Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Finished the turn, and didn't do a single offensive action...a sure sign of snow fatigue.[;)]

Hard to fight from a Cold Zone base in winter months ...

Image
Attachments
frozensmiley1.jpg
frozensmiley1.jpg (166.22 KiB) Viewed 519 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Feb 13, 1942

The Dutch hold out one more time! If Japan holds true to course, they will shock again tomorrow...but we managed to get forts up to one overnight. Perhaps we will be able to hold again?



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (433.13 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Chinese forces hold here, but will be forced to retreat tomorrow no doubt.

Ground combat at 76,53 (near Kweilin)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 35767 troops, 233 guns, 717 vehicles, Assault Value = 1594

Defending force 26247 troops, 165 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 717

Japanese adjusted assault: 915

Allied adjusted defense: 1432

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
631 casualties reported
Squads: 28 destroyed, 107 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 31 (1 destroyed, 30 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
3062 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 239 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
Guns lost 19 (1 destroyed, 18 disabled)

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (579.89 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan continues to bomb Cloncurry at altitude and a few major bombing raids in China.

Those Bleheims were lost flying supplies to China...will need to look at the fatigue, etc. Worst day of op losses flying to China so far.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (102.7 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Perth

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (268.52 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japan working on isolating Australia...will they invade New Zealand?

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (488.48 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by ny59giants »

Raoul Island would be nice for a size 2 AF with Betty/Nells and Air HQ to make the trip to NZ more hazardous. The can almost reach the southern edge of the map.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Encircled »

Don't think he'll go for NZ

Raoul and the Cook Islands achieves his aims of cutting off without risking emergency reinforcements

Course, he might reckon that you've put all your troops into Oz, rather than NZ............
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Lemme guess: You have a CA TF ready to pounce at Eua? [;)]

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Feb 14, 1942

Still being a pest around Soerabaja. Good intel...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (81.18 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Repulse, sitting at 70+ damage, continues to soak up hits costing Japan planes. These came from a carrier though, normally it has been Sally/Betty.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (192.01 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Brisbane: The Impact of a HQa at Tamworth coordinating the strikes is easily seen as the squadrons fly together.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (340.05 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Another invasion as expected...our transport and an AMc fled full speed prior to the invasion fleet showing up...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (412.24 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The Dutch hold one last time...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (114.16 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The Chinese hold again at 1-1, and more importantly looks like they disable quite a few vehicles...but the big fight versus the IJ tanks is yet to come, but any reduction in their fighting force is needed.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (114.52 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The Maryborough Line...

equal assault value, but we have better tubes. Forts are 3+ and building. The great fear is a flank invasion.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (400.57 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

The 4th division could be in Reserve mode. But probably not as your opponent seems to want as much firepower shooting as is possible.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

How about that.[:)]

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (343.19 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Japanese OP losses continue quite high.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (92.67 KiB) Viewed 519 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

China

Japan has a lot of forces just north of Kweilin...16 units, very tank heavy.


We are massing our best units for a big climatic tank battle in terrain of our choosing. Using our interior lines, and transports to meet him with our best.

43rd Cavalry with Stuarts
One Chinese Artillery unit with 105mms
2 Indian Mountain Gun units (3.7 inch)
1 British 2 pounder AT unit
1 Chinese 37mm AT unit
4 US TOE Chinese Corps with healthy AT pools, plus AA and 75mm guns prioritized to them.
1 Base force for AA

Regular Chinese Corps to fill out the stacking limit...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (627.15 KiB) Viewed 519 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”