no duel precipitates with U.S. CVs - instead a strike from Emirau hits a IJN CVE.
Too bad the KB wasn't a hex closer. (In other words, within Beaufighter torpedo range.) A squadron of TBM's might be helpful there.
no duel precipitates with U.S. CVs - instead a strike from Emirau hits a IJN CVE.
KB retiring towards Palau tangles with U.S. CVs and 3 strikes are exchanged each way - it goes the U.S. way, Kaga damaged, a Chitose CVL and 2 CVEs are sunk, U.S. undamaged
With Palau taken, Ambon should be in routine supply - which will help sustain an offensive in the Dutch East Indies.
SIGINT warns the Japanese are attempting a withdrawal of troops from Broome to Tjilatjap - Allied forces in Timor are determined to stop them. The race to Java is on!
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Every now and then SIGINT comes through in spades. I wonder how much is left at Broome?
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Incidentally, are you playing the game Even or using Help Japanese? The latter really restricts Allied infantry replacements.
I didn't want to make it sound like everything was going my way [;)]ORIGINAL: Rybka
I don´t understand a Skipjack´s wailing over lack of squads. He has so many units with full or nearly full manpower. I´m losing over 200 squads every turn.
Those LCUs got away! Curses [:@] Off to man the next line of defenses, no doubt. Hopefully I will be there soon.ORIGINAL: Rybka
It took 5 turns from Broome to Miri, a long time even for slow and damaged ships. Fortunately, LCUs were not affected by this horrible experience.
I don´t understand a Skipjack´s wailing over lack of squads. He has so many units with full or nearly full manpower. I´m losing over 200 squads every turn.
Skipjack_
Those LCUs got away! Curses Off to man the next line of defenses, no doubt. Hopefully I will be there soon.
ORIGINAL: Rybka
I didn´t have a bigger reserve for a long time. Partially due to my effort of agument the army by dividing units. I´m not sure if this tactic was good.
Makes you want a Witp "Do not accept replacements" toggle. [;)]ORIGINAL: Rybka
Priority in receiving reinforcement have units, that are on top of list. It looks there is a random element influencing this rule. More control of this would be useful.
It seems the engineer units suffer the most when their transports are lost. My theory is because all the losses have to come out of squads, since their is no AFV/Artillery to absorb the load cost of the sunk APs. Here is an engineer that I loaded on 2 APs (100 lift capacity each). Not a good idea - the 1 AP sunk took 100 squads. Lost on 2/13/44, five months later they have not received any replacements. To paraphrase Jim Carrey, "If after 5 months you haven't received any replacements - just keep waiting!" [:D]ORIGINAL: Rybka
Once, I carried two Eng on a small TF (2 DDs, 2 Seiwa Marus) and Skipjack sunk both DDs. After unloading, I realized both LCUs suffer losses.