The bug thread.

Post bug reports and ask for game support here.
User avatar
squadleader_id
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:31 am
Contact:

RE: The bug thread.

Post by squadleader_id »

Elements file error:
Sandbags "Rubble To" Brick Wall (57), should be Debris (221).

Note: same error for TLD elements.
xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by xe5 »

On the Battlegroup screen, when the reserve BG tab is selected and any frontline BG teams occupying "joint slots" (slots that either BG can fill) are removed from the active roster, the correct point value is returned to the frontline BG point pool but the frontline teams removed from the active roster are not returned to the frontline BG forcepool.

Conversely, when the frontline BG tab is selected and any reserve BG teams occupying "joint slots" are removed from the active roster, the correct point value is returned to the reserve BG point pool but the reserve teams removed from the active roster are not returned to the reserve BG forcepool.

Image
Attachments
Joint1.jpg
Joint1.jpg (167.64 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
RD Oddball
Posts: 4836
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:38 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by RD Oddball »

Thanks SquadLeader. Will file a bug.

@Stolidog - Movement restrictions are set by each element and are the same for each instance of the element. So it's not as simple as jacking up the movement restrictions on the "gas tank" element. We could have a "gas tank wall" element that has a high movement penalty then a "gas tank" element or "gas tank floor" similar to the way buildings work and probably would be a reasonable enhancement to add. We'll consider this as an enhancement as well. Thank you.

*EDIT*
Forgot to react to the smokestack question. It's coded as out of bounds as deploying there wouldn't be realistic. The smokestack element should have it's own elevation so the elevation of the terrain that element sits on should be similar to the surrounding terrain.
User avatar
RD Oddball
Posts: 4836
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:38 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by RD Oddball »

ORIGINAL: xe5

On the Battlegroup screen, when the reserve BG tab is selected and any frontline BG teams occupying "joint slots" (slots that either BG can fill) are removed from the active roster, the correct point value is returned to the frontline BG point pool but the frontline teams removed from the active roster are not returned to the frontline BG forcepool.

Conversely, when the frontline BG tab is selected and any reserve BG teams occupying "joint slots" are removed from the active roster, the correct point value is returned to the reserve BG point pool but the reserve teams removed from the active roster are not returned to the reserve BG forcepool.

I'll file a report Mick. Thank you.

*EDIT*

Are you using the first update?
xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by xe5 »

Yes, 5.60.01b
User avatar
RD Oddball
Posts: 4836
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:38 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by RD Oddball »

Thanks.
zon
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:46 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by zon »

Data glitch: PzIIIG and M mainguns are set to fire 360 degrees. Edit: In other words, the turret doesn`t need to rotate in order for the gun to fire on a target.
xe5
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 5:06 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by xe5 »

Based on the longer shadows of the stone "fence" (1 meter high) at the bottom center of Schijndel, the map maker likely intended this be coded as a stone wall (4 meters high) instead.

Image
Attachments
Fencewall.jpg
Fencewall.jpg (82.17 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
RD Oddball
Posts: 4836
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:38 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by RD Oddball »

Stone wall is made for buildings and is impassable to vehicles. A stone fence, regardless of height, would be passable by a tank plowing into it because of the lack of support by interior walls and floors. So perhaps an enhancement is in order to add an element called "tall stone fence" to suit Shane's artistic whims. [;)] Added.
zon
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:46 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by zon »

ORIGINAL: zon

Data glitch: PzIIIG and M mainguns are set to fire 360 degrees. Edit: In other words, the turret doesn`t need to rotate in order for the gun to fire on a target.

250/9 has the same problem. Also, it's got a MG34 - wasn't there a larger gun on this vehicle?
7A_Woulf
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:18 am

RE: The bug thread.

Post by 7A_Woulf »

ORIGINAL: zon
250/9 has the same problem. Also, it's got a MG34 - wasn't there a larger gun on this vehicle?

ABout 250/9 from Wikipedia: "Reconnaissance variant with a 2 cm KwK 38 autocannon coaxial with an MG34 or MG42 in a low, open topped turret identical to the SdkFz-222 armoured car (early version) and the sdkfz-234/1 armoured car (late version)."
zon
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:46 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by zon »

ORIGINAL: 7A_Woulf

ORIGINAL: zon
250/9 has the same problem. Also, it's got a MG34 - wasn't there a larger gun on this vehicle?

ABout 250/9 from Wikipedia: "Reconnaissance variant with a 2 cm KwK 38 autocannon coaxial with an MG34 or MG42 in a low, open topped turret identical to the SdkFz-222 armoured car (early version) and the sdkfz-234/1 armoured car (late version)."

Thanks. Checked again, and it does have a 2cm gun. Duh. So this narrows the issue to the bug shared with the MKIIIs.
User avatar
Ivan_Zaitzev
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:52 am

RE: The bug thread.

Post by Ivan_Zaitzev »

In Driel the maps looks like it haves a big elevation because of the shadows, but it really is just a meter or half a meter of elevation.
Is this a bug?
User avatar
RD Oddball
Posts: 4836
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:38 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by RD Oddball »

Yes Ivan it's an enhancement. Doesn't necessarily stop game play (bug) but I agree it would be more correct if it had greater elevation differences. I'll add a report. Thank you for taking the time to report it.
kojusoki1
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:44 am

RE: The bug thread.

Post by kojusoki1 »

Im not sure if it is posted or not, but it seems Headgrows allow LOS (see pic)

Also map SOuth OOsterbreck has wrong coding of buildings to the south east (at least there)
Attachments
SonHeath.jpg
SonHeath.jpg (145.7 KiB) Viewed 438 times
User avatar
RD Oddball
Posts: 4836
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:38 pm

RE: The bug thread.

Post by RD Oddball »

It depends upon the elevations of the origination of the LOS and destination. e.g. as an extreme example (not the one you showed) if you're looking across a valley you'll have clear LOS. So if in your example your mortar team and the point their looking at are on the same elevation or one is higher but both are above the max hedge elevation, they'll be able to see over. So we almost need to look at the elevation points. Since you provided a screenshot, I'll have a look.

Do you have specifics on the building coding? Although we went through all the map coding carefully a few times it's possible some spots were missed.
kojusoki1
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:44 am

RE: The bug thread.

Post by kojusoki1 »

I know issues regarding elevation but i think the map should be fixed (but this time im not 100% sure).

Im providing a pic of the building that is certainly wrong codded
Also, Im sending another issue:
KG Brinkannm, after anihilating Brits at the "end of battle" screen had a bug: instead of vehicles I used, I had completly different units. WIth quite a strange stats...see pic
Attachments
building.jpg
building.jpg (98.64 KiB) Viewed 444 times
kojusoki1
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:44 am

RE: The bug thread.

Post by kojusoki1 »

and the next post as I cant upload 2 pics at the time (this pic is regarding strange stats)

Rememeber - there should be 3 armoured cars
Attachments
ressurection.jpg
ressurection.jpg (106.31 KiB) Viewed 444 times
User avatar
Andrew Williams
Posts: 3862
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

RE: The bug thread.

Post by Andrew Williams »

i see the building coding extends about 15 meteres beyond the building... or the walls and roof are glass a very futuristic design in 1944
ImageImage
User avatar
squadleader_id
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:31 am
Contact:

RE: The bug thread.

Post by squadleader_id »

ORIGINAL: kojusoki1

Im not sure if it is posted or not, but it seems Headgrows allow LOS (see pic)

Also map SOuth OOsterbreck has wrong coding of buildings to the south east (at least there)

Just like in TLD, Small Hedgerows do not block LOS (see elements file)...only Large Hedgerows block LOS.
AFAIK this was corrected in an unofficial patch for CC5 and in most major CC5 mods...but I guess it's making a comeback in TLD and LSA [;)]
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”