Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Odin
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Wanne-Eickel

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Odin »

Son Schrott[:D]
Image
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

ORIGINAL: DivePac88

Here is one in action with a Nazi saucer. [;)]

Image

dum dum dum dum dum dum dum FLASH!!!!!! AAAAAAHHHHHHH....KING OF THE IMPOSSIBLE (guitar solo)

Yeah, Queen!

But I'm really insulted in seeing that the nazi sauver only has one tripple turret. [;)]
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by timtom »

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Terminus
ORIGINAL: timtom

Honourable mention to the Blen IV (Bolingbroke this one, but hey...).

...but dang the B-10 hit must'a hit every branch falling out of the ugly tree.

Image

Compared to some, the Blenheim was a beautiful airplane...

Except for the deformed nose greenhouse, I'd say that it has very pleasant lines. [:)]

Certainly. Trim off the nose and you're more or less left with a Beaufort or Beaufighter.
Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
Durbik
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Krakow, Poland

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Durbik »

But I'm really insulted in seeing that the nazi sauver only has one tripple turret.

it's just a top turret, who knows what's underneath
obey the fist!
User avatar
Panther Bait
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:59 pm

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Panther Bait »

The model fighting the Nazi saucer appears to be different to me.  No triple turrets, but something else on the bottom.  Four Tesla death rays perhaps??  And at least one more in a dorsal mount?

Mike

Also the props seem to be synchronized somehow. The high-speed photography stopped all the props in the same orientation. Amazing technology.
When you shoot at a destroyer and miss, it's like hit'in a wildcat in the ass with a banjo.

Nathan Dogan, USS Gurnard
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Anthropoid »

I'm pretty sure those are Surovov Mk XII Rocket boosters.
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: Durbik
But I'm really insulted in seeing that the nazi sauver only has one tripple turret.

it's just a top turret, who knows what's underneath
You are right. Maybe it has a lot of missiles and is filled with Wunderwaffen [;)]
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
flaggelant
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Netherlands

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by flaggelant »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns
ORIGINAL: Mynok
You do have to admire the triple 16" turret on that fake beast though! [:'(]

Now let's not go changing history here Mynok, [:-] that's two x triple 16" turrets, not just one. Note the undercarriage area. [;)][:D][:D]

Jim
They could fire them when making a landing on a short runway... of course this was a bit rough on the people at the airbase, not to mention the folks in the "greenhouse" cockpit area right in front of the guns... [X(] [:'(]


not only runways, i bet it could've served as a airbreak as well
(after which gravity suported enough acceleration to get up to a flying speed again [:D])
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by DivePac88 »

ORIGINAL: Panther Bait

The model fighting the Nazi saucer appears to be different to me.  No triple turrets, but something else on the bottom.  Four Tesla death rays perhaps??  And at least one more in a dorsal mount?

Mike

Also the props seem to be synchronized somehow. The high-speed photography stopped all the props in the same orientation. Amazing technology.

Here is the model in question on the deck.

Image
Attachments
k79999.jpg
k79999.jpg (97.49 KiB) Viewed 423 times
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Canoerebel »

All this yacking about "ugly bombers" and nobody has seen fit to follow up on what seems to be the most preposterous claim in this thread? That Eleanor Roosevelt was a "knockout" when she was younger? Here she is in 1943:

Image
Attachments
EleanorRo..elt1943.jpg
EleanorRo..elt1943.jpg (58.79 KiB) Viewed 423 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Canoerebel »

And here she is in 1902

Image
Attachments
EleanorRo..elt1902.jpg
EleanorRo..elt1902.jpg (49.77 KiB) Viewed 423 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by DivePac88 »

Eleanor Roosevelt was a very special lady; she basically single-handedly saved FDR from himself when he was paralyzed by polio. It is her, with the help of others that then encouraged FDR after his rehabilitation to re-enter politics. So while I know this is only light-hearted banter, perhaps we should be showing some more respect.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII

Post by Anthropoid »

There seem to be several different versions of this K-7 RDF (Russo-Dread-Fighter) floating around in here. I see one with Suvorov rocket boosters, one with one Mogilev 16" plane-mount air cannons, another with two of these Mogilev gun turrets . . . didn't look closely but it looks like there might even be two different configurations of the rocket-booster version: one WITH extra 6" booster-assisted thruster guns, and the other (the one assaulting the Nazi sauzer) without. Can one of you expert technical guys please sort this whole thing out, its all becoming quite a muddle.
 
Now as to Eleanor in her latter years: now I understand that quote attributed to her "Beautiful young people are accidents of nature. Beautiful old people are works of art." Looks like she wasn't actually so artistically gifted after all.
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”