Return of the Sheep! - JocMeister(A) vs. MrKane(J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
EHansen
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:31 am

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by EHansen »

Considering how terrible his damage control is, he could either lose some of the ships with fires or they will end up with high damage. I would be sure that some will
not be able to leave port, so bomb away at night and see what happens.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

Dude, you totally pooped in his happy place. Well done!

I love you.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: EHansen

Considering how terrible his damage control is, he could either lose some of the ships with fires or they will end up with high damage. I would be sure that some will
not be able to leave port, so bomb away at night and see what happens.

Disagree. IJN damage control really isn't as bad as it's made out to be. For xAKs and the like, sure. For commissioned vessels, keep in mind that crew experience matters and IJN ships have pretty good experience.

Looks like 1 DD probably sank beyond Kuroshio, maybe 2 more. Maybe RO-61 sinks on the way to get repairs. Hatsuharu stands a reasonable chance to make it. The bigger merchant ships will make it for sure - the AKEs, AS, AG, etc. Their durability is too high for one hit to sink them.

Probably 10-20 Sys on Nachi, Haguro, Myoko, Ashigara. Abukuma and Isuzu may be 30+. Mogami probably 30+.
User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by koniu »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: EHansen

Considering how terrible his damage control is, he could either lose some of the ships with fires or they will end up with high damage. I would be sure that some will
not be able to leave port, so bomb away at night and see what happens.

Disagree. IJN damage control really isn't as bad as it's made out to be. For xAKs and the like, sure. For commissioned vessels, keep in mind that crew experience matters and IJN ships have pretty good experience.

Looks like 1 DD probably sank beyond Kuroshio, maybe 2 more. Maybe RO-61 sinks on the way to get repairs. Hatsuharu stands a reasonable chance to make it. The bigger merchant ships will make it for sure - the AKEs, AS, AG, etc. Their durability is too high for one hit to sink them.

Probably 10-20 Sys on Nachi, Haguro, Myoko, Ashigara. Abukuma and Isuzu may be 30+. Mogami probably 30+.
+1

I will say that most of those ships need to back north for repairs.
Even with only sys damage there is to many damage on to many ships to repair them in Noumea at once. It will just take to long.
I believe also that most of them took major flood or engine damage, not much but enough to force them to use shipyard. And nearest one is in Manila and Japan. Long trip from Noumea.

They are out of action for at lest 2+ months.

On Your place i will send all subs in area between Salomon's and Noumea. Some of those DDs and CAs will move pretty slow.
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: koniu

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: EHansen

Considering how terrible his damage control is, he could either lose some of the ships with fires or they will end up with high damage. I would be sure that some will
not be able to leave port, so bomb away at night and see what happens.

Disagree. IJN damage control really isn't as bad as it's made out to be. For xAKs and the like, sure. For commissioned vessels, keep in mind that crew experience matters and IJN ships have pretty good experience.

Looks like 1 DD probably sank beyond Kuroshio, maybe 2 more. Maybe RO-61 sinks on the way to get repairs. Hatsuharu stands a reasonable chance to make it. The bigger merchant ships will make it for sure - the AKEs, AS, AG, etc. Their durability is too high for one hit to sink them.

Probably 10-20 Sys on Nachi, Haguro, Myoko, Ashigara. Abukuma and Isuzu may be 30+. Mogami probably 30+.
+1

I will say that most of those ships need to back north for repairs.
Even with only sys damage there is to many damage on to many ships to repair them in Noumea at once. It will just take to long.
I believe also that most of them took major flood or engine damage, not much but enough to force them to use shipyard. And nearest one is in Manila and Japan. Long trip from Noumea.

They are out of action for at lest 2+ months.

On Your place i will send all subs in area between Salomon's and Noumea. Some of those DDs and CAs will move pretty slow.

If the bombs bounced off armor, the CAs are looking at System damage only. Minor float and engine damage at most, which can be repaired well enough that they'll still go 25+ knots.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

Thanks guys. [:)]

Sorry if I sound pessimistic but I really need VPs. Having the CAs/CLs knocked out for a couple of months is nice of course. But nothing that will change much. Tom still has KB around (I hope) and that is enough to dominate the area. He doesn´t really need the CAs. And I don´t really benefits much from their absence in SOPAC. After all I don´t have anything bigger then a AM in SOPAC right now.

But as princep says this no doubt means Tom will stop using Noumea as a forward base. He will probably move back to Brisbane or even all the way back to Rabaul. And it will no doubt make him a little nervous for a while. [:'(]

Just ran the next turn. No sinking sounds and no more ships on the list. Subs are already in place north of Noumea.

Regarding Japanese damage control my experience mirrors Lokas. At least so in three PBEM I´ve never seen any spectacular sinkings from low damage. Hit Akagi with double TT twice and she was still afloat. Yamato took 4 TTs and didn´t sink. Hit some Japanese CAs with 4-6 penetrating 1000lbs bombs and they just sailed away despite "fuel explosions" "massive damage" and "heavy damage heavy fires".

So I don´t think anything will sink but perhaps 2 DDs. The rest will make it no doubt.
Image
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Cribtop »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: Cribtop

Dude, you totally pooped in his happy place. Well done!

I love you.

There's a great story behind my quote. My wife once had to attend one of those touchy-feely team building conferences. In the first exercise, participants were asked to envision their "Happy Place" - a wonderful sanctuary, be it a tropical island, secure cave, whatever. In the next exercise, the facilitator asked for constructive criticism. After a bit of that was directed at one worker, she was asked to respond to the criticism. She said, of course: "He pooped in my happy place." Everyone died laughing.
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

Hey cool. 5000 posts! I need a new life or something! [:D]
Image
User avatar
RogerJNeilson
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:21 am
Location: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by RogerJNeilson »

I have a passionate hatred of Jap CAs, so even a paint scratch on those b*********ers is a moment of rejoicing for me.

Roger
An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6416
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JeffroK »

Well done, but I dont think the result is either as good or as bad as brought up, its just handing out what should have begun earlier.

Now MrKane has to think about what he does, not just stroll around planning HIS next attack.

Now you have to work out how to hit him somewhere else or with a different tactic.

Force him into making a mistake, or trying to cover 2-3 approaches with on 1 KB.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

[font="Verdana"]24th August 42[/font]
______________________________________________________________________________

Besides the Noumea raid yesterday its very little to report.

------------------------
SOPAC/OZ
------------------------

My 4E doesn´t fly at night. No explanation given. Neither did the recon so it could be weather although the weather was fine both over Noumea and Fiji. [&:]

Tom sweeps Sydney with A6M5s. Very dangerous plane as he can reach our HRed max alt of 33k. I have nothing that can go that high besides the extremely rare P38s which isn´t even operational yet.

I have now lost 2 of the extremely precious F-4s to OP losses. Only 4 left now but they will luckily start producing in just 6 days.

------------------------
Burma
------------------------

Nothing here since Tom crushed the RAF over Calcutta. He seems content for now to bomb the Chinese from bases in Burma.

------------------------
Next OP
------------------------

Fleet and troops will arrive in 3 days. I will spend some time to go through Intel Monkey today and see if something has changed.

Landing could be as soon as in 20-30 days.

Image
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Encircled »

As has been said, good raid that.

Big case of "victory disease" there on your opponents part not having CAP up, and thats really good news for you.

User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Barb »

Hmm... done some maths on the Noumea raid...
96 of your heavy bombers achieved total of 83 hits in thunderstorms and flying at some 13 000ft through thunderstorms.
Considering that B-17Es flown at extended range with reduced bomb load - you have dropped 578 bombs (If I remember the bomb-load right ..4 per B-17E, 10 per B-17D, 10 per LB-30 and 10 per B-24D)... and got 14,36% accuracy... [X(]
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Barb

Hmm... done some maths on the Noumea raid...
96 of your heavy bombers achieved total of 83 hits in thunderstorms and flying at some 13 000ft through thunderstorms.
Considering that B-17Es flown at extended range with reduced bomb load - you have dropped 578 bombs (If I remember the bomb-load right ..4 per B-17E, 10 per B-17D, 10 per LB-30 and 10 per B-24D)... and got 14,36% accuracy... [X(]

They were flying at 10k (lowest allowed altitude for 4Es by HR). I also left out a couple of attacks that didn´t hit anything. So I would say around 10% of all bombs hit something.

In my experience with the game that is pretty bad for a port attack.
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

[font="Verdana"]26th August 42[/font]
______________________________________________________________________________

Turns are a bit slow today.

------------------------
SOPAC/OZ
------------------------

On the second day the 4Es take off during the night. Nothing spectacular. I´m mostly doing this to force Tom to relocate.
Night Air attack on Noumea , at 115,160

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 32 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 6

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CA Mogami, Bomb hits 2

Night Air attack on Noumea , at 115,160

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 16 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 6

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CL Kiso, Bomb hits 1
CA Mogami, Bomb hits 1
Night Air attack on Noumea , at 115,160

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 49 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 6

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CL Kiso, Bomb hits 1, on fire
Night Air attack on Noumea , at 115,160

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 6

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CL Kiso, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
Night Air attack on Noumea , at 115,160

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 20 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Allied aircraft
LB-30 Liberator x 4

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CL Kiso, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
CA Myoko, Bomb hits 1

Might have cost him Kiso keeping them in port. Strangely enough he only moved in 70 Fighters for protection. Had I known I might have tried another daylight attack.

Now supply is gone so I have to pull back. At least for now!
Image
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
ORIGINAL: Barb

Hmm... done some maths on the Noumea raid...
96 of your heavy bombers achieved total of 83 hits in thunderstorms and flying at some 13 000ft through thunderstorms.
Considering that B-17Es flown at extended range with reduced bomb load - you have dropped 578 bombs (If I remember the bomb-load right ..4 per B-17E, 10 per B-17D, 10 per LB-30 and 10 per B-24D)... and got 14,36% accuracy... [X(]

They were flying at 10k (lowest allowed altitude for 4Es by HR). I also left out a couple of attacks that didn´t hit anything. So I would say around 10% of all bombs hit something.

In my experience with the game that is pretty bad for a port attack.

From 10,000 with thunderstorms? 10% sounds good to me.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Might have cost him Kiso keeping them in port. Strangely enough he only moved in 70 Fighters for protection. Had I known I might have tried another daylight attack.

Now supply is gone so I have to pull back. At least for now!

Good followup. Look for an Alf in the aircraft losses over the next day or two... what size is Noumea's port? If he built it bigger than 3, you probably won't see her show up.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
From 10,000 with thunderstorms? 10% sounds good to me.

Not complaining but in my experience port attacks for some reason are conducted by laser guided bombs. 30% hit rate wouldn´t have surprised me one bit! [:)]
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
Good followup. Look for an Alf in the aircraft losses over the next day or two... what size is Noumea's port? If he built it bigger than 3, you probably won't see her show up.

Size 5 so unless the fires rage out of control I´m not expecting anything.
Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by ny59giants »

Sounded like it was a good plan. The only thing I thought of while reading about your initial strike was where was the 10 plus subs to be placed north of island to catch the damaged ships leaving the next day. Add this to list for next time. [;)]
[center]Image[/center]
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Sounded like it was a good plan. The only thing I thought of while reading about your initial strike was where was the 10 plus subs to be placed north of island to catch the damaged ships leaving the next day. Add this to list for next time. [;)]

Can´t have them there due to ASW air. The subs (only 8 though [;)]) are patrolling between the New Hebrides and the Solomons in a ASW search gap. [:)]
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”