Option 47

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

ORIGINAL: Centuur

The order in which to proceed was decided on by Matrix. That was: supply - naval combat - Netplay. After that, I would first like to see the missing components of the "standard" game as the half map scenario's, search and seizure, neutrality pacts and mutual peace with multiplayer Netplay and a lot of bugs fixed too...

That's a whole different strategy. Optional rules are nice, but they are optional, aren't they...

Yes they are centuur, even optional rule # 47 is optional [:D]

Bo
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 29655
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Option 47

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: bo

ORIGINAL: Centuur

The order in which to proceed was decided on by Matrix. That was: supply - naval combat - Netplay. After that, I would first like to see the missing components of the "standard" game as the half map scenario's, search and seizure, neutrality pacts and mutual peace with multiplayer Netplay and a lot of bugs fixed too...

That's a whole different strategy. Optional rules are nice, but they are optional, aren't they...

Yes they are centuur, even optional rule # 47 is optional [:D]

Bo
Saying that an optional rule is optional would be a Yogi Berra ism. Here's a small sampling of his famous quotes,

"It anit over 'till it's over"
"It's like deja vu all over again."
"Baseball is 90 percent mental. The other half is physical."
"If you can't imitate him, don't copy him."
"80% of putts that are short don't go into the hole."

Ronnie
Larry Smith
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Williams Lake, BC, Canada

RE: Option 47

Post by Larry Smith »

Hey, hey, hey, Booboo! That's a mighty nice picnic basket you got there!

[Different Yogi, I know]
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

ORIGINAL: Larry Smith

Hey, hey, hey, Booboo! That's a mighty nice picnic basket you got there!

[Different Yogi, I know]

What does this have to do with optional rule 47 [:D] Ok sorry, but those two Yogi's look alike [:(]

Bo
User avatar
Admiral Delabroglio
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:16 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by Admiral Delabroglio »

Hello

When playing, it is possible to at least make an imitation of option 47 :
Even if the unit gets reorganized, just pretend it isn't and don't move it.
If your opponent wants to destroy it, choose the die roll to mimic the result that would have been if the unit(s) had been flipped, including the odds change. Or choose the die roll to make sure a ground strike succeeds.

Sure, it is awkward, but better than nothing. Attach the comment "Option forty-sevened" to the unit(s) in order to remember.

Now I really wish it were possible to destroy your own units in MWiF. For instance to get the repair pool rid of obsolete naval units that you intend to let rust in repair yards, to get rid of outdated planes in the reserve pool, and to avoid turning the game into a "Prisonners in Flames" one.

Best regards
Admiral Delabroglio
Extraneous
Posts: 1810
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:58 am

RE: Option 47

Post by Extraneous »

ORIGINAL: Admiral Delabroglio

Hello

When playing, it is possible to at least make an imitation of option 47 :
Even if the unit gets reorganized, just pretend it isn't and don't move it.
If your opponent wants to destroy it, choose the die roll to mimic the result that would have been if the unit(s) had been flipped, including the odds change. Or choose the die roll to make sure a ground strike succeeds.

Sure, it is awkward, but better than nothing. Attach the comment "Option forty-sevened" to the unit(s) in order to remember.

Now I really wish it were possible to destroy your own units in MWiF. For instance to get the repair pool rid of obsolete naval units that you intend to let rust in repair yards, to get rid of outdated planes in the reserve pool, and to avoid turning the game into a "Prisonners in Flames" one.

Best regards

Did they get rid of the scrap rule?

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)
User avatar
Zorachus99
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Palo Alto, CA

RE: Option 47

Post by Zorachus99 »

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: bo

If you are talking about Matrix's MWIF where does that happen all the time when no one has ever played an actual game with another person as of yet because we have no net play, I am not talking about games that paul plays or e-mail games or vassel, I am talking about MWIF on the computer.

Bo
Well, for me, I am talking about MWiF which I am playing with 4 others right now. And I'm talking about the board game. Please do not create false impressions here for new readers. Many people are playing the game one on one as well, as the AARs demonstrate. Don't turn the discussion of this option into another "Sad, Sad, Sad" thread, please.

One of those is more than enough.

Posts like this aggravate me a bit. Your title should say Beta-Tester. You have the Debug Tool to fix these issues. Therefore, you do not have them. That's disingenuous if you aren't up front about that. Releasing the debug tool to this 'huge' community with a warning that it might screw up the game is not sufficient for some reason.

I bought the game because I'm getting old, and I make far too many simple mistakes on supply, and other complex issues playing the boardgame online with Vassal. I just need something to calculate supply, and prevent illegal moves.

However, if you are any fan of SPI or other old wargames, realize that the most important aspect of this game has 2 serious issues.

1) Isolated units are automatically re-organized regardless of whether they can trace supply. You literally cannot pocket the enemy, wear them down, and kill them. These things traditionally shown by step-losses, were represented by disruption alone, simplifying play from that of Fire in East. I've played it, and found the detail amazing, but game-play a bit funny.
2) The finer points of tracing supply across straights is broken, so I had to abandon the first game I've been able to play past the first turn. Too many turns were ruined by my wondering what was going on.

Paul FIXED supply problem I come across with a tool he has.

3) Why can't the customers have the same tool? Everyone cannot rely on beta-testers to fix their games to proceed. That is not a functional or realistic process.
4) Implementation of optional 47 consists only of changes to the re-organization phase, and has no impact during the tracing of supply during the turn. Therefore the changes only exist in that location, not everywhere in the game like other things requested.

I would really like to play this game to the end at least once.

Yes Paul, I understand you have no problem with this, but you have the debug tool. [:@]

I promise that if I get that tool, I won't ever report a game bug in a game where the tool has been used. Or maybe stamp the save to indicate the tool has been used. Whatever. The customers of this game need it.
Most men can survive adversity, the true test of a man's character is power. -Abraham Lincoln
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

ORIGINAL: Zorachus99

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: bo

If you are talking about Matrix's MWIF where does that happen all the time when no one has ever played an actual game with another person as of yet because we have no net play, I am not talking about games that paul plays or e-mail games or vassel, I am talking about MWIF on the computer.

Bo
Well, for me, I am talking about MWiF which I am playing with 4 others right now. And I'm talking about the board game. Please do not create false impressions here for new readers. Many people are playing the game one on one as well, as the AARs demonstrate. Don't turn the discussion of this option into another "Sad, Sad, Sad" thread, please.

One of those is more than enough.

Posts like this aggravate me a bit. Your title should say Beta-Tester. You have the Debug Tool to fix these issues. Therefore, you do not have them. That's disingenuous if you aren't up front about that. Releasing the debug tool to this 'huge' community with a warning that it might screw up the game is not sufficient for some reason.

I bought the game because I'm getting old, and I make far too many simple mistakes on supply, and other complex issues playing the boardgame online with Vassal. I just need something to calculate supply, and prevent illegal moves.

However, if you are any fan of SPI or other old wargames, realize that the most important aspect of this game has 2 serious issues.

1) Isolated units are automatically re-organized regardless of whether they can trace supply. You literally cannot pocket the enemy, wear them down, and kill them. These things traditionally shown by step-losses, were represented by disruption alone, simplifying play from that of Fire in East. I've played it, and found the detail amazing, but game-play a bit funny.
2) The finer points of tracing supply across straights is broken, so I had to abandon the first game I've been able to play past the first turn. Too many turns were ruined by my wondering what was going on.

Paul FIXED supply problem I come across with a tool he has.

3) Why can't the customers have the same tool? Everyone cannot rely on beta-testers to fix their games to proceed. That is not a functional or realistic process.
4) Implementation of optional 47 consists only of changes to the re-organization phase, and has no impact during the tracing of supply during the turn. Therefore the changes only exist in that location, not everywhere in the game like other things requested.

I would really like to play this game to the end at least once.

Yes Paul, I understand you have no problem with this, but you have the debug tool. [:@]

I promise that if I get that tool, I won't ever report a game bug in a game where the tool has been used. Or maybe stamp the save to indicate the tool has been used. Whatever. The customers of this game need it.

Agreed, that is why I wanted your post # 32 reread. I have the tool. And I thought maybe wrongly so, that if Steve does not put in rule 47 for some reason, then, if you had the debug tool you could disorganized those units turn after turn until Steve does something about that rule.

I do not know enough about players habits as to whether this would be a good idea or not [debug tool] I guess it could lead to a lot of trouble. Of course the perfect solution is to NEVER leave units in your rear [:-]

Bo
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: Option 47

Post by Joseignacio »

ORIGINAL: bo

ORIGINAL: Larry Smith

Hey, hey, hey, Booboo! That's a mighty nice picnic basket you got there!

[Different Yogi, I know]

What does this have to do with optional rule 47 [:D] Ok sorry, but those two Yogi's look alike [:(]

Bo

They are the same, I guess Yogi Berra was intended to be "Yogi Bear" and was misspelled.
Larry Smith
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Williams Lake, BC, Canada

RE: Option 47

Post by Larry Smith »

Yogi Berra was a famous football coach, back in the 1960's or 1970's; I can't remember which team.
Yogi Bear was a cartoon character, and rumor has it the character was named after the coach, but I don't know if that is true or not. I've never seen a photo of the coach, so I have no idea what he looks like. Might be why the bear had the fedora, collar and tie all the time.
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

ORIGINAL: bo

ORIGINAL: Larry Smith

Hey, hey, hey, Booboo! That's a mighty nice picnic basket you got there!

[Different Yogi, I know]

What does this have to do with optional rule 47 [:D] Ok sorry, but those two Yogi's look alike [:(]

Bo

They are the same, I guess Yogi Berra was intended to be "Yogi Bear" and was misspelled.

Would you please just worry about your Oso's and Osa's and optional rule 47 and not our Bear's and Berra's [:D]

Bo
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

Errrr Larry please stick to your Canadian sports as you know nothing about US sports, this is a picture of Yogi Berra the great catcher for the New York Yankees. [:(]

Bo

Image
Attachments
YogiBerra.jpg
YogiBerra.jpg (127.49 KiB) Viewed 139 times
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

And this is a picture of the cartoon character Yogi Bear, so from now on if you want concrete information come to me as I never make a mistake about anything.[:D]

Bo

Image
Attachments
YogiBear.jpg
YogiBear.jpg (134.34 KiB) Viewed 139 times
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Option 47

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: bo

And this is a picture of the cartoon image Yogi Bear, so from now on if you want concrete information come to me as I never make a mistake about anything.[:D]

Bo

Image
warspite1

Indeed, you are certainly smarter than the average bo [;)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

It took you years warspite to come to that conclusion which is very hurtful [:(]

There was no comma after average, so are you referring to a lot of Bo's out there in the world. Good lord that would be a disaster if there were more of me around. [:D]

Bo
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Option 47

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: bo

There was no comma after average, so are you referring to a lot of Bo's out there in the world. Good lord that would be a disaster if there were more of me around. [:D]

Bo
warspite1

No it was a play on his catchphrase: Smarter than the average bear.....
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: bo

There was no comma after average, so are you referring to a lot of Bo's out there in the world. Good lord that would be a disaster if there were more of me around. [:D]

Bo
warspite1

No it was a play on his catchphrase: Smarter than the average bear.....

Which Yogi? [:(]

Bo
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Option 47

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: bo

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: bo

There was no comma after average, so are you referring to a lot of Bo's out there in the world. Good lord that would be a disaster if there were more of me around. [:D]

Bo
warspite1

No it was a play on his catchphrase: Smarter than the average bear.....

Which Yogi? [:(]

Bo
warspite1

There's only one Yogi [&o]


Image
Attachments
smarterthan1.jpg
smarterthan1.jpg (24.63 KiB) Viewed 139 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
bo
Posts: 4175
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:52 pm

RE: Option 47

Post by bo »

How stupid of me of course there is only one Yogi, thank you warspite for keeping me straight [:(]

Bo
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8468
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: Option 47

Post by paulderynck »

deleted


Paul
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”