A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30884
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #5. War declarations.

USSR
1. The Soviet spy Richard Sorge in Japan taps into the diplomatic conservation between Hideki Tojo and Adolf Hitler plans against the Soviet Union.
2. Specifically, Japan’s plan to force a peace with the Soviet Union at the end of this turn; which will make the USSR inactive (or neutral) again and force the USSR to demobilize their on-board reserves and MIL armies/corps (i.e., move from the board to their reserve pool).
3. Richard Sorge passes on this to Joseph Stalin, who assembles his top advisors (e.g., Molotov) and generals (e.g., Zhukov) to first assess the impact of coming to peace with Japan and then what to do to counter all this; especially given the imminent threat of a German invasion.
4. Of the 16 reserve/MIL armies/corps currently in play, 13 are on the Eastern Front, which will significantly strip the Soviet defenses in Eastern Poland and the Baltic States.
5. And, though these 16 armies/corps can be called out as soon as Germany declare war on the Soviet Union, they must be placed face down (i.e., disorganized) in a Soviet home city, which degrades their effectiveness and the Soviet Eastern Front defense overall.
6. There’s a 10% to 30% chance this will be the last allied impulse of the turn, which would risk (75.3%*) that Germany could declare war against a neutral Soviet Union at the start of next turn. * axis get the initiative and move first.
7. To negate this risk, the USSR WILL declare war on Italy this impulse, which carriers an expected 3.5 chit loss from the US German/Italy entry pool, which currently contains 7 chits (1,1,2,2,3,3,3).
8. But so be it, the Soviet can’t have their Eastern Front defenses stripped & degraded just prior to Germany’s invasion.
05-AL-USSR-DOW-on-USSR-USE-Entry.png
05-AL-USSR-DOW-on-USSR-USE-Entry.png (16.8 KiB) Viewed 45 times
USA
1. The US, specifically President Roosevelt, is privy to the planning between Tojo & Hitler and Stalin’s preemptive response through the UK code breakers at Bletchley Park.
2. If the US does nothing, the worse case would be 2,3,3,3 and the best case 1,1,2 loss of chits from the US Germany/Italy entry pool.
3. So, Ge/It entry level would drop from 44 (40% DOW vs Germany) to between 27 (10%) & 39 (10%).
4. So, no matter the draw, DOW chance vs Germany will drop from 40% to 10%.
5. While not ideal, the Soviet upcoming DOW vs Italy has forced the US to take a 40% DOW shot vs Germany this impulse.
6. This means if that DOW fails the US will lose (another) chit in the Ge/It entry pool & 1 in the tension pool.
7. Combine with the Soviet DOW vs Italy the worst case would be the loss of 2,2,3,3,3 (5 chits) and the best case 1,1,2,3 (4 chits).
8. This means US Ge/It entry level would drop from its current 44 to between 24 (0% DOW chance) & 35 (10%).
9. Now on the upside, the US gets 2 chit draws each time to make up for the losses if the DOW fails.
10. No matter, the US hand is forced and will attempt DOW vs Germany & Italy (40%).
05-AL-SOI-US-Entry-Pool.png
05-AL-SOI-US-Entry-Pool.png (120.32 KiB) Viewed 50 times
05-AL-SOI-US-DOW-Chance.png
05-AL-SOI-US-DOW-Chance.png (234.41 KiB) Viewed 50 times
I need some practice ... and I promise to limit my memes to 1 or less per impulse or two or three ...
05-AL-War-Declarations.png
05-AL-War-Declarations.png (3.1 MiB) Viewed 44 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30884
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. War Declarations.
05-AL-War-Declarations-CL.png
05-AL-War-Declarations-CL.png (77.71 KiB) Viewed 42 times
05-AL-Relations.png
05-AL-Relations.png (95.28 KiB) Viewed 42 times
US Entry Options.
05-AL-US-Entry-Options.png
05-AL-US-Entry-Options.png (183.99 KiB) Viewed 42 times
US Aligns Panama.
05-AL-Setup-Panama.png
05-AL-Setup-Panama.png (1.4 MiB) Viewed 42 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30884
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #5. Impulse Planning.

USA – Combine.
Pacific
1. NM 1/3. Supply CP & PBY-1 N2 & 2 USNs BB + 2 BB at sea) supply & escort TF -> Bismarck Sea[0].
2. Ship Philippine gold RP to US factory.
3. NM 2/3. CV Saratoga (SBD-4, F4F-4 CAGs), Hornet (F4F-4 CAG) patrol TF -> Bismarck Sea[3].
4. NM 3/3. 2 USN CAs w/4th inf div, 10th Mtn div –> The Solomons[4]
5. LM 1-2/4. Unopposed (i.e., vs 0-str notional) amph landings from Solomons[4] to capture Truk (objective) & Kwajalein (objective).
6. Flyout USAAF FTR-2 (Kauai, Kaula) -> The Marshalls for EOT RTB to Kwajalein.

Western
7. Strategic bombing raid vs Hamburg.

Med
8. LM 3-4/4. Eisenhower HQ-A & XXIX Mtn corps. Debark. CSV[0] -> Rabat, Morocco.
9. USN East Med ground strike vs isolated LBA Terr (Benghazi).

Active WAR.
05-AL-WAR-USA.png
05-AL-WAR-USA.png (57.32 KiB) Viewed 28 times
US Production (Post Successful DOW on Ge/It).
05-AL-US-Production-Post-DOW-CL.png
05-AL-US-Production-Post-DOW-CL.png (13.41 KiB) Viewed 28 times
05-AL-US-Production-Post-DOW.png
05-AL-US-Production-Post-DOW.png (29.71 KiB) Viewed 28 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30884
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #5. Impulse Planning.

Weather Report.
05-AL-IP-Weather-Report.png
05-AL-IP-Weather-Report.png (100.71 KiB) Viewed 23 times
CW – Land.
Med
1. West Med (search by USN or Free France), break Italian supply to North Africa, Sardinia, Corsica and block Sardinia RP shipment to Italian factory.
2. Capture Algiers, Algeria.
3. If supply broken, capture SW1-Leghorn (Corsica).
4. Strat bomb (milk run) Taranto (1 fac).

East Africa
5. Isolate OOS & flipped 2-3 ETH Terr adjacent to Djibouti, French Somaliland.
6. Adequate screen Djibouti.

Pacific
7. Eliminate NEI 0-2 partisan (NW1-Telok Betong) and open rail Palembang to Telok Betong.
8. This assault carriers an estimated 7.5% risk of “losing” Palembang 2 oil to other 0-2 NEI partisan & back-to-back axis (SOT-EOT) impulse pair).
10. FYI. Plan to RTB@EOT, Queens w/4-2 Bombay MIL in Arabian Sea[2] to Singapore or, 2 Palembang Oil threaten, Telok Betong if, and only if, target RTB port in supply.

Free France – Combine
1. Strengthen isolation of 3-2 LBA Terr in Benghazi.
2. NM – Set SAS escort in North Atlantic.

Active WAR (CW & Free France).
05-AL-WAR-CW-FR.png
05-AL-WAR-CW-FR.png (64.27 KiB) Viewed 23 times
Attack Planning.
05-AL-IP-Med-CW-AP-CL.png
05-AL-IP-Med-CW-AP-CL.png (11.56 KiB) Viewed 23 times
05-AL-IP-Med-CW-AP.png
05-AL-IP-Med-CW-AP.png (17.89 KiB) Viewed 23 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30884
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #5. Impulse Planning.

USSR – Naval
1. USSR takes a rare naval to sortie ships and subs of their Baltic and Black Sea fleets into the highest sea boxes possible in order to stay at sea for as long as possible.

Active WAR.
05-AL-WAR-USSR.png
05-AL-WAR-USSR.png (36.58 KiB) Viewed 21 times
Nationalist – Land
1. Liberate 2-hexes east & 1-hex east-southeast of Changsha.
2. Ensure Cav corps & div end organized back in Changsha.

Active WAR.
05-AL-WAR-NAP.png
05-AL-WAR-NAP.png (10.76 KiB) Viewed 21 times
CCP – Pass
1. With USSR taking a naval, the CCP passes.

Active WAR.
05-AL-WAR-CCP.png
05-AL-WAR-CCP.png (16.81 KiB) Viewed 21 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30884
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: A Competitive GW (Solo) Scenario by the Numbers.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 16. Mar/Apr 1942. Allied #5. Actions, Activities Available, Initiative, Impulse Info.
05-AL-Actions-Activities-Available.png
05-AL-Actions-Activities-Available.png (14.83 KiB) Viewed 21 times
05-AL-Impulse-Initiative-Info.png
05-AL-Impulse-Initiative-Info.png (64.46 KiB) Viewed 21 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”