The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Moderator: Joel Billings
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
I think I saw some pretty good men disruption in my game when Soviets attack me. Maybe 1k people. Or maybe I am confusing it with something else.
Слава Україні!
Glory to Ukraine!
Glory to Ukraine!
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Turn 13. Some strong armored/motorised pushes at the approach to Moscow, mostly blunted by costly reserve activations from my own armored. Zero attacks in the Leningrad sector. Some slight pushing in the south.


- Attachments
-
- 1067.jpg (384.55 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Close hold.


- Attachments
-
- 1068.jpg (159.66 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Way stronger hold.


- Attachments
-
- 1069.jpg (159.24 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Look at that German SU commitment to a hasty!


- Attachments
-
- 1070.jpg (152.11 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Final hold.


- Attachments
-
- 1071.jpg (155.98 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
More tank battles. No hold.


- Attachments
-
- 1072.jpg (163.31 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Losses, 2-1 AFV losses is a very good turn.


- Attachments
-
- 1073.jpg (53.61 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
OOB Turn 13.


- Attachments
-
- 1075.jpg (104.17 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Wikipedia says the Germans lost roughly 2,735 tanks during Barbarossa. We approach pretty historical numbers!
Of course, the Soviets also suffered 3 million more casualties, so...
Of course, the Soviets also suffered 3 million more casualties, so...
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
ORIGINAL: RedJohn]Look at that German SU commitment to a hasty!
After some recent changes they have chance to commit to a battle during hasty attack. But they were always displayed on the battle report screen, even if they do not participate in a battle. Probably it is a case now.
It is nice to be a Soviet player, German get close to historical losses while Soviets have 3 mil more alive, and same pattern across multiple games.
Слава Україні!
Glory to Ukraine!
Glory to Ukraine!
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Turn 14. Some slight pushing at Crimea, but the entrances still hold. No attacks at Leningrad, 2 attacks at the Moscow front. Majority of the action is centered around Kursk, which risks envelopment.


- Attachments
-
- 1076.jpg (272.39 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
We have an actual guards division!


- Attachments
-
- 1077.jpg (74.96 KiB) Viewed 308 times
- Beethoven1
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 9:23 pm
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
ORIGINAL: Stamb
It is nice to be a Soviet player, German get close to historical losses while Soviets have 3 mil more alive, and same pattern across multiple games.
I think the German manpower losses tend to be less than historical. The German AFV losses are higher relative to the manpower losses because of how vulnerable/brittle Panzers/AFVs are (and also because Soviet players will deliberately target them for that reason, while generally leaving motorized divisions alone).
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
We mostly abandon Kursk, leaving behind 2 rifle divisions and an army HQ I don't really care for.


- Attachments
-
- 1078.jpg (108.97 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
OOB Turn 14.


- Attachments
-
- 1081.jpg (121.08 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Turn 15. Kursk with it's 2 beaten up units are encircled, Orel is threatened. No attacks at Leningrad, Vyazma, or Stalino.


- Attachments
-
- 1090.jpg (353.49 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
Bobkin is also encircled as you can see above, thankfully they can just leave the pocket.
Anyway, my OOB is close to 4m. Will probably reach it during mud, and then I get another 500,000 on turn 24 before blizzard. Snow will be the last chance, it seems, for the axis to deal a blow to my OOB.

Anyway, my OOB is close to 4m. Will probably reach it during mud, and then I get another 500,000 on turn 24 before blizzard. Snow will be the last chance, it seems, for the axis to deal a blow to my OOB.

- Attachments
-
- 1091.jpg (114.74 KiB) Viewed 308 times
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
That seems a quick and premature game over for the German player from my perspective.
If you play with VPs I doubt they have the needed to survive the first VP check. But even if they manage, it's more due to Soviet concession than their real advance.
If you play with VPs I doubt they have the needed to survive the first VP check. But even if they manage, it's more due to Soviet concession than their real advance.
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar
ORIGINAL: AlbertN
That seems a quick and premature game over for the German player from my perspective.
If you play with VPs I doubt they have the needed to survive the first VP check. But even if they manage, it's more due to Soviet concession than their real advance.
He will meet the HWM due to Kursk falling, but just barely. Orel might also fall, which will give him some safety net.
There is a realistic chance of sudden victory though, yes.
Anyway I formed a new army under Vatutin, made up of all cavalry. These have 0 losses and will be used as the backbone for my cavalry corps.

- Attachments
-
- 1092.jpg (27.59 KiB) Viewed 308 times