Tale of the Sheep! - JocMeister (A) vs. Lowpe (J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

tiemanjw
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:15 am

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by tiemanjw »

They provide Aviation Support that does not require he tender to be disbanded.

What do you know... learn something every day. I admit I didn't believe you at first, so I took one of my bases that that some AVs in port, formed them into a support TF, and the base info screen still indicated they could provide support. Learn something new every day. Thanks.

Yours and BBFanBoy's points all stand - it is probably usually better to disband for the reasons stated, but it isn't necessary.
poodlebrain
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:14 pm
Location: Comfy Chair in Baton Rouge

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by poodlebrain »

An ancillary benefit of suppressing the airfield at Coal Harbor is it prevents expansion of the port. And a level 1 port is a rather severe limitation on Coal Harbor as a sustainable forward base of operations. If the KB returns to support Coal Harbor I would take it as a sign that Japan has plans for some sort of offensive operation on the West Coast. A level 1 port at Coal Harbor will make it useless as a staging base for any large scale operation.
Never trust a man who's ass is wider than his shoulders.
tiemanjw
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:15 am

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by tiemanjw »

ORIGINAL: poodlebrain

An ancillary benefit of suppressing the airfield at Coal Harbor is it prevents expansion of the port. And a level 1 port is a rather severe limitation on Coal Harbor as a sustainable forward base of operations. If the KB returns to support Coal Harbor I would take it as a sign that Japan has plans for some sort of offensive operation on the West Coast. A level 1 port at Coal Harbor will make it useless as a staging base for any large scale operation.

While suppression is never a bad idea... don't underestimate how much you can move through a small port given enough nav support. And enough is not all that much (at least not as far as the allies are concerned). 1 USN BF can make it viable, and 2, well, even better.
poodlebrain
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:14 pm
Location: Comfy Chair in Baton Rouge

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by poodlebrain »

ORIGINAL: tiemanj

While suppression is never a bad idea... don't underestimate how much you can move through a small port given enough nav support. And enough is not all that much (at least not as far as the allies are concerned). 1 USN BF can make it viable, and 2, well, even better.
I would presume that while suppressing the airfield that Joc would also bombard the port occasionally to reduce its cargo and fuel handling capacities. This would prolong the presence of any ships loading and/or unloading offering increased opportunities to attack them while they are most vulnerable. It would also limit the utility of the base for naval combatants as refueling and rearming would be a problem. Knowing Japanese surface combat capabilities are limited, I would create PT boats at Victoria to make nuisance raids on Coal Harbor and create some small fast SCTFs to make sorties against Victoria whenever shipping is detected at Coal Harbor. Without the KB to support Coal Harbor, it would become an extremely dangerous place for any assets the Japanese commit there.
Never trust a man who's ass is wider than his shoulders.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by BBfanboy »

Jocke is marching troops overland to take Coal Harbour, so he doesn't want to spook them into evacuating before he gets there. [:)]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
tiemanjw
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:15 am

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by tiemanjw »

ORIGINAL: poodlebrain

ORIGINAL: tiemanj

While suppression is never a bad idea... don't underestimate how much you can move through a small port given enough nav support. And enough is not all that much (at least not as far as the allies are concerned). 1 USN BF can make it viable, and 2, well, even better.
I would presume that while suppressing the airfield that Joc would also bombard the port occasionally to reduce its cargo and fuel handling capacities. This would prolong the presence of any ships loading and/or unloading offering increased opportunities to attack them while they are most vulnerable. It would also limit the utility of the base for naval combatants as refueling and rearming would be a problem. Knowing Japanese surface combat capabilities are limited, I would create PT boats at Victoria to make nuisance raids on Coal Harbor and create some small fast SCTFs to make sorties against Victoria whenever shipping is detected at Coal Harbor. Without the KB to support Coal Harbor, it would become an extremely dangerous place for any assets the Japanese commit there.

I agree with all that. I was just saying that naval support squads vastly increase load / unload rate - much more cost effectively than increasing port size.
poodlebrain
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:14 pm
Location: Comfy Chair in Baton Rouge

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by poodlebrain »

Naval support squads at small unfortified ports are highly vulnerable to bombardment. And naval support does not increase fuel handling.
Never trust a man who's ass is wider than his shoulders.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by RangerJoe »

At Coal Harbor, would a SCTF, followed by DMS TF, a bombardment TF and then a DM or two laying mines be effective? Should the DMS go first, separately or be included in both the SCTF and the Bombardment group? If they went in at full speed, they should be able to get back under your CAP, correct? Close the port until your mines are cleared as well as doing damage to the port, airfield and airplanes as well destroying supplies.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

[font="Verdana"]5th August -42[/font]
______________________________________________________________________________

Sadly only a quick update. Busy evening!

------------------------
NORPAC
------------------------

Absolutely perfectly timed...and weather make a mass of things. [:(]

First all my DDs clashed with a small transport TF defended by some Japanese DDs. Results are...underwhelming.
Night Time Surface Combat, near Coal Harbour at 204,49, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Asagumo, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
DD Umikaze
DD Suzukaze
DD Shirayuki
E Kunashiri, Shell hits 1
AK Sado Maru, Shell hits 1
xAK Minryo Maru, Shell hits 6, on fire


Allied Ships
DD Farenholt
DD Caldwell
DD Dale, Shell hits 1
DD Worden
DD MacDonough, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Dewey, Shell hits 6, heavy fires

In the morning massive Japanese sweeps hits Vancouver as predicted. Sadly our P40s there decide not to sweep back. The P38s do go in. But results are again...underwhelming. Quite disappointed in how our P38s did.
Afternoon Air attack on Coal Harbour , at 204,49

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 35 NM, estimated altitude 21,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 36
A6M2-N Rufe x 6


Allied aircraft
P-38E Lightning x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38E Lightning: 4 destroyed

CAP is as you can see very, very weak. Our B17s go in...but the heavy rain and AA means little result.
Afternoon Air attack on Coal Harbour , at 204,49

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 30 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 29
A6M2-N Rufe x 6


Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 25

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 1 destroyed on ground

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 13 damaged

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 3 [:(]

This is followed by the usual fragmented gazillion strikes. Not much is lost as the CAP don´t have time to react. But the airfield is barely scratched. I´ll take the VPs though. Good day in that regards thanks to RAF work in India.

------------------------
India
------------------------

Good day here when the RAF catches some LRCAP up in the North! [&o]
Afternoon Air attack on 8th Tank Regiment, at 53,28 , near Benares

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid spotted at 33 NM, estimated altitude 21,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 3


Allied aircraft
Hurricane IIc Trop x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 2 destroyed


Allied aircraft losses
Hurricane IIc Trop: 1 destroyed

About 15 Zeroes shot down for only 1 Hurricane! Good work. [:)]

------------------------
SOPAC
------------------------

We bag a PB outside Vanikoro. 10 VPs. I´ll take it.

I shouldn´t complain really. Despite not closing CH I´m +13 VPs today and Japanese AV ratio drops below 3,3 for the first time in months.





Image
Attachments
airlosses30.jpg
airlosses30.jpg (227.81 KiB) Viewed 273 times
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

I´ll try to answer the questions tomorrow. Really busy tonight but I wanted to get the update up. [:)]
Image
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by Capt. Harlock »

First all my DDs clashed with a small transport TF defended by some Japanese DDs. Results are...underwhelming.

You have my sympathies, but let's face it: DD vs DD combat in early August '42 generally does not go the way the Allies would like.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by Lokasenna »

In my experience... that CAP still being up, even though it was relatively light (still 35 planes!), is what caused your bombers to miss. More so than heavy rain (which doesn't seem to have THAT much of an effect, unlike Thunderstorms) or the AA. The AA doesn't seem to mess with aim so much as cause damage. I'm sure it does affect hit rate, but I've noticed a far larger effect from 1) CAP, and 2) Thunderstorms. In that order.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

At Coal Harbor, would a SCTF, followed by DMS TF, a bombardment TF and then a DM or two laying mines be effective? Should the DMS go first, separately or be included in both the SCTF and the Bombardment group? If they went in at full speed, they should be able to get back under your CAP, correct? Close the port until your mines are cleared as well as doing damage to the port, airfield and airplanes as well destroying supplies.

It depends on if he has any CD guns at CH. If he does any minesweeping would be suicidal!
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

In my experience... that CAP still being up, even though it was relatively light (still 35 planes!), is what caused your bombers to miss. More so than heavy rain (which doesn't seem to have THAT much of an effect, unlike Thunderstorms) or the AA. The AA doesn't seem to mess with aim so much as cause damage. I'm sure it does affect hit rate, but I've noticed a far larger effect from 1) CAP, and 2) Thunderstorms. In that order.

Might be right. I think my numbers are bit on the small side too. Only 90 4Es in total. Probably expecting a little bit too much from them.

Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

[font="Verdana"]VPs[/font]
______________________________________________________________________________

As I said I really shouldn´t complain. We are steadily making progress in the VP department.

Image
Attachments
VP12.jpg
VP12.jpg (440.19 KiB) Viewed 273 times
Image
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

[font="Verdana"]Coal Harbor[/font]
______________________________________________________________________________

I´ve pretty much decided to give up for now trying to close it from the air. We have parity in actual number of fighters in the area but quality wise the allies are lagging.

This is what swept Vancouver last turn.
Afternoon Air attack on Vancouver , at 209,49

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 19 NM, estimated altitude 22,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 7
Ki-44-IIa Tojo x 42


No Japanese losses

Aircraft Attacking:
42 x Ki-44-IIa Tojo sweeping at 20000 feet

Afternoon Air attack on Vancouver , at 209,49


Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 22 NM, estimated altitude 23,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 36

No Japanese losses

Aircraft Attacking:
36 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 20000 feet


If I want to close CH I will need to wear down his CAP. This is probably not something I can achieve without crippling losses. Besides Japanese strat bombing has been anemic at best and I think his OP and flak losses are greater then his gains.

So at least for now I´ll revert to trying to ambush his bombers. Next month the P40K arrives which is a tremendous step up for the Allies.
Image
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by RangerJoe »

Plus, if he is keeping his best pilots there with lots of planes, they aren't somewhere else. You only get better in pilots, airframes and anti-aircrafts. You get to use those permanently restricted air units for things other than ASW and training.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by ny59giants »

I just had almost even numbers of Tojo vs P-40Ks over Cox's Bazar at 20k. Since you are playing with altitude restrictions, the "K" came out with 6:1 kills which should help you out in the next few months once this model comes out.
[center]Image[/center]
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by JocMeister »

18 hours without nicotine. Not.feeling.good.
Image
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Canada and India invaded!

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Plus, if he is keeping his best pilots there with lots of planes, they aren't somewhere else. You only get better in pilots, airframes and anti-aircrafts. You get to use those permanently restricted air units for things other than ASW and training.
Not sure it is all going to be easier for the Allies. Lowpe is an experienced Japanese player and knows how to manage the industry to produce advanced fighters early. This may mean a counter to the P-40K is not far off.
Good point about the perm restricted air units.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”