Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

I like Sonia's, but they do go down easily.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (358.93 KiB) Viewed 404 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Nadi falls...

Suva will be next.

Quite the concentration of IJN forces.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (353.28 KiB) Viewed 404 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

20 torpedoes in 5 distinct encounters with Haruna since yesterday...several hits, but no explosion.

Lost a submarine off Australia, hit a mine and then savagely attacked.

Ambassador
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Ambassador »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

20 torpedoes in 5 distinct encounters with Haruna since yesterday...several hits, but no explosion.

Lost a submarine off Australia, hit a mine and then savagely attacked.

You only need to be lucky once. It must have been stressful for NJP.[:D]
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Our cap traps worked ok...unfortunately most were at long range so damage done wasn't great.

IJN destroyers raided Chittagong, missed the mines, and sank a MTB.

Poor Seawolf hit a mine, which I kind of new were going to show up at Townsville, and then was sunk by aggressive destroyers on ASW duty.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (145.7 KiB) Viewed 404 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The first cargo ships and tankers arrive from Bombay, feeding Mombassa.


One route I am currently pondering, and will send at least one large tanker to is England. Seems to be about 152 hexes one way but doesn't generate enough fuel for a big fuel convoy system, but plentiful supplies.

I am currently setting up fuel from Abadan to Socrata to Mombassa to Cape Town. Cape Town to southern Australia ports.

England to Cape Town for Supplies primarily and some fuel.

On the opposite side, Balboa to Port Stanley...Port Stanley to New Zealand via the southern islands. NZ to Tasmania.

Balboa will be fed from Eastern US and San Diego once our ASW is up to snuff.

These aren't optimized routes for distance, but rather for safety. I believe I have the time given logistics on hand and what will be arriving.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (321.08 KiB) Viewed 404 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

KB and friends.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (317.6 KiB) Viewed 404 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Perth/Darwin/Brisbane, Noumea, Fiji + Tahiti and Alaska....a solid route to auto victory.

I have neglected Alaska till recently, but I have been building up Prince Rupert and defending the West Coast. Time to move forward and secure Alaska, Line Islands, and Tahiti.

A construction company will land in Seward in a day or two, and our CS convoys are set up for Alaska.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (477.07 KiB) Viewed 404 times
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I have neglected Alaska till recently, but I have been building up Prince Rupert and defending the West Coast. Time to move forward and secure Alaska, Line Islands, and Tahiti.

A construction company will land in Seward in a day or two, and our CS convoys are set up for Alaska.
You can safely wait until the end of the cold season methinks, March that is. Construction is x4 slower currently.

Japan also tends to wait for spring to move here, so you have some space for them to cover until they reach Alaska
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I have neglected Alaska till recently, but I have been building up Prince Rupert and defending the West Coast. Time to move forward and secure Alaska, Line Islands, and Tahiti.

A construction company will land in Seward in a day or two, and our CS convoys are set up for Alaska.
You can safely wait until the end of the cold season methinks, March that is. Construction is x4 slower currently.

Japan also tends to wait for spring to move here, so you have some space for them to cover until they reach Alaska

I don't know...Japan likes the forward invasion...I was thinking he would hit deep here in the final stages of the Amphibious bonus phase...

He does need China...and also still has to take Luzon and Singers and Miri and Balikpapen.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Dewey...

Marblehead decided to leave Luzon, after several failures at intercepting, the IJN started to heavily escort their fleets, and her torpedoes are less than reliable...off to Seattle.

Two cargo ships are trying to figure out their way to Luzon...volunteer crews. They must have family there.[;)]

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (385.12 KiB) Viewed 404 times
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I don't know...Japan likes the forward invasion...I was thinking he would hit deep here in the final stages of the Amphibious bonus phase...

He does need China...and also still has to take Luzon and Singers and Miri and Balikpapen.
I don't mean not shipping anything here, just keep construction units doing productive work elsewhere for a couple weeks more. Combat units are welcome! :)

I'd say that a number of setbacks with aggressive early expansion should have curbed your opponent's enthusiasm, but you never know.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

I think Canada is a little closer to England. It does not accumulate supplies and fuel much until you start to load ships from there. Then the US supplies and fuel flow readily to Canada to feed the ships.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I think Canada is a little closer to England. It does not accumulate supplies and fuel much until you start to load ships from there. Then the US supplies and fuel flow readily to Canada to feed the ships.


I can use that I guess...although I was thinking England to Cristobel. Panama Canal looks to be very busy this game.

I like Port Stanley to Cape Town at c90+ hexes too. Although Cristobel to Cape Town seems better.

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Turn is finished, rejiggered out sub patrols to avoid freshly laid minefields, continued or CAP trap exercise...

All troops will evacuate Perth region except static forces today before the rail line gets cut by roving armored units. I fear my lack of recon will allow the IJA tankers to cut the rail line unexpectedly.

Flying out what troops I can from Fiji.





User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

The East Coast of the US is the closest port and thus will be quicker. You can always draw/pull more supply there if needed. Just have lots of smaller convoys so it is busy every day.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
...IJA tankers to cut the rail line unexpectedly.
This is the point when one marvels at how IJA tankers are so much different compared to IJN tankers [:D]
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
...IJA tankers to cut the rail line unexpectedly.
This is the point when one marvels at how IJA tankers are so much different compared to IJN tankers [:D]
Yes, they are built to stop trains running into their side!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Ambassador
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Ambassador »

If memory serves, Eastern Canada is 19 hexes closer to UK, 13 hexes closer to Aden and 8 hexes closer to Cape Town, compared to Eastern USA.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Feb 7th, 1942

I forgot how poor the British MTBs were...all gone now.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (280.03 KiB) Viewed 404 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”