Variants - Allied side - Xargun welcome

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Mar 28, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Mar 28, 1942

Wacked a PB

ASW attack near Singkep at 50,88

Japanese Ships
PB Kantori Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
PB Hakozake Maru

Allied Ships
SS Truant
==============================================
Another shock attack at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 52710 troops, 504 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1446

Defending force 22853 troops, 105 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 266

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 756

Allied adjusted defense: 649

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
2425 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 182 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 26 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled

Allied ground losses:
423 casualties reported
Squads: 59 destroyed, 14 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 27 disabled
Engineers: 8 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 13 (12 destroyed, 1 disabled)
====================================================
And a DA at Ambon
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3851 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 152

Defending force 2215 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 31

Japanese adjusted assault: 29

Allied adjusted defense: 46

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
46 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
61 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Mar 29, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Mar 29, 1942

Shock attack at Wenchow again:
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 51000 troops, 504 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1269

Defending force 22137 troops, 94 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 256

Japanese adjusted assault: 678

Allied adjusted defense: 703

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
516 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 9 (1 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1007 casualties reported
Squads: 54 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 38 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 19 (11 destroyed, 8 disabled)
=========================================================
And at Ambon
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3807 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 147

Defending force 2115 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 23

Japanese adjusted assault: 13

Allied adjusted defense: 22

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
15 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
285 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
==================================================
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Mar 30, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Mar 30, 1942

Well, the Brit subs are doing good

Submarine attack near Singapore at 50,84

Japanese Ships
xAKL Akita Maru, Shell hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Trusty

Japanese ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

xAKL Akita Maru is sighted by SS Trusty
SS Trusty attacking xAKL Akita Maru on the surface

I heard sinking sounds after the combat and it showed up on the sunk ship list

User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Mar 31, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Mar 31, 1942

Last day of the amphibious bonus, yeah.

Ambon falls
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3837 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 151

Defending force 1923 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 15

Japanese adjusted assault: 87

Allied adjusted defense: 22

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Ambon !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1020 casualties reported
Squads: 32 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 189 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 13 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 26 (26 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 3
=============================================

DA at Batavia:
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 34990 troops, 366 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 1208

Defending force 18738 troops, 173 guns, 80 vehicles, Assault Value = 506

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 875

Allied adjusted defense: 395

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
931 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 109 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 21 disabled

Allied ground losses:
751 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 81 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
5th Amphibious Brigade
6th Guards Division
2nd Recon Regiment
4th Division
14th Guards Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Merak Base Force
ML-KNIL
KNIL Army Command
ABDA
Batavia Base Force

=============================================
Landings at Dobo and Taberfane

And since the turn I am working on is 1 April, 1942
there are a huge number of ships waiting for upgrades this next turn.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 1, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 1, 1942

A SA at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 33337 troops, 368 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 1033

Defending force 18034 troops, 173 guns, 80 vehicles, Assault Value = 410

Japanese adjusted assault: 291

Allied adjusted defense: 579

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
1028 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 9 (2 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1224 casualties reported
Squads: 54 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 16 (2 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 2, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 2, 1942

A DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52976 troops, 507 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1343

Defending force 21806 troops, 84 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 267

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 957

Allied adjusted defense: 625

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
569 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 46 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Vehicles lost 23 (4 destroyed, 19 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
970 casualties reported
Squads: 42 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 63 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 14 (1 destroyed, 13 disabled)
================================================
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 3, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 3, 1942

A DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52618 troops, 507 guns, 313 vehicles, Assault Value = 1295

Defending force 21002 troops, 83 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 231

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 749

Allied adjusted defense: 610

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
597 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 9 disabled

Allied ground losses:
819 casualties reported
Squads: 21 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 63 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 11 (7 destroyed, 4 disabled)
The defenders are getting a bit thin.
=================================================
A Da at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 30259 troops, 327 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 995

Defending force 17170 troops, 171 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 346

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 505

Allied adjusted defense: 877

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1042 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 82 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled

Allied ground losses:
674 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 54 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 22 (1 destroyed, 21 disabled)
=====================================================
A landing at Lautem on Timor
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 4, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 4, 1942

another DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52390 troops, 507 guns, 314 vehicles, Assault Value = 1271

Defending force 20402 troops, 78 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 209

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 671

Allied adjusted defense: 772

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
694 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 51 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 46 (1 destroyed, 45 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
825 casualties reported
Squads: 30 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 8 (3 destroyed, 5 disabled)
=================================================
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 5, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 5, 1942

Love those British subs
Sub vs Sub: SS Trusty attacking SS I-156 at 52,84 - near Tioman Island

Japanese Ships
SS I-156, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Trusty

SS Trusty launches 6 torpedoes at 3,000 yards
===================================================


User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 6, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 6, 1942

A DA at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52256 troops, 507 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1248

Defending force 19806 troops, 73 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 186

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 887

Allied adjusted defense: 706

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
565 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 55 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
747 casualties reported
Squads: 28 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 47 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 7 (4 destroyed, 3 disabled)
======================================================
and a DA at Batavia
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 28564 troops, 328 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 840

Defending force 16073 troops, 169 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 238

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 151

Allied adjusted defense: 419

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
758 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 104 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled

Allied ground losses:
620 casualties reported
Squads: 51 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 29 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
====================================================
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 7, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 7, 1942

A DA at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 51963 troops, 507 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1214

Defending force 19111 troops, 70 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 150

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 576

Allied adjusted defense: 328

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
385 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
886 casualties reported
Squads: 12 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 76 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 8, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 8, 1942

A Shock Attack at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 51541 troops, 507 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1197

Defending force 18506 troops, 66 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 130

Japanese adjusted assault: 1025

Allied adjusted defense: 928

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
1357 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 40 disabled
Engineers: 75 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 7 (3 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
413 casualties reported
Squads: 24 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 15 destroyed, 62 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)
============================================
Troops land at Port Blair

BTW, this is the view out my front door right now


Image
Attachments
front door 1.jpg
front door 1.jpg (959.5 KiB) Viewed 470 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 9, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 9, 1942

Shock attack at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 50584 troops, 505 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1132

Defending force 17906 troops, 63 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 121

Japanese adjusted assault: 636

Allied adjusted defense: 361

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
404 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 40 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Allied ground losses:
801 casualties reported
Squads: 39 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 68 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 14 (13 destroyed, 1 disabled)
==================================================
A DA at Batavia
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 17764 troops, 212 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 810

Defending force 15915 troops, 169 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 249

Japanese adjusted assault: 121

Allied adjusted defense: 387

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1003 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled

Allied ground losses:
288 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (3 destroyed, 3 disabled)
==================================================
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

More snow

Post by Nomad »

Now we are getting some snow;


Image
Attachments
frontdoor2.jpg
frontdoor2.jpg (641.51 KiB) Viewed 470 times
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

Apr 10, 1042

Post by Nomad »

Apr 10, 1942

Wenchow finally falls
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 50424 troops, 505 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1112

Defending force 17107 troops, 52 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 91

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 680

Allied adjusted defense: 274

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Wenchow !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
277 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 12 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled

Allied ground losses:
24291 casualties reported
Squads: 527 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1663 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 56 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 45 (45 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 8
================================================
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 11, 1042

Post by Nomad »

Apr 11, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

The snow is melting.
User avatar
Mark VII
Posts: 1848
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 6:41 am
Location: Brentwood,TN

RE: Apr 11, 1042

Post by Mark VII »

With your 14 feet of average snow I doubt that it ever totally melts in West Yellowstone?
ORIGINAL: Nomad

Apr 11, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

The snow is melting.
Image
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Apr 11, 1042

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: Mark VII

With your 14 feet of average snow I doubt that it ever totally melts in West Yellowstone?
ORIGINAL: Nomad

Apr 11, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

The snow is melting.

Generally speaking, snow that falls after Halloween will be here until the next May. This snow may or may not melt. Some that is in shade may be here next Spring.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20416
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: More snow

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Now we are getting some snow;


Image
Yeah, a couple of days ago the province of Alberta, just north of you, also got snow. Hazards of living alongside the Rockies which make cold air slide along their flank instead of passing over.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

Apr 12, 1942

Post by Nomad »

Apr 12, 1942

Nothing of interest to talk about in the game.

West Yellowstone basically is surrounded by mountains, so it gets a lot of snow and cold temperatures.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”