game, I am anxious to see how it plays out.

The supply line is much shorter than to the south pacific. And he doesnt need to send transports there on a regular basis. Midway base is big enough to store supplies for
a reasonable garrison for 3+ months of operations (granting that he is mainly doing naval search and not much else). Betties are great naval search planes and he got more
of them, if he brings a HQ he can even arm them with torps as a "nice to have" option.
An AV at Marcus needs 2-3 surprize bomb hits or a small raiding fleet to put out of action again, countering Midway would need an operation under air cover.

And the EW timing is critical for erstad, knowing 5-7 days in advance whats coming at him (compared to EW from Marcus I.) can mean the difference
between a successful Allied offense and a bloodbath.

That said it seems like erstad underestimated the Midway defense a bit or decided speed is more important than prep.
I´m also looking forward to the next updates. [:)]
Image
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

december 1942

Post by aztez »

LoBaron: Cheers. He did definately calculate wrong here in terms of ground unit and ship losses.

I mean we have "killed" nearly 16 000 enemy troops which an high number to be paid even for Midway.

Oh, I don't mind him doing this since I can recapture the base later on with "ease" if chosen to do so. It is just too isolated but as you said it can serve as float/recon plane base.

I think he wants this base to as an early warning buffer base and there it will serve it's purpose quite nicely.

Personally I have used the base as submarine station. It is not an disaster even if/when the base is lost though.

More worried about the actual losses on ground combat. Maybe this is taste come when we start going forward.

offenseman: I think he will dump the supplies in with couple of runs. He really cannot keep it supplied with regular transport convoys.

Allthough his economy must be in great shape otherwise he would not be doing the things he has done so far.

cfulbright: You actually read my mind. There is only SST Argonaut available and it has left Pearl Harbour last turn.

I haven't converted more since I think we need more "combat" submarines. They really are causing a lot more damage than in the classic witp.
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Midway (november 30th - december 1st 1942)


The japanese transports came back and unloaded supplies into the ground combat units already ashore. Our coastal guns and mines caused some damage...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 40 encounters mine field at Midway Island (158,91) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

22 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
DMS W-19, Shell hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-15, Shell hits 10, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Mikazuki, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Yamasimo Maru, Mine hits 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Invasion action off Midway Island - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

15 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Kirishima
BB Kongo
DD Kagero
xAKL Konsan Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
SC CHa-45, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC CHa-44


Allied ground losses:
33 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (0 destroyed, 3 disabled)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invasion Support action off Midway Island - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

25 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Kirishima
BB Kongo
DD Yayoi
DD Kagero, Shell hits 1
xAKL Konsan Maru, Shell hits 5, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC CHa-44, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invasion Support action off Midway Island

2 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAKL Yuki Maru, Shell hits 1
BB Hyuga

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invasion Support action off Midway Island

6 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAKL Taiyu Maru, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
BB Hyuga

5in CD Gun Coastal Battery engaging xAKL Taiyu Maru at 12,000 yards
BB Hyuga fires to suppress enemy guns at 12,000 yards


No suprises here since he came in fully committed to capture the atoll so he will most likely achieve this.

KB launched couple of raids againts our troops and caused moderate damage. The reports indicated some carrier aircraft damaged.

SST Argonaut is loaded and moving towards Midway as we speak. Also some regular submarines are entering the area so hopefully these vessels can sunk few ships.

Image
Attachments
midway.jpg
midway.jpg (94.5 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Burma (november 30th - december 1st 1942)


Dave continued to hit Cox's Bazar last turn. I wonder why is he so obsessed with this base. It is nice but to me secondary.

BB Yamato and and IJN cruisers continued bombard the base from the sea. Personally somewhat suprised to see BB Yamato here. No doubt BB Musashi is with her.

We also managed to engage mini KB here too...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Akyab at 54,44

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 51



Allied aircraft
Hurricane IIc Trop x 5
SBD-3 Dauntless x 11


No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Hurricane IIc Trop: 2 destroyed
SBD-3 Dauntless: 7 destroyed, 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
CVE Unyo, Bomb hits 1


... Dave stated that CVE Unyo only needs an paint job. Damn, we really have been unlucky with his carriers.. we have missed naval bombings, had quite a few submarines assault these vessels etc. The end result is most likely that his carriers are still on full swing.

Mini KB launched an strike againts bastion at Cox's Bazar...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on Cox's Bazar , at 54,43

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 33 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 4
D3A1 Val x 16



Allied aircraft
Hurricane IIc Trop x 6
P-40K Warhawk x 2


Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
D3A1 Val: 7 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Hurricane IIc Trop: 1 destroyed


...a few of his aircraft downed. Not bad kill ratio here.

Hmmm, he really has been aggressive lately and I wonder what the main strategy with him is this time around. I think he trying to force me to make an error which will lead up longterm benefits.

Another quite obvious conclusion is that his economy is in excellent shape. As stated earlier my recon flights indicated the bulk of the DEI bases suffering 0% partisan/engineer sabotage. That was unlikely FOW taking these actions into play.

Image
Attachments
burma.jpg
burma.jpg (251.24 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Intel screen december 1942...

Image
Attachments
intel.jpg
intel.jpg (102.93 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Fighter replacement pools...

Image
Attachments
fighters.jpg
fighters.jpg (100.09 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Bomber replacement pools...

Image
Attachments
bombers.jpg
bombers.jpg (100.99 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Top aces...

Image
Attachments
pilots.jpg
pilots.jpg (108.28 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

IJN ship losses.. (Heavy FOW included.. no doubt)

Image
Attachments
IJN.jpg
IJN.jpg (109.32 KiB) Viewed 182 times
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: december 1942

Post by aztez »

Allied ship losses...

Image
Attachments
allied.jpg
allied.jpg (108.07 KiB) Viewed 182 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”