This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

The Line Islands

Palmyra is at Port 2(2)-03%, Air- 2(0)-02% & Fort-2(6). Will expand and use this as a Fighter base to sweep Christmas should this become necessary. There are 12 PT boats, two ACMs and 150 mines at the base. There are 84 Fighters protecting the area and two AE's to resupply the US 1st Bat Div as it bombards Christmas Island, over and over.

Fanning is at Port 1(0)-05%, Air- 0(3)-25% & Fort-2(6). Will expand and use this as a B-17/B-24 base to bomb Christmas should this become necessary and/or for training. There are two Combat Eng Bats on the Island working to expand it ASAP. As we expand we will add 150 mines to the 12 PT boats to present to prevent any bombardment task forces from hitting the heavy bombers.

We are looking at landing in May of '42 at Christmas Island. We have allocated one US Inf Division, 2 Combat Eng Bats and 2 US Art Bats for the job. We may have a second inf division to send as well if we need it.

If the KB comes looking for a fight, we will have the ability to project large numbers of fighters from both Islands and add some number of marine dive bombers to the American Carriers. With plenty of scouting depth, I can't ask for a better place to fight in 1942 if the KB comes out.

Image
Attachments
XMAS.jpg
XMAS.jpg (402.11 KiB) Viewed 356 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

12 Feb42 - 13 Feb 42 Executive Summary

The first deliberate attack in made at Singapore, more below. The three carries still in action and eight days out from New Zealand where they will hide and wait to see what can be done with them. There is one minor naval combat to note where the Dutch forces ambushed some ASW forces and then escaped the land bases air for no losses.

Japanese Amphibious Landings:
Amphibious Assault at Lunga (114,138)
Amphibious Assault at Makin (136,125)

Japan Conquerors the Following Bases:
Rabaul
Tulagi
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Dutch Surface Forces

The cat and mouse games continues in the NEI. A week ago the Mini-KB was brought in to cover the landings at Palembang and prevent Force Z or any air bombing of the oil fields. Having been ready for this I had the area overrun with submarines, so he countered with a large ASW commitment. While my subs failed to hit the Mini-KB or slow the supplies into the area I was able to slip in this surface force to do some damage.

This should take four SC's out of the game for later.

------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Muntok at 50,89, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
SC Ch 7, Shell hits 10, and is sunk
SC Ch 24, Shell hits 5, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC Ch 25, Shell hits 7, and is sunk
SC Ch 26, Shell hits 4, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CL Java
CL Sumatra
CL De Ruyter
DD Barker
DD Bulmer
DD Paul Jones
DD Parrott
DD Piet Hein
DD Kortenaer
DD Witte de With
DD Banckert
DD Van Ghent
DD Tenedos

------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Billiton at 53,93

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 10
G3M2 Nell x 13
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2 Nell: 3 damaged
G3M2 Nell: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
CL De Ruyter
CL Sumatra

Aircraft Attacking:
12 x G3M2 Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 45cm Type 91 Torp
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Ground combat at Singapore (50,84)

Not sure, but I think I am doing very well here. It is just a mater of time till it falls but I hope to take a chuck.

------------------------------------------
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 57231 troops, 678 guns, 146 vehicles, Assault Value = 1586
Defending force 59894 troops, 641 guns, 389 vehicles, Assault Value = 1037

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 1249
Allied adjusted defense: 2879
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
7525 casualties reported
Squads: 120 destroyed, 467 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 190 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 82 disabled
Guns lost 46 (15 destroyed, 31 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1455 casualties reported
Squads: 20 destroyed, 195 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 54 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 30 disabled
Guns lost 53 (4 destroyed, 49 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (1 destroyed, 21 disabled)

Assaulting units:
113th Infantry Regiment
Imperial Guards Division
55th Infantry Regiment
56th Infantry Regiment
15th Ind Engineer Regiment
56th Engineer Regiment
41st Infantry Regiment
23rd Ind Engineer Regiment
16th Infantry Regiment
21st Infantry Regiment
11th Infantry Regiment
5th Engineer Regiment
12th Engineer Regiment
4th Ind Engineer Regiment
114th Infantry Regiment
42nd Infantry Regiment
24th Infantry Regiment
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
25th Army
56th Field Artillery Regiment
5th Field Artillery Regiment
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st RF Gun Battalion
18th Mountain Gun Regiment
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Mortar Battalion
5th Mortar Battalion
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
27th Australian Brigade
SSVF Brigade
2nd Malay Battalion
1st Mysore Battalion
2/17 Dogra Battalion
11th Indian Division
22nd Australian Brigade
1st Malay Battalion
1st Manchester Battalion
1st Hyderabad Battalion
2nd Loyal Battalion
2nd Gordons Battalion
3rd Cavalry Regiment
9th Indian Division
Malaya Army
223 Group RAF
3rd Heavy AA Regiment
109th RAF Adv Base Force
24th NZ Pioneer Coy
112th RAF Adv Base Force
AHQ Far East
2nd ISF Base Force
3rd HK&S Light AA Regiment
111th RAF Adv Base Force
224 Group RAF
1st ISF Base Force
113th RAF Adv Base Force
2nd HK&S Heavy AA Regiment
110th RAF Adv Base Force
1st Indian Heavy AA Regiment
III Indian Corps
Singapore Base Force
Singapore Fortress
22nd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
Malayan Air Wing
1st HK&S Heavy AA Regiment
109th RN Base Force
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

KB
It looks like the KB is heading back to Truck to finally rearm and repair after grabbing the area of over the last two turns. I expect it will be in port for at least 14 days as it will need a lot of aircraft replacements.

Follow the KB -

1. Hit's Peal on December 7th to start the war.
2. Moved to Wake to hunt my CV in the area.
3. Moved to Turk (assumed) but was off the grid for 10 days.
4. Moved to Christmas Island to support taking it and failed.
5. Moved to support the landing at Canton.
6. Moved back to Christmas Island to support the landings that took the area.
7. Split with some of it at Christmas and some of it going to Wake to hit the Lexington.
8. Reformed at Christmas and smashed more stuff heading to the area.
9. Moved to Bomb Pago Pago
10. Moved to Support the Landing in Fiji that failed.
11. Moved West to Port Moresby and then to the Rabaul/Tulagi Area to support the landings.

I assume it met with some AE's at Canton and at Shortlandss that he took for resupply but I am not 100% certain of this. I know he had an AE at Christmas Island he used to supply but it is gone now.

Image
Attachments
KN.jpg
KN.jpg (316.58 KiB) Viewed 356 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Air Losses for the Empire or Japan
Can anyone give me any perspective on the overall losses? Are they running higher that I should expect? I have been able to draw him into fighters with my P-39s and P-40's over the Line Islands, Fiji and Samoa.

Image
Attachments
JALOSS.jpg
JALOSS.jpg (91.69 KiB) Viewed 356 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Base Control

Image
Attachments
basecontrol.jpg
basecontrol.jpg (191.49 KiB) Viewed 356 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: rook749

Air Losses for the Empire or Japan
Can anyone give me any perspective on the overall losses? Are they running higher that I should expect? I have been able to draw him into fighters with my P-39s and P-40's over the Line Islands, Fiji and Samoa.

Image
[font="Tahoma"] Looks to me that you are doing very well. Usually the overall losses at this stage are in the Empire's
favour, not the Allies. You have done very well against his Kates and Vals. Most of the losses were A2A and Flak, so the pilots
were probably lost to him as well. The graphic just shows the Japanese side - sometimes I like to see the overall loss rankings
of the Allies interspersed with the IJ losses so I can compare DBs to DBs, LBs to LBs and fighters to fighters. If your DB losses
are significantly more than his, that would change the interpretation of the Val losses.[/font]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

[font="Tahoma"] Looks to me that you are doing very well. Usually the overall losses at this stage are in the Empire's
favour, not the Allies. You have done very well against his Kates and Vals. Most of the losses were A2A and Flak, so the pilots
were probably lost to him as well. The graphic just shows the Japanese side - sometimes I like to see the overall loss rankings
of the Allies interspersed with the IJ losses so I can compare DBs to DBs, LBs to LBs and fighters to fighters. If your DB losses
are significantly more than his, that would change the interpretation of the Val losses.[/font]

As Requested, this one also shows by sides total losses.


Image
Attachments
AALOSS.jpg
AALOSS.jpg (214.62 KiB) Viewed 356 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Aircraft Pools
While my pools are great given my losses of P-40E's and P-39D's they are too bad at least I have some reserve. Most fighter units in the Line Islands, Samoa and Fiji are at full strenght. The one at Peal, well they have been picked bear.


Image
Attachments
ACPOOLS.jpg
ACPOOLS.jpg (291.86 KiB) Viewed 356 times
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by FeurerKrieg »

Air losses seem pretty low for the IJAAF. Has he been hiding his Oscars from you?

IJN losses seem more typical. Certainly nothing that is going to be putting a damper on his operations just yet.
Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg

Air losses seem pretty low for the IJAAF. Has he been hiding his Oscars from you?

IJN losses seem more typical. Certainly nothing that is going to be putting a damper on his operations just yet.

Allied high command asks Oscars what are those? [:D]

Yes, I have really only seen them on sweeps in Singapore and the Philippines after he gained control of the air. His Oscars and Two Unrestricted Infantry Divisions are still MIA and it makes me nervous......
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »


14 Feb 42 - 15 Feb 42 Executive Summary

Seems the CA Nachi is raiding the West Coast. He did get two tankers [:-] . I have some DD's in the area that will pursue him but I think I can get his replenishment task force. Other than a bombardment at Singapore who's forts went back to LVL 3 not much going on this turn.

Japanese Amphibious Landings:
None.

Japan Conquerors the Following Bases:
Auki
Feni Islands
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Ohh Look Some AO's

He was able to get two tankers but it seems his replenishment task force is right next to my Battleships.....

------------------
Day Time Surface Combat, near San Francisco at 213,80, Range 21,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CA Nachi, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
AM Robin, Shell hits 8, and is sunk
TK Hagood
TK Halo, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
TK Gulfland
TK Fosna, Shell hits 13, heavy fires, heavy damage [later sank]
xAK Hawaiian
xAK Minnesotan, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage [later sank]
xAK Trento
xAK Charles H Cramp
xAK Santa Teresa
xAK Anniston City
xAK Chickasaw City
xAK Knoxville City
xAK Steel Exporter, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Makawao
xAK Mormacdove
xAK San Angelo
xAK San Felipe
xAK Vermont
xAK Ernest Meyer
xAK Alcoa Pennant
xAK Cold Brook
xAK Dorothy Philips, Shell hits 1
xAK Liberty
xAK Laida

Image
Attachments
AO_KILL.jpg
AO_KILL.jpg (189.18 KiB) Viewed 358 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

14 Feb 42 - 15 Feb 42 Executive Summary

So the payback for the tankers was on AO confirmed sunk and most likely more more sunk or scuttled. The big problem with Christmas Island as as base is without the KB around I just have a location where I can use those gas Sucking BB's from Peal that has a ton of fuel.......

Japanese Amphibious Landings:
Amphibious Assault at Abemama (136,130)
Amphibious Assault at Kendari (70,106)

Japan Conquerors the Following Bases:
Japanese forces CAPTURE Abemama !!!
Thousand Ship Bay
Dagua

--------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Hilo at 182,123, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Shirayuki
DD Hatsuyuki, Shell hits 1
AO Hayamoto, Shell hits 8, heavy fires, heavy damage
AO Iro, Shell hits 2, and is sunk

Allied Ships
BB Colorado
BB New Mexico
BB Mississippi, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1
BB Warspite
DMS Zane
DMS Boggs
DMS Perry


User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

BB Mississippi

I so wish I had the Long Lance....all this from one torpedo. Will make for Alameda's 180 Size Repair Yard. Still worth it for one sunk AO and one more that has to be on the bottom (sunk/scuttled). If nothing else it should teach him that the area from Peal to the Line Islands is mine unless the KB is present. Even with the KB in the area I still control the area from Palmyra to Fanning as my 125 land bases fighters are more than enough to with the USN 1st Bat Div and 23 PTs to control the islands themselves.

The Mississippi will be replaced by the Idaho and the bombardment of Christmas Island will resume.

Image
Attachments
MISSISSIPPI.jpg
MISSISSIPPI.jpg (113.89 KiB) Viewed 358 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

18 Feb 42 - 19 Feb 42 Executive Summary

Other than the bombardment of Palembang nothing really of note this turn. The hope is to draw more "stuff" to the area to make him run me off. [;)] The KB/Mini-KB or some part of that seems to be in Rabaul. Bombardment force in route to Christmas Island for the next round. After two or three more wackes I will pull this back for some minor repairs and rest. I will keep rotating in DDs and CLs to grind the XP as much as possible

Japanese Amphibious Landings:
None.

Japan Conquerors the Following Bases:
Japanese forces CAPTURE Kendari !!!
Lihir

--------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Palembang at 48,91, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
AMc Wa 3, Shell hits 3, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CL Java
CL Sumatra
CL De Ruyter
DD Barker
DD Bulmer
DD Paul Jones
DD Parrott
DD Piet Hein
DD Kortenaer
DD Witte de With
DD Banckert
DD Van Ghent
DD Tenedos

--------------------

Night Naval bombardment of Palembang at 48,91

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2 Nell: 12 damaged
G3M2 Nell: 1 destroyed on ground
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 3 damaged
A6M2 Zero: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
CL De Ruyter
CL Sumatra
CL Java

Japanese ground losses:
88 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 20

CL De Ruyter firing at Palembang
CL Sumatra firing at Palembang
CL Java firing at Palembang
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by rook749 »

Question: Saratoga Upgrade

If I am understanding the upgrade requirments correcly, I can upgrade the Saratoga at Melbourne in Austria as this has a level 10 Repair Yard? Just want to make sure before I mess up my planning....

I will of course fly the airplanes off just in case the KB shows up for the 21 days she is in the yard. [:D]

Image
Attachments
sara.jpg
sara.jpg (127.55 KiB) Viewed 358 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by BBfanboy »

Yes - Saratoga does not have to enter the drydock for this upgrade, it just needs the shops and cranes of a level 10 shipyard.
Are you sure KB is not going to come visiting during the 21 day refit?
Many IJ players make the Great Australian Circle Tour after their landings in the DEI and NG are completed.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: This will End Badly Rook749 vs AirGriff

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: rook749

Night Time Surface Combat, near Palembang at 48,91, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
AMc Wa 3, Shell hits 3, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CL Java
CL Sumatra
CL De Ruyter
DD Barker
DD Bulmer
DD Paul Jones
DD Parrott
DD Piet Hein
DD Kortenaer
DD Witte de With
DD Banckert
DD Van Ghent
DD Tenedos

[font="Microsoft Sans Serif"] Herro Boys, Perth Peony here with music to sooth your spirits and words to depress your morale.
But first, the Allied High Command is pleased to announce another great victory near Palembang, with the sinking of 2 Carriers, a Battleship, and numerous
Cruisers and Destroyers.
[/font]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”