Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: Extraneous
ORIGINAL: Mziln
warspite1, for any credit for work done in the write-ups:

You are not authorized to use the name “Mziln” or “Jesse G. Nelson” or “Jesse Nelson” or variations on these names.

You are authorized to use “Anonymous”, “Patrice Forno”, or take the credit yourself.



This was discussed by email with Patrice Forno, Shannon V. Okeets, and one other (I forget who and have deleted the email).

Further discussion about the usage of these names and the “Mziln” account is not allowed due to possible violation of the NDA.
Jesse G. Nelson, to make it clear, no one can use "Patrice Forno" except me, so you don't have to authorize the use of my name to others.
If you don't want your name, or any other alias you use, be it "Mziln" or "Extraneous" or any other of your devising, you have the right to ask to be called "Anonymous", but not my name.
User avatar
MajorDude
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:35 pm

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by MajorDude »

Maybe we should add "People Descriptions" to the thread's name... or start a new thread called "People Descriptions"... [:D]
Extraneous
Posts: 1810
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:58 am

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Extraneous »

ORIGINAL: Froonp
ORIGINAL: Extraneous
ORIGINAL: Mziln
warspite1, for any credit for work done in the write-ups:

You are not authorized to use the name “Mziln” or “Jesse G. Nelson” or “Jesse Nelson” or variations on these names.

You are authorized to use “Anonymous”, “Patrice Forno”, or take the credit yourself.



This was discussed by email with Patrice Forno, Shannon V. Okeets, and one other (I forget who and have deleted the email).

Further discussion about the usage of these names and the “Mziln” account is not allowed due to possible violation of the NDA.
Jesse G. Nelson, to make it clear, no one can use "Patrice Forno" except me, so you don't have to authorize the use of my name to others.
If you don't want your name, or any other alias you use, be it "Mziln" or "Extraneous" or any other of your devising, you have the right to ask to be called "Anonymous", but not my name.

Remember what I said in the emal Patrice? You could have the credit for all my work if you wanted it. So I had to offer the credit again since you didn't refuse it then.


I didn't and still don't care who gets the credit for the work.


Just don't use my name or handle.
University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: Extraneous
Remember what I said in the emal Patrice? You could have the credit for all my work if you wanted it. So I had to offer the credit again since you didn't refuse it then.
Well, I don't want to have credit for anything but things I did or wrote.
You are posting interesting informations sometimes, and no one but you will get the credit for that.

I don't remember you proposing me to take credit for things you wrote, maybe you did and I flushed that from my memory, but if you are proposing that to me, I don't want to.
I didn't and still don't care who gets the credit for the work.
Just don't use my name or handle.
I don't think anyone will do that Jessie, so it's just fine.
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: MajorDude

Maybe we should add "People Descriptions" to the thread's name... or start a new thread called "People Descriptions"... [:D]



===
More seriously, there is a section in the Player's Manual where I acknowledge the tremendous help I received while developing MWIF.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
Patience
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:59 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Patience »

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


Mziln - if you are still around - can you let me know which source you used to identify Takachiho and Saien as Oyodo-class please? Many thanks

I checked a 1938 and 1946 version of Jane's Fighting Ships and found no reference to these 2 cruisers. If anyone has an earlier version of this publication you may be able to find it there.
"Time is the greatest teacher... Unfortunately she kills all her students."
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42123
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Patience
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


Mziln - if you are still around - can you let me know which source you used to identify Takachiho and Saien as Oyodo-class please? Many thanks

I checked a 1938 and 1946 version of Jane's Fighting Ships and found no reference to these 2 cruisers. If anyone has an earlier version of this publication you may be able to find it there.
Warspite1

Patience - thanks but you won't find them in Jane's - they never existed. Only one Oyodo was completed and only two were named - In WIF/MWIF the Japanese have the option of building both. However, what I was trying to find out was whether it was likely the two ships identified were meant to be two of the other seven unbuilt/unnamed Oyodos or whether the Japanese had another planned cruiser design that ADG were allowing the Japanese player the option to build.

Unless something else comes to light, I have taken the approach that ADG have given the Japanese player the option of building two more Oyodos. Thanks anyway [:)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Patience
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:59 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Patience »

Thank you.

That seems logical. The earlier references to these vessels by wiki indicates they were no longer in service for ww2. That being the case it would be ridiculous to include them in WiF.

"Time is the greatest teacher... Unfortunately she kills all her students."
User avatar
Anendrue
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:26 pm

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Anendrue »

ORIGINAL: Patience

Thank you.

That seems logical. The earlier references to these vessels by wiki indicates they were no longer in service for ww2. That being the case it would be ridiculous to include them in WiF.

Except WiF allows for the what ifs in life within the context of playable game history. Whatever the heck that means [:D].
Integrity is what you do when nobody is watching.
User avatar
Patience
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:59 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Patience »

Historically speaking, right? LOL.
"Time is the greatest teacher... Unfortunately she kills all her students."
Extraneous
Posts: 1810
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:58 am

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Extraneous »

Most of the “What if ships” represent proposed ship construction as part of a 9-year plan starting in 1942 and ending in 1950.
 
See: Chart 8 — Fifth Armament Replenishment Plan
University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)
User avatar
Patience
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:59 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Patience »

It looks like they are a what if.  I suppose if japan doesn't need more carriers they could potentially build the extras.

Oyodo (Japanese:??, named after a river in Japan, literally means "big stagnant water") was a light cruiser of the Imperial Japanese Navy, the only ship of her class. Her design was basically an improved version of the Agano-class cruisers, though while the same general hull form as Agano was adopted, with flush deck and bulbous bow, the armament differed both in layout and weapons, and the armour protection scheme was reduced.DesignThe Oyodo design was approved under the 1939 4th Replenishment Programme. However, out of the 2 ships authorised, only one (Oyodo) was laid down ? immediately after she was completed all available shipbuilding resources at that yard were used to build more aircraft carriers. In line with contemporary Japanese submarine tactics, the Oyodo class were to be the flagships of scouting submarine flotillas. To this end, the Oyodo class was to operate up to six of the upcoming Kawanishi E15K1 Shiun floatplanes; however, the requirements for these planes were issued only in mid-1939.
"Time is the greatest teacher... Unfortunately she kills all her students."
Extraneous
Posts: 1810
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:58 am

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Extraneous »

ORIGINAL: Patience

It looks like they are a what if.  I suppose if japan doesn't need more carriers they could potentially build the extras.

Oyodo Japanese:??, named after a river in Japan, literally means "big stagnant water") was a light cruiser of the Imperial Japanese Navy, the only ship of her class. Her design was basically an improved version of the Agano-class cruisers, though while the same general hull form as Agano was adopted, with flush deck and bulbous bow, the armament differed both in layout and weapons, and the armour protection scheme was reduced.DesignThe Oyodo design was approved under the 1939 4th Replenishment Programme. However, out of the 2 ships authorised, only one (Oyodo) was laid down ? immediately after she was completed all available shipbuilding resources at that yard were used to build more aircraft carriers. In line with contemporary Japanese submarine tactics, the Oyodo class were to be the flagships of scouting submarine flotillas. To this end, the Oyodo class was to operate up to six of the upcoming Kawanishi E15K1 Shiun floatplanes; however, the requirements for these planes were issued only in mid-1939.

Try this "Oyodo" (the dash above the O doesent display in the forums).

Where did you get a translation to "big stagnant water"?
University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)
User avatar
Patience
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:59 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Patience »

Here is the link I used to get the info. There are obviously several web pages that describe this vessel. I guess we can pick and choose. I didn't browse any other pages that included the translation so I used this one. :)


http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/japane ... esign.html
"Time is the greatest teacher... Unfortunately she kills all her students."
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42123
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by warspite1 »

Okay back to What ship am I?

I have the following two clues for each of the two ships in question (Froonp and abj9562 are NOT allowed to "guess")

SHIP 1 (Easy Question)
a) I am represented by a counter in World In Flames.
b) Neither I nor my sister survived the war, although at least my sister was lost fighting heroically at sea…unlike me.

SHIP 2 (Difficult Question)
a) I am represented by a counter in World In Flames, but really I should have two counters.
b) I had seven sisters, although eleven sisters was the original plan.

More clues tomorrow unless someone gets it.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Patience
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:59 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Patience »

For Ship one,  I'll go out on a limb.  Its Bismark
"Time is the greatest teacher... Unfortunately she kills all her students."
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42123
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Patience

For Ship one,  I'll go out on a limb.  Its Bismark
Warspite1

A good guess Patience - but incorrrect I'm afraid.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
BallyJ
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:04 pm

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by BallyJ »

Primed by the last poster.
I will guess Tirpitz!!!
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42123
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: BallyJ

Primed by the last poster.
I will guess Tirpitz!!!
Warspite1

A more logical conclusion given the second clue but....no cigar.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 30687
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Okay back to What ship am I?

I have the following two clues for each of the two ships in question (Froonp and abj9562 are NOT allowed to "guess")

SHIP 1 (Easy Question)
a) I am represented by a counter in World In Flames.
b) Neither I nor my sister survived the war, although at least my sister was lost fighting heroically at sea…unlike me.
I am going with Musashi since trying to put the ship on ground to avoid beeing sunk can hardly be called fighting heroically at sea.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”